The Twenty-First Amendment: Reversing Prohibition's Legacy

The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution was added to repeal the Eighteenth Amendment, which had established a nationwide prohibition on alcohol. The Eighteenth Amendment, ratified in 1919, had banned the manufacture, sale, transportation, and importation of intoxicating liquors, but it quickly fell out of favour with the American public due to ineffective and harsh enforcement, the rise of organised crime, and widespread defiance of the law. The Twenty-first Amendment, proposed by Congress in 1933, aimed to rescind prohibition and grant states greater authority to regulate alcohol within their borders. It is unique among the amendments to the U.S. Constitution as the only one to repeal a prior amendment and the only one ratified by state ratifying conventions.

Explore related products

The American First Amendment in the Twenty-First Century, Cases and Materials, 5th (University Casebook Series)

$285

First Amendment (Examples & Explanations)

$50.09 $76.95

The First Amendment (Concepts and Insights)

$45 $60

The First Amendment (Aspen Casebook)

$17.99 $228

The First Amendment (Aspen Casebook)

$83.67 $206

First Amendment Law: Freedom of Expression & Freedom of Religion, Fourth Edition

$151.5 $202

The Twenty-first Amendment repealed the Eighteenth Amendment

The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution repealed the Eighteenth Amendment, which had mandated a nationwide prohibition on alcohol. The Eighteenth Amendment, ratified on January 16, 1919, after years of advocacy by the temperance movement, prohibited the manufacture, sale, transportation, and importation of intoxicating liquors. However, Prohibition was controversial and quickly fell out of favour with the American public due to ineffective and harsh enforcement, the rise of organised crime, and widespread defiance of the law.

The Twenty-first Amendment, proposed by Congress on February 20, 1933, and ratified on December 5, 1933, ended national prohibition and granted states the authority to regulate or prohibit alcoholic beverages within their borders. It is unique among the amendments to the U.S. Constitution for being the only one to repeal a prior amendment.

Section 1 of the Twenty-first Amendment expressly repeals the Eighteenth Amendment. Section 2 bans the importation of alcohol into states and territories that have laws prohibiting it, giving states broad regulatory power over alcoholic beverages. This section has been the focus of litigation concerning the impact of the amendment on other provisions of the Constitution, such as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Freedom of Speech Clause of the First Amendment.

The Twenty-first Amendment's proposal and ratification resulted from the problematic experience of Prohibition in the United States. The Eighteenth Amendment's inflexible nationwide ban on the liquor trade was seen as having negative consequences that outweighed any benefits, and it had lost popular support by the early 1930s. The Twenty-first Amendment sought to address these issues while recognising states' authority to regulate alcohol according to local sentiment.

Prohibition was unpopular with the American public

The negative impacts of Prohibition were recognised by Americans, who believed that the adverse effects of the "noble experiment" outweighed any potential benefits. The Twenty-First Amendment's framers acknowledged the failures of the Eighteenth Amendment's inflexible and problematic nationwide ban on the liquor trade. They sought to address this by recognising the states' authority to regulate or prohibit alcoholic beverages within their borders, in accordance with local sentiment.

The political movement for the repeal of the Eighteenth Amendment gained momentum as more Americans opposed it. The Twenty-First Amendment was proposed by Congress on February 20, 1933, and ratified by state ratifying conventions on December 5, 1933, ending national Prohibition. This amendment was unique as it was the only one to repeal a prior amendment and the only one ratified by state ratifying conventions.

While the Twenty-First Amendment ended nationwide Prohibition, it did not mandate a uniform approach to alcohol regulation across the country. Instead, it granted states the authority to regulate or prohibit alcoholic beverages within their jurisdictions, leading to variations in the availability, pricing, and terms and conditions surrounding alcoholic beverages across the United States.

The temperance lobby retained political power

The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution repealed the Eighteenth Amendment, which had mandated a nationwide prohibition on alcohol. The Twenty-first Amendment was proposed and ratified in 1933, ending the unpopular nationwide ban on the manufacture, sale, and transportation of intoxicating liquors.

While the Eighteenth Amendment and its implementing law, the Volstead Act, were controversial from the start, they were the result of years of advocacy by the temperance movement. Despite the amendment, many Americans continued to drink, leading to the emergence of a profitable black market for alcohol and fueling the rise of organised crime. This resulted in a loss of public support for Prohibition, with Americans believing that the negative consequences outweighed any benefits.

However, despite this shift in public opinion, the temperance lobby retained political power in many states. Lawmakers were either beholden to or fearful of this lobby, which complicated the repeal process. To overcome this, the Twenty-first Amendment was ratified not by the legislatures of the states, but by state ratifying conventions, as provided for by the Constitution. This was an unprecedented step, taken to ensure the amendment's passage despite the ongoing influence of the temperance movement.

The Twenty-first Amendment's framers sought to recognise states' authority to regulate or prohibit alcoholic beverages within their borders, in line with local sentiment. This resulted in a grant of greater regulatory power to the states, allowing them to control the availability, prices, and terms and conditions surrounding alcoholic beverages. The amendment's second section has been interpreted as giving broad authority to the states in this regard, limiting the power of the national government to intrude upon state alcohol beverage control policies.

In conclusion, the Twenty-first Amendment was added to the Constitution due to the negative consequences of Prohibition and a shift in public opinion. However, the temperance lobby retained political power, influencing lawmakers and complicating the repeal process. The unprecedented use of state ratifying conventions to ratify the amendment ensured its passage, despite the ongoing influence of the temperance movement.

Explore related products

Understanding The First Amendment (Understanding Series)

$19.5 $49

First Amendment

$2.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Pocket Size (Annotated)

$7.49

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States: And All Its Amendments

$6.97 $6.97

The Twenty-first Amendment was the only amendment ratified by state conventions

The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution, which ended federal prohibition of alcohol, is unique in several ways. One distinctive aspect is that it was the only amendment in US history to be ratified by state conventions, rather than by legislatures. This distinction is primarily due to the unique circumstances surrounding the amendment's passage and the desire to involve the people more directly in the process.

The Twenty-first Amendment stands out as the single amendment to the US Constitution that demanded a unique ratification procedure, reflecting the nation's complex relationship with alcohol regulation. The process of repealing Prohibition and altering the Constitution to allow for state-by-state alcohol regulation involved convening state conventions, a marked departure from the usual role of state legislatures in the amendment ratification process.

The road to the Twenty-first Amendment began with the Eighteenth Amendment, which established Prohibition in 1919. As the negative consequences of Prohibition became evident, support grew for its repeal. When Congress proposed the Twenty-first Amendment in 1933, it specified that ratification would occur through state conventions, a process outlined in Article V of the Constitution. This decision reflected a desire to involve the people more directly and to ensure that the will of the people, rather than political pressures on state legislators, drove the amendment's ratification.

The convention method of ratification elevated the people's voice and empowered them to shape the nation's alcohol policies. Each state held a convention, with delegates elected specifically for the purpose of considering the Twenty-first Amendment. This process ensured that the delegates were directly accountable to the voters on this specific issue. By involving the people so directly, the ratification process for the Twenty-first Amendment stands as a testament to the power of popular sovereignty and a reminder of the complex and dynamic nature of the US constitutional system.

The unique ratification process also reflected a sense of urgency and a desire for swift action. The nation was in the grip of the Great Depression, and there was a widespread belief that ending Prohibition would provide an economic boost and reduce the burden on the criminal justice system. By using state conventions, the ratification process could proceed more quickly, as it did not have to wait for the regular legislative sessions in each state.

The swift ratification of the Twenty-first Amendment, accomplished in just over ten months, stands as a powerful example of responsive governance and a reflection of the people's will. It not only ended a controversial era of Prohibition but also restored the states' authority to regulate alcohol, shaping the beverage landscape that Americans know today.

The amendment gave states broad authority over the regulation of alcohol

The Twenty-first Amendment to the United States Constitution repealed the Eighteenth Amendment, which had enforced a nationwide prohibition on alcohol. The Twenty-first Amendment was proposed by the 72nd Congress on February 20, 1933, and ratified by state ratifying conventions on December 5, 1933. It is the only amendment to repeal a previous amendment and the only amendment ratified by state conventions.

The Twenty-first Amendment gave states broad authority over the regulation of alcohol within their borders. This included the ability to regulate the availability, price, and terms and conditions of alcoholic beverages. States could also delegate their authority to counties and municipalities, resulting in variations across the country. The amendment's second section has been interpreted as limiting the power of the national government to interfere with state alcohol control policies.

The Supreme Court has upheld the broad authority of states over alcohol regulation in cases such as Craig v. Boren (1976) and South Dakota v. Dole (1987). In Craig v. Boren, the Court distinguished two characteristics of state laws permitted by the amendment: importation of intoxicants and purely economic matters. The Court clarified that the amendment created an exception to the normal operation of the Commerce Clause. In South Dakota v. Dole, the Court upheld the withholding of federal highway funds from South Dakota due to its law allowing the sale of low-alcohol beer to adults under 21.

While the Twenty-first Amendment granted states significant regulatory power over alcohol, the precise scope of this authority has been the subject of litigation and interpretation. Some have argued that the amendment's framers only intended to protect dry states from beverage imports that violated state law, rather than granting sweeping regulatory powers. The amendment's impact on other constitutional provisions, such as the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Freedom of Speech Clause of the First Amendment, has also been a matter of legal debate.

Frequently asked questions