Delegates' Refusal: The Constitution's Independence

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was a pivotal event in American history, where 55 delegates gathered in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation and shape the future of the nation. However, not all delegates supported the Constitution that emerged from this convention. Some, like Patrick Henry, refused to participate due to suspicions of a shift towards monarchy. Others, known as Anti-Federalists, opposed the Constitution because it created a powerful central government, reminiscent of the one they had overthrown, and lacked a bill of rights. Large and small states also clashed over representation in Congress, with the Great Compromise addressing this issue. Delegates debated key issues like slavery, state versus federal powers, and executive power, but not all agreed on the final compromises. The Constitution's ratification was a challenging process, requiring the support of 9 out of 13 states, and it was only achieved through compromises like the vote now, amend later approach.

Explore related products

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

1787: The Grand Convention

$15.65 $28.95

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member

$0.99 $99

The convention was initially to revise the Articles of Confederation, not write a new constitution

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was a significant event in American history. While the convention was originally intended to revise the Articles of Confederation, it ultimately resulted in the creation of a new constitution. The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, had been adopted by the Second Continental Congress in 1777 and ratified by all states in 1781. It guaranteed state sovereignty and independence, with each state having one vote in the Congress of the Confederation. However, the Articles lacked enforcement powers and could not regulate commerce or print money, leading to concerns about the young country's stability.

The convention was convened in Philadelphia, with 55 delegates in attendance, including George Washington, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton. These delegates were tasked with revising the existing government and addressing issues such as representation, state versus federal powers, executive power, slavery, and commerce. However, the convention ultimately resulted in the creation of a new frame of government rather than revisions to the Articles of Confederation.

The delegates crafted a powerful central government, compromising between wildly different interests and views. They established a system of checks and balances by dividing federal authority between the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. The convention also debated and enshrined controversial issues such as slavery within the new constitution. The Three-Fifths Compromise, which counted enslaved people towards congressional representation, greatly increased congressional seats in several states, particularly in the South.

The convention's outcome was not without opposition. Some delegates, such as Patrick Henry, refused to participate, suspecting a move towards monarchy. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution due to its creation of a powerful central government and the lack of a bill of rights. Despite this resistance, the Constitution was ratified by 9 of the 13 states, enacting a new government and marking a significant shift from the original intent of revising the Articles of Confederation.

Some delegates were wary of a powerful central government

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was a pivotal moment in American history, where 55 delegates gathered in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation and address pressing issues facing the young nation. Among the delegates, there were differing views on the role of the federal government, with some wary of a powerful central government and loyal to their individual states.

The delegates had convened to address issues such as representation, state versus federal powers, executive power, slavery, and commerce. While some delegates believed that the federal government should have the authority to overrule state laws, others feared the concentration of power in a strong central government, concerned that it would oppress citizens and infringe upon states' rights. This concern was heightened by the knowledge that George Washington, a proponent of a stronger national government, would become the first president.

The delegates' wariness of a powerful central government was influenced by their commitment to principles of equality and liberty articulated in the Declaration of Independence. They understood the importance of protecting individual liberties and ensuring that the government served the public interest. This wariness also stemmed from the delegates' diverse interests and views, representing different states with varying populations and needs. The large states favoured representation by population, while small states argued for equal representation by state, leading to the "Great Compromise" that established the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Additionally, the delegates were tasked with revising the existing government, but they ended up creating a new model that relied on checks and balances, dividing federal authority among the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. This compromise-filled approach to constitution-building was also influenced by the absence of some prominent founders, including Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Patrick Henry, and others, who were absent from the convention due to their roles as ministers or state affairs.

The delegates' wariness of a powerful central government resulted in a constitution that has endured as one of the longest-lived and most emulated in the world. Their efforts to balance state and federal powers, protect individual liberties, and create a system of checks and balances laid the foundation for the American system of government that continues to this day.

The convention's outcome contradicted the nation's core values of liberty and equality regarding slavery

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was a significant event in American history, where 55 delegates gathered in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation and address several pressing issues. Among the topics discussed were representation, state versus federal powers, executive power, slavery, and commerce. The outcome of the convention, however, contradicted the nation's core values of liberty and equality, particularly regarding slavery.

At the time of the convention, slavery in America was in decline, but it remained a significant part of the social and economic fabric in five of the states represented. The delegates' commitment to principles of equality, as articulated in the Declaration of Independence, was limited, especially when it came to the debates surrounding slavery. The Three-Fifths Compromise provided that three-fifths of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, increasing the number of congressional seats in southern states. This compromise, while aimed at resolving disputes between large and small states, entrenched racial inequality into the fabric of the nation.

The delegates also debated the federal government's power to ban the importation of enslaved people. They agreed to allow Congress to ban it after 20 years, but this clause could not be amended, further complicating the issue. The convention's outcome, in this case, contradicted the core values of liberty and equality by delaying the potential abolition of the slave trade and perpetuating the institution of slavery within the new nation.

Additionally, the delegates' creation of a powerful central government caused concern among Anti-Federalists, who believed it resembled the oppressive regime they had recently overthrown. The convention's outcome, favouring a strong central government, contradicted the nation's core values of liberty and equality by potentially threatening individual freedoms and state sovereignty.

The Constitutional Convention, while successful in drafting a long-lasting constitution, faced challenges in reconciling the nation's core values with the complex realities of the time. The outcome, particularly regarding slavery and federal power, highlighted the contradictions between the ideals of liberty and equality and the compromises made during the nation-building process.

Explore related products

Secret Proceedings and Debates of the Constitutional Convention 1787

$15 $20

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates[ANTI-FEDERALIST PAPERS & THE C][Mass Market Paperback]

$21.97 $44.95

Debates and Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Delaware

$32.32

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$19.99 $32.5

James Madison's Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 and Their (Classic Reprint)

$11.32 $11.32

The delegates' proposal to elect the president was unpopular

Additionally, many of the delegates were wary of centralized power and loyal to their individual states. They wanted to ensure that the president would represent the interests of all the states, not just the one with the largest population. This concern led to the creation of the Electoral College, a group of "electors" chosen by the state legislatures or the people of their individual states to elect the president.

Another reason for the unpopularity of the delegates' proposal was the absence of prominent founders and leaders, such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and John Jay. These individuals may have been able to provide valuable input and influence the delegates' decisions, but they were absent from the Constitutional Convention for various reasons.

Furthermore, the delegates' commitment to principles of equality, as articulated in the Declaration of Independence, was limited. They supported the imposition of property qualifications for voters, which contradicted the core values of liberty and equality on which America had declared its independence. This inconsistency may have made their proposals for electing the president less trustworthy in the eyes of the public.

Lastly, the delegates' proposal for electing the president was at odds with the existing system of government under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles established a weak central government with limited powers, and the delegates' proposal for a strong executive branch was seen as a significant departure from this framework. This shift in power dynamics may have been concerning to those who valued state sovereignty and independence.

Some delegates were absent, including Thomas Jefferson and John Adams

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 was a pivotal event in American history, where 55 delegates gathered in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation and shape the future of the nation. Notably, some prominent figures were absent from this assembly, including Thomas Jefferson and John Adams.

Thomas Jefferson, the author of the Declaration of Independence, was unable to attend the Constitutional Convention as he was serving as the minister to France at the time. Jefferson was in France during the Revolution, playing a crucial role in fostering Franco-American relations. His absence from the Convention is understandable given his diplomatic responsibilities abroad.

John Adams, another Founding Father and future president, was also absent from the Constitutional Convention. Adams was serving as the minister to Britain, representing American interests in the aftermath of the Revolutionary War. While he couldn't be physically present, Adams remained engaged with the proceedings, writing home to encourage the delegates in their endeavours.

The absence of Jefferson and Adams is significant as they were both influential figures in the nation's founding. Jefferson, as the primary author of the Declaration of Independence, had already left an indelible mark on the nation's ideology, and his absence may have been a missed opportunity for his insights to be incorporated into the Constitution. Similarly, Adams, with his diplomatic experience, could have contributed a unique perspective to the debates surrounding the nation's future governance.

It's worth noting that other notable figures, such as Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, John Hancock, and John Jay, were also absent from the Constitutional Convention. Some, like Patrick Henry, may have deliberately refused to participate due to their suspicions about the convention's intentions. However, it's also possible that many of the older and more experienced leaders were simply preoccupied with local affairs, as the convention's scope expanded beyond its original purpose of strengthening the Articles of Confederation.

Despite their absence, the delegates who crafted the Constitution navigated complex issues of representation, state versus federal powers, slavery, and commerce. The resulting document, with its system of checks and balances, has endured as one of the most enduring and emulated constitutions worldwide.

Frequently asked questions