The Constitution: Why Some Delegates Refused To Sign It

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Of the 42 men present, 39 endorsed the document, while 13 dropped out either for personal reasons or in protest. Notably, Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, and George Mason refused to sign the Constitution because they believed it did not adequately protect individual rights and lacked a Bill of Rights. Their opposition, along with that of other delegates and citizens, led to the formation of Anti-Federalist groups and the establishment of the Bill of Rights in 1791.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$12.95 $22

Miracle At Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention May - September 1787

$10.55 $19.99

The Constitutional Convention: A History Just for Kids

$13.99 $13.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

No protection of individual rights

The United States Constitution was signed on 17 September 1787, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Of the 55 delegates present at the convention, 39 signed the final draft. The remaining 13 dropped out, either for personal reasons or in protest over decisions made during the deliberations. Three of the 42 who remained refused to sign.

Some delegates refused to sign the Constitution because it lacked a Bill of Rights, which they believed would protect individual liberties and prevent the federal government from overstepping its power. These delegates, known as Anti-Federalists, argued that the new Constitution granted too much power to the federal government, risking the potential for tyranny. They believed that a powerful centralized government could threaten the rights of states and individuals.

Prominent Anti-Federalists included George Mason of Virginia, who had previously authored Virginia's Declaration of Rights, and Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts. Mason's objections later became a critical reference point for opponents of the Constitution. In the fall of 1787, he revised and expanded his objections, which circulated widely and were published on 21 November 1787. Other delegates who refused to sign due to concerns about individual rights included Edmund Randolph of Virginia and Patrick Henry.

The criticisms of the Anti-Federalists eventually led Federalists, who supported the Constitution, to agree to add the Bill of Rights as the first ten amendments. This compromise helped facilitate the ratification of the Constitution by addressing concerns about individual liberties. The Bill of Rights has since become a cornerstone of American democracy, ensuring the protection of freedom of speech, religion, assembly, and other fundamental rights.

Lack of a Bill of Rights

The absence of a Bill of Rights was a significant concern for several delegates, who refused to sign the US Constitution due to this omission. This issue of individual liberties not being protected in the original document led to the emergence of Anti-Federalists, who opposed the concentration of power in the federal government and the potential threat to personal freedoms.

George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, and Edmund Randolph were among the key figures who refused to sign, advocating for greater protections of individual rights. Mason, an influential Virginian delegate, had previously drafted Virginia's Declaration of Rights in 1776. He played a crucial role in persuading many Americans to oppose the new government through his pamphlet. Mason, along with Gerry and Randolph, believed that a strong national government could infringe upon civil liberties without explicit protections in place.

The lack of a Bill of Rights became a significant point of contention during the ratification debates, threatening the support needed for ratification. This concern was addressed through the Massachusetts Compromise, where it was agreed that the First Congress would consider the rights and amendments proposed by the states. This compromise paved the way for the eventual addition of the Bill of Rights as the first ten amendments to the Constitution.

The absence of a Bill of Rights in the original Constitution highlighted the delegates' fears of centralized power and its potential abuse. The inclusion of the Bill of Rights, ratified in 1791, ensured protections for fundamental rights, including freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. The addition of these amendments addressed the concerns raised by Mason and other delegates, safeguarding individual freedoms and civil liberties from potential government overreach.

Numerous disappointing compromises

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Of the 42 men present, 39 endorsed the Constitution. The remaining three delegates, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, and Edmund Randolph, refused to sign the document because it lacked a Bill of Rights.

The original Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, which would have guaranteed civil liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. George Mason, an influential Virginian delegate, had drafted Virginia's Declaration of Rights in 1776 and insisted that the Constitution include provisions to protect individual freedoms. He feared that a strong national government could infringe upon these rights, and his concerns were shared by other delegates and citizens, leading to broader opposition. This opposition formed groups known as Anti-Federalists, who argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government.

The absence of a Bill of Rights led to significant opposition from several states during the ratification process. States like Virginia and New York made their ratification contingent upon the promise of amendments to protect individual rights. The delegates' refusal to sign highlighted the importance of individual rights and ultimately led to the establishment of the Bill of Rights in 1791.

The final draft of the Constitution, presented on September 12, 1787, contained numerous compromises that disappointed several delegates. They believed that these compromises impaired the quality of the document. Alexander Hamilton, for example, called the Constitution a "weak and worthless fabric", certain that it would be superseded. The delegates' refusal to sign due to disappointing compromises and the lack of a Bill of Rights reflects the challenges faced in creating a unanimous and widely accepted Constitution.

Explore related products

Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence: Senator Rand Paul, Delegates of The Constitutional Convention

$2.99 $2.99

Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787

$18 $18

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$28.49 $32.5

The Selling of the Constitutional Convention: A History of News Coverage (Culture)

$44.73 $52

Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention

$26 $26

The Constitutional Convention: Core Documents

$0.99

Fear of government overreach

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, at Independence Hall in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Of the 42 men present, 39 signed the document. The remaining three delegates, George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, and Edmund Randolph, refused to sign the Constitution, citing the absence of a Bill of Rights as their primary reason.

These delegates feared that without explicit protections for individual rights, the Constitution would enable government overreach and infringe upon civil liberties. They believed that a strong national government could pose a threat to freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. This concern was shared by other delegates and citizens, leading to broader opposition against the Constitution and the formation of Anti-Federalist groups.

The absence of a Bill of Rights led to significant opposition from several states during the ratification process. States like Virginia and New York made their ratification contingent upon the promise of amendments to protect individual rights. The demands of these dissenting delegates and their supporters ultimately led to the establishment of the Bill of Rights in 1791.

The final draft of the Constitution, presented on September 12, 1787, was a compromise document that disappointed several delegates. Alexander Hamilton, for example, described the Constitution as a "weak and worthless fabric", reflecting his dissatisfaction with the numerous concessions it contained. The delegates who refused to sign the Constitution believed that their stance was necessary to safeguard individual rights and prevent government overreach.

In summary, the fear of government overreach due to the absence of a Bill of Rights was a significant factor in the refusal of some delegates to sign the United States Constitution. Their actions and the broader opposition they helped galvanize led to the eventual inclusion of the Bill of Rights, which addressed concerns about individual liberties and the potential for governmental abuse of power.

Anti-Federalist beliefs

The Anti-Federalists, an opposition group that arose during the Constitutional Convention, argued that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government. They believed that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual rights and liberties, such as freedom of speech, religion, and the right to a fair trial. This belief stemmed from the absence of a Bill of Rights in the original Constitution, which they feared would allow a strong national government to infringe upon their freedoms.

Key figures among the Anti-Federalists included George Mason, Elbridge Gerry, and Edmund Randolph, who refused to sign the Constitution due to their concerns about the lack of protection for individual rights. George Mason, an influential Virginian delegate, had previously drafted Virginia's Declaration of Rights in 1776. He and his fellow Anti-Federalists feared that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power and could potentially overreach. Their demands and those of states like Virginia and New York, which made ratification contingent upon promised amendments, ultimately led to the establishment of the Bill of Rights in 1791.

The Anti-Federalists' refusal to sign the Constitution was not an isolated incident. Several other delegates were also disappointed by the numerous compromises contained in the final document, believing that they had impaired its quality. Alexander Hamilton, for example, called the Constitution a "weak and worthless fabric", certain that it would be superseded.

The Anti-Federalists' beliefs and actions during the Constitutional Convention reflected their commitment to protecting individual rights and limiting the power of the federal government. Their opposition and demands for amendments helped shape the final form of the Constitution and the establishment of the Bill of Rights, ensuring that the concerns of citizens and delegates who feared government overreach were addressed.

Frequently asked questions