Nationalist Rejection: The Flaws Of Richard's 1946 Constitution

Nigerian nationalists rejected the 1946 Richard Constitution, drafted by Sir Arthur Richards, for several reasons. The constitution was intended to promote national unity and enhance Nigerian participation in the discussion of their affairs. However, it was criticised for not allowing nationalist leaders to participate fully in the country's administration and for being imposed without adequate popular vote or consultation with Nigerians. The council, which was supposed to consist of many Nigerians, was dominated by Europeans, and the governor retained veto power. The constitution also introduced regionalism, unintentionally causing political division and ethnic rivalries in the country.

Explore related products

The Changing Constitution: Constitutional Law in the Trump-Era Supreme Court

$36.21 $39.99

The Penguin Guide to the United States Constitution: A Fully Annotated Declaration of Independence, U.S. Constitution and Amendments, and Selections from The Federalist Papers

$12.89 $15

Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution

$17.61 $20

The Dynamic Constitution: An Introduction to American Constitutional Law and Practice

$36.83 $42

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution (Penguin Civic Classics)

$10.09 $14

Lack of popular vote

The Richard Constitution of 1946 was drafted by Sir Arthur Richards, the Governor of Nigeria, to promote national unity and enhance the participation of Nigerians in the discussion of their affairs. However, the constitution was criticised for its lack of a popular vote, leading to its rejection by Nigerian nationalists.

The Richard Constitution replaced the Clifford Constitution of 1922, which had been criticised for its weaknesses and for bringing sectionalism into the Nigerian government. Nigerian nationalists had pressured the previous governor, Sir Bernard Bourdillon, to create a new constitution that would unify the country and address social and political differences.

While the Richard Constitution did involve consultations with the Nigerian people, it was ultimately imposed without a popular vote. This autocratic approach was the main criticism of the nationalists, who argued that Nigerians should be properly consulted before a new constitution was decided. They claimed that the constitution did not allow for the full participation of nationalist leaders in the administration of the country and that it was partial against the southern region.

The constitution's lack of a popular vote contributed to its perception as undemocratic and imposed. The electoral principle was not extended beyond Lagos and Calabar, and the regional assemblies functioned primarily as advisory bodies. The official and unofficial representatives were ineffective, with no legislative power, and the elected or nominated members owed allegiance to the person who nominated them rather than to the people.

In conclusion, the lack of a popular vote in the Richard Constitution of 1946 was a significant factor in its rejection by Nigerian nationalists. The constitution's imposition without adequate popular consultation was viewed as autocratic and undemocratic, and it failed to address the nationalists' desire for full participation in the administration of their country.

Ineffective representatives

The Richard Constitution of 1946 was drafted by Sir Arthur Richards, the then Governor of Nigeria. It replaced the Clifford Constitution of 1922, which was deemed defective and highly criticized for bringing sectionalism into the Nigerian government. The Richard Constitution was intended to promote national unity and enhance the participation of Nigerians in the discussion of their affairs. However, it was criticized by Nigerian nationalists for being undemocratic and imposed without adequate popular vote or consultation with the people.

One of the main criticisms of the Richard Constitution was the ineffectiveness of its official and unofficial representatives. The constitution was designed to bring the North and South together under one legislature, with an unofficial majority in the central legislative council. However, the majority of these unofficial members were chiefs or government nominees, and they had no legislative power. The Legislative Council was selected, not elected, meaning that the elected or nominated members owed allegiance to the person who nominated them rather than to the people. This created a disconnect between the representatives and those they represented, and the nationalists argued that these members could not truly represent the people's interests.

The constitution also introduced regionalism, dividing Nigeria into three regions: North, West, and East. Each region had its own regional council and legislative assembly, which acted as advisory and consultative bodies. While this allowed for the representation of various interests and sectors, it also unintentionally caused political division within the country, as each region represented one or more ethnic groups, leading to regional rivalry.

The Richard Constitution's approach to representation and regionalism was a significant point of contention for Nigerian nationalists. They believed that the constitution fell short of its goal to promote national unity and enable effective participation of Nigerians in governing their country. The ineffectiveness of the representatives, due to their lack of legislative power and allegiance to the governor, contributed to the rejection of the Richard Constitution by Nigerian nationalists.

Electoral principle limitations

The Richards Constitution of 1946 was drafted to promote unity in Nigeria and encourage greater participation of Nigerians in the discussion of their own affairs. However, it faced opposition from nationalists due to several limitations and shortcomings. One of the main criticisms pertained to the electoral principle, which was not extended beyond Lagos and Calabar. This restriction contradicted the promise of adequate popular vote and contributed to the perception of the constitution as autocratic and imposed.

The electoral principle's limited scope meant that the indirect system of government was carefully incorporated into the constitution, linking local authorities to regional assemblies and the assemblies to the central legislative body in Lagos. While this structure was intended to foster unity and representation, critics argued that it resulted in the dominance of unofficial nominees in the central legislative council, undermining the influence of elected representatives.

The regional assemblies, which were supposed to function as electoral colleges for the indirect election of members of the legislative council, became advisory and consultative bodies. This deviation from their intended purpose contributed to the perception that the constitution was arbitrarily imposed and undemocratic.

Furthermore, the electoral principle's limitation to specific regions contributed to the introduction of regionalism, unintentionally causing political division within Nigeria. The constitution's focus on regional councils and assemblies, though intended to represent diverse interests, inadvertently fostered regional rivalries as each region represented distinct ethnic groups.

In summary, the limitations of the electoral principle in the Richards Constitution of 1946 contributed to criticisms of its imposed and undemocratic nature. The concentration of power in unofficial nominees, the advisory role of regional assemblies, and the unintended political divisions underscored the shortcomings of the electoral principle's restricted scope. These factors ultimately fueled nationalist opposition to the constitution.

Explore related products

The Classical Liberal Constitution: The Uncertain Quest for Limited Government

$24.63 $29

Reimagining a More Perfect Union: A Better Constitution for Modern America

$13.2 $18.99

Georgia's Constitution and Government

$15.41 $16.95

How Progressives Rewrote the Constitution

$5.38 $9

Saving The Constitution

$19.95 $19.95

Penguin Guide to the United States Constitution (10) by Beeman, Richard [Paperback (2010)]

$14.45

Regional assemblies

The Richard Constitution of 1946 was intended to promote national unity and enhance the participation of Nigerians in the discussion of their affairs. It was also meant to address the social and political differences within the country. The constitution was drafted by Sir Arthur Richards, replacing the Clifford Constitution of 1922, which was criticised for bringing sectionalism into the Nigerian government.

The Richard Constitution introduced regionalism in Nigeria, dividing the country into three regions: North, West, and East, each with its own regional council and legislative assembly. The regional assemblies functioned as electoral colleges for the indirect election of members of the legislative council. The regional assemblies were linked to the central legislative body in Lagos, which was dominated by unofficial nominees of the governor.

The creation of the Regional House of Assembly was a significant aspect of the Richard Constitution. The assembly members were to be elected by the native authorities, and the Regional assembly members were to elect members of the central legislative council through an Electoral College. This was done to provide for an African majority in the House of Assembly and to forge political and constitutional links between the native authorities and the legislative council.

However, the Richard Constitution was criticised by Nigerian nationalists for not allowing their full participation in the administration of the country. They also opposed the principle of nomination, regarding it as undemocratic and preventing true representation of the people. The constitution was also accused of being partial against the Southern region, as the chief's house was built in the north instead of the south, bringing the north into the mainstream of Nigerian politics.

Partiality

The Richard Constitution of 1946 was drafted by Sir Arthur Richards, replacing the Clifford Constitution of 1922. It was designed to promote national unity and increase African participation in Nigerian affairs. However, the constitution was criticised for being partial and favouring the northern region over the south.

One of the main points of contention was the creation of the House of Chiefs in the north, while no such house was established in the south. This was seen as a deliberate move by colonial powers to bring the north into the mainstream of Nigerian politics. The more politically engaged and educated south vehemently opposed this, arguing that it gave the north an unfair advantage and allowed them to dominate Nigerian politics.

The constitution also retained the governor's veto power, allowing them to reject or accept advice from the executive council. This was criticised as undemocratic and autocratic, particularly by nationalists who wanted a greater say in how the country was administered. They argued that the constitution did not allow for the full participation of nationalist leaders in the country's governance.

Furthermore, while the Richard Constitution did involve Nigerians in its drafting, the process was not inclusive enough. Many felt that Nigerians should have been properly consulted before the constitution was finalised and that the promise of adequate popular vote had not been fulfilled. The impression of an unofficial majority in the council, dominated by chiefs or government nominees, further added to the perception of partiality and undemocratic practices.

The Richard Constitution's attempt to address regionalism and promote unity in Nigeria inadvertently led to increased regional rivalry. By establishing regional assemblies and dividing the country into regions, the constitution contributed to political division as each region represented distinct ethnic groups. This regionalism, unintentionally introduced through the constitution, became a source of tension and rivalry among the regions.

Frequently asked questions