Quebec's Refusal To Sign The Constitution: Why?

why did quebec refused to sign the constitution

Quebec has never signed the Canadian Constitution, and this is largely due to two reasons. Firstly, the new amending formula meant that Quebec lost its veto power, which was its right to reject or prevent constitutional changes. Secondly, a clause in the Charter of Rights guaranteed minority language rights, which would have meant the end of Quebec's Bill 101, as it protected English language rights in Quebec. In 1987, an attempt was made to win Quebec's consent to the revised Canadian Constitution, resulting in the Meech Lake Accord, which proposed strengthening provincial powers and declaring Quebec a distinct society. However, this accord fell through, and Quebec remains the only province whose government has not consented to the Constitution.

Characteristics Values
Quebec's Veto Power Quebec lost its veto power, which was the right to reject or prevent any constitutional changes it disagreed with.
Minority Language Rights The Charter of Rights included a clause guaranteeing minority language rights, which would have overridden Quebec's Bill 101 and protected English language rights in the province.
Political Betrayal Quebec's premier, René Lévesque, felt betrayed by the English-speaking premiers, claiming they plotted against him, fuelling separatist sentiment in Quebec.
Constitutional Amendments Quebec sought to abolish the monarchy and the oath to the Queen, which was rejected by other provincial premiers and the Supreme Court.
Failure to Reach Agreement Efforts to bring Quebec into the constitutional accord took several years, and even with a change in leadership, the deal ultimately failed.

cycivic

Quebec lost its veto power

Quebec's refusal to sign the Canadian Constitution in 1982 was largely due to the loss of its veto power and the protection of minority language rights. The new amending formula meant that Quebec lost its right to reject or forbid constitutional changes. Previously, Quebec, along with Ontario or a majority of Western or Maritime provinces, could prevent any constitutional amendments they disagreed with. The loss of this veto power was a significant blow to Quebec's ability to influence and control constitutional changes.

The issue of veto power was a contentious point during the negotiations leading up to the 1982 Constitution Act. Quebec's premier at the time, René Lévesque, felt betrayed by the English-speaking premiers and claimed that they had plotted against him, an event known in Quebec nationalist circles as the "night of the long knives." Lévesque had agreed to an amending formula in the "April Accord" that did not provide a specific veto for Quebec, which further fuelled separatist sentiment in the province.

The loss of veto power meant that Quebec could no longer unilaterally block constitutional changes. This represented a significant shift in the balance of power and diminished Quebec's ability to protect its unique cultural and linguistic identity within Canada. The new amending formula allowed for constitutional changes to be made without requiring unanimous consent from all provinces, which Quebec had previously relied on to maintain its autonomy.

Additionally, the new Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which was a central part of the 1982 Constitution, included a clause guaranteeing minority language rights "where numbers warrant." This clause threatened the end of Quebec's Bill 101, which imposed the official language of Quebec as the only language of commercial signs. The protection of minority language rights in the Charter conflicted with Quebec's desire to protect and promote the French language within the province.

Quebec's refusal to sign the Constitution in 1982 has had lasting political implications. Despite efforts through the Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords to secure Quebec's approval, the province has never formally approved of the enactment of the act. The lack of formal approval has been a persistent issue in Quebec politics, and the province's relationship with the rest of Canada continues to be shaped by this historical event.

cycivic

The protection of minority language rights

Quebec's refusal to sign the 1982 Constitution Act was influenced by several factors, including the protection of minority language rights. At the time, Quebec's premier, René Lévesque, was strongly opposed to the patriation of the constitution without the province's consent. This sentiment was shared by many Quebec nationalists, who felt betrayed by the English-speaking premiers.

One of the main concerns for Quebec was the protection of minority language rights, specifically the rights of the French-speaking minority in the province. The new Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which was a central piece of the constitutional resolution, included a clause that guaranteed minority language rights "where numbers warrant". This clause threatened the existence of Quebec's Bill 101, which imposed the official language of Quebec as the only language of commercial signs and protected French language rights in the province.

The guarantee of minority language rights in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms would have ensured that English-language rights in Quebec were protected, while also protecting French-language rights in the rest of Canada. However, this clashed with Quebec's desire to protect and promote the French language within the province. Quebec had passed Bill 101, which imposed French as the official language of the province, and any infringement on this law was seen as a threat to the preservation of Quebec's unique cultural and linguistic identity.

To address this concern, Lévesque made use of the notwithstanding clause in both the Canadian Charter and the Quebec Charter to shield Bill 101 and other Quebec laws from judicial review. This allowed him to temporarily counter the Ford decision, which struck down the section of Bill 101 imposing French as the only language of commercial signs. However, the use of the notwithstanding clause in this context provoked outrage across the country and contributed to the failure of the Meech Lake Accord, which aimed to secure approval from Quebec for the constitution.

cycivic

Quebec felt betrayed by English-speaking premiers

Quebec's refusal to sign the Constitution in 1982 was largely due to the province's feeling of betrayal by English-speaking premiers, specifically regarding the loss of its veto power and the protection of minority language rights.

The sense of betrayal stemmed from the actions of the Gang of Eight premiers, who, led by Lougheed, promoted an alternative constitutional accord. This accord, known as the April Accord, did not provide Quebec with a specific veto, which was a significant loss of power for the province. Quebec's premier at the time, René Lévesque, felt deeply wronged by this, claiming that the English-speaking premiers had plotted against him. This incident fuelled separatist sentiment in Quebec and became known as the ""night of the long knives"" in Quebec nationalist circles.

The loss of veto power was a significant blow to Quebec, as it meant they could no longer prevent constitutional changes they disagreed with. Additionally, a clause in the Charter of Rights guaranteed minority language rights, which would have impacted Quebec's Bill 101 by protecting English language rights in the province. This was seen as a threat to Quebec's unique linguistic identity.

Lévesque's anger extended beyond the loss of veto power and minority language rights. He was also furious that the Canada Act, which accomplished the patriation of the Constitution, was signed without Quebec's consent. He felt that the federal government's actions were a form of "Canadian trickery" and sought to respond with legal countermeasures. This included the use of the notwithstanding clause in both the Canadian Charter and the Quebec Charter, which allowed him to shield Quebec laws from judicial review.

The feeling of betrayal and the subsequent refusal to sign the Constitution had lasting consequences. It took another five years before an agreement was reached to bring Quebec into the constitutional accord, and even then, the deal ultimately failed. The Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords, which were designed to secure approval from Quebec, also failed. The lack of formal approval from Quebec has remained a persistent political issue, and the province has never formally approved of the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982.

cycivic

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Quebec's refusal to sign the Constitution Act, which included the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, was influenced by two primary factors. Firstly, Quebec lost its veto power, which previously allowed it to reject or forbid constitutional changes it disagreed with. This shift in the amending formula was a significant blow to Quebec's ability to shape the country's future direction independently. Secondly, a clause in the Charter of Rights guaranteed minority language rights "where numbers warrant." This clause threatened to overturn Quebec's Bill 101, which imposed the official language of Quebec as the sole language on commercial signs, while also protecting French language rights in the rest of Canada.

Despite Quebec's initial refusal to sign, subsequent efforts were made to secure the province's approval. The Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords were specifically designed to address Quebec's concerns and bring them on board. However, these attempts ultimately failed, and as of 2024, Quebec has never formally approved of the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982, or the accompanying Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This ongoing lack of formal approval has been a persistent political issue in Quebec, with lasting implications for the province and the country as a whole.

cycivic

Quebec's outrage at patriation

Quebec's outrage at the patriation of the Constitution in 1982 was profound and long-lasting. The province's premier, René Lévesque, was furious that the Canada Act, which patriated the Constitution, was signed without Quebec's consent. He felt betrayed by the English-speaking premiers, claiming they plotted against him on the "night of the long knives". This sentiment fuelled separatist sentiment in Quebec for years.

There were two main reasons for Quebec's refusal to sign the agreement. Firstly, the new amending formula meant Quebec lost its veto over future constitutional changes. Previously, Quebec, along with Ontario or a majority of Western or Maritime provinces, could prevent any constitutional amendments they disagreed with. Secondly, a clause in the Charter of Rights guaranteed minority language rights "where numbers warrant". This would have meant the end of Quebec's Bill 101 by protecting English language rights in the province, while also protecting French language rights in the rest of Canada.

Lévesque's response to this perceived betrayal was to normalise the use of the notwithstanding clause in both the Canadian Charter and the Quebec Charter. This allowed him to shield Quebec's laws from judicial review. He also sought to abolish the oath to the monarch, which is demanded of all members of Parliament and provincial legislative assemblies. These actions contributed to the demise of the Meech Lake Accord, a package of constitutional amendments intended to address Quebec's outrage at patriation.

It took another five years for an agreement to be reached that would bring Quebec into the constitutional accord. However, even this deal ultimately failed, and as of 2024, the Government of Quebec has never formally approved of the enactment of the Constitution Act, 1982. The lack of formal approval remains a persistent political issue in Quebec.

Frequently asked questions

Quebec's premier at the time, René Lévesque, was furious that the Canada Act, which brought about the patriation of the Constitution, was signed without Quebec's consent. This resulted in a sense of betrayal and fuelled separatist sentiment in the province.

The lack of formal approval from Quebec has remained a persistent political issue. The Meech Lake and Charlottetown Accords were attempts to secure Quebec's approval, but both efforts failed.

Yes, Quebec lost its veto power to prevent constitutional changes without its consent. Additionally, a clause in the Charter of Rights guaranteed minority language rights, which would have overridden Quebec's Bill 101, protecting English language rights in the province.

Lévesque claimed that the English-speaking premiers plotted against him during the First Ministers' conference, resulting in the presentation of a completed agreement without his input. This incident fuelled Quebec nationalist sentiments and became known as the "Night of the Long Knives".

While Quebec never formally approved of the enactment of the Constitution Act, the Supreme Court ruled that their consent was not necessary. However, the dispute over the Constitution has continued to shape Quebec's political landscape, with ongoing debates about the province's role within Canada.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment