The Conservative Party's Role In The Uk's Entry To Europe

The question of which political party took the UK into Europe is a pivotal one in British political history, centered on the country's accession to the European Economic Community (EEC), the precursor to the European Union (EU), in 1973. The Conservative Party, under the leadership of Prime Minister Edward Heath, played the most significant role in this process, as it was during their tenure that the UK formally joined the EEC. Heath's government negotiated the terms of membership, which were subsequently ratified by Parliament. While the Labour Party had initially been more skeptical of European integration, they later supported continued membership, particularly after the 1975 referendum, where the UK public voted overwhelmingly to remain in the EEC. This decision marked a defining moment in the UK's relationship with Europe, setting the stage for decades of political debate and ultimately leading to the Brexit referendum in 2016.

Explore related products

I Love UK: Travel Planner for Checklist, Itineraries, Journal Entries and Sketch, Write and Doodle Travel Journal, Travel Notebook United Kingdom Flag ... x 9", 100 pages for writing notes and sketch

$6.99

Family Firms and Merchant Capitalism in Early Modern Europe: The Business, Bankruptcy and Resilience of the Höchstetters of Augsburg (Routledge Explorations in Economic History)

$42.55 $55.99

Government Debts and Financial Markets in Europe (Financial History)

$72.99

Germany and the Second World War: Volume III: The Mediterranean, South-east Europe, and North Africa, 1939-1941

$110

Governing Europe in a Globalizing World: Neoliberalism and its Alternatives following the 1973 Oil Crisis (Routledge Studies on Government and the European Union Book 8)

$58.89 $61.99

Writing Royal Entries in Early Modern Europe (Early European Research, 3)

$138.89 $150

Labour's 1960s Pro-EEC Stance: Harold Wilson's Labour Party initially championed UK's European Economic Community (EEC) membership

In the 1960s, Harold Wilson's Labour Party emerged as a vocal advocate for the UK's membership in the European Economic Community (EEC), marking a pivotal moment in British political history. This pro-EEC stance was rooted in a pragmatic vision of economic modernization and international cooperation. Wilson, a charismatic and intellectually astute leader, believed that joining the EEC would provide the UK with access to a vast common market, fostering economic growth and securing its position as a global player. Labour’s position was not merely ideological but a calculated strategy to address the UK’s declining industrial competitiveness and its diminishing influence on the world stage.

The Labour Party’s advocacy for EEC membership was also a response to the shifting geopolitical landscape of the post-war era. As the British Empire waned, Wilson saw European integration as a means to redefine Britain’s role in the world. By aligning with Europe, Labour aimed to leverage collective strength in an increasingly multipolar world, dominated by the United States and the Soviet Union. This approach contrasted sharply with the Conservative Party’s more ambivalent attitude toward Europe, which was often influenced by imperial nostalgia and a preference for Commonwealth ties. Labour’s pro-EEC stance thus represented a forward-looking, modernizing agenda that sought to position the UK at the heart of a dynamic and economically powerful bloc.

However, Labour’s path to EEC membership was not without challenges. Internal party divisions and external opposition complicated Wilson’s efforts. Many Labour MPs, particularly on the left, were skeptical of the EEC, viewing it as a capitalist club that could undermine British sovereignty and workers’ rights. Wilson had to navigate these tensions carefully, balancing the party’s traditional socialist principles with the pragmatic benefits of European integration. His government’s first application to join the EEC in 1967 was vetoed by French President Charles de Gaulle, a setback that underscored the complexities of the UK’s European ambitions. Despite this, Wilson remained committed to the cause, laying the groundwork for future attempts.

The legacy of Labour’s 1960s pro-EEC stance is profound. While the UK’s eventual accession to the EEC in 1973 occurred under a Conservative government led by Edward Heath, it was Wilson’s Labour Party that first championed the idea and built the political case for membership. Labour’s vision of a Europe-oriented UK influenced subsequent generations of policymakers and shaped the UK’s relationship with the continent for decades. Even as the UK grappled with questions of sovereignty and identity in the 21st century, culminating in Brexit, the origins of its European journey can be traced back to Wilson’s Labour Party and its bold, forward-thinking approach to the EEC.

For those studying or debating the UK’s European history, Labour’s 1960s pro-EEC stance offers valuable lessons. It highlights the importance of visionary leadership, the complexities of balancing national interests with international cooperation, and the enduring impact of early political decisions. By examining this period, one gains insight into the roots of Britain’s European debate and the role of political parties in shaping a nation’s destiny. Wilson’s Labour Party may not have been the one to formally take the UK into Europe, but its advocacy was instrumental in setting the stage for this transformative chapter in British history.

Conservative Divide (1970s): Edward Heath led the UK into the EEC in 1973, splitting the Conservative Party

The decision to join the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1973 under Edward Heath’s Conservative government was a seismic event that fractured the party along ideological and pragmatic lines. Heath, a staunch pro-European, viewed membership as essential for Britain’s economic modernization and global influence. His Cabinet, however, was far from united. Figures like Enoch Powell vocally opposed the move, arguing it would erode national sovereignty. This internal rift was not merely a clash of personalities but a reflection of deeper tensions within conservatism—between those who saw Europe as an opportunity and those who viewed it as a threat to British identity and independence.

To understand the divide, consider the contrasting narratives within the party. Pro-European Conservatives, like Heath, framed EEC membership as a pragmatic step to secure Britain’s post-imperial role. They emphasized economic benefits, such as access to a larger market, and the potential for political stability in a post-war Europe. In contrast, Eurosceptics like Powell and Margaret Thatcher (initially ambivalent but later a critic) warned of the EEC’s supranational ambitions, fearing it would undermine parliamentary sovereignty. This ideological split was exacerbated by the 1975 referendum on continued membership, which Heath supported but many in his party opposed, further polarizing the Conservatives.

The practical consequences of this divide were profound. Heath’s decision alienated a significant portion of the party’s grassroots, many of whom felt betrayed by what they saw as a surrender of British interests. This discontent simmered throughout the 1970s, contributing to Heath’s electoral defeat in 1974 and setting the stage for Thatcher’s rise. Her eventual leadership marked a shift toward a more Eurosceptic stance, though even she would later clash with her party over Europe. The 1973 entry, therefore, was not just a policy decision but a catalyst for decades of internal Conservative conflict.

For those studying or debating Britain’s European journey, the Heath era offers a critical lesson: party unity is fragile when national identity and sovereignty are at stake. Heath’s miscalculation was not in joining the EEC but in underestimating the emotional and ideological resistance within his own ranks. This divide persists in the Conservative Party today, with Brexit being its most recent manifestation. To navigate such divisions, leaders must balance pragmatism with sensitivity to core values—a challenge Heath failed to meet, leaving a legacy of discord that continues to shape British politics.

1975 Referendum: Labour, under Wilson, held a referendum, securing public approval for EEC membership

The 1975 European Communities membership referendum stands as a pivotal moment in the UK's relationship with Europe, one that underscores the Labour Party's role in shaping this trajectory. Under the leadership of Harold Wilson, Labour took the unprecedented step of putting the UK's membership of the European Economic Community (EEC) to a public vote. This move was not merely a procedural formality but a strategic decision to legitimize the UK's place in Europe through democratic consent. By securing a resounding 67.2% majority in favor of staying in the EEC, Wilson’s government not only solidified the UK’s membership but also set a precedent for using referendums to address contentious political issues.

Analytically, the 1975 referendum reveals Labour’s nuanced approach to European integration. Wilson, a pragmatist, faced internal party divisions over Europe, with some Labour MPs staunchly opposed to EEC membership. By renegotiating the terms of UK membership and then holding a referendum, Wilson effectively neutralized dissent within his party while appealing to the broader electorate. This strategy highlights Labour’s ability to balance ideological differences with political expediency, a trait that contrasts sharply with the Conservative Party’s later handling of Europe, which often exacerbated divisions rather than resolving them.

Instructively, the 1975 referendum offers lessons for modern policymakers on managing complex international commitments. Wilson’s government demonstrated the importance of public engagement in foreign policy decisions, particularly those with long-term implications. The campaign leading up to the referendum involved widespread public information efforts, including televised debates and informational booklets distributed to every household. This approach ensured that voters were informed, a principle that remains crucial in today’s polarized political climate. For instance, when considering future referendums, governments should prioritize transparency and education to avoid the misinformation that plagued the 2016 Brexit vote.

Persuasively, the 1975 referendum underscores the enduring impact of Labour’s decision to anchor the UK in Europe. By securing public approval, Labour not only ensured the UK’s continued membership but also fostered economic and cultural ties that benefited the nation for decades. Critics of the EEC at the time argued that membership would erode British sovereignty, yet the referendum results suggest that the majority of voters valued the economic opportunities and stability offered by European integration. This historical precedent challenges the narrative that the UK’s relationship with Europe was inherently contentious, reminding us that, at one point, a clear majority saw value in being part of the European project.

Comparatively, the 1975 referendum contrasts sharply with the 2016 Brexit referendum, both in outcome and approach. While Wilson’s Labour government sought to unite the nation behind a shared vision of European cooperation, the 2016 vote under a Conservative-led government deepened divisions. The 1975 campaign’s focus on informed debate and consensus-building stands in stark relief to the polarizing rhetoric of the Brexit campaign. This comparison highlights the importance of leadership style and intent in shaping public opinion on critical issues, with Labour’s approach in 1975 emerging as a model of constructive engagement.

In conclusion, the 1975 referendum under Harold Wilson’s Labour government was a defining moment in the UK’s European journey. By securing public approval for EEC membership, Labour not only resolved immediate political challenges but also laid the groundwork for the UK’s role in Europe for decades to come. This episode serves as a reminder of the power of democratic processes in legitimizing international commitments and the importance of leadership in navigating complex political landscapes. As the UK continues to grapple with its post-Brexit identity, the lessons of 1975 remain as relevant as ever.

Explore related products

Life on Svalbard: Finding Home on a Remote Island Near the North Pole

$15.11 $32

Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe: Second Edition

$65.95

The Medieval World View: An Introduction

$87.6 $108

The Celts: A Very Short Introduction (Very Short Introductions Book 94)

$3.99 $4.79

Declining Democracy in East-Central Europe: The Divide in the EU and Emerging Hard Populism (New Horizons in European Politics series)

$162.35

Archimedes and the Door of Science (Living History Library)

$12 $14.95

Thatcher's Euroscepticism: Margaret Thatcher's later skepticism influenced Conservative attitudes toward European integration

Margaret Thatcher's initial enthusiasm for European integration as Prime Minister, marked by her signing of the Single European Act in 1986, belies the profound shift in her stance that would later define her legacy. By the late 1980s, Thatcher's rhetoric grew increasingly critical of the European Economic Community (EEC), particularly its federalist ambitions. She famously declared, *"We have not successfully rolled back the frontiers of the state in Britain, only to see them re-imposed at a European level,"* during her 1988 Bruges speech. This speech is often cited as the turning point in her relationship with Europe, signaling a growing Euroscepticism that would resonate deeply within the Conservative Party.

Thatcher's skepticism was rooted in her belief in national sovereignty and free-market economics. She viewed the EEC's push for greater political and economic integration as a threat to British independence and a hindrance to her deregulation agenda. Her opposition to the European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) and the proposed single currency exemplified her fear of ceding control over monetary policy. This stance was not merely ideological but also pragmatic; Thatcher understood the political risks of alienating a British electorate historically wary of continental entanglements.

The impact of Thatcher's Euroscepticism on the Conservative Party cannot be overstated. Her rhetoric and policies laid the groundwork for the party's increasingly ambivalent, and later hostile, attitude toward European integration. Her successors, particularly John Major and David Cameron, grappled with the legacy of her skepticism, often finding themselves torn between pro-European factions within the party and the growing Eurosceptic wing. Thatcher's influence was so profound that it contributed to the eventual Brexit referendum in 2016, with many Leave campaigners invoking her name as a symbol of British defiance against European bureaucracy.

To understand Thatcher's role in shaping Conservative attitudes, consider this practical takeaway: her Euroscepticism was not just a personal conviction but a strategic recalibration of the party's identity. By framing European integration as a threat to British sovereignty, she created a narrative that resonated with both her party and the electorate. This narrative became a cornerstone of Conservative policy, influencing everything from treaty negotiations to election campaigns. For those studying the UK's relationship with Europe, Thatcher's evolution from a cautious supporter to a vocal critic offers a critical lens through which to analyze the complexities of British Euroscepticism.

In conclusion, Margaret Thatcher's later skepticism toward Europe was more than a personal shift—it was a transformative force within the Conservative Party. Her ability to articulate a vision of Britain as a sovereign, independent nation outside the constraints of European integration left an indelible mark on British politics. While the Conservative Party was the one that took the UK into Europe under Edward Heath in 1973, it was Thatcher's Euroscepticism that ultimately shaped the party's trajectory toward Brexit. Her legacy serves as a reminder of how individual leadership can redefine a party's stance on critical issues, with consequences that echo for decades.

Tony Blair's Pro-EU Legacy: Labour, under Blair, deepened UK-EU ties, advocating for closer European cooperation

The Labour Party, under Tony Blair's leadership, played a pivotal role in shaping the UK's relationship with Europe, leaving a lasting pro-EU legacy. Blair's tenure as Prime Minister from 1997 to 2007 was marked by a concerted effort to deepen UK-EU ties, a strategy that stood in stark contrast to the more ambivalent approach of his Conservative predecessors. This period witnessed a significant shift in Britain's European policy, with Labour actively advocating for closer cooperation and integration.

A Pro-European Vision: Blair's Labour government embraced a vision of a more united Europe, believing that the UK's future prosperity and influence were intrinsically linked to its engagement with the EU. This ideology was a departure from the traditional Euroscepticism that had often characterized British politics. Labour's manifesto under Blair consistently emphasized the benefits of EU membership, including economic growth, enhanced security, and a stronger global voice for the UK. For instance, the 2001 manifesto highlighted the party's commitment to "work for a more flexible and decentralized Europe, where power is returned to the people and their elected representatives."

Policy Initiatives and Achievements: During Blair's premiership, Labour implemented several policies to strengthen UK-EU relations. One notable example was the adoption of the euro as a long-term goal, although this was subject to strict economic tests. The government also played a key role in shaping EU policies, such as the Lisbon Strategy, which aimed to make the EU the most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world by 2010. Labour's influence was instrumental in ensuring that the UK was at the heart of these European initiatives, rather than on the sidelines.

Impact and Criticisms: Blair's pro-EU stance had a profound impact on the UK's political landscape. It positioned Labour as the party of European engagement, attracting voters who valued international cooperation. However, this approach also drew criticism from Eurosceptic factions within the party and the wider public. Some argued that Blair's enthusiasm for Europe compromised the UK's sovereignty and failed to address concerns about immigration and bureaucratic red tape. Despite these controversies, Labour's pro-EU legacy under Blair is undeniable, as it set the tone for a more integrated and cooperative relationship with Europe.

In the context of the UK's complex relationship with Europe, Tony Blair's Labour government stands out for its unwavering commitment to European unity. This period demonstrated that a major political party could successfully advocate for closer EU ties, shaping public opinion and policy in a way that still resonates today. While the UK's eventual decision to leave the EU in 2016 may seem like a rejection of this legacy, Blair's influence on the Labour Party's European policy remains a significant chapter in the story of 'which political party took the UK into Europe.'

Frequently asked questions