Woodrow Wilson's Moral Diplomacy In Mexico: Intervention Considered

US President Woodrow Wilson's intervention in Mexico during the Mexican Revolution is considered a classic example of moral diplomacy. This term refers to Wilson's belief that the United States had a moral responsibility to support democratic governments and protect human rights by opposing authoritarian regimes. In 1913, Mexico came under the rule of General Victoriano Huerta, who seized power through a coup, overthrowing the democratically elected president, Francisco I. Madero. Huerta's regime was marked by violent repression of opposition groups, which clashed with Wilson's democratic ideals. In 1914, Wilson ordered US forces to occupy the Mexican port of Veracruz, citing the need to prevent arms from reaching Huerta's government and to protect American interests. This intervention, known as the Veracruz Incident, was justified by Wilson as an effort to uphold American moral values, remove Huerta, and encourage democratic governance in Mexico. Wilson's administration explicitly called for free elections in Mexico, favouring Venustiano Carranza over Huerta, and actively supporting factions aiming for democratic rule. Despite the principles of moral diplomacy, Wilson's actions in Mexico also led to significant resentment among the Mexican people towards American interference.

Explore related products

The Politics of Truth: A Diplomat's Memoir: Inside the Lies that Led to War and Betrayed My Wife's CIA Identity

$16.68 $26.99

President Wilson And The Moral Aims Of The War

$30.95

Conservative Internationalism: Armed Diplomacy under Jefferson, Polk, Truman, and Reagan

$18.06 $35

The Tragedy of U.S. Foreign Policy: How America’s Civil Religion Betrayed the National Interest

$18.29 $33

Reagan, Congress, and Human Rights (Human Rights in History)

$24.99 $48

Russia, the Near Abroad, and the West: Lessons from the Moldova-Transdniestria Conflict

$57

Wilson's intervention in Mexico was framed as moral diplomacy due to his goal of promoting democracy

Woodrow Wilson's intervention in Mexico was framed as moral diplomacy due to his stated goal of promoting democracy and opposing authoritarianism. Wilson believed that the United States had a moral responsibility to support democratic governments and protect human rights. This belief, known as "moral diplomacy," guided Wilson's foreign policy in Mexico.

The Mexican Revolution, which began in 1910, saw the rise of General Victoriano Huerta, who seized power through a coup, overthrowing the democratically elected president, Francisco I. Madero. Huerta's regime was characterised by authoritarian rule and the use of violent force against its opposition, which clashed with Wilson's democratic ideals. Wilson refused to recognise Huerta's government, calling it "a government of butchers" that did not reflect the will of the Mexican people.

In April 1914, Mexican officials in Tampico arrested several American sailors, and Wilson used this incident to justify sending US forces to occupy the port of Veracruz. He claimed that this action was necessary to prevent arms from reaching Huerta's government and to protect American interests. Wilson's administration explicitly called for free elections in Mexico, and he justified the use of military force as a means to uphold American moral values and support the establishment of democracy in Mexico.

Wilson favoured Venustiano Carranza, Huerta's opponent, and actively supported a faction that aimed for democratic governance. However, Wilson's intervention in Mexico also led to significant resentment among the Mexican people towards American interference. Additionally, Wilson's pursuit of moral diplomacy abroad contrasted with his allowance of racial policies within the United States.

Wilson's actions in Mexico can be understood in the context of his broader foreign policy vision, outlined in his "Fourteen Points" speech in 1918. He advocated for a "new diplomacy" based on open agreements and the self-rule of colonial holdings. Wilson's approach to Mexico reflected his belief in promoting democracy and opposing authoritarianism through moral diplomacy, despite the complexities and backlash it created in US-Mexican relations.

Wilson believed in the removal of authoritarian leader Victoriano Huerta

Woodrow Wilson's foreign policy was based on the principles of morality and unselfishness. He believed in the sovereignty of popular will and was convinced that democracy was gaining strength across the world. In his view, "just government" must rest "upon the consent of the governed". This was reflected in his dealings with Mexico, where he refused to recognise the legitimacy of the authoritarian leader Victoriano Huerta, who had seized power through a coup. Wilson's stance was in contrast to that of most European nations, who welcomed the friendly climate for foreign investments that Huerta offered.

Wilson's predecessor, President Taft, had also refused to recognise the Huerta regime diplomatically. However, Wilson took this a step further, actively working to remove Huerta from power. He issued a policy statement concerning US-Mexico relations, which formed the basis for his diplomatic dealings with Mexico throughout his administration. In it, he insisted that the Mexican people must be governed by a democratic administration in accordance with a Constitution guaranteeing basic rights and freedoms.

Wilson's policy received opposition from many important sources. Additionally, Wilson revealed in private statements and letters a strong personal animosity toward General Victoriano Huerta. This characteristic, reminiscent of Wilson's personality struggles at other periods of his life, explains the continual insistence of Wilson that he was fighting Huerta, not the Mexican people.

In April 1914, Mexican officials in Tampico arrested several American sailors who blundered into a prohibited area. Wilson used this incident to justify ordering the US Navy to occupy the port city of Veracruz, a move that greatly weakened Huerta's control. This occupation was considered an example of "moral diplomacy" because Wilson justified it as an effort to remove Huerta, whom he deemed a tyrant, and to encourage democratic governance in Mexico. The US Navy occupied Veracruz to show Mexico that Huerta had to step down, and he soon abandoned power to Venustiano Carranza, whom Wilson immediately recognised as the de facto president of Mexico.

Wilson supported democratic governance and opposed authoritarian regimes

Woodrow Wilson's intervention in Mexico was considered "moral diplomacy" because he aimed to promote democracy by removing the authoritarian leader, Victoriano Huerta. Wilson believed that the United States had a moral responsibility to support democratic governments and protect human rights. Huerta had seized power through a coup, overthrowing the democratically elected president, Francisco I. Madero, and his regime was repressive and violent towards its opposition. Wilson's refusal to recognise Huerta's government and his actions during the Veracruz Incident demonstrate his commitment to democratic principles.

Wilson's stance on Mexico can be understood in the context of his broader approach to foreign policy, known as "Wilsonianism" or "Wilsonian idealism". This approach emphasised liberal democratic internationalism, self-determination, and open diplomacy. In his Fourteen Points speech delivered to Congress in 1918, Wilson outlined his vision for a new diplomacy based on open covenants and the eventual self-rule of colonial holdings. He advocated for the formation of a general association of nations to guarantee the political independence and territorial integrity of all states, regardless of size.

Despite his support for democratic governance and opposition to authoritarian regimes, Wilson's actions in Mexico were not without controversy. His intervention led to significant resentment among the Mexican people, who resented American interference in their country's affairs. Additionally, Wilson's unilateral decision to send troops into Mexico in pursuit of Pancho Villa, a rival of Carranza, provoked a confrontation between American and Carranza's forces, resulting in casualties on both sides.

Furthermore, Wilson's commitment to democratic ideals was not always consistent. While he promoted democracy abroad, he allowed racial policies at home, and his administration took control of countries like Nicaragua, resulting in prolonged wars and the installation of authoritarian regimes. Wilson's complex legacy highlights the challenges of implementing democratic ideals in the complex realm of international relations.

Explore related products

Intervention in Mexico

$25.95

Intervention!: The United States and the Mexican Revolution, 1913-1917

$24.39 $27.5

Viva Juarez! Volume I: A Wargames Resource Book for The French Intervention in Mexico, 1862-1867

$30

A Short History of U.S. Interventions in Latin America and the Caribbean (Viewpoints / Puntos de Vista)

$33.95 $33.95

Independent Mexico: The Pronunciamiento in the Age of Santa Anna, 1821–1858 (The Mexican Experience)

$21.1 $40

Maximilian in Mexico: The Story of the French Intervention (1861-1867)

$35.95

Wilson's refusal to recognise Huerta's government demonstrates his commitment to moral diplomacy

Woodrow Wilson's refusal to recognize Victoriano Huerta's government in Mexico demonstrates his commitment to the principle of moral diplomacy. Wilson believed that the United States had a moral responsibility to support democratic governments and protect human rights. He saw himself as a promoter of democracy and an opponent of authoritarianism.

Huerta had seized power through a coup, overthrowing the democratically elected president, Francisco I. Madero, and murdering him. Wilson, who had assumed the presidency in March 1913, refused to recognize Huerta as the legitimate head of the Mexican government. From March to October 1913, he pressured Huerta to resign, even urging European powers to refrain from recognizing Huerta's government. Wilson also imposed an arms embargo on Huerta's regime, reversing his previous easy access to arms.

Wilson's refusal to recognize Huerta was not just a matter of principle but also a strategic calculation. He believed that by withholding recognition, the US could force Huerta to comply with Washington's demands. Wilson's administration explicitly called for free elections in Mexico, and the president justified the use of military force in Veracruz as a means to uphold US moral values and support the establishment of democracy in Mexico. The occupation of Veracruz was considered an example of "moral diplomacy" because it was aimed at removing Huerta, whom Wilson deemed a tyrant, and encouraging democratic governance in Mexico.

Wilson's commitment to moral diplomacy in Mexico, however, had its complexities and limitations. While he initially supported Venustiano Carranza, Huerta's main opponent, Wilson later changed his stance and proposed a joint intervention with Latin American nations to remove Carranza. Wilson's actions during the Veracruz Incident and his refusal to recognize Huerta's government caused significant resentment among the Mexican people against American interference. Additionally, Wilson's commitment to Mexican self-determination was tested when he unilaterally sent troops into Mexico in pursuit of Pancho Villa, a rival of Carranza, without securing permission from the Carranza government.

Wilson favoured Venustiano Carranza, who aimed for democratic governance

President Woodrow Wilson's intervention in Mexico was considered "moral diplomacy" because he aimed to promote democracy by removing the authoritarian leader, Victoriano Huerta. Wilson believed that the United States had a moral responsibility to support democratic governments and protect human rights. Wilson's refusal to recognise Huerta's government and his actions during the Veracruz Incident illustrate his commitment to the principle of moral diplomacy.

However, Wilson's relationship with Carranza was not always positive. In 1915, Wilson proposed a meeting of the United States and six Latin American nations to discuss joint intervention to remove Carranza. By the time the conference convened, Wilson had changed his mind and extended de facto recognition to Carranza. In 1916, Pancho Villa, one of Carranza's rivals, moved to provoke a war between the Carranza government and the United States by crossing the border and killing several Americans. Wilson sent an expedition of US soldiers into Mexico in pursuit of Villa, but they failed to capture him and instead clashed with Carranza's army. Wilson withdrew the troops from Mexico in February 1917.

Despite these complications, Wilson's overall support for Carranza can be seen as part of his commitment to democratic governance in Mexico. Wilson favoured Carranza because he represented a break from the authoritarian rule of Huerta and a move towards democracy. This support, however, did not prevent Wilson from taking unilateral action in Mexico or from pursuing negotiations with Villa.

Frequently asked questions