The Elastic Clauses: Flexibility In The Us Constitution

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a part of the US Constitution that gives Congress the power to make laws that are necessary and proper to execute the powers vested in the government. The clause was included to address future issues and challenges that the Founding Fathers couldn't have conceived of when drafting the Constitution. It has been invoked several times in US history, with the first practical example being in 1791 when Hamilton used it to defend the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States. The Elastic Clause has been a source of contention between political parties, with some arguing it grants the federal government too much power, while others claim it permits only the execution of powers granted by the Constitution. The interpretation and application of the Elastic Clause continue to be debated in legal and political spheres.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution: Explained--Clause by Clause--for Every American Today

$9.97 $12

Georgia's Constitution and Government, 10th Edition

$14.36 $15.95

The Oldest Constitutional Question: Enumeration and Federal Power

$42.83 $49.95

Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints

$98.4 $123

Constitutional Construction: Divided Powers and Constitutional Meaning

$44.2 $49

Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints

$119.1 $217

The Elastic Clause gives Congress implied power

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It grants Congress the implied power to make all laws deemed "necessary and proper" to execute the powers vested in the government by the Constitution. This clause was included to give the Constitution longevity, ensuring it could guide future generations long after its framers were gone.

The Elastic Clause reads: "The Congress shall have Power... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." The definitions of "necessary," "proper," and "carrying into execution" have been debated since the clause was written during the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787. There is a strong possibility that the vagueness of these terms was intentional.

The Elastic Clause gives Congress the flexibility to achieve the other 17 enumerated powers. It allows Congress to decide when, how, and whether to legislate for "carrying into execution" the powers of another branch while respecting the separation of powers. This clause has been invoked several times in US history and is considered the most important and controversial constitutional clause.

The first practical example of the Elastic Clause in action came in 1791 when Alexander Hamilton used it to defend the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States. Hamilton argued that the bank was a reasonable means of executing powers related to taxation and borrowing funds, even if it was not absolutely necessary. This set a precedent for interpreting the Elastic Clause as applying to activities reasonably related to constitutional powers, not just those that are absolutely necessary.

It allows Congress to address future issues

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It was designed to give Congress the flexibility to address future issues and challenges that the Framers of the Constitution could not have possibly foreseen.

The Elastic Clause reads: "The Congress shall have Power... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." This clause grants Congress the authority to use all means "necessary and proper" to execute the powers vested in them by the Constitution.

The Framers of the Constitution wanted to create a document that could guide future generations long after they were gone. They understood that they could not possibly list all the issues that future governments might need to deal with, so they included the Elastic Clause to give Congress the flexibility to address future challenges. This clause allows Congress to make laws to ensure that the powers vested in them by the Constitution can be carried out effectively. For example, the government is given the power to collect taxes in Clause 1, but in order to do so, they must pass a law to create a tax-collecting agency, which is not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

The Elastic Clause has been invoked several times in US history and is considered the most important and controversial constitutional clause. One notable example of its use was in the case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, where the Supreme Court ruled that the Elastic Clause gave Congress the implied power to establish a national bank, even though the Constitution did not explicitly grant permission to do so. This case set a precedent for interpreting the Elastic Clause as granting Congress broad powers to address issues not specifically enumerated in the Constitution.

The Clause is also known as the 'Necessary and Proper Clause'

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It grants Congress the legislative power to make all laws that are deemed necessary and proper for executing the powers vested in the US government by the Constitution. This clause was included to address future issues and challenges that the Founding Fathers could not have possibly foreseen.

The Necessary and Proper Clause is significant as it gives Congress implied powers in addition to its enumerated powers. This means that Congress can use all appropriate means required to execute its Expressed Powers, even if those means are not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution. This interpretation was solidified in the landmark Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, where the Court ruled that Congress had the implied power to establish a bank, as it was a suitable instrument to aid in Congress's express taxing and spending powers.

The Elastic Clause has been a source of contention between political parties, with Anti-Federalists expressing concern that it grants the federal government too much power. Interpretations of the clause vary, with some arguing for a strict interpretation where there must be an essential connection between the implemented power and the law, while others advocate for a looser interpretation that allows any law that might be deemed conducive to executing the power.

The Necessary and Proper Clause has been invoked in various Supreme Court cases, such as Wickard v. Filburn, where it was used to justify the regulation of wheat production and consumption, and in the Federal Kidnapping Act, where it was used to make kidnapping a federal crime if it involved transporting a person across state lines. However, it was also used in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius, where the Supreme Court ruled that the individual mandate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act could not be upheld under the Necessary and Proper Clause as it granted Congress too much power.

Explore related products

Constitutional Powers and Politics: How Citizens Think about Authority and Institutional Change (Constitutionalism and Democracy)

$14.2 $32.5

Constitutional Law and Politics: Struggles for Power and Governmental Accountability (Volume 1)

$170

American Constitutional Law: Powers and Liberties [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$260 $359

Constitutional Law and Politics: Struggles for Power and Governmental Accountability (Volume 1)

$86 $107.5

Constitutional Law: Governmental Powers and Individual Freedoms

$198.49

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: National Power and Federalism (Examples & Explanations Series)

$59.81 $76.95

The Elastic Clause has been invoked several times in US history

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It grants Congress the legislative power to make all laws that are "necessary and proper" for executing the powers vested in the government by the Constitution. This clause was included to give Congress flexibility in exercising its powers and addressing future issues and challenges that the Framers of the Constitution could not have foreseen.

• McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): In this landmark case, the US Supreme Court ruled that the Elastic Clause grants implied powers to Congress in addition to its enumerated powers. The case involved Maryland's attempt to impede the operations of the Second Bank of the United States by imposing a tax on out-of-state banks. The Court, in an opinion by Chief Justice John Marshall, held that while the Constitution did not explicitly permit the creation of a federal bank, it conferred upon Congress the implied power to do so to fulfill its express taxing and spending powers.
• First Bank of the United States (1791): Alexander Hamilton, the first Secretary of the Treasury, invoked the Elastic Clause to justify the creation of the First Bank of the United States. He argued that the bank was a reasonable means of carrying out powers related to taxation and borrowing. James Madison disagreed, concerned that the bank would be used by the wealthy against the interests of the South, and argued that Congress lacked the constitutional authority to charter a bank.
• Wickard v. Filburn (1942): The Supreme Court upheld a federal statute making it a crime for a farmer to produce more wheat than was allowed under price and production controls, even for personal consumption. The Necessary and Proper Clause was used to justify the regulation of production and consumption as necessary for regulating interstate commerce.
• City of Boerne v. Flores (1997): In this case, the Archbishop of San Antonio sued local zoning authorities for violating his rights under the 1993 Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) by denying him a permit to expand his church. The Elastic Clause's "necessary and proper" aspect was invoked, with the zoning authorities arguing that the RFRA was unconstitutional as it sought to override the local preservation ordinance.
• United States v. Comstock: On May 17, 2010, the Supreme Court ruled, by a vote of 7-2, that the Elastic Clause granted Congress the authority to enact a law for the civil commitment of a sexually dangerous person after completing their federal prison sentence.

These examples demonstrate the significant role the Elastic Clause has played in shaping US history and the ongoing debate surrounding its interpretation and application.

The Elastic Clause is the most important and controversial constitutional clause

The Elastic Clause, also known as the Necessary and Proper Clause, is a clause in Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution. It is considered the most important and controversial constitutional clause. The clause reads:

> "The Congress shall have Power... To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

The Elastic Clause was included in the Constitution to give Congress the flexibility to address future issues and challenges that the Framers of the Constitution could not have conceived of. It grants Congress the implied power to use all appropriate means required to execute its Expressed Powers. This implied power has been a source of contention, with some arguing that it grants the federal government boundless power, while others argue that it only permits the execution of powers granted by the Constitution.

The Elastic Clause has been invoked several times in US history and has been used to justify a wide range of federal actions, including the creation of a national bank, Obamacare, and the legalization of marijuana. The first practical example of the Elastic Clause in action came in 1791 when Hamilton used it to defend the constitutionality of the First Bank of the United States. The Elastic Clause was also invoked in the landmark Supreme Court case McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819, which reaffirmed Hamilton's view that legislation reasonably related to express powers was constitutional.

The Elastic Clause continues to be a subject of debate and legal action, with arguments centering on the extent of the implied powers it grants to Congress. It is likely that the Framers of the Constitution kept the definitions of "necessary," "proper," and "carrying into execution" vague to allow for flexibility in interpretation. As a result, the Elastic Clause remains a powerful and controversial tool for Congress to address complex and evolving issues.

Frequently asked questions