Understanding The Fundamentals Of Legal Consideration

A legally binding contract must include consideration for every individual or entity involved. Consideration is a promise, performance, or forbearance bargained by a promisor in exchange for their promise. It is the main element of a contract, without which a contract cannot be enforced. Consideration can come in many forms, such as money, products, promises, and labor. For instance, in a contract, one party may offer a product, and the other party may offer money in exchange. In this case, the product and the money are the considerations. However, it is important to note that a contract without consideration may still be enforceable under certain conditions, such as promissory estoppel or detrimental reliance.

Explore related products

Legal Considerations for Fire & Emergency Services

$111.26 $117

Legal Considerations for Fire & Emergency Services

$91.63 $117

School Handbooks: Legal Considerations 4th Edition

$30

Legal Considerations for Tactical Medical Responders: For Both the Individuals and Agencies

$24.99

Legal and Ethical Considerations for Public Relations

$9.99 $17.21

School Handbook: Legal Considerations

$23

Promises to do something one is not legally obligated to do

Consideration is a fundamental component of a binding contract. It is defined as a "bargained-for exchange of a legal detriment" between the parties involved. This means that each party agrees to do something they are not legally required to do or to refrain from doing something that is within their legal rights.

Consideration is essential for a contract to be enforceable. Without it, a contract cannot be considered legally binding. The concept of consideration ensures that both parties are serious about the agreement and intend to be legally bound by it. It also helps to maintain fairness and prevent one party from taking advantage of the other.

A common example used to illustrate the concept of consideration is a promise to pay someone in exchange for them agreeing to let you out of a lease or contract. Here, the promise to pay serves as the consideration, as it is something the promisor is not legally obligated to do.

Another example is when a person agrees to give up their legal right to engage in certain activities in exchange for a promise of payment. In this case, the forbearance, or the giving up of a valid legal right, constitutes consideration, even if the promisee does not gain any direct material benefit.

It's important to note that courts generally do not question the adequacy of consideration unless there is an extreme imbalance in the bargaining power of the parties involved. As long as both parties agree to incur a legal detriment, the agreement is considered "bargained for" and thus enforceable.

In summary, the concept of "promises to do something one is not legally obligated to do" is a crucial aspect of consideration in contract law. It ensures that agreements are fair and that both parties are committed to upholding their end of the bargain.

Promises not to do something one has a right to do

Promises to refrain from exercising a legal right which one has the legal right to exercise can constitute legal consideration. This is known as a covenant not to sue. For example, a promise to refrain from suing someone in return for the settlement of a legal dispute. In such a case, the legal value is the forbearance, or giving up of the legal right to sue for redress in the courts, in exchange for the agreed-upon settlement.

In general, forbearance is the giving up of a valid legal right. For example, "I will give up my right to sue you for defamation if you agree to retract your comments." Such a promise has legal significance because it involves a bargain, and courts will enforce it.

However, it is important to note that a promise to refrain from doing something that one does not have a legal right to do would not constitute valid consideration. For example, a person demanding extra compensation for refraining from doing something they are already forbidden from doing.

Additionally, past consideration, or a promise made in return for an act or event that has already taken place, is generally not considered valid consideration. For example, if a person's dog escapes and is found and returned, and they promise a reward for the dog's return, this is not valid consideration because the act of returning the dog occurred before the promise of a reward was made.

Furthermore, a promise that is based on a moral obligation, a moral duty, a sense of honor, or love or affection is also generally not enforceable as consideration.

In summary, a promise to refrain from doing something one has the legal right to do can constitute legal consideration if it involves a bargain and results in a detriment to the promisee and/or a benefit to the promisor. However, there are exceptions, such as when the promise is based on past consideration or moral obligation, or when it involves an act that the promisor is already legally forbidden from doing.

Promises must be bargained for

For a promise to be considered valid consideration, it must be bargained for. This means that the promise must be exchanged for something of value, such as a benefit to the promisor or a detriment to the promisee. The price, or consideration, can be stipulated by the promisor and need not be monetary or of monetary value. For example, if a person uses money to purchase an apple, the apple is the merchant's consideration, and the money is the person's consideration.

A promise is not valid consideration if it is gratuitous, meaning it is not part of a bargained-for exchange. In other words, if the promisee acts in reliance on a promise, but that act was not part of a bargain, then the promise is not valid consideration. For example, in an Australian case, the government promised a subsidy if wool was purchased for Australian use. The subsidy was later discontinued. The court held that the purchase of wool was a condition necessary for the subsidy but was not part of a bargained-for exchange and therefore not valid consideration.

Additionally, a promise is not valid consideration if it is a promise to do something that the promisor is already legally obligated to do. For example, a promise to refrain from suing someone in return for the settlement of a legal dispute is not valid consideration because the promisor is already legally obligated to settle the dispute.

Courts will generally not review the adequacy of consideration, meaning they will not consider whether the bargained-for promise or performance is equal in value to the counter-promise or performance. However, courts may review the adequacy of consideration in certain situations, such as when there is an extreme difference in the bargaining power of the parties or when the plaintiff is seeking an equitable remedy for the defendant's breach of contract.

In some cases, a contract without consideration may still be enforceable if it has a substitute, such as promissory estoppel or detrimental reliance. Promissory estoppel may apply when there is reasonable and foreseeable reliance on the promise, and enforcement of the promise is necessary to avoid injustice.

Explore related products

Dictionary of Legal Terms: Definitions and Explanations for Non-Lawyers

$24.96 $24.99

Elder Care Assistance: A Practical Guide Covering Health, Financial and Legal Considerations

$12.95

Legal Considerations for Fire & Emergency Services, 4th Ed

$85.6

Legal Considerations for Fire & Emergency Services

$85.6

Legal Environment of Business: Practical Considerations (Higher Education Coursebook)

$176

Arson Investigation: Techniques, Legal Considerations, and Best Practices for Insurance Adjusters

$15.99 $15.99

Consideration must be adequate

Consideration is a vital component of a contract, constituting the value exchanged between the parties involved. It can take various forms, including money, work performance, property, or other items of legal value. While courts typically do not scrutinize the equivalency of exchanges, consideration must be adequate to ensure fairness in the transaction.

The adequacy of consideration comes into question when there is an indication of an imbalance resulting from factors that compromise the fairness of the entire agreement. For example, a significant disparity in the bargaining power of the parties may warrant a review of the adequacy of consideration. In the case of Scrooge offering to buy Caspar's motorcycle worth $700 for $10 and a $5 fountain pen, the court would likely consider this agreement supported by adequate consideration as both parties agreed to give up something of their own.

To be legally sufficient, consideration must meet specific conditions. Firstly, it cannot be something that a party is already legally obligated to do. For instance, a police officer cannot collect a reward for the capture and arrest of an outlaw as it is part of their legal duty. Secondly, consideration involves performing an act that one is not ordinarily obligated to perform. This could include a promise to do something positive or negative. For example, a promise to refrain from suing someone in exchange for restitution demonstrates forbearance, which holds legal value.

Consideration must also be bargained for, implying that both parties experience a gain or detriment as a result of the contract. This mutuality of obligation ensures that both parties are bound by the agreement. In the example of Betty offering to give a book to Lou, only the scenario where Lou agrees to pay $25 for the book constitutes a binding contract with valid consideration. This is because both parties exchange something of value, demonstrating their seriousness about the agreement and their intention to be legally bound.

In summary, for a contract to be valid, consideration must be adequate and legally sufficient. It must be bargained for, involve an exchange of value, and not be based on pre-existing legal obligations. Courts will intervene to review the adequacy of consideration when there are concerns about the fairness of the transaction due to factors like significant disparities in bargaining power.

Past consideration is not sufficient

In contract law, consideration is the benefit or value that each party brings to the agreement and is legally obligated to provide once the contract is in place. It is a mutual exchange of promises, performances, forbearances, or property with legal value.

Past consideration refers to an act that could have served as consideration if it had been bargained for at the time but was not the subject of a bargain. In other words, it is a promise made after the promisee's act, which was not part of the original agreement. For example, Mrs. Ace's dog escapes from her condo. Robert finds the dog, returns it to Mrs. Ace, and only then does she promise to pay him $50 as a reward. This is past consideration because the promise of payment was made after the act of returning the dog, and Robert did not initially bargain for or demand any reward.

Past consideration is generally not sufficient to support a promise or contract because there is no exchange or bargain. For something to be considered valid consideration, it must be bargained for and agreed upon by both parties. Both parties must gain a reward and experience detriment as a result of the contract. In the example with Mrs. Ace and Robert, Robert did not bargain for the reward, so there was no exchange or detriment experienced by Mrs. Ace. Therefore, Robert's act of returning the dog would not be considered valid consideration.

Additionally, for consideration to be legally sufficient, it must be something that a party is not already obligated to do. For example, a police officer cannot collect a reward for the capture and arrest of an outlaw because they are already legally obligated to perform this duty. Similarly, a party cannot promise to refrain from doing something they are already forbidden from doing. For instance, a person cannot demand extra compensation for refraining from something they are legally prohibited from doing, such as engaging in illegal activities.

In summary, past consideration is not sufficient to constitute legal consideration because it lacks the essential elements of a bargain and mutual exchange of value. Valid consideration requires a promise, performance, forbearance, or property with legal value that is bargained for and agreed upon by both parties, resulting in a gain or detriment for each party.

Frequently asked questions