
The Constitutional Act of 1791, also known as the Canada Act, was an act of the British Parliament that divided the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada, each with its own government and administration. While the Act was a first step towards Confederation, it also set the stage for rebellion due to its rigid colonial structures and the discontent it caused among both English and French speakers. The Act's failure to establish responsible government and its problematic distribution of financial powers in favour of appointed councils contributed to political conflict and intercultural tension in the early 19th century, leading to the rebellions of 1837-1838.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Rigid colonial structures | Set the stage for rebellion in Upper and Lower Canada |
| Did not establish responsible government | Contributed to the intercultural conflict of the early 19th century |
| Distribution of financial power | More financial powers were granted to the appointed councils than to the elected assemblies |
| Increased rights for Protestants | The French Canadians and the Roman Catholic church in Quebec felt overshadowed by Loyalist settlements |
| Continuation of civil law in Lower Canada | Guaranteed the right of Canadians to use French in courts and to practise the Catholic faith |
| Guarantee of rights and privileges | Guaranteed the same rights and privileges enjoyed by other subjects in British North America |
| Taxation rights | Gave colonial assemblies the right to levy taxes to pay for local civil and legal administration |
| Division of the Province of Quebec | Divided the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada, each with its own parliament and government |
| Strengthening political dependency | Strengthened the bonds of political dependency by fixing the constitutional weaknesses of previous colonial governments |
| Women's suffrage | Gave women who owned property in Lower Canada the right to vote |
Explore related products
$25.95
What You'll Learn

It divided the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada
The Constitutional Act of 1791 was an act of the British Parliament that divided the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada. This division was made along the Ottawa River, with the western half becoming Upper Canada (now southern Ontario) and the eastern half becoming Lower Canada (now southern Quebec). The names "Upper" and "Lower" were given based on their relative elevation along the St. Lawrence River.
Each colony was given its own constitution, administration, and legislature, with Upper Canada receiving English law and institutions, and Lower Canada retaining French civil law and institutions, including the Custom of Paris, seigneurial land tenure, and the privileges accorded to the Roman Catholic Church. This division was intended to accommodate the influx of Loyalist settlers after the American Revolution, who sought representative institutions and English common law. It also aimed to strengthen the bonds of political dependency and remedy the constitutional weaknesses of previous colonial governments.
The act was problematic as it contributed to intercultural conflict between English-speaking and French-speaking Canadians. French Canadians and the Roman Catholic Church felt overshadowed by Loyalist settlements and increased rights for Protestants, while new English-speaking settlers felt the French still had too much power. The act also failed to establish responsible government and granted more financial powers to appointed councils than to elected assemblies, creating political conflict and contributing to the rebellions of 1837-1838.
Money Management: Elder Abuse or Care?
You may want to see also

It favoured British settlement in Upper Canada
The Constitutional Act of 1791 was an act of the British Parliament that divided the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada. The Act was a first step towards Confederation, but its rigid colonial structures also set the stage for rebellion in the Canadas.
The Act favoured British settlement in Upper Canada by giving it a separate administration and a provincial constitution. This meant that Upper Canada would have English law and institutions, while Lower Canada retained French civil law and institutions. Upper Canada was also given a Legislative Council, appointed by the crown for life, and a Legislative Assembly, elected by the people.
The Act was designed to ""assimilate" each colony's constitution to that of Britain and to guarantee the same rights and privileges that were enjoyed by other subjects in British North America. It also aimed to strengthen the bonds of political dependency by addressing the constitutional weaknesses of previous colonial governments.
By favouring British settlement in Upper Canada, the Act contributed to the creation of two distinct colonies with their own provincial legislatures and separate cultural identities. This division between Upper and Lower Canada, with their respective English and French influences, set the stage for future political and cultural conflicts in the region.
The favouring of British settlement in Upper Canada through the Constitutional Act of 1791 had both immediate and long-term impacts on the region's demographics, governance, and cultural dynamics, shaping the future course of Upper and Lower Canada in the years to come.
Trump's Immigration Ban: Unconstitutional Move
You may want to see also

It failed to establish responsible government
The Constitutional Act of 1791 was intended to address the problems arising from an influx of United Empire Loyalists and the creation of new provinces in what is now Ontario, Canada. However, it
Understanding Connecticut's Constitution: Knowledge or Ignorance?
You may want to see also
Explore related products

It contributed to the rebellions of 1837-38
The Constitutional Act of 1791 was an act of the British Parliament that led to the division of the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada, each with its own government and legislature. While this act was a step towards Confederation, its rigid colonial structures and certain provisions contributed to the rebellions of 1837-38.
Firstly, the Act failed to establish a responsible government. It favoured British settlement in Upper Canada and gave more financial powers to the appointed councils than to the elected assemblies. This created political conflict and contributed to the intercultural tensions that led to the rebellions. The Act's failure to adequately address the power dynamics between the elected assemblies and the appointed councils, with the latter being modelled on the House of Lords and devoted to the interests of the Crown, further exacerbated the situation.
Secondly, the Act's provisions regarding the clergy and the appropriation of land for the support of a Protestant clergy fuelled resentment. The Clergy Reserves constituted one-seventh of the territory of Upper and Lower Canada, and income from these lands went exclusively to the Church of England and, later, in part, to the Church of Scotland. This created economic difficulties and resentment towards the Anglican church, the Family Compact, and the Château Clique.
Thirdly, the Act's attempt to "'assimilate' the colony's constitution to that of Britain caused discontent among French Canadians and English Patriots in Lower Canada. The French-Canadian ideal of Lower Canada as a distinct, national homeland separate from English-speaking Upper Canada clashed with the reality of continued Anglo-Canadian political and economic dominance. This disjuncture fuelled the desire for reform and contributed to the Lower Canada Rebellion of 1837-38.
Additionally, the Act's division of the Province of Quebec disrupted the unity of French-speaking Canadiens and created a sense of cultural and political division. While Lower Canada retained French civil law and institutions, including the privileges accorded to the Roman Catholic Church, Upper Canada received English law and institutions. This further contributed to the tensions that led to the rebellions.
Understanding Our Constitution's Preamble: Internalizing India's Founding Ideals
You may want to see also

It was flawed in its distribution of financial powers
The Constitutional Act of 1791 was an act of the British Parliament that divided the Province of Quebec into Upper Canada and Lower Canada, with each colony having its own administration, parliament, and government. The Act was a response to the increased population in Canada after the American Revolution, which saw thousands of Loyalists seeking refuge in British North America.
One of the main issues with the Constitutional Act of 1791 was its flawed distribution of financial powers. The Act granted more financial powers to appointed councils than to the elected assemblies, limiting the powers of the elected colonial assemblies. These councils, modelled on the British House of Lords, were devoted to the interests of the Crown. This distribution of financial powers was a contributing factor to the intercultural conflict of the early 19th century.
The Act also created the Clergy Reserves in Upper Canada, which constituted one-seventh of the territory of Upper and Lower Canada. Income from the lease or sale of these reserves went exclusively to the Church of England and, later, also to the Church of Scotland. This created difficulties in economic development and led to resentment against the Anglican church and associated groups.
Furthermore, the Constitutional Act failed to establish a responsible government and instead bolstered the authority of the governor, making him a true representative of the Crown. This centralisation of power limited the influence of elected representatives and contributed to the power imbalance between the colonies and the British government.
The financial powers granted by the Constitutional Act of 1791 ultimately contributed to tensions and laid the groundwork for future conflicts. The Act's failure to adequately address financial matters and the distribution of powers created challenges for economic development and governance in the region.
Pierce Butler's Influence: Shaping the US Constitution
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
They felt overshadowed by Loyalist settlements and increased rights for Protestants.
They felt the French still had too much power.
It granted more financial powers to the appointed councils than to the elected assemblies.
It provided for a province (Lower Canada) which the French considered to be their own, separate from English-speaking Upper Canada, but the reality was that Anglo-Canadians continued to dominate the province politically and economically.
By giving Upper Canada a separate administration and favoring British settlement there, the Act contributed to intercultural conflict in the early 19th century.

![The Constitutional Act of the Province of Lower Canada [microform]: Anno Regni Georgii III, Regis Magnæ Britanniæ Et Hiberniæ Tricessimo Primo: at the ... Day of November, Anno Domini Reign Of...](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/61+ve7Nuv6L._AC_UY218_.jpg)























