The Constitutional Command: Seidman's Legacy And Impact

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center, is known for his contributions to critical legal studies and constitutional legal theory. Seidman believes that certain aspects of the Constitution should be preserved, including freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and equal protection under the law. He also advocates for maintaining a bicameral legislature with checks and balances. While some of his views are considered controversial, Seidman's work has sparked important discussions about constitutional reform and the preservation of fundamental rights.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$245.32 $359

Constitutional Law (Aspen Casebook)

$121.6 $269

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

Constitutional Law + CasebookConnect (Aspen Casebook Series)

$75 $269

Constitutional Law: Cases, Comments, and Questions (American Casebook Series)

$300

Constitutional Law: 2020 Supplement (Supplements)

$11.85 $53

Freedom of speech

Louis Michael Seidman, a prominent legal scholar and Professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Law Center, has written extensively on the topic of freedom of speech. Seidman's work often focuses on the progressive case for free speech and the modern American free speech right.

In his essay "Can Free Speech Be Progressive?", Seidman argues that the notion of free speech in the American context is deeply rooted in ideas about fixed property rights and equates freedom with government inaction. He claims that free speech, particularly in the era of social media, is not progressive as it relies too heavily on capital. According to Seidman, cheap speech, like that found on Twitter, is not beneficial to progressives as it often turns into speech clutter and trolling, hindering meaningful progressive discussion.

However, some disagree with Seidman's assertions. They argue that cheap speech does exist and is associated with progressive successes, such as the #metoo and #blacklivesmatter movements. Additionally, it provides a low-risk platform for speakers who fear state violence for expressing their views.

Despite his criticisms, Seidman does believe that the constitutional command of freedom of speech is essential. He supports the First Amendment's protection of free speech, which states: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Seidman recognises the importance of freedom of speech in a thriving democracy, allowing individuals to express their ideas and opinions without fear of government censorship or punishment.

Seidman also advocates for maintaining certain structural elements that promote a functioning democracy, such as a bicameral legislature with checks and balances.

Freedom of religion

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of Constitutional Law at Georgetown University Law Center, is a well-known advocate for preserving specific constitutional commands. While Seidman's focus is primarily on the structural aspects of the Constitution, such as the bicameral legislature, his views on freedom of speech shed light on his perspective on individual rights and freedoms.

Seidman strongly supports retaining the constitutional command of freedom of speech, which is enshrined in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. This right enables individuals to express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions without fear of censorship or punishment. It is considered fundamental to a thriving democracy as it fosters open discussion, encourages diverse viewpoints, and holds the government accountable.

Now, turning to the topic of freedom of religion, it is essential to recognize that it is also addressed in the First Amendment. The First Amendment includes two provisions related to religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from "establishing" or endorsing a particular religion. This clause aims to prevent state-sponsored religions, such as the Church of England, and ensures the separation of church and state. The precise definition of "establishment" has been further clarified by the U.S. Supreme Court in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), setting a three-part test to determine when government assistance to religion is permissible.

On the other hand, the Free Exercise Clause safeguards citizens' right to practice their religion without interference. This right, however, is not absolute and may be limited if the religious practice conflicts with "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest, as seen in the Supreme Court case Prince v. Massachusetts (1944), where the Court ruled that the state's interest in protecting public health and safety overrode religious objections to inoculation.

In conclusion, while Seidman himself does not explicitly mention freedom of religion in the context of constitutional commands, the First Amendment's provisions on religion are integral aspects of individual liberty and religious freedom in the United States. These clauses ensure that citizens can practice their religion without government interference and that the government remains neutral in matters of religion, promoting a diverse and inclusive society.

Checks and balances

The legislative branch makes laws, but the president in the executive branch can veto those laws. The legislative branch makes laws, but the judicial branch can declare those laws unconstitutional. The executive branch, through federal agencies, is responsible for the day-to-day enforcement and administration of federal laws.

The US Constitution's framers were influenced by Enlightenment thinkers such as Montesquieu and Blackstone. They saw checks and balances as essential for the security of liberty. The system has been applied in other countries, including Germany and France.

Louis Michael Seidman, a legal scholar, believes that certain structural elements of the US Constitution should be kept, such as the bicameral legislature, which promotes checks and balances within the legislative process.

Explore related products

On Constitutional Disobedience (Inalienable Rights)

$43.99 $52

High Court Case Summaries on Constitutional Law (Keyed to Stone, Seidman, Sunstein, Tushnet, and Karlan)

$45.75

Constitutional Law: Principles and Practice

$129.99 $193.95

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

Constitutional Law (Supplement)

$19.9 $50

First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook)

$104 $314

Individual rights

Louis Michael Seidman, a professor of constitutional law at Georgetown University Law Center, is a well-known advocate for critical legal education. He believes that some aspects of the Constitution should be maintained, including freedom of speech and religion, equal protection under the law, and the right to be secure from governmental deprivation of life, liberty, and property.

Seidman argues that freedom of speech is essential for a thriving democracy. It enables individuals to express their ideas and opinions without fear of government censorship or punishment. This right is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, which states: "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." Freedom of speech includes not only spoken words but also written expression, symbolic speech, and other forms of communication. Landmark Supreme Court cases, such as Tinker v. Des Moines (1969) and Texas v. Johnson (1989), have upheld the importance of freedom of speech in schools and protected acts of symbolic speech like burning the American flag.

Additionally, Seidman supports the idea of Congress being divided into two houses, the House of Representatives and the Senate. This bicameral system promotes checks and balances within the legislative process, ensuring diverse representation and preventing any one group from wielding too much power.

Seidman also emphasizes the importance of individual rights, such as the right for people to follow any religion they choose without repression. This aligns with his belief in freedom of speech, as both rights guarantee the ability to express one's beliefs and opinions freely.

Overall, Seidman's views on constitutional commands focus on maintaining individual freedoms, encouraging democratic participation, and ensuring a stable and informed society.

Open discussion and debate

Freedom of speech is viewed as a cornerstone of American democracy, promoting diverse viewpoints and holding the government accountable. Seidman believes that freedom of speech is fundamental to a free and fair society, where individuals can express their thoughts and ideas without restriction. This right is also protected in various Supreme Court rulings, such as Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), which upheld students' rights to wear armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War, and Texas v. Johnson (1989), which protected the act of burning the American flag as a form of symbolic speech.

In addition to freedom of speech, Seidman also advocates for maintaining certain structural elements in the Constitution that promote a functioning democracy. He supports the idea of a bicameral legislature, with Congress divided into two houses (the House of Representatives and the Senate). This structure provides checks and balances, ensures diverse representation, and necessitates collaboration and compromise among elected representatives.

While Seidman argues for the preservation of certain constitutional commands, he has also suggested that some aspects of the Constitution could be reformed or updated. For example, he has argued for the importance of engaged citizens, who can hold the government accountable and ensure that power is not concentrated in the hands of a few.

Overall, Seidman's views on constitutional commands, such as freedom of speech and a bicameral legislature, emphasize the importance of open discussion and debate in a democratic society. These rights and structures provide a foundation for individuals to express their opinions, promote diverse viewpoints, and hold their government accountable.

Frequently asked questions