Malcolm Rivera
The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, meaning it tells the federal government or the state to leave people alone. It does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even basic ones such as maintaining law and order. The Constitution is supposed to protect citizens from tyranny, but it is not always clear whose interests it serves. For example, when the people went to the Supreme Court and asked them to stop Mississippi from invading their decisions about what kind of family they wanted to raise, the Supreme Court allowed every state to invade their peoples' privacy, opening the door to more violations.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Protects citizens from tyranny | Citizens have the right to jury trials in a criminal prosecution, to be secure in its persons, and to not house their own armed forces |
| Protects states from Federal tyranny | States have a right to jury trials in a criminal prosecution, to be secure in its persons, and to not house their own armed forces |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny
- The Constitution protects the states from Federal tyranny
- The Constitution protects citizens' right to privacy
- The Constitution protects citizens' right to a jury trial in a criminal prosecution
- The Constitution protects citizens' right to be secure in their persons
The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny
The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, which means it tells the federal government or the state to leave people alone. It does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even something as basic as maintaining law and order.
The absence of a bill of rights in the original Constitution generated a lot of controversy and nearly prevented its ratification. However, most of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention felt it was unnecessary to spell out people's rights in the national Constitution.
Despite the lack of a bill of rights, the Constitution has been interpreted by the Supreme Court as protecting certain rights, such as the right to privacy. However, the Supreme Court has also allowed states to invade the privacy of their citizens, which some argue opens the door to tyranny.
Citizenship Rights: Constitution's Promotion and Protection
You may want to see also
The Constitution protects the states from Federal tyranny
The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, which means it tells the federal government or the state to let people alone. It does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even something as basic as maintaining law and order.
The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny. However, some argue that the Federal government protecting the rights of citizens of the states is tyranny, which opens the door to tyranny of the states – something just as dangerous as tyranny of the Federal government.
The original Articles speak more about the requirements of the states than of prohibitions of actions by the Federal government. It could be argued that the Amendments protect the states from Federal tyranny, if you accept that states have a right to jury trials in a criminal prosecution, to be secure in its persons, and to not house their own armed forces.
The Supreme Court has been accused of allowing every state to invade its people's privacy, which opens the door to more violations.
The Constitution's Tyranny Safeguards: Freedom's Foundation
You may want to see also
The Constitution protects citizens' right to privacy
The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, which means it tells the federal government or the state to let people alone. It does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even something as basic as maintaining law and order.
The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny. This includes the right to privacy. For example, when the people went to the Supreme Court and asked them to stop Mississippi from invading their decisions about what kind of family they wanted to raise, based on an already established right to privacy, the Supreme Court allowed every state to invade their peoples' privacy.
The original Articles of the Constitution speak more about the requirements of the states than prohibitions of actions by the Federal government. It is possible that the Amendments protect citizens' right to privacy, if you accept that states have a right to jury trials in a criminal prosecution, to be secure in its persons, and to not house their own armed forces.
The Heroes Protecting America's Natural Resources
You may want to see also
Explore related products
The Constitution protects citizens' right to a jury trial in a criminal prosecution
The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, which means it tells the federal government or the state to leave people alone. It does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even something as basic as maintaining law and order.
The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny, including tyranny from the states. It grants citizens the right to a jury trial in a criminal prosecution, to be secure in their persons, and to not house their own armed forces.
The absence of a bill of rights in the original Constitution generated more controversy than any other aspect of the document and nearly prevented its ratification. Most of the delegates to the Constitutional Convention felt it was unnecessary to spell out people’s rights in the national Constitution.
The Supreme Court has the power to interpret the Constitution and can allow states to invade the privacy of their citizens, as seen in the case of Mississippi, which opened the door to more violations.
Immigration Status and Constitutional Rights: Who's Protected?
You may want to see also
The Constitution protects citizens' right to be secure in their persons
The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties, which means it tells the federal government or the state to leave people alone. It does not require the federal government or the state to provide services, even something as basic as maintaining law and order.
The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny. This includes the tyranny of the federal government, which some argue is the same as the federal government protecting the rights of citizens of the states. However, it also protects citizens from the tyranny of the states, which can be just as dangerous.
The Constitution also protects citizens' right to privacy. For example, when the people went to the Supreme Court and asked them to stop Mississippi from invading their decisions about what kind of family they wanted to raise, the Supreme Court allowed every state to invade their peoples' privacy, opening the door to more violations.
The Constitution also protects the states from federal tyranny. The original Articles speak more about the requirements of the states than the prohibitions of actions by the federal government. It is possible that the Amendments protect the states' right to jury trials in criminal prosecutions, to be secure in their persons, and to not house their own armed forces.
The White House: Ultimate Security and Protection Protocols
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The Constitution protects citizens from tyranny.
The Constitution tells the Federal government to let people alone; it does not require the Federal government to provide services, even something as basic as maintaining law and order.
The Constitution speaks more about the requirements of the states than prohibitions of actions by the Federal government.
