Amendments: The Constitution's 1791 Evolution

which section of the constitution was added 1791

The first ten amendments to the US Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, were added in 1791. These amendments defined citizens' rights in relation to the newly established government under the Constitution. During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, its opponents argued that it would open the way to tyranny by the central government. The First Amendment, for example, prohibits Congress from obstructing the exercise of certain individual freedoms, such as freedom of religion, speech, and assembly. The Second Amendment protects the right to keep and bear arms, while the Third Amendment prohibits the federal government from forcing individuals to provide lodging to soldiers during peacetime. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens against unreasonable searches and seizures, and the Ninth Amendment declares that individuals have fundamental rights beyond those explicitly stated in the Constitution.

Characteristics Values
Number of Amendments 10
Date of Ratification 15 December 1791
First Amendment Freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and right to petition
Second Amendment Right to keep and bear arms
Third Amendment Prohibits the federal government from forcing individuals to provide lodging to soldiers in their homes during peacetime
Fourth Amendment Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures of either self or property by government officials
Ninth Amendment Declares that individuals have other fundamental rights, in addition to those stated in the Constitution

cycivic

The Bill of Rights

The first ten amendments to the United States Constitution are collectively known as the Bill of Rights and were added in 1791, a few years after the Constitution itself was ratified in 1788. The Bill of Rights play a crucial role in safeguarding the fundamental rights and freedoms of American citizens and have had a profound impact on the development of US law and governance.

The amendments in the Bill of Rights provide explicit guarantees of personal freedoms and rights, as well as limitations on the powers of the federal government. They were designed to assure citizens that the new national government would not usurp their basic freedoms and to provide a framework for interpreting and applying the Constitution. The first amendment, for example, protects freedom of religion, speech, and the press, while the second amendment guarantees the right to keep and bear arms.

Other amendments in the Bill of Rights protect the right to peaceably assemble, the right to keep and be secure in one's person and property from unreasonable searches and seizures, and the right to a fair and speedy trial. The fifth amendment also includes a provision known as the "Takings Clause," which requires the government to provide just compensation when taking private property for public use. The sixth amendment, meanwhile, outlines additional rights of the accused, including the right to a public trial, the right to a speedy trial, and the right to confront and subpoena witnesses.

The addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution had a profound impact on the development of American law and governance. It provided a clear framework for interpreting the Constitution and resolving disputes over the powers of the federal government. The amendments have been widely influential, shaping legal interpretations and public policy, and serving as a model for other nations in drafting their own constitutions.

In conclusion, the Bill of Rights, comprising the first ten amendments to the US Constitution, is a cornerstone of American liberty and democracy. These amendments safeguard the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens while limiting the powers of the federal government. The Bill of Rights has not only shaped the legal landscape of the United States but has also influenced constitutional thinking and governance worldwide.

cycivic

First Amendment

The First Amendment was one of the ten amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, which was added to the US Constitution in 1791. It was adopted on December 15, 1791, and it prevents Congress from making laws that respect an establishment of religion, prohibit the free exercise of religion, or abridge the freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the freedom of assembly, or the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.

The First Amendment was proposed to address Anti-Federalist opposition to Constitutional ratification and to define citizens' rights in relation to the newly established government under the Constitution. During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, opponents argued that the Constitution as drafted would open the way to tyranny by the central government, and demanded a "'bill of rights' that would spell out the immunities of individual citizens.

The First Amendment applies only to state actors, but there is a common misconception that it prohibits any entity, including private, non-governmental entities, from limiting free speech. The Supreme Court has ruled that the protection of speech is not absolute and that commercial speech is less protected by the First Amendment than political speech and is therefore subject to greater regulation.

The Free Press Clause protects the publication of information and opinions and applies to a wide variety of media. The Petition Clause protects the right to petition all branches and agencies of the government for action, and the Court has also ruled that the amendment implicitly protects freedom of association.

Through a series of 20th- and 21st-century court decisions, speech rights have been expanded significantly, protecting various forms of political speech, anonymous speech, campaign finance, pornography, and school speech. These rulings have also defined a series of exceptions to First Amendment protections.

cycivic

Second Amendment

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, which was added in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, has been the subject of considerable debate and interpretation. It reads:

> "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

The amendment has sparked differing interpretations, with some arguing for an individual right theory that guarantees citizens' rights to possess firearms. This interpretation holds that legislative bodies are restricted from prohibiting firearm possession, rendering prohibitory and restrictive regulations potentially unconstitutional. On the other hand, scholars supporting a collective rights theory argue that the amendment's reference to "'a well-regulated Militia' indicates that the Framers intended to restrict Congress from legislating away a state's right to self-defence, rather than establishing an individual right to gun ownership.

The Second Amendment has been the subject of several significant court cases. In United States v. Cruikshank (1876), the Supreme Court ruled that the right to bear arms is not granted by the Constitution but that the Second Amendment restricts the powers of the National Government. In United States v. Miller (1939), the Court adopted a collective rights approach, determining that Congress could regulate certain weapons under the National Firearms Act of 1934 if they had no reasonable relationship to a well-regulated militia.

More recently, in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), the Supreme Court ruled that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep a gun for self-defence, marking the first time the Court acknowledged an individual's right to own a gun. This ruling was further strengthened in McDonald v. Chicago (2010), where the Court held that the Second Amendment applies to state and local governments through the incorporation doctrine. The debate around the Second Amendment continues, with organisations advocating for both gun control and gun rights.

cycivic

Ninth Amendment

The Ninth Amendment to the United States Constitution was introduced during the drafting of the Bill of Rights. It reads: "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people."

The Ninth Amendment was proposed by Congress in 1789 and ratified in 1791, along with the other nine amendments that became the Bill of Rights. These amendments defined citizens' rights in relation to the newly established government under the Constitution. The Ninth Amendment specifically addresses the concern that future generations might argue that a right not listed in the Bill of Rights did not exist. It asserts that just because a right is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, it does not mean that the people do not retain that right.

During the debates on the adoption of the Constitution, its opponents argued that it would open the way to tyranny by the central government. They demanded a "bill of rights" that would spell out the immunities of individual citizens. The Ninth Amendment was intended to protect against the idea that by enumerating particular exceptions to the grant of power to the Federal Government, those rights that were not mentioned were intended to be assigned to the government and were therefore insecure. It was meant to assure the people that the Constitution was intended to limit the Federal Government to the powers granted expressly or by necessary implication.

Despite its inclusion in the Bill of Rights, the Ninth Amendment has rarely played a significant role in US constitutional law. For a long time, it was considered "forgotten" or "irrelevant" by legal academics. However, some scholars have challenged this view and argued for the importance of the Ninth Amendment in protecting unenumerated rights. The interpretation of the Ninth Amendment and its role in constitutional law continues to be a subject of debate among legal scholars.

cycivic

Fourth Amendment

The Fourth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the US Constitution in 1791. The Fourth Amendment protects US citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government. However, it does not guarantee protection from all searches and seizures, only those deemed unreasonable under the law.

The determination of whether a search is considered reasonable is made by balancing two interests. On one side is the intrusion on an individual's Fourth Amendment rights, and on the other side are legitimate government interests, such as public safety. The location of the search or seizure also plays a role in determining the extent of an individual's protection under the Fourth Amendment. For example, searches and seizures inside a home without a warrant are generally considered unreasonable.

The addition of the Fourth Amendment addressed concerns raised during debates on the adoption of the Constitution. Opponents of the Constitution argued that it could lead to tyranny by the central government, particularly in light of recent British violations of civil rights during the Revolution. They demanded a "bill of rights" that would explicitly outline the immunities of individual citizens.

As a result, the First Congress of the United States proposed 12 amendments to the state legislatures, 10 of which were ratified and became the Bill of Rights in 1791. These amendments defined citizens' rights in relation to the newly established government under the Constitution, ensuring that individual freedoms were protected.

Frequently asked questions

The Bill of Rights was added to the US Constitution in 1791. It defined citizens' rights in relation to the newly established government under the Constitution.

The French Constitution of 1791 was the first written constitution in France, created after the collapse of the absolute monarchy of the Ancien Régime. It redefined the organisation of the French government, citizenship, and the limits to the powers of government.

The French Constitution of 1791 retained the monarchy but sovereignty resided in the Legislative Assembly, which was elected by a system of indirect voting. It also amended King Louis XVI's title from 'King of France' to 'King of the French', implying that his power emanated from the people and the law, not from divine right or national sovereignty.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment