Donating To Political Campaigns: Who's Most Likely?

who is more likely to donate to a political campaign

Political donations are an integral part of election campaigns, with individuals, corporations, and organizations contributing financially to support candidates and parties. In recent years, the share of Americans donating to political campaigns has increased, with 12% reporting donations in 2016, up from 6% in 1992. Various factors influence the likelihood of individuals donating to political campaigns, including age, income, education, and political engagement. Older, higher-income, and more educated Americans are more inclined to donate, with income and education levels showing a strong correlation. Political engagement also plays a significant role, with those actively following government affairs and frequent voters being more likely to contribute financially. Additionally, ultra-wealthy individuals, often referred to as megadonors, can significantly influence election outcomes by contributing substantial amounts to candidates and super Political Action Committees (PACs).

Characteristics Values
Political engagement More likely to donate
Education level Higher education, more likely to donate
Income Higher income, more likely to donate
Age Older, more likely to donate
Political affiliation Democrats more likely to donate than Republicans
Ultra-wealthy philanthropists Ken Griffin, Paul Singer, Michael Bloomberg, and Reid Hoffman are mega-donors
Passion for a candidate or cause More likely to donate

cycivic

Income, education, and age

Education also plays a crucial role in an individual's propensity to donate. The same survey revealed that 29% of people with postgraduate degrees contributed to political campaigns, compared to 24% with college degrees and 7% with a high school diploma or less. This indicates that higher educational attainment correlates with increased political engagement through financial contributions.

Age is another factor that influences donation behaviour. Older Americans are more likely to donate than younger ones. The average donation rate for those aged 18 to 29 is 9%, while it increases to 32% for individuals aged 65 and above. This trend may be attributed to various factors, including accumulated wealth, increased political interest, or a sense of civic duty among older adults.

While income, education, and age are critical factors, other aspects, such as political engagement and affiliation, also come into play. Individuals who actively follow government affairs and vote regularly are more inclined to donate. For instance, during the 2016 campaign, 28% of politically engaged Americans made donations, compared to less than 7% of those less engaged. Additionally, Democrats have been found to be more likely to donate than Republicans, with higher donation rates in recent years.

The reasons for donating vary, with some individuals strongly supporting a candidate, passionate about specific issues, or believing in the impact of their financial contributions. However, it is worth noting that most Americans have never donated to political campaigns, and many believe that money has too much influence on politics.

cycivic

Political engagement

Americans who are more politically engaged are more likely to donate to political campaigns. This was evident in the 2016 campaign, where those closely following government affairs and politics were more inclined to contribute financially. Voting behaviour also plays a role, with frequent voters being more likely to donate than those who vote infrequently or not at all. Political affiliation matters too, with Democrats historically showing a higher propensity to donate than Republicans.

Income, Education, and Age Factors

Higher-income individuals are more likely to donate to political campaigns. Those with family incomes of $150,000 or more are more inclined to contribute, with nearly a third reporting political donations. Education is another critical factor, as those with postgraduate degrees or college degrees are more likely to donate than those with a high school diploma or less. Older Americans also tend to outpace younger ones in terms of donation rates, with the 65-and-older age group having the highest donation rate at 32%.

Passion and Beliefs

Many individuals donate to political campaigns because they passionately support a candidate, a specific issue, or their political party. This passion and belief in a candidate or cause can be a strong motivator for financial contributions. It's a way for people to actively participate in the political process and feel engaged in civics, even if their individual donations are relatively small.

Mega-Donors and Ultra-Wealthy Philanthropists

A significant factor in political donations is the influence of mega-donors and ultra-wealthy philanthropists. Individuals like Ken Griffin, Paul Singer, Michael Bloomberg, and Reid Hoffman can collectively contribute hundreds of millions of dollars to candidates and super PACs. These donations can have a substantial impact on influencing voters and shaping political outcomes.

Advertising and Gen Z

Advertising plays a pivotal role in spurring donations, with half of previous donors citing ads from candidates or political parties as a motivating factor. Gen Zers are particularly susceptible to advertising, with 76% reporting that ads influenced their decision to donate, significantly higher than other age groups.

cycivic

Ultra-wealthy philanthropists

The use of "dark money" in politics, or donations from undisclosed sources, has also been on the rise since the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court Citizens United ruling. This allows wealthy individuals and corporations to funnel money through nonprofits and avoid disclosure, further complicating the tracing of influence in political campaigns. While it is challenging to track the exact flow of money, it is clear that ultra-wealthy philanthropists are significant contributors to political campaigns, and their influence is likely even greater than what is publicly known.

In addition to direct contributions to candidates, ultra-wealthy philanthropists also utilize other avenues to influence politics. For example, they may contribute to traditional PACs, which have donation limits, or they may engage in grant-making through charitable organizations and foundations. While incorporated charitable organizations are prohibited from contributing to federal elections, they can still engage in political activity to a certain extent.

The impact of these donations is significant, especially in states like Pennsylvania, where politicians operate in a system that incentivizes extensive fundraising. In Pennsylvania, powerful interests donated $18 million to the state's top lawmakers, with the largest contribution coming from donors connected to K-12 schools. While donations do not guarantee that lawmakers will align with the interests of donors, the influence of money in politics remains a concern for many.

Overall, ultra-wealthy philanthropists play a significant role in political campaigns through their substantial financial contributions. Their influence is likely to continue growing as election cycles see increasing donations from these individuals, impacting the democratic process and policy-making in the United States.

cycivic

Democrats vs Republicans

Political donations from individuals represent a large share of campaign funding. In the 2016 election cycle, 71% of Hillary Clinton's fundraising total and 40% of Donald Trump's came from individual contributions.

According to a 2023 NBC News poll, 30% of registered voters made campaign contributions within the past two years. Of those voters, 37% were Democrats, 26% were Republicans, and 22% were independents. This marks the first election since at least 1992 when Democrats have been significantly more likely than Republicans to donate.

Several factors influence the likelihood of individuals donating to political campaigns. One factor is age, with older Americans being more likely to contribute than younger Americans. Income is also a factor, as higher-income individuals tend to donate more. For instance, among those who donated, 27% of those with family incomes of $150,000 or more contributed more than $250, while only 16% of contributors with incomes between $75,000 and $150,000 gave at least $250. Education is another factor, with individuals with higher levels of education being more likely to donate.

While the data shows varying results regarding the donation patterns of Democrats and Republicans, it is important to note that only a tiny fraction of Americans make campaign contributions to political candidates, parties, or PACs.

cycivic

Why people donate

Political donations from individuals make up a large share of campaign funding. For instance, in the 2016 election cycle, 71% of Hillary Clinton's fundraising total and 40% of Donald Trump's came from individual contributions. A study by Blackbaud suggested that donors who gave to presidential and other federal candidates in the 2012 election tended to increase their overall donations to charity that year. Charitable giving increased in nine of the last ten presidential election years.

There are several reasons why people donate to political campaigns. Firstly, people who are more politically engaged are more likely to donate. During the 2016 campaign, politically engaged Americans were much more likely to make political donations. Among those who said they always or nearly always voted, 21% said they had made a donation, compared with 4% of those who seldom voted or only voted part of the time.

Secondly, higher-income, more educated, and older Americans are more likely to donate. According to the 2016 Pew Research Center survey, 32% of those with family incomes of $150,000 or more made a political donation, compared to 7% of those with family incomes below $30,000. The survey also found that 29% of those with a postgraduate degree reported donating, compared to 7% of those with a high school diploma or less. Additionally, older Americans are more likely to contribute than younger Americans, with a 32% donation rate for those aged 65 and older, compared to 9% for those aged 18 to 29.

Thirdly, people donate because they believe in a particular candidate, cause, or issue and want to support them. It is a way for individuals to engage in civics and participate in the country's political system. As one source states, "voting with your dollars" carries more weight than simply casting a ballot on election day.

Lastly, advertising plays a role in influencing people to donate. According to LendingTree, half of previous donors (50%) say they have been motivated to donate by an ad from a candidate or political party, with Gen Zers being the most receptive to political advertising.

Frequently asked questions

According to a 2016 survey, politically engaged Americans are more likely to donate to political campaigns. Those who follow government and public affairs most of the time reported donating at a rate of 28%, compared to less than 7% for those who follow some of the time or less. Democrats were twice as likely as Republicans to say they donated, with 22% of Democrats and 10% of Republicans reporting donations.

Older, more educated, and higher-income Americans are also more likely to donate. A 2016 survey found that 32% of those with family incomes of $150,000 or more made a political donation, compared to 7% of those with incomes under $30,000. The survey also showed that 29% of those with postgraduate degrees donated, compared to 7% of those with a high school diploma or less. The average donation rate for those aged 18-29 was 9%, while for those aged 65 and older, it was 32%.

People donate to political campaigns to support a candidate, party, or cause they believe in. Donations can be seen as a form of speech protected by the Constitution, allowing individuals to publicly express their support. Some also view donating as a way to participate in the civic system and influence politics, even if their contribution is small.

Advertising plays a role in influencing donors. Half of previous donors (50%) say they were motivated to donate by ads from candidates or political parties, with Gen Zers being the most susceptible at 76%.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment