Federalists Feared: Why Oppose A New Constitution?

The Federalists, who supported Alexander Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies, were against writing a new constitution because they believed in a strong central government and wanted to ensure weaker state governments. They supported a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers, and a more mercantile economy. They also advocated for the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy. To ensure the adoption of the Constitution, Federalists like James Madison promised to add amendments to protect individual liberties, which became the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$33.58 $42.5

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$7.38 $8.95

The Essential Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches and Writings

$15.96 $16.95

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$60.73 $85

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$31.94 $42.5

Federalists supported a strong national government

The Federalist Party supported Alexander Hamilton's aggressive fiscal policies, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy. They also supported the establishment of a national bank, the assumption of state debts, and other Hamiltonian proposals.

To ensure the adoption of the Constitution, Federalists like James Madison promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties, including the First Amendment, which became the Bill of Rights. In response to charges that the Constitution created a strong national government, Federalists argued that the separation of powers among the three branches of government protected the rights of the people. They believed that because the three branches were equal, none could assume control over the other, serving as checks" on the other branches to ensure that no one branch had too much power.

The Federalists were well-organised and had strong support in the press. They published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers, known as The Federalist Papers, advocating for the ratification of the Constitution and proposing an alternative to the Articles of Confederation, which were generally considered inadequate. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote these essays under the pen name of Publius. The Federalists ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates, and their efforts led to the adoption of the Constitution and the creation of a strong national government.

Anti-Federalists wanted to protect individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists wanted to protect individual liberties and prevent the creation of a powerful central government. They fought against the ratification of the Constitution, arguing that it gave the federal government too much power and lacked a bill of rights to protect individual freedoms. The Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry and Melancton Smith, published articles and delivered speeches to combat the Federalist campaign. They sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation, which were considered inadequate due to their lack of enforcement powers and inability to regulate commerce or print money.

The Anti-Federalists' efforts were not entirely in vain. While they failed to prevent the adoption of the Constitution, their opposition led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights, which became the First Amendment. The debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists highlighted the importance of freedom of speech and press in achieving national consensus.

The Federalists, on the other hand, supported a strong national government and an expansive interpretation of congressional powers. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to address the nation's challenges, such as disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade. The Federalists, including Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, wrote a series of newspaper essays known as The Federalist Papers to advocate for their position. They argued that the separation of powers among the three branches of government (legislative, executive, and judiciary) would protect the rights of the people and ensure that no one branch became too powerful.

The ratification of the Constitution was a closely contested campaign. A compromise was struck when Massachusetts agreed to ratify the Constitution if the Federalists would include a Bill of Rights. This compromise helped secure victory for the Federalists, leading to the adoption of the Constitution and the creation of one of the longest-lived and most emulated constitutions in the world.

Federalists were better organised and connected

The Federalists were a group that supported a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution, and a more mercantile economy. They included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They were well-organized and connected, with strong support from the press. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation's challenges and prevent it from collapsing. Alexander Hamilton, a key figure in the Federalist Party, played a role in convincing Congress to organize a Grand Convention of state delegates to revise the Articles of Confederation, which were considered inadequate.

The Federalists' organization and connections were evident in their use of the press to articulate their positions. Writing under the pen name "Publius," Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay authored 85 influential newspaper essays known as "The Federalist Papers." These papers advocated for the adoption of the Constitution and proposed an alternative to the Articles of Confederation. The Federalists also had strong support from the newspapers of that time, which helped amplify their message.

In contrast to the Federalists, the Anti-Federalists, including some former Federalists, opposed the creation of a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown. They favored stricter constitutional construction and states' rights. While they wrote articles and delivered speeches against the ratification of the Constitution, collectively known as "The Anti-Federalist Papers," they were less organized and often wrote under pseudonyms.

The Federalists' superior organization and connections contributed to their success in the state ratification debates. They were able to secure the necessary support for the adoption of the Constitution, which created a strong national government with separate branches and checks on power to prevent any single branch from becoming too powerful. The Federalists' efforts led to the establishment of a new government and the creation of one of the longest-lived and most emulated constitutions in the world.

Explore related products

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

An Anti-Federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates (American Political Thought)

$27.3 $42.99

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification Vol. 2 (LOA #63) ... America Debate on Constitution Collection)

$19.99

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

Federalists wanted weaker state governments

Federalists, including big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals, wanted weaker state governments. They supported a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers under the Constitution through the elastic clause, and a more mercantile economy. They believed that a strong central government was necessary to face the nation’s challenges. They wanted to replace the Articles of Confederation, which they considered inadequate, with a new Constitution. America’s first constitution, the Articles of Confederation, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn’t regulate commerce, or print money. The states’ disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the young country apart.

Federalists supported Alexander Hamilton’s aggressive fiscal policies and expansive constitutional interpretations. They wanted a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution. They favored a strong centralized government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative, rather than direct, democracy. They also wanted to ensure the protection of individual liberties, which led to the addition of the Bill of Rights.

To advocate for their position, Federalists published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers in which they advocated for the ratification of the Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote a series of 85 powerful newspaper essays known as The Federalist Papers. The Federalists were better organized and had strong support in the press of the day. They ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, fought against the creation of a stronger national government and sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation. They emphasized states’ rights and agrarianism, and they opposed the establishment of a national bank, the assumption of state debts, and other Hamiltonian proposals. They wrote their own series of articles and delivered numerous speeches against the ratification of the Constitution, known as The Anti-Federalist Papers.

Anti-Federalists sought less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation

The Anti-Federalists were a diverse group with varying motivations, but they shared a common concern: preventing the establishment of a powerful central government that could threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty. They sought to preserve the principles of federalism, believing that the national government under the Articles of Confederation, while perhaps needing some adjustments, should remain relatively weak compared to the states.

The Articles of Confederation, the predecessor to the US Constitution, established a loose confederation of states with a weak central government. The Anti-Federalists, led by figures like Patrick Henry, believed that the Articles provided an adequate framework for governance and that any changes should be minimal. They argued that the proposed constitution's strong national government would infringe on the rights of states and individuals, potentially leading to a monarchical system similar to the one they had recently overthrown in the British.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to a strong central government was driven by their belief in the importance of states' rights and local control. They feared that a powerful national government would concentrate power in the hands of a few, undermining the sovereignty and prestige of the states and localities. This concern was particularly salient given the recent history of colonial rule, where power had been centralised in the hands of a distant monarch.

Additionally, the Anti-Federalists worried about the potential infringement of personal liberties. They believed that the Constitution's strong central government could lead to the erosion of individual rights and freedoms. This concern was addressed in part by the inclusion of a Bill of Rights, which guaranteed specific liberties and limited the powers of the federal government. The Anti-Federalists' influence helped ensure that the Constitution included these protections, even though they were ultimately unsuccessful in preventing its ratification.

The Anti-Federalists' desire for a weaker central government and their concerns about the potential abuse of power by a strong executive branch were not without merit. Their efforts to seek less drastic changes to the Articles of Confederation reflected a cautious approach to governance and a desire to protect the rights and liberties of the people they represented. While the Federalists ultimately prevailed in the ratification debates, the Anti-Federalists played a crucial role in shaping the final form of the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Frequently asked questions