Amending The Constitution: Flexibility And Safeguards

The delegates of the 1787 Constitutional Convention added provisions for amending the Constitution to address concerns about the limitations of the Articles of Confederation, the need for a strong central government, and the protection of individual rights. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington feared the young nation was on the brink of collapse due to state disputes. The delegates aimed to create a powerful central government while navigating differing interests and views, resulting in a compromise-filled Constitution. The inclusion of provisions for amendments ensured the document's adaptability and allowed for future revisions to address evolving needs and perspectives. The addition of the Bill of Rights, proposed by James Madison, further exemplified the delegates' recognition of the need for a flexible and evolving framework to govern the nation.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments: History, Law, Politics

$54.85 $60.95

The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and all of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation

$4.5 $17.99

The Constitutional Amendments: 1789 To the Present

$136.39 $149

The Constitution of the United States: And All Its Amendments

$6.97 $6.97

The delegates wanted to limit Congress's power to restrict slave importation and levy taxes on slaves

The delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention disregarded Congress's recommendation to "solely amend the Articles". They wanted to limit Congress's power to restrict slave importation and levy taxes on slaves. Some delegates from the southern states, including John Rutledge of South Carolina, opposed allowing amendments to existing provisions of the draft Constitution that already limited Congress's power in these areas. They were concerned that amendments removing these limitations on Congress's power could result in federal taxes on slaves, who were considered property at the time.

The delegates adopted a provision stating that the importation of slaves would not be prohibited by Congress prior to the year 1808, but that a tax or duty may be imposed on such importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each person. This was a compromise between those who wanted to let the southern states import slaves and those who wanted to ban the slave trade. The delegates also included a fugitive slave clause in the Constitution, which required escaped slaves to be returned to their masters, without mentioning the words "slaves" or "slavery".

The delegates from Virginia and Pennsylvania, including James Madison, played a significant role in the Convention. Madison was opposed to an Article V convention to consider adding a bill of rights to the Constitution, expressing concern about the lack of detail in the article regarding how the convention amendment process would work. He later proposed giving the national legislature sole authority to propose amendments whenever it thought necessary or when two-thirds of the states applied.

The delegates wanted to provide stability to the new government by including specific procedures for amending the Constitution. They believed that states should have the power to amend the Constitution without Congress's approval because the national legislature would inevitably abuse its power and ignore states’ calls for necessary changes. This was reflected in the Virginia Plan, which stated that "the assent of the National Legislature ought not to be required". However, some delegates believed that this made amendments too difficult and advocated for Congress to play a greater role in proposing amendments.

They aimed to prevent a potential runaway convention that could exceed its scope and attempt to change the Constitution without enough state ratification

The delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention disregarded Congress's recommendation to "solely amend the Articles". Instead, they sent a new Constitution to Congress, which was then sent to the states for ratification. The delegates were wary of centralized power and loyal to their states, so they created a powerful central government. Representing a wide range of interests and views, they crafted compromises.

The delegates did not consider the draft Article V language until a month before the end of the Federal Convention. At that time, the draft text required Congress to call a convention for proposing amendments to the Constitution upon the request of two-thirds of the states. Some delegates believed that this made amendments too difficult and advocated for Congress to play a more significant role in proposing amendments. Alexander Hamilton, for instance, noted the difficulties in amending the Articles of Confederation.

Some delegates from the southern states, including John Rutledge of South Carolina, opposed allowing amendments to existing provisions of the draft Constitution that already limited Congress's power to restrict the importation of slaves or levy taxes on land or slaves. Fervent disagreement between northern and southern states over slavery prompted the inclusion of these provisions. Some delegates were concerned that amendments removing the limitation on Congress's power to levy direct taxes without apportionment could result in federal taxes on slaves, who were considered property.

Proponents of including specific procedures for amending the Constitution maintained that such a mechanism would provide stability to the new government. George Mason, for instance, stated that it was better to provide for amendments in an "easy, regular and Constitutional way" than to leave alterations to "chance and violence". He argued that states should have the power to amend the Constitution without Congress's approval because the national legislature would inevitably abuse its power and ignore states' calls for necessary changes.

James Madison, the Father of the Constitution, was opposed to an Article V convention to consider adding a bill of rights to the Constitution. He expressed concern about the lack of detail in the article regarding how the convention amendment process would work, stating that "difficulties might arise as to the form" a convention would take. He later proposed removing references to the convention amendment process, thus giving the national legislature sole authority to propose amendments whenever it thought necessary or when two-thirds of the states applied to the national legislature.

If states have the power to limit an Article V convention to a particular subject matter, and Congress only has the power to call a convention but no further power to control or regulate it, then there is a potential concern that an Article V convention could become a "runaway convention" that attempts to exceed its scope. To prevent this, the delegates ensured that none of the amendments proposed by a convention would become part of the Constitution until three-fourths of the states ratified them, which is more than the number of states required to call a convention.

The delegates wanted to ensure the central government was powerful but not reminiscent of the one that had just been overthrown

The delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention wanted to create a powerful central government, but they were also wary of centralised power and loyal to their states. They aimed to address the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which had left the young nation on the brink of collapse. The Articles had given the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. The delegates wanted to ensure that the new government had the power to address these issues, but they also wanted to avoid creating a government that was too similar to the one that had just been overthrown.

The delegates, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, were concerned about the potential for state disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade to tear the country apart. They sought to create a stronger central government that could effectively address these issues. However, they also wanted to avoid concentrating too much power in the central government, as they understood the dangers of centralised power and the potential for abuse.

To address these concerns, the delegates included provisions for amending the Constitution. They recognised that the new government would need to adapt and evolve over time, and they wanted to provide a mechanism for doing so without requiring a complete overthrow of the government. By allowing for amendments, they hoped to create a more stable and responsive government.

The delegates debated the process for amending the Constitution, with some advocating for a greater role for Congress in proposing amendments, while others wanted to circumvent the national legislature altogether. They ultimately agreed on a process that required a constitutional convention to be called upon the request of two-thirds of the states. This compromise allowed for amendments while also ensuring that any changes would have broad support across the states.

The delegates also included a Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution after its initial ratification. This addressed concerns about the lack of protections for individual rights and helped to allay fears that the new government was too reminiscent of the one that had been overthrown. The delegates recognised the importance of balancing a strong central government with the protection of individual liberties.

Explore related products

The Thirteenth Amendment and American Freedom: A Legal History (Constitutional Amendments)

$78 $78

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution

$35.63 $39.99

Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment (City Lights Open Media)

$11.98 $16.95

The Second Amendment Primer: A Citizen's Guidebook to the History, Sources, and Authorities for the Constitutional Guarantee of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms

$12.99 $12.99

The Founders' Second Amendment: Origins of the Right to Bear Arms

$20.93 $28.95

The inclusion of a Bill of Rights was important to some delegates, but others believed it wasn't necessary

The delegates to the 1787 Constitutional Convention were tasked with revising the existing government, but they ended up creating a powerful central government. The delegates, representing diverse interests and views, crafted compromises, including provisions for amending the Constitution.

The inclusion of a Bill of Rights was a significant point of contention, with some delegates advocating strongly for its inclusion. One of the most prominent supporters of the Bill of Rights was George Mason, who proposed that the Constitution be "prefaced with a Bill of Rights" to "give great quiet to the people of America." Mason, along with two other delegates, refused to sign the Constitution because it lacked a bill of rights. James Madison, initially an opponent of the Bill of Rights, eventually introduced a list of amendments, or the Bill of Rights, to the Constitution in 1789. Madison recognised the importance voters attached to these protections and the role they could play in educating people about their rights.

However, others, including Madison and other supporters of the Constitution, initially believed that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary. They argued that "the government can only exert the powers specified by the Constitution." They were wary of centralised power and loyal to their states, and they eventually agreed to consider amendments to secure ratification in key states like Massachusetts.

The delegates' differing views on the Bill of Rights reflect the broader tensions between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported a strong central government to address the nation's challenges, while the Anti-Federalists opposed a powerful central government, having just overthrown a similar system.

The delegates' inclusion of provisions for amending the Constitution, such as the Bill of Rights, was an attempt to balance these diverse interests and views and create a more durable framework for the nation.

Some delegates wanted to amend the Articles of Confederation, while others wanted to create a new government

The Articles of Confederation, which served as the United States' first constitution, asserted the sovereignty of each state and outlined a Congress with representation not based on population, with each state holding one vote. However, the Articles had limitations, such as the inability to regulate commerce, raise funds, or assemble delegates. This led to disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening to tear the young nation apart.

As a result, delegates convened in Philadelphia in May 1787, initially intending to revise the Articles of Confederation. Some delegates, including James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and George Washington, believed that the Articles needed amendments to strengthen the central government and address the country's challenges. They recognised the limitations of the Articles and sought to give more power to the central government.

However, by mid-June, the delegates had decided to create a new government and completely redesign the existing system. They realised that the defects in the frame of government could not be remedied by simply altering the Articles. This decision was influenced by the fierce arguments and compromises made during the convention, particularly regarding congressional representation. The delegates crafted a powerful central government, bypassing state legislatures and calling for special ratifying conventions in each state.

The delegates' decision to create a new government reflected their recognition of the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation and their desire to establish a stronger and more effective central government. They aimed to address the challenges facing the nation, including disputes over territory, taxation, and trade, by creating a new system that mixed elements of centralised authority and a confederation of sovereign states.

Frequently asked questions