The Constitution: Why Amendments Are Tough To Pass

why did congress make ammending the constitution difficult

The United States Constitution was written to endure for ages to come, and to ensure its longevity, the framers made it a challenging process to amend the document. In over 230 years, there have only been 27 amendments, with the last one being ratified in 1992. The process is intentionally difficult, requiring a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. The strict requirements have led to criticisms that it is too challenging to enact amendments, with only a small number of amendments being passed by Congress and sent to the states for ratification.

Characteristics Values
Difficulty level High
Number of amendments since the Constitution was drafted in 1787 27
Number of measures proposed to amend the Constitution from 1789 through Jan. 3, 2019 11,848
Number of amendments passed by Congress and sent to the states 33
Number of amendments that need to be approved by two-thirds of both Houses of Congress 2/3
Number of states that need to ratify a proposed amendment for it to become part of the Constitution 38 of 50

cycivic

The framers wanted the Constitution to be enduring

The framers of the United States Constitution intended for the document to be enduring and to "endure for ages to come". To ensure its longevity, they made the process of amending it a challenging task. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, demonstrating the difficulty of the process.

Article V of the Constitution outlines the primary paths for amending the document. An amendment can be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution when ratified by legislatures or conventions in three-quarters of the states (38 out of 50 states). This ratification process is overseen by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).

The framers likely anticipated that the process would become more challenging as the nation grew in size and population. The difficulty in amending the Constitution has been criticised for being too strict and biased towards the federal government, making it challenging to secure the required approval from Congress and the states. However, the strict process ensures that amendments are reserved for significant changes that impact all Americans or protect the rights of citizens.

Despite the challenges, proponents of amendments have persistently pursued changes. Since 1789, approximately 11,848 measures have been proposed to amend the Constitution, with the last ratified amendment being the 27th Amendment in 1992. While the process is designed to be difficult, it is not impossible to enact amendments, and the Constitution has been successfully amended multiple times to meet the challenges and crises of the nation.

cycivic

Amendments must be approved by two-thirds of Congress

The United States Constitution was written with the intention of enduring for ages to come. To ensure its longevity, the framers made it a challenging task to amend the document. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, demonstrating the rarity and difficulty of the amendment process.

Amending the Constitution is a complex process, and one of the key requirements is that amendments must secure the approval of two-thirds of Congress. This means that for an amendment to pass, it needs to gain a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. This high threshold ensures that any changes to the Constitution reflect a broad consensus among legislators, representing the interests and needs of their constituents.

The two-thirds requirement in both chambers of Congress sets a high bar for amending the Constitution. It is designed to prevent hasty or partisan changes to the nation's foundational document. By requiring a supermajority, the process encourages amendments that have broad support and are carefully considered. This safeguard helps maintain the stability and integrity of the Constitution, ensuring that it remains a consistent framework for governing the country.

The challenge of securing a two-thirds majority in Congress for an amendment is further compounded by the need to also gain approval from a significant proportion of state legislatures. This dual requirement ensures that any changes to the Constitution are thoroughly vetted and reflect the interests of both the federal government and the individual states. While it makes the process more arduous, it also helps to protect the rights and powers of states within the federal system.

The framers of the Constitution envisioned a document that could adapt to future challenges and crises while also maintaining its enduring nature. The requirement for a two-thirds majority in Congress is a key part of this design, ensuring that any amendments reflect a strong consensus and are in the best interests of the nation as a whole. While critics argue that this process is too strict, it has resulted in a Constitution that has stood the test of time.

cycivic

Three-quarters of states must ratify an amendment

The United States Constitution was drafted to "endure for ages to come", and its framers intentionally made it difficult to amend. In over 230 years, there have only been 27 amendments, with the last one being ratified in 1992.

Amending the Constitution is a challenging and lengthy process. A proposed amendment must first be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress. Following this, it must be ratified by three-quarters of the state legislatures, which is 38 out of 50 states. This step ensures that any amendment has a significant impact on the country and its citizens. The process is designed to be strict and requires a high level of approval, making it difficult to enact amendments.

The ratification process is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who is in charge of the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). The Archivist works closely with the Director of the Federal Register, following procedures established by the Secretary of State and the Administrator of General Services. Once a proposed amendment is ratified by three-quarters of the states, the OFR drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid. This certification is then published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large, officially notifying Congress and the nation of the completed amendment process.

The difficulty in amending the Constitution has been a topic of debate. Critics argue that the process is too strict and biased towards the federal government, making it challenging to incorporate modern values. However, supporters of a rigorous amendment process believe that it ensures the Constitution's longevity and helps maintain its relevance in the face of future challenges and crises.

Despite the challenges, proponents of amendments remain persistent. Since 1789, approximately 11,848 measures have been proposed to amend the Constitution. While the process is deliberately difficult, it is not impossible to amend the Constitution. The high bar for ratification ensures that any changes made to the supreme law of the land reflect the needs and values of a significant portion of the country.

The Constitution's Early Beginnings

You may want to see also

cycivic

Only 27 amendments since 1787

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come", as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s. The framers made it difficult to amend the Constitution to ensure its longevity. In over 230 years, there have only been 27 amendments to the Constitution, including the first 10 amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, which were ratified in 1791, four years after the Constitution was drafted.

The process of amending the Constitution is challenging and time-consuming. A proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress and then ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. Alternatively, two-thirds of the state legislatures could request that Congress convene a Constitutional Convention, although this has never occurred. The difficulty of the amendment process is evident in the numerous unsuccessful attempts to amend the Constitution, including those by supporters of congressional term limits and a balanced budget amendment.

The Constitution is a concise document, typically fewer than 20 pages in booklet form, outlining the structure of the government rather than the majority of laws in the United States. Most law changes do not necessitate constitutional amendments. Amendments are generally only required to modify or clarify provisions explicitly stated in the Constitution.

The amendment process has been criticised for being too strict and biased towards the federal government, making it challenging to secure the required approval from Congress and the states. However, the strict process ensures that amendments are reserved for significant changes affecting all Americans or securing citizens' rights.

cycivic

Amendments must affect all Americans or secure rights

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come", as Chief Justice John Marshall wrote in the early 1800s. To ensure its longevity, the framers made it a challenging process to amend the document. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, including the first 10 amendments, which were adopted four years later as the Bill of Rights.

Amendments must be of significant impact, affecting all Americans or securing the rights of citizens. For instance, an amendment to outlaw flag burning or to endorse a crime victims' rights amendment. Other proposals that have gained traction with some congressional leaders include allowing voluntary school prayer and making English the official language of the country.

The process of amending the Constitution is intentionally difficult and time-consuming. A proposed amendment must be passed by a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress and then ratified by three-fourths of state legislatures. This can be initiated by Congress or by two-thirds of state legislatures calling for a Constitutional Convention, although this has never happened. The strictness of the process has been criticised for being biased towards the federal government and not allowing amendments that limit the national government.

The endurance of the Constitution is further ensured by making two aspects unchangeable. Firstly, every state will have the same number of Senators, and secondly, until 1808, no amendment could limit the slave trade.

Frequently asked questions

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come". To ensure it would last, the framers made it a challenging process to amend the document.

The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787, including the first 10 amendments adopted four years later as the Bill of Rights.

Article V of the Constitution outlines the process of amending it. An amendment must be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution when ratified by legislatures or conventions in three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50).

Critics argue that the amendment process is too strict and requires approval by two-thirds of both Houses of Congress and three-quarters of the states. This makes it challenging to secure the necessary support for an amendment to be approved.

While constitutional amendments are rare, it's important to note that the Constitution is interpreted and applied differently over time. The courts, Congress, the President, and the people's changing understandings can all influence how the Constitution is implemented in practice, even without formal amendments.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment