Federalist Speakers: Constitution Ratification Supporters

The ratification of the U.S. Constitution was a hotly debated topic, with Federalists arguing in favour of a strong national government. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay were among the prominent figures who contributed to the Federalist Papers, a collection of essays aimed at persuading the public to support the Constitution. To identify a Federalist speaker, look for comments that favour a robust federal government and centralised authority. They might also mention the need for federal control over trade or the importance of a national army.

Explore related products

The U.S. Constitution and Other Writings (Leather-bound Classics)

$13.21 $24.99

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

The Federalist Papers (Signet Classics)

$8.12 $8.95

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

The Federalist Papers: Large Print Unabridged 1787 Original Version

$27.99

Federalist Papers

The Federalist Papers were a collection of essays written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, which argued in favour of a strong national government. They believed that a centralised authority was crucial for maintaining order, providing for the common defence, and facilitating economic growth.

The Federalists were proponents of ratifying the U.S. Constitution, believing that a strong central government was necessary to avoid the chaos that might arise from weaker state governments and to ensure effective governance over the nation. They argued that federal control over trade and a national army were important, and that a unified government could better address national issues.

In contrast, Anti-Federalists such as Patrick Henry and George Mason opposed the ratification of the Constitution, warning that a powerful national government would violate natural rights and civil liberties, including the rights of conscience, trial by jury, and liberty of the press.

To identify a Federalist speaker, look for comments that favour a robust federal government and support the ratification of the Constitution.

Alexander Hamilton

Hamilton and the Federalists argued in favour of a strong national government, believing that a centralised authority was crucial for maintaining order, providing for the common defence, and facilitating economic growth. They felt that a strong central government was necessary to avoid the chaos that might arise from weaker state governments and to ensure effective governance over the nation.

Hamilton's views, therefore, aligned with those of the Federalists, who supported the ratification of the US Constitution.

James Madison

Madison was a key figure in the debate over the ratification of the Constitution, and his arguments in favour of a strong national government were well-structured and persuasive. He clashed with Anti-Federalists such as George Mason and Patrick Henry, who warned that a powerful national government would violate natural rights and civil liberties.

Madison's contributions to the Federalist Papers were significant, and he is known for his support of a strong federal government. He argued that federal control over trade and a national army were important, and that a unified government was necessary to address national issues effectively.

Madison's views on governance were aligned with the Federalists, and he played a crucial role in shaping the political landscape of the early United States. His arguments in favour of ratification helped to persuade the public and laid the foundation for the country's system of government.

Explore related products

The Federalist Papers, Extended Edition: An Essential Collection of The Original, Unabridged Text (1787–88) With Detailed Commentary on Each Essay to Guide you Through America's Founding Ideas

$24.95

The Federalist, Zinfadel Bourbon Barrel, 750mL

$16.25 $19.99

The Federalist Papers Made Easier: The Complete and Original Text Subdivided and Annotated for Easier Understanding

$24.95

The Federalist: A Commentary on the Constitution of the United States (Modern Library Classics)

$13.74 $24

The Federalist (Hackett Classics)

$19

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$10

John Jay

Jay was a prominent figure in the debate over the ratification of the Constitution, and his arguments in favour of a strong national government were well-structured and persuasive. He clashed with Anti-Federalists such as Patrick Henry, who warned that a powerful national government would violate natural rights and civil liberties.

Jay's contributions to the Federalist Papers were significant, and he is known for his support of a strong central government. He believed that federal control over trade and a national army were important, and that a unified government was necessary to address national issues. Jay's arguments were influential in shaping the public's opinion on the Constitution, and he played a key role in the eventual ratification of the document.

Jay's legacy is that of a strong advocate for a powerful national government and the ratification of the US Constitution. His ideas continue to shape American politics and governance, and he is remembered as one of the key figures in the country's early history.

George Mason

Mason was a delegate to Virginia’s ratifying convention. He was sometimes overshadowed by Patrick Henry, but he played a constructive role in pointing out perceived flaws in the new document and in recommending subsequent amendments. He also opposed the provision within the Constitution prohibiting ex post facto laws.

Mason was on good terms with Anti-Federalist James Monroe and with constitutional supporters Jefferson, Madison, and John Marshall. However, his opposition to the Constitution largely ended his relationship with George Washington.

On August 31, 1787, Mason seconded Massachusetts's Elbridge Gerry's motion to postpone consideration of the final document, stating that "he would sooner chop off his right hand than put it to the Constitution as it now stands". However, he did not rule out signing it, saying that he wanted to see how certain matters still before the convention were settled before deciding a final position.

Frequently asked questions