India's Current Ruling Party: Who Holds Power Today?

As of the latest general elections held in India, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) is currently in power, leading the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the BJP secured a significant majority in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of India's Parliament, in the 2019 elections, continuing its governance from the previous term that began in 2014. The party's focus on nationalist policies, economic reforms, and development initiatives has been central to its political agenda, shaping the country's domestic and foreign policies during its tenure.

Explore related products

Presidential Leadership in Political Time: Reprise and Reappraisal

$24.99 $29.99

Living Indigenous Leadership: Native Narratives on Building Strong Communities

$37.95

The Myth of the Strong Leader: Political Leadership in the Modern Age

$21.04 $32

"Indian" in the Cabinet: Speaking Truth to Power

$22.28 $26.94

Leadership Lessons from the Cherokee Nation: Learn from All I Observe

$30.79 $37

A North American Tour Journal 1824–1825: The Making of a Prime Minister

$4.19 $50

Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP): Currently the ruling party, led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has been the dominant political force in India since 2014, securing consecutive terms under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This right-wing party, rooted in Hindu nationalist ideology, has reshaped India’s political landscape through a blend of economic reforms, cultural assertions, and centralized governance. Its electoral success hinges on a narrative of development, nationalism, and a promise to restore India’s global standing, resonating deeply with a significant portion of the electorate.

Analytically, the BJP’s rise reflects a shift in India’s political priorities. Unlike the Congress Party’s secular and welfare-centric approach, the BJP emphasizes majoritarian identity politics, often polarizing voters along religious and cultural lines. Policies like the Citizenship Amendment Act (2019) and the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir exemplify this strategy, consolidating support among Hindu voters while alienating minorities. Critics argue this approach undermines India’s pluralistic ethos, yet proponents view it as a corrective to historical injustices.

Instructively, understanding the BJP’s governance requires examining its key initiatives. The party’s flagship programs, such as Swachh Bharat Abhiyan (Clean India Mission) and Digital India, aim to modernize infrastructure and improve governance efficiency. However, implementation challenges persist, particularly in rural areas. For instance, while the Ujjwala Yojana provided cooking gas connections to millions, its impact is tempered by affordability concerns. Citizens engaging with these schemes should track local implementation and advocate for transparency to ensure benefits reach intended recipients.

Persuasively, the BJP’s economic policies present a mixed picture. Pro-business reforms like the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and Make in India initiative have attracted foreign investment and streamlined taxation. Yet, critics highlight rising income inequality and joblessness, particularly post-demonetization in 2016. Small businesses, a critical voter base, often struggle with GST compliance, suggesting a need for policy fine-tuning. Voters should weigh these economic outcomes against the BJP’s promises of growth and self-reliance (Atmanirbhar Bharat) when assessing its performance.

Comparatively, the BJP’s leadership style under Modi stands in stark contrast to previous administrations. Modi’s charismatic, centralized authority has enabled swift decision-making but also raised concerns about democratic checks and balances. Unlike the coalition-based governance of the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), the BJP’s majority in the Lok Sabha allows it to push through legislation with minimal opposition. This efficiency, however, risks sidelining dissent, as seen in debates over farm laws in 2020. Citizens must remain vigilant to ensure accountability, even in a dominant-party system.

Descriptively, the BJP’s cultural agenda is as defining as its policy initiatives. The party champions Hindu cultural revival, evident in projects like the Ram Mandir in Ayodhya, which symbolizes its ideological commitment. This focus on cultural heritage resonates with many Hindus but has sparked accusations of marginalizing other communities. Observers note that this cultural nationalism often intertwines with electoral strategy, particularly in states with diverse demographics. For instance, the BJP’s gains in West Bengal in 2021 were attributed to a mix of developmental promises and cultural appeals.

In conclusion, the BJP’s tenure as India’s ruling party is marked by bold initiatives, ideological assertiveness, and a transformative vision. While its policies have delivered notable achievements, they also provoke debate over inclusivity and democratic norms. Citizens engaging with the BJP’s agenda should critically evaluate its impact on unity, economy, and governance, ensuring their voices shape India’s future trajectory.

National Democratic Alliance (NDA): BJP-led coalition in power at the central government level

The National Democratic Alliance (NDA), a coalition led by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), currently holds power at the central government level in India. This alliance, formed in 1998, has been a dominant force in Indian politics, particularly since 2014, when Narendra Modi became the Prime Minister. The NDA’s success lies in its ability to unite diverse regional parties under a common agenda, though the BJP remains the undisputed leader with the largest number of seats in the Lok Sabha. This structure allows the coalition to maintain a majority while accommodating regional interests, a critical factor in India’s federal political system.

Analyzing the NDA’s composition reveals its strategic brilliance. The BJP, with its strong ideological base and organizational strength, forms the core. Regional parties like the Janata Dal (United) in Bihar, the Shiv Sena in Maharashtra, and the AIADMK in Tamil Nadu (until recently) bring localized support and political clout. This diversity enables the NDA to navigate India’s complex electoral landscape, where state-level dynamics often dictate national outcomes. For instance, the BJP’s partnership with the Janata Dal (United) in Bihar has been pivotal in securing a stronghold in this politically significant state.

From a practical standpoint, the NDA’s governance model emphasizes centralized decision-making coupled with regional adaptability. Policies like the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the Digital India initiative reflect a unified national vision, while schemes like the PM Kisan Samman Nidhi are tailored to address regional agrarian concerns. This dual approach ensures that the coalition remains relevant across India’s diverse socio-economic spectrum. However, critics argue that the BJP’s dominance sometimes overshadows smaller allies, leading to occasional tensions within the alliance.

Comparatively, the NDA’s longevity in power contrasts sharply with the United Progressive Alliance (UPA), led by the Indian National Congress, which struggled with coalition management in its later years. The NDA’s ability to maintain cohesion, despite ideological differences among its members, highlights its political acumen. For instance, while the BJP champions Hindutva, allies like the Republican Party of India (Athawale) focus on Dalit empowerment, demonstrating the coalition’s inclusive approach. This balance between ideological consistency and pragmatic flexibility is a key takeaway for understanding the NDA’s sustained success.

In conclusion, the NDA’s BJP-led coalition exemplifies a unique blend of centralized leadership and regional inclusivity, making it a formidable force in Indian politics. Its ability to adapt policies to regional needs while pursuing a national agenda has solidified its position at the helm of the central government. As India continues to evolve, the NDA’s model of coalition politics offers valuable insights into managing diversity and maintaining power in the world’s largest democracy.

Lok Sabha Majority: BJP holds a majority in the lower house of Parliament

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) currently holds a majority in the Lok Sabha, the lower house of India's Parliament, a position it has maintained since 2014. This majority is not just a number; it is a mandate that allows the BJP to drive its legislative agenda with minimal opposition. With 303 out of 543 seats in the 17th Lok Sabha (as of the 2019 general election), the BJP’s dominance is a testament to its strategic campaigning, grassroots mobilization, and the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. This majority enables the party to pass bills, allocate budgets, and shape policies without relying heavily on coalition partners, a luxury few ruling parties in India’s history have enjoyed.

Analytically, the BJP’s Lok Sabha majority reflects a shift in India’s political landscape. Historically, coalition governments have been the norm, with regional parties often holding the balance of power. However, the BJP’s ability to secure a standalone majority twice in a row (2014 and 2019) indicates a consolidation of its voter base and a weakening of the opposition. This majority has allowed the BJP to implement controversial but transformative policies, such as the abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir and the introduction of the Citizenship Amendment Act. Critics argue that this unchecked power risks sidelining minority voices, while supporters view it as a mandate for decisive governance.

From an instructive perspective, understanding the BJP’s majority in the Lok Sabha requires examining its electoral strategy. The party’s success lies in its ability to blend nationalistic rhetoric with localized issues, appealing to diverse demographics across India’s states. For instance, in Hindi-speaking regions, the BJP emphasizes cultural nationalism, while in the Northeast, it focuses on development and infrastructure. This tailored approach, combined with a robust organizational structure, has helped the BJP secure votes in regions where it traditionally had little presence. For political parties aiming to challenge the BJP, the takeaway is clear: a one-size-fits-all strategy will not suffice; instead, they must adapt to regional aspirations while maintaining a cohesive national narrative.

Persuasively, the BJP’s Lok Sabha majority raises questions about the health of India’s democracy. While a strong majority ensures stability and enables swift decision-making, it also reduces the role of opposition parties in policy formulation. The marginalization of opposition voices can lead to a lack of accountability and oversight, critical components of a functioning democracy. For instance, the passage of the Farm Laws in 2020, which were later repealed, highlighted the risks of pushing through legislation without adequate consultation. Proponents of democratic pluralism argue that a dominant single-party rule, while efficient, must be balanced with mechanisms to protect dissent and minority rights.

Comparatively, the BJP’s majority in the Lok Sabha stands in contrast to its position in the Rajya Sabha, the upper house, where it lacks a majority. This bifurcation of power forces the BJP to negotiate with other parties to pass legislation, creating a natural check on its authority. However, in the Lok Sabha, the BJP’s dominance is nearly absolute, allowing it to shape the national agenda unilaterally. This duality underscores the importance of both houses in India’s parliamentary system and serves as a reminder that while a majority in the Lok Sabha is powerful, it is not absolute. For citizens, this dynamic highlights the need to engage with both houses of Parliament to ensure a balanced and inclusive governance framework.

Explore related products

THE CBN WAY: Principles of Visionary Leadership

$12.95 $12.95

A Day in Life of an Indian Political Campaign Manager: Dive Into the High-Energy World of Politics, Strategy, and Leadership

$9.49

Strategies of Power (Amit Shah's Leadership in Indian Politics)

$21.96

ALL ARE NOT BORN LEADERS: Developing Political Leadership for Indian Democracy

$0.99

Atal Bihari Vajpayee's Words of Wisdom: Leadership and Legacy by Raghav (Inspirational & Motivational Thoughts)

$0.99

Ogimaag: Anishinaabeg Leadership, 1760-1845

$28.7 $35

State Governments: BJP governs multiple states, either independently or in coalition

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has established a formidable presence in India's state governments, governing multiple states either independently or through coalitions. As of recent data, the BJP holds power in over 15 states, either on its own or in alliance with regional parties. This dominance is a testament to the party’s strategic political maneuvering and its ability to adapt to diverse regional dynamics. For instance, in states like Uttar Pradesh, India’s most populous state, the BJP governs independently, showcasing its strong electoral base and organizational strength. In contrast, in states like Bihar and Maharashtra, the BJP operates in coalition governments, balancing regional aspirations with its national agenda.

Analyzing the BJP’s state-level governance reveals a pattern of leveraging local leadership while aligning with the central government’s policies. In states like Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh, the BJP’s long-standing rule has been marked by infrastructure development and economic reforms, often cited as models of governance. However, in coalition-led states, the party faces the challenge of balancing its ideological priorities with the demands of alliance partners. For example, in Maharashtra, the BJP’s coalition with the Shiv Sena (prior to their split) required careful negotiation on issues like agrarian reforms and urban development. This dual approach—independent governance in some states and coalition management in others—highlights the BJP’s adaptability as a national party.

For those interested in understanding the BJP’s state-level strategies, a comparative study of its governance models is instructive. In states like Assam, the BJP has successfully addressed regional concerns like immigration and development, securing local support. Conversely, in states like Karnataka, the party’s focus on urban infrastructure has sometimes overshadowed rural development, leading to political challenges. Practical tips for analyzing BJP-led states include examining budget allocations, policy implementation timelines, and public feedback mechanisms. For instance, tracking the allocation of funds for education and healthcare in BJP-governed states can provide insights into the party’s priorities.

Persuasively, the BJP’s state-level governance serves as a microcosm of its national aspirations. By governing diverse states, the party gains a testing ground for policies that can be scaled nationally. However, this approach is not without risks. Over-centralization of decision-making can alienate regional allies, as seen in some coalition governments. To mitigate this, the BJP often appoints regional leaders with strong local connect, ensuring that state-specific issues are addressed effectively. For instance, in West Bengal, the BJP’s recent gains have been attributed to its focus on grassroots mobilization and addressing local grievances.

In conclusion, the BJP’s governance of multiple states, either independently or in coalition, reflects its strategic depth and political acumen. By tailoring its approach to regional contexts, the party has managed to maintain a strong foothold in India’s diverse political landscape. For observers and stakeholders, understanding these dynamics offers valuable insights into the BJP’s operational model and its implications for India’s federal structure. Whether through independent rule or coalition management, the BJP’s state-level governance remains a critical aspect of its national political strategy.

Opposition Parties: Indian National Congress (INC) and others form the main opposition

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) currently holds power in India, leading the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) coalition. This dominance raises questions about the role and effectiveness of opposition parties, particularly the Indian National Congress (INC), in shaping the country’s political discourse. While the BJP’s stronghold is evident, the opposition’s ability to challenge, critique, and offer alternatives is crucial for a healthy democracy. Here, we dissect the dynamics of the INC and other opposition parties as they navigate their role in counterbalancing the ruling regime.

Analytically speaking, the INC, once the dominant force in Indian politics, has struggled to regain its footing since the 2014 general elections. Its decline is attributed to internal leadership disputes, a lack of cohesive messaging, and an inability to connect with younger voters. Despite these challenges, the INC remains the principal opposition party, holding significant influence in states like Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, and Punjab. Its role is pivotal in raising issues such as economic inequality, farmers’ rights, and alleged government overreach, though its impact is often diluted by the BJP’s majority in Parliament. Other opposition parties, including regional heavyweights like the Trinamool Congress (TMC), Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK), and the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), contribute to a fragmented yet vocal opposition bloc. Their collective strength lies in their regional appeal and ability to mobilize grassroots support, but coordination among them remains a hurdle.

Instructively, for the opposition to effectively challenge the BJP, unity is non-negotiable. The INC must address its internal fissures and adopt a more inclusive leadership model, possibly involving younger leaders like Rahul Gandhi and Priyanka Gandhi Vadra in more decisive roles. Simultaneously, opposition parties must forge strategic alliances, as seen in the 2022 Bihar elections, where the RJD, Congress, and Left parties united to defeat the NDA. Such coalitions require setting aside ideological differences and focusing on common goals, such as protecting federalism and ensuring accountability. Practical steps include joint parliamentary interventions, coordinated public campaigns, and leveraging social media to amplify their message.

Persuasively, the opposition’s role extends beyond criticism; it must offer a compelling alternative vision for India. The INC, with its historical legacy, is well-positioned to lead this charge by revisiting its core principles of secularism, social justice, and inclusive development. Regional parties, with their deep-rooted local connections, can complement this by addressing state-specific issues while aligning with a broader national agenda. For instance, the TMC’s emphasis on women’s empowerment and the DMK’s focus on Tamil identity can enrich the opposition’s narrative. However, this requires a shift from reactive politics to proactive policy-making, backed by data-driven solutions and grassroots engagement.

Comparatively, India’s opposition can draw lessons from global examples. In the United States, the Democratic Party’s resurgence after 2016 involved grassroots mobilization and a focus on healthcare and climate change. Similarly, the Labour Party in the UK rebuilt itself by addressing economic inequality and youth concerns. India’s opposition must similarly adapt to changing demographics, with over 65% of the population under 35, by prioritizing education, employment, and digital literacy. Regional parties, with their agility, can lead this charge, while the INC provides the national framework.

Descriptively, the opposition’s landscape is a mosaic of ideologies, ambitions, and challenges. From the Left parties advocating for workers’ rights to the AAP’s anti-corruption stance, each party brings a unique flavor to the political table. Yet, their collective impact is often muted by the BJP’s narrative dominance and organizational prowess. The opposition’s task is not just to survive but to thrive, by reinventing itself as a credible, united, and forward-looking alternative. This requires not just political acumen but also a deep commitment to democratic values and public service. Without a robust opposition, India’s democracy risks becoming a monologue, and the voices of millions could go unheard.

Frequently asked questions