Hamilton's Constitutional Opponents: Who Were They?

Alexander Hamilton, a lawyer, statesman, and founder of the Federalist Party, played a significant role in the formation and ratification of the US Constitution. Hamilton was a strong advocate for a federal government that united the 13 states and promoted his views through The Federalist Papers, a series of essays written with James Madison and John Jay. However, his ideas faced opposition from Anti-Federalists, who feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and threatened the liberties won during the Revolution. At the New York ratification convention, Hamilton and 19 other Federalists faced 47 Anti-Federalists, but Hamilton's persuasive arguments ultimately led to New York's ratification of the Constitution. Hamilton's commitment to federalism, executive power, and his interpretation of constitutional government left a lasting impact on the US political system.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$10 $15.59

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Federalist Papers, Extended Edition: An Essential Collection of The Original, Unabridged Text (1787–88) With Detailed Commentary on Each Essay to Guide you Through America's Founding Ideas

$24.95

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

Hamilton's views on federal power

Alexander Hamilton was a strong supporter of federal power. He believed that a unitary executive was a necessary ingredient for a quick, decisive executive to conduct war. In Federalist No. 70, he argued that a plural executive leads to a lack of accountability and that misconduct and disagreements among members of the council contributed to the decline of the Roman Empire. Hamilton's views on federal power were shaped by his experiences as an artillery officer in the American Revolutionary War and as an aide to Commander-in-Chief George Washington. He had firsthand knowledge of the difficulties involved in funding and operating the Continental Army, which influenced his belief in the need for a strong federal government.

Hamilton's proposal for the new government was modeled on the British system, which he considered the "best in the world." Under his system, senators and a national "governor" would be chosen by special electors and would serve for life. Members of an assembly would be elected directly by citizens and would serve three-year terms. State governors would be chosen by the national governor. Hamilton's plan was not adopted, but he played a crucial role in the ratification and interpretation of the Constitution. He collaborated with James Madison and John Jay on the Federalist Papers, a collection of 85 articles and essays written under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the Constitution.

Hamilton consistently sided with greater federal power at the expense of the states, which placed him at odds with Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers. Jefferson, in particular, opposed Hamilton's support for a de facto central bank, arguing that no specific authorization for its establishment existed in the Constitution. Hamilton, on the other hand, believed that a central bank was permissible under Congress's constitutional authority to issue currency, regulate interstate commerce, and do what was "necessary and proper" to enact the provisions of the Constitution.

Hamilton's views became the basis for the Federalist Party, which was opposed by the Democratic-Republican Party led by Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton and the Federalists supported the Haitian Revolution and helped draft Haiti's constitution in 1801. In 1790, he persuaded Congress to establish the U.S. Revenue Cutter Service to protect American shipping. Hamilton's policies and interpretations of the Constitution have proven greatly influential in the development of the U.S. government and continue to be cited in scholarly studies and court decisions.

Anti-Federalists' opposition

Alexander Hamilton's views on the Constitution were opposed by Anti-Federalists, who feared that the document gave too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states, threatening the liberties won in the American Revolution. This opposition was particularly prominent in New York, where Anti-Federalists like Governor George Clinton held power. Hamilton's former colleagues, Robert Yates and John Lansing Jr., also opposed his goal of a strong national government. They worked with Clinton to campaign against the ratification of the Constitution, arguing that it would eliminate the liberty of New Yorkers.

Hamilton's plan for a new national government was also met with resistance. He proposed a president and senators who would serve for life, contingent on "good behaviour", which many saw as a form of monarchy. This idea contributed to a hostile view of Hamilton as a monarchist sympathizer, particularly from James Madison. Hamilton's preference for a constitutional monarchy and his interpretation of the Constitution, which favoured greater federal power, placed him at odds with Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers.

Despite this opposition, Hamilton played a crucial role in the ratification of the Constitution. He collaborated with James Madison and John Jay on the Federalist Papers, a collection of 85 articles and essays written under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote ratification. Hamilton's campaign in New York, where he spoke passionately and logically in support of the Constitution, was particularly challenging due to the strong Anti-Federalist presence. However, his efforts were successful, and New York became the eleventh state to ratify the Constitution.

Hamilton's influence extended beyond the ratification process. His interpretations of the Constitution, set forth in The Federalist Papers, remain highly influential and continue to be cited in scholarly studies and court decisions. Hamilton's policies and constitutional interpretations, particularly of the Necessary and Proper Clause, have greatly influenced the development of the US government and set precedents for federal authority.

Hamilton's proposal for a national government

Alexander Hamilton, an American military officer, statesman, and Founding Father, played a crucial role in shaping the early political and economic landscape of the United States. Hamilton's proposal for a national government, presented during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, reflected his vision for a strong and centralised authority.

Hamilton's plan, often referred to as "The Hamilton Plan", advocated for a bicameral legislature consisting of a House and a Senate. The House, or the lower chamber, would be directly elected by the citizens and serve a three-year term. On the other hand, the Senate would be composed of senators chosen by special electors from electoral districts and would hold their offices for life. This proposal mirrored the British system, which Hamilton admired and considered the "best in the world."

At the heart of Hamilton's proposal was the idea of a powerful executive. He envisioned a national "governor" chosen by the people through a popular vote in electoral districts. This governor would serve during good behaviour or for life, a suggestion that initially garnered no endorsements from his fellow delegates. Additionally, Hamilton proposed that state governors be appointed by the federal government, specifically by the national governor.

Hamilton's economic policies further emphasised his preference for a robust national government. He proposed the establishment of a federal bank modelled after the Bank of England, with key differences. Hamilton wanted to exclude the government from involvement in public debt while ensuring a stable and flexible money supply to support economic development and business operations. To address the issue of national currency, Hamilton suggested minting a United States dollar comparable in weight to the Spanish peso, the most circulated coin in the United States at the time.

Explore related products

The Essential Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers (Hackett Classics)

$11 $11

The Anti-Federalist Papers Publisher: Signet Classics

$11.53 $24.99

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers

$10.95

The Federalist Papers Made Easier: The Complete and Original Text Subdivided and Annotated for Easier Understanding

$24.95 $24.95

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

Hamilton's influence on the ratification

Alexander Hamilton was a key figure in the ratification of the US Constitution. Hamilton was just 30 years old when he was selected to serve as one of New York's delegates at the Constitutional Convention in 1787. He had spent years pondering the issues the delegates would face, and his experience as an artillery officer in the American Revolutionary War and as an aide to Commander-in-Chief George Washington gave him valuable insight into the difficulties of funding and operating the Continental Army.

Hamilton's proposal for the new government was modelled on the British system, which he considered the "best in the world". He proposed that senators and a national "governor" would be chosen by special electors and would serve for life, while members of an assembly would be elected directly by citizens for three-year terms. Hamilton's plan was not adopted, and his direct influence at the Convention was limited. His fellow delegates rejected the extreme degree to which his plan concentrated power at the federal level, but they also understood that giving more power to the central government was necessary for the nation's survival.

Hamilton played a significant role in the ratification process, particularly through his collaboration with James Madison and John Jay on the Federalist Papers. This was a collection of 85 articles and essays written under the pseudonym "Publius" to promote the ratification of the Constitution. Hamilton wrote 51 of these essays, and the Federalist Papers were essential in convincing Americans across the country to support the Constitution.

Hamilton was a Federalist, and Federalists supported ratification. Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government and worked to convince the states to reject it. Hamilton's home state of New York was particularly problematic, as the other two delegates from New York had fled the convention in anger and Anti-Federalists such as Governor George Clinton held power in the state. However, Hamilton was well-prepared to defend the Constitution, and his persuasive abilities played a critical role in gaining support for ratification.

Hamilton's interpretations of the Constitution, as set forth in The Federalist Papers, continue to be highly influential. They have been cited in scholarly studies and court decisions, particularly in support of greater federal power at the expense of state power. Hamilton's views became the basis for the Federalist Party, which was opposed by the Democratic-Republican Party led by Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton consistently took the side of greater federal power, placing him at odds with Jefferson and other Founding Fathers.

Hamilton's monarchist leanings

Alexander Hamilton's views on the US Constitution were shaped by his experiences as an artillery officer in the American Revolutionary War, where he fought against the British Army. He then served as an aide to Commander-in-Chief George Washington, witnessing the challenges of funding and leading the Continental Army. Hamilton's wartime experiences influenced his belief in the need for a stronger central government and a powerful executive, as outlined in his proposal for a new government at the Constitutional Convention in 1787.

Hamilton's proposal, which he acknowledged bore similarities to an elective monarchy, included a national "governor" chosen for life by special electors, senators chosen for life with removal contingent on "good behaviour", and an assembly elected directly by citizens for three-year terms. Hamilton's plan was not adopted, but he played a significant role in the Constitution's ratification and interpretation, particularly through his collaboration with James Madison and John Jay on the Federalist Papers.

Hamilton's preference for a strong central government and his interpretation of the Constitution's Necessary and Proper Clause placed him at odds with Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers, who favoured more states' rights and opposed his support for a central bank. Jefferson characterised Hamilton as a "monarchist" and accused him of corruption, claiming he swayed Congress to his will. Hamilton's views became the basis for the Federalist Party, which was opposed by Jefferson's Democratic-Republican Party.

Hamilton's defence of his proposal for a president for life drew on the example of the British monarchy, arguing that the monarch's personal interest and self-preservation aligned with the country's interests and reduced the influence of foreign powers. He also believed that a longer term for the executive would provide stability and motivation to act in the nation's long-term interests. However, Hamilton's ideas contributed to a hostile view of him as a monarchist sympathiser, and he was displeased with certain aspects of the final Constitution.

Hamilton's influence extended beyond the US, as he helped draft Haiti's constitution in 1801 and supported the Haitian Revolution. His policies and interpretations of the US Constitution continue to be influential, shaping the development of the US government and providing precedents for federal authority that are still cited by courts.

Frequently asked questions