Amending The Constitution: A Tough Task

The United States Constitution was written to endure for ages to come, and the framers made it difficult to amend the document to ensure its longevity. Since the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, it can only be changed through the amendment process, which is time-consuming and rarely used. The process requires a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Additionally, three-fourths of the states must ratify the amendment. The Constitution has only been amended 27 times since 1787, and the difficulty of the process has led to many unsuccessful attempts at reform.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$105.46 $150

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $14.95

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Amendments require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress

Amending the US Constitution is a challenging task. The Constitution's framers intended for it to be an "enduring" document, and while they knew it would need to be amended to meet future challenges and crises, they also wanted to ensure it would last.

A proposed amendment must be passed by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate (also known as both houses of Congress). This is a high bar to clear, and it becomes even more challenging when there is significant partisan division. When political parties are more divided, it becomes harder to reach the required supermajority agreement, as legislatures are often not represented by a single political party.

The concentration of legislative power within a single party can also impact the likelihood of an amendment passing. If the dominant party is open to pushing through an amendment without opposition support, it may be easier to achieve the necessary two-thirds majority. However, this can also create a political reality that thwarts amendment, with certain amendments becoming impossible to pass due to strong opposition from the dominant party.

The dynamic nature of constitutional politics also plays a role. The configuration of congressional power, the evolution of constitutional norms, and the interactions between executives, legislators, judges, and the people can all influence the difficulty of amending the Constitution at any given time.

The requirement of a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress is just one aspect of what makes amending the US Constitution challenging. The process is deliberately designed to be difficult, ensuring that any changes to the Constitution are carefully considered and have a significant impact on the nation and its citizens.

Amendments need ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures

Amending the US Constitution is a challenging and time-consuming process. The Constitution's framers intended for it to be a durable document that would "endure for ages to come". To achieve this, they made the process of amending it difficult.

A proposed amendment must first be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress. This is the first significant hurdle, as achieving a supermajority agreement can be challenging, especially in times of political division. Once an amendment is proposed by Congress, the Archivist of the United States is responsible for administering the ratification process.

The critical aspect that addresses the topic's focus is the requirement for ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures, which equates to 38 out of 50 states. This means that even if an amendment proposal manages to gain the necessary support in Congress, it still faces a formidable task in garnering approval from a significant majority of states. This step ensures that any amendment reflects a broad consensus across the country and is not just the will of the federal government.

The process of ratification involves the state legislatures formally submitting the amendment to their states, after which the states take action on the proposal. If a state ratifies the amendment, it sends an original or certified copy of the state's action to the Archivist, who then passes it on to the Director of the Federal Register for examination and custody. Once an amendment is ratified by the required number of states, the Director of the Federal Register drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify the amendment's validity. This certification is published in the Federal Register, marking the completion of the amendment process.

The requirement for ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures is a crucial component of the amendment process outlined in Article V of the Constitution. It ensures that any changes made to the Constitution reflect the will of a significant majority of states and protects against hasty or partisan changes to the nation's foundational document.

Political circumstances can make amendments harder or easier

The United States Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come". To ensure its longevity, the framers made it a challenging task to amend the document. The difficulty in amending the Constitution is further influenced by political circumstances, which can either ease or complicate the process.

Political circumstances play a crucial role in determining the feasibility of constitutional amendments. The level of partisan division is a significant factor; when political parties are deeply divided, achieving the required supermajority agreement becomes more challenging. On the other hand, when a single party holds a dominant position and is willing to cooperate, amending the Constitution may become more feasible, assuming the party is open to pushing through changes without opposition support.

The configuration of congressional power and the dynamics of multilevel political agreement and disagreement can also impact the amendment process. For instance, the convergence of constitutional structures of federalism with variable political dynamics can result in constitutional paralysis, hindering the implementation of amendments.

The evolution of constitutional norms and political practices over time, shaped by the interactions among executives, legislators, judges, and the people, can either facilitate or hinder amendments. Additionally, the perception of the Constitution as being challenging to amend, referred to as "the myth of unamendability," can become a self-fulfilling prophecy, further contributing to the difficulty of enacting amendments.

The demand for amendments can also be influenced by the availability of substitutes, such as informal amendments or judicial lawmaking. In some cultures, there may be a greater acceptance of frequent amendments and judicial lawmaking, while in others, resistance to change may prevail.

Furthermore, the number of states and the population size can impact the difficulty of amending the Constitution. As the nation grew in size and population, the process of securing the required majority for amendments became more challenging.

Explore related products

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.59 $180

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$15.99 $26.99

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought

$95

The US Constitution's amendment procedures give veto power to constitutional players in both levels of government

The US Constitution was written "to endure for ages to come", and as such, the process of amending it is deliberately difficult and time-consuming. The US Constitution's amendment procedures give veto power to constitutional players in both levels of government, allowing for a system of checks and balances that ensures any changes to the Constitution are carefully considered and widely supported.

The process of amending the Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. An amendment may be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Once an amendment is proposed by Congress, it must be ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) to become part of the Constitution. This ratification process gives veto power to both the national legislature and the states. The national legislature can block an amendment by failing to reach the required two-thirds majority vote, and a cohort of thirteen states can prevent an amendment from being ratified.

The amendment process is deliberately designed to be challenging, requiring supermajority agreement across legislatures that may not be controlled by a single political party. This helps to ensure that amendments have broad support and are not passed due to the dominance of a single party. The likelihood of a successful amendment rises when political parties are willing to cooperate and decreases during periods of political division.

The complexity of the amendment process also stems from the interplay between federalism and multilevel political agreement or disagreement. The convergence of constitutional structures at the federal and state levels can lead to constitutional paralysis, making it challenging to secure the necessary consensus for amendments.

While the President does not have a formal role in the amendment process, they can indirectly influence it through their veto power over legislation. If Congress passes a bill to propose an amendment and sends it to the President, the President can veto it and prevent it from becoming law. However, Congress can override the presidential veto with a two-thirds vote in both chambers. This dynamic between the executive and legislative branches adds another layer of complexity to the amendment process.

In summary, the US Constitution's amendment procedures give veto power to constitutional players at both the national and state levels. This distributed power dynamic ensures that amending the Constitution is a challenging and deliberate process, requiring broad consensus and safeguarding the enduring nature of the document.

Amendments require supermajority agreement in legislatures

The United States Constitution was written to be an "enduring" document. The framers of the Constitution made it difficult to amend to ensure its longevity. The Constitution has been amended only 27 times since it was drafted in 1787.

Amendments to the Constitution require a supermajority agreement in legislatures. This means that a proposed amendment must be passed by two-thirds of both houses of Congress (a supermajority). This is a challenging feat, as it requires significant support from both political parties. If an amendment is passed by Congress, it is then sent to the states for ratification.

The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately challenging and time-consuming. In addition to requiring a supermajority in Congress, a proposed amendment must also be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states). This requirement gives veto power to a cohort of 13 states, which can block any amendment proposal. The likelihood of an amendment's defeat rises in periods of political division and high partisan division.

The dynamic nature of constitutional politics also plays a role in the difficulty of amending the Constitution. The configuration of congressional power, the consolidation and disintegration of legislative majorities within and across states, and the evolution of constitutional norms and political practices all influence the amendment process.

The process of amending the Constitution in the United States is complex and demanding, requiring broad support and agreement across legislatures.

Frequently asked questions