The Origins Of Realism Politics: Who Shaped This Theory?

The concept of realism in politics, a dominant theory in international relations, traces its roots to ancient thinkers like Thucydides, who emphasized power dynamics and self-interest in his historical accounts. However, the modern formulation of political realism is often attributed to Hans Morgenthau, a 20th-century political scientist whose seminal work, *Politics Among Nations* (1948), systematized realism as a framework centered on state sovereignty, power struggles, and the anarchic nature of the international system. Morgenthau’s ideas built upon earlier contributions from thinkers like Niccolò Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes, who explored themes of human nature, statecraft, and the pursuit of power. While Morgenthau is widely regarded as the father of classical realism, the theory has since evolved through the works of scholars like Kenneth Waltz, who introduced structural realism, and others who have expanded its scope to address contemporary global challenges. Thus, realism’s invention is not attributed to a single individual but rather to a lineage of thinkers who collectively shaped its enduring influence on political thought.

Explore related products

Political Realism in Apocalyptic Times

$29.33 $45

The Political Theory of the American Founding: Natural Rights, Public Policy, and the Moral Conditions of Freedom

$28.13 $42

Realism in Political Theory

$44.79 $55.99

The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory

$62.07 $67

Assemblage Theory (Speculative Realism)

$28.99 $27.86

Husserlian Phenomenology and Contemporary Political Realism (Routledge Innovations in Political Theory)

$54.99 $54.99

E.H. Carr's Contribution: Carr's The Twenty Years' Crisis is foundational to classical realism

E.H. Carr’s *The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations* is a seminal work that laid the groundwork for classical realism in international relations theory. Published in 1939, the book emerged as a critique of the idealist assumptions that dominated interwar thinking, particularly those associated with the League of Nations and the belief in collective security. Carr argued that idealism, with its emphasis on moral principles and international cooperation, failed to account for the anarchic nature of the international system and the primacy of power politics. His work marked a turning point in the study of international relations, shifting the focus from normative aspirations to the realities of state behavior and power dynamics.

Carr’s central contribution to classical realism lies in his distinction between *utopia* and *reality* in international politics. He criticized idealists for their utopian belief in a world governed by universal moral principles, arguing that such ideas were disconnected from the actual behavior of states. Carr asserted that politics is inherently about power, and states act primarily in their self-interest. He famously stated, “Politics is a struggle for power, and the ultimate form of power is the unlimited power of a world state.” This realist perspective emphasized the anarchic structure of the international system, where the absence of a central authority compels states to rely on self-help and the pursuit of power to ensure their survival.

Another key aspect of Carr’s contribution is his analysis of the interwar period, which he saw as a crisis of liberalism and idealism. He argued that the failure of the Versailles system and the rise of revisionist powers like Nazi Germany exposed the inadequacies of idealist approaches. Carr’s critique of the League of Nations highlighted the limitations of institutions that lacked enforcement mechanisms and the political will of great powers. By grounding his analysis in historical events, Carr demonstrated the empirical relevance of realism, making it a more compelling framework for understanding international politics.

Carr also introduced the concept of *political realism* as a method of analysis rather than a set of prescriptions. He distinguished between *realists* and *idealists* not as moral opposites but as different ways of understanding the world. For Carr, realism was about recognizing the world as it is, not as one wishes it to be. This methodological focus on power and interest became a cornerstone of classical realism, influencing later thinkers like Hans Morgenthau, who further developed realist theory in the post-World War II era.

In conclusion, E.H. Carr’s *The Twenty Years’ Crisis* is foundational to classical realism because it provided a systematic critique of idealism, emphasized the centrality of power in international politics, and grounded realist theory in historical analysis. By challenging utopian assumptions and focusing on the realities of state behavior, Carr established realism as a dominant paradigm in the study of international relations. His work remains essential reading for understanding the origins and enduring relevance of realist thought in global politics.

Hans Morgenthau's Role: Morgenthau's Politics Among Nations defines realism's core principles

Hans Morgenthau, a German-American political scientist, is widely regarded as one of the most influential figures in the development of classical realism in international relations. His seminal work, *Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace* (1948), is a cornerstone text that defines the core principles of realism. Morgenthau's role in shaping realism cannot be overstated, as he systematically articulated the theory's assumptions about human nature, the state, and the international system. By grounding his analysis in the pursuit of power and the anarchic nature of international politics, Morgenthau provided a framework that continues to influence scholars and policymakers alike.

In *Politics Among Nations*, Morgenthau identifies six core principles of realism. First, he argues that politics is governed by objective laws derived from human nature, which is characterized by a constant desire for power. This view contrasts with idealist perspectives that emphasize morality or progress. Second, Morgenthau asserts that the state is the primary actor in international relations, driven by its interest in survival and power maximization. Third, he highlights the anarchic structure of the international system, where there is no central authority above states, leading to a self-help environment. Fourth, Morgenthau emphasizes the importance of national interest, defined in terms of power, as the guiding principle of foreign policy. Fifth, he underscores the role of power, both military and non-military, as the means to achieve national goals. Finally, Morgenthau advocates for moral considerations in foreign policy but insists they must be tempered by political realism to avoid impractical idealism.

Morgenthau's contribution lies in his ability to synthesize these principles into a coherent and actionable theory. He rejects the notion that international relations can be transformed by moral appeals or legal frameworks alone, arguing instead that states must act prudently within the constraints of the anarchic system. This pragmatic approach distinguishes realism from other schools of thought and makes it particularly relevant in understanding and predicting state behavior. Morgenthau's focus on power and interest also provides a critical lens through which to analyze historical and contemporary conflicts, from the Cold War to modern geopolitical rivalries.

Moreover, Morgenthau's work in *Politics Among Nations* extends beyond theoretical abstraction; it offers practical guidance for policymakers. He stresses the importance of understanding the balance of power, the limits of moral universalism, and the necessity of strategic thinking. By doing so, Morgenthau bridges the gap between academic theory and political practice, ensuring that realism remains a vital tool for navigating the complexities of international politics. His emphasis on the enduring nature of power struggles and the state-centric system has proven remarkably resilient, even as the global landscape has evolved.

In conclusion, Hans Morgenthau's *Politics Among Nations* is a defining text that crystallizes the core principles of realism. His role in shaping the theory is unparalleled, as he provided a clear and comprehensive framework for understanding international relations through the lens of power, interest, and anarchic structure. Morgenthau's realism remains a foundational perspective in the study of global politics, offering both analytical rigor and practical insights into the behavior of states in an uncertain world. His legacy endures as a testament to the enduring relevance of realism in explaining and addressing the challenges of international affairs.

Thucydides' Influence: Ancient historian Thucydides is often cited as realism's precursor

The influence of the ancient Greek historian Thucydides on the development of political realism is profound and widely acknowledged. Often regarded as a precursor to realist thought, Thucydides' seminal work, *History of the Peloponnesian War*, provides a detailed account of the conflict between Athens and Sparta in the 5th century BCE. His analytical approach to history and politics laid the groundwork for many of the principles that would later define realism as a political theory. Thucydides focused on power dynamics, state interests, and the role of human nature in shaping political outcomes, themes that are central to realist philosophy.

One of Thucydides' most significant contributions to realism is his emphasis on the primacy of power in international relations. In his narrative, states act out of self-interest and a desire for survival and dominance, rather than moral or ethical considerations. This is exemplified in the Melian Dialogue, where Athens bluntly asserts its power over the neutral island of Melos, stating, "The strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must." This stark portrayal of power politics resonates with realist thinkers, who argue that states operate in an anarchic international system where power is the ultimate currency.

Thucydides also introduced the concept of "realpolitik," or practical politics, by analyzing events without idealism or moral judgment. He viewed history as driven by immutable forces such as fear, honor, and interest, rather than by abstract ideals or divine intervention. This empirical and pragmatic approach aligns closely with realism's focus on observable behavior and material capabilities of states. His method of historical inquiry, which sought to understand events as they actually occurred, has been adopted by realist scholars as a model for studying international relations.

Furthermore, Thucydides' exploration of human nature as a constant factor in politics is a cornerstone of realist thought. He argued that human behavior is predictable and shaped by self-interest, fear, and the pursuit of power. This pessimistic view of human nature contrasts with idealist perspectives that emphasize cooperation and progress. Realists, drawing on Thucydides, contend that while individuals and societies may change, the fundamental drivers of political behavior remain consistent, making conflict and competition inevitable in the international arena.

Finally, Thucydides' influence on realism is evident in his understanding of the balance of power and its role in maintaining stability. He observed how the rise of Athenian power and its imperial ambitions provoked Sparta and its allies, leading to war. This dynamic mirrors realist theories about the dangers of power imbalances and the need for states to counterbalance hegemonic actors. Thucydides' work thus provides a historical framework for understanding the recurring patterns of state behavior, making him an indispensable figure in the intellectual lineage of political realism.

Explore related products

Soviet Socialist Realism: Origins and Theory

$32.59 $54.99

Classics of Moral and Political Theory

$52 $52

Political Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction

$11.53 $12.99

How to Survive a Hostile World: Power, Politics, and the Case for Realism

$22 $24

Thucydides and the Ancient Simplicity: The Limits of Political Realism

$63 $63

Fascism (Key Concepts in Political Theory)

$19.95 $19.95

Machiavelli's Realism: The Prince introduces power-centric thinking, a realism cornerstone

Niccolò Machiavelli's *The Prince* is widely regarded as a foundational text in the development of political realism, introducing power-centric thinking as a cornerstone of this philosophy. Written in the early 16th century, the work is a pragmatic guide to statecraft, devoid of moralizing, and focused on the acquisition, maintenance, and exercise of power. Machiavelli's realism is rooted in the observation of human nature and political behavior as they are, rather than as they ought to be. He argues that effective leadership requires a clear-eyed understanding of power dynamics, often necessitating actions that may appear ruthless but are justified by the goal of state stability and security.

Central to Machiavelli's realism is the idea that politics is inherently a struggle for power. In *The Prince*, he advises rulers to prioritize the preservation of their authority above all else, even if it means employing deceit, force, or manipulation. This power-centric approach contrasts sharply with idealistic or moralistic views of governance, which emphasize justice, virtue, or religious principles. Machiavelli's realism is grounded in the belief that political success is determined by practical action and adaptability, not by adherence to abstract ideals. He famously asserts that it is better for a ruler to be feared than loved if he cannot be both, as fear ensures control and order.

Machiavelli's emphasis on power as the primary currency of politics laid the groundwork for realist thinking in international relations and political theory. His analysis of statecraft focuses on the balance of power, the role of military strength, and the necessity of strategic thinking in a competitive political environment. For Machiavelli, the state is an entity that must survive in an anarchic system, where self-reliance and strength are paramount. This perspective resonates with later realist thinkers, such as Hans Morgenthau, who similarly prioritized power and national interest in their analyses of international politics.

The Prince also introduces the concept of virtù, often misunderstood as virtue in the moral sense, but in Machiavelli's context, it refers to a leader's ability to act decisively and effectively in pursuit of power. This includes the capacity to adapt to changing circumstances, to use force when necessary, and to outmaneuver opponents. Machiavelli's virtù is a practical skill rather than a moral quality, reflecting his belief that successful leadership requires a focus on results rather than intentions. This idea underscores the power-centric nature of his realism, as it elevates the ability to achieve political goals above ethical considerations.

In conclusion, Machiavelli's *The Prince* is a seminal work that introduces power-centric thinking as a fundamental principle of political realism. By prioritizing the practicalities of statecraft over moral or idealistic concerns, Machiavelli established a framework for understanding politics as a relentless pursuit of power. His insights into human nature, leadership, and the dynamics of political survival continue to influence realist thought, making him a pivotal figure in the invention of realism in politics. Through *The Prince*, Machiavelli not only described the world as it is but also provided a manual for navigating its complexities with a focus on power as the ultimate political tool.

Realism's Evolution: Post-WWII, realism adapted to address nuclear and systemic challenges

The evolution of realism in international politics underwent a significant transformation in the post-World War II era, primarily due to the emergence of nuclear weapons and the systemic challenges of the Cold War. While classical realism, often associated with thinkers like Thucydides, Niccolò Machiavelli, and Hans Morgenthau, emphasized power politics and the anarchic nature of the international system, the post-WWII context demanded a reevaluation of these principles. The invention of the atomic bomb introduced an unprecedented level of destructive capability, forcing realists to adapt their theories to address the implications of nuclear deterrence and mutual assured destruction (MAD). This period marked a shift from classical realism to neorealism, with Kenneth Waltz emerging as a key figure in this evolution.

Kenneth Waltz, in his seminal work *Theory of International Politics* (1979), reformulated realism by focusing on the systemic constraints of the international system rather than the nature of human beings or states. Waltz argued that the anarchic structure of the international system, characterized by the absence of a central authority, compels states to act in self-interested ways to ensure survival. This structural realism, or neorealism, emphasized the distribution of power among states and the role of balancing behavior in maintaining stability. In the nuclear age, Waltz's theory highlighted how the bipolarity of the Cold War, with the United States and the Soviet Union as superpowers, created a system where mutual deterrence became a central mechanism for preventing large-scale conflict.

The adaptation of realism to address nuclear challenges also led to the development of defensive realism, a variant that stresses the limited goals of states in an anarchic system. Defensive realists, such as Robert Jervis and Jack Snyder, argued that states primarily seek security rather than unlimited power. In the nuclear context, this perspective emphasized the stabilizing effects of deterrence, as states recognized the catastrophic consequences of nuclear war. Jervis, in particular, explored how perceptions and signaling in a nuclear world could either mitigate or exacerbate tensions, underscoring the importance of strategic stability in preventing accidental or intentional conflict.

Systemic challenges beyond nuclear weapons also shaped realism's evolution during this period. The Cold War introduced complexities such as ideological competition, proxy wars, and the role of international institutions. Realists like John Mearsheimer later built on Waltz's foundation by critiquing the role of institutions and norms, arguing that they could not overcome the anarchic structure of the system. However, other scholars, such as Joseph Grieco, explored how states' relative gains concerns could hinder cooperation even in the presence of shared threats, further refining realist theory to account for the systemic dynamics of the post-WWII world.

In summary, the post-WWII era forced realism to adapt to the realities of nuclear weapons and systemic Cold War challenges. The shift from classical realism to neorealism, spearheaded by Kenneth Waltz, refocused the theory on systemic structures and the logic of deterrence. Subsequent developments, such as defensive realism, further nuanced the understanding of state behavior in a nuclearized world. This evolution ensured that realism remained a dominant paradigm in international relations, capable of addressing the unique complexities of the 20th century's geopolitical landscape.

Frequently asked questions