How Political Campaigns Are Funded And Why It Matters

Political campaigns are financed through a combination of public and private donations, with laws in place to regulate these contributions. These laws are designed to ensure transparency and fairness in the campaign financing process. They include limits on contribution amounts from individuals and organizations, disclosure requirements for donors and expenses, and restrictions on the use of funds. Political Action Committees (PACs), for instance, are exempt from certain contribution limits and can accept unlimited donations from various sources, including corporations and labor organizations. Additionally, public funding programs provide eligible candidates with federal funds to cover campaign expenses, with the aim of reducing the influence of private interests. These laws and regulations surrounding campaign financing aim to strike a balance between allowing candidates to raise the necessary funds for their campaigns while also maintaining integrity and fairness in the political process.

Explore related products

Campaign Finance: What Everyone Needs to Know®

$12.77 $16.95

Buying the Vote: A History of Campaign Finance Reform

$23.87 $51

The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook

$31.83

The Campaign Finance Cases: Buckley, McConnell, Citizens United, and McCutcheon (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$20.67 $29.99

Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution (The Tanner Lectures on Human Values)

$19.84 $32

PACs, Activism, & Campaign Finance Law: How You Can Quickly & Easily Build Your Own Political Action Committee using PACs, Super PACs, and FARA (The ... and the Science of Electioneering)

$19

Public funding for presidential campaigns

In the United States, the Federal Election Commission (FEC) plays a crucial role in administering the public funding program and determining candidate eligibility. The presidential public funding program aims to match individual contributions up to a certain amount and provide funding for major party nominees' general election campaigns, as well as assist eligible minor party nominees. This program is financed through taxpayers who voluntarily designate a portion of their taxes to the Presidential Election Campaign Fund.

To be eligible for public funds, presidential nominees of major parties must agree to limit their spending and refrain from accepting private contributions for their campaigns. They are, however, allowed to spend an additional amount from their personal funds, which does not count against the expenditure limit. The basic grant amount for major party nominees is $20 million, adjusted for inflation each presidential election year.

The concept of "clean elections" is also relevant to public funding for presidential campaigns. Clean elections typically involve candidates agreeing to limit their spending and private fundraising in exchange for government grants. While participation in clean elections is not legally required, it does come with certain restrictions and reporting requirements for candidates who choose to opt-out.

Limits on individual donors

Political campaigns can be financed by both public and private donations, and federal laws place limits on campaign contributions to candidates for President and Congress. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) enforces the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (FECA), which limits the amount of money individuals and political organisations can give to a candidate running for federal office.

The FEC also oversees public funding used in presidential elections, and eligible presidential candidates can receive federal government funds to pay for the expenses of their campaigns in both the primary and general elections. Under the presidential public funding program, the first $250 of each contribution from individuals to an eligible presidential candidate during the primary campaign is matched by federal funds. Major party nominees in the general election receive a grant of $20 million, plus the difference in the price index, and they may not accept private contributions for the campaign. Candidates may spend an additional $50,000 of their own personal funds, which does not count against the expenditure limit.

The FEC also sets campaign contribution limits for individuals and groups, and the Commission recommends that campaigns encourage contributors to designate their contributions for specific elections. Written designations promote consistency in reporting and avoid the appearance of excessive contributions. Undesignated contributions count against the donor's contribution limits for the candidate's next election.

While there are limits on individual donors, there are no limits on how much a Political Action Committee (PAC) can donate. PACs are regulated by the FEC and are supported by corporate interests.

Political Action Committees (PACs)

Federal law allows for two types of PACs: connected and non-connected. Connected PACs, also known as corporate PACs, are established by businesses, non-profits, labour unions, trade groups, or health organisations. They receive and raise money from a restricted class, such as managers and shareholders in the case of a corporation. Non-connected PACs are formed by groups with an ideological mission, single-issue groups, and members of Congress and other political leaders.

PACs are subject to certain rules and regulations. For example, the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA) created rules for disclosure, requiring all donations received by PACs to go through a central committee and for PACs to file regular reports disclosing anyone who has donated at least $200. Additionally, PACs must register with the FEC within 10 days of their formation, providing their name, address, treasurer, and any connected organisations.

There are also different types of PACs, including Super PACs and Hybrid PACs. Super PACs, or independent expenditure-only political action committees, can raise unlimited amounts from individuals, corporations, unions, and other groups but cannot coordinate with or contribute directly to candidate campaigns or political parties. Hybrid PACs, on the other hand, solicit and accept unlimited contributions but maintain a separate bank account subject to statutory amount limitations, allowing them to make contributions to federal candidates.

Explore related products

Campaign Finance & American Democracy: What the Public Really Thinks and Why It Matters

$2.99 $32

The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform

$29.17 $32

Campaign Finance and Political Polarization: When Purists Prevail

$29.95

Capital Campaigns: A Guide for Board Members and Others Who Aren't Professional Fundraisers but Who Will Be the Heroes Who Create a Better Community

$15.21 $17.95

The Elections of 2024 (Miller Center Studies on the Presidency)

$32.5 $32.5

Marketing ROI: The Path to Campaign, Customer, and Corporate Profitability

$20 $58

Contribution limits for parties

Political campaigns can be financed by both public and private donations. Individual donors can contribute up to a set amount, and finance laws require that donors and the amounts given be identified. However, there are no limits on how much a PAC (Political Action Committee) can donate.

The Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) increased the contribution limits for individuals giving to federal candidates and political parties. Every two years, the Federal Election Commission updates certain contribution limits, such as the amount individuals may give to candidates and party committees, which are indexed to inflation.

The presidential public funding program provides federal government funds to eligible presidential candidates to cover the qualified expenses of their political campaigns in both the primary and general elections. The program matches the first $250 of each contribution from individuals that an eligible presidential candidate receives during the primary campaign. To be eligible for public funds, candidates may not accept private contributions for the campaign.

There are also specific contribution limits for national party committees, which apply to their accounts for the presidential nominating convention, election recounts and contests, and other legal proceedings, as well as national party headquarters buildings. A national party committee, Senate campaign committee, and House campaign committee are considered separate entities with separate limits.

Additionally, there are rules regarding the designation of contributions. For example, if a contributor makes a contribution to a committee not authorized by any candidate, and it is known that a substantial portion will be spent on behalf of a particular candidate, the contribution counts against the contributor's per-election limit for that candidate. Written designations for contributions from political committees promote consistency in reporting and help avoid the appearance of excessive contributions.

Independent expenditures

The concept of independent expenditures has been the subject of legal rulings, notably the 1976 Buckley v. Valeo case heard by the United States Supreme Court. The Court upheld limits on contributions to candidates for Federal office but did not support restrictions on independent expenditures. Subsequently, in 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, in Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commission, ruled that political action committees (PACs) and other groups could make unlimited independent expenditures without restrictions on the source or size of contributions.

The FEC has established specific requirements for independent expenditures, including the need for a disclaimer. This disclaimer must identify the individual, group, political committee, corporation, or labour organization funding the communication and state that it was not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. The disclaimer must include the full name, address, telephone number, or website address of the payor and cannot be omitted, even on small items or apparel.

Despite regulations, critics argue that FEC rules are often circumvented through loopholes, resulting in coordinated independent expenditures. An example of this is the case of Jeb Bush and his Right to Rise super PAC, which raised scrutiny for perceived coordination in their dealings.

Overall, independent expenditures are a significant aspect of political campaign financing, allowing outside groups and individuals to support or oppose federal candidates without contribution limits. However, the potential for coordination and the exploitation of loopholes have led to ongoing debates and scrutiny surrounding this aspect of campaign financing.

Frequently asked questions