What The Constitution Doesn't Do For Us

which of the following does the constitution not do

The United States Constitution is the highest law of the land, and it establishes the country's governing principles, outlining the rights and responsibilities of the federal government and serving as the foundation for the country's legal system. It is a written document that establishes a federal government with limited powers and outlines the rights and freedoms of citizens. The Constitution is interpreted and enforced by the judicial branch, with the Supreme Court having the final say on constitutional matters. It consists of seven articles outlining the structure and powers of the three branches of the federal government, including the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. The Constitution also includes the Bill of Rights, which protects the fundamental rights of citizens, such as freedom of speech and religion. It does not, however, outline every specific power granted to the government, and it is up to interpretation how some of these powers are exercised.

Characteristics Values
Powers of the judiciary Enumerated by the Constitution to extend to cases arising "under the Constitution"
Powers of the government Limited to those specifically granted by the Constitution
Rigidity The provisions cannot be legally changed as easily as ordinary laws
Education Not mentioned in the Constitution; reserved for the States
Design of coinage Not mentioned in the Constitution, but follows from the right to coin money
Election of the President Done by the House of Representatives if there is no majority Electoral College vote
Oath of Office The President must swear to "faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and [...] preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States"
Commander-in-Chief The President is the Commander-in-Chief of the Army, Navy, and Militia of the several States
Veto The President can veto a bill passed by Congress, but Congress can override with a two-thirds majority in both houses
Pocket veto If Congress adjourns before the end of 10 days, the President can prevent a bill's enactment by not signing it
Preamble An introduction to the highest law of the land, communicating the intentions and purpose of the document
Legislative Powers Vested in a Congress of the United States, consisting of a Senate and House of Representatives
House of Representatives Members are chosen every second year by the people of the several states
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment Limited to removal from office and disqualification to hold future office
Congress Assembly Congress shall assemble at least once a year, on the first Monday in December unless a different day is appointed by law

cycivic

The Constitution does not define government powers or individual rights

The US Constitution does not define government powers or individual rights in the preamble. The preamble sets the stage for the Constitution and communicates the intentions of its framers and the purpose of the document. It is not the law itself, but rather an introduction to the highest law of the law. The preamble outlines five objectives: establishing justice, domestic tranquility, providing for the common defence, promoting general welfare, and securing liberty.

The Constitution does, however, establish a federal government with defined powers. While the federal government possesses significant authority, the Constitution confines that authority to the powers it lists. The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution, ratified in 1791, specifies that every power not granted to the federal government is delegated to state governments. In other words, if the Constitution grants a specific power to the federal government, it is its power alone. Every unenumerated power is a power reserved for the states.

The Ninth Amendment clarifies that the Bill of Rights does not enumerate all possible rights of the people. It states that just because the Bill of Rights lists some rights, it does not constitute an exhaustive list. People may possess other fundamental rights beyond those listed.

The Constitution also does not explicitly mention education. Education is a matter reserved for the states. Additionally, the Constitution is considered a "rigid" document, meaning its provisions are written and cannot be legally changed as easily as ordinary laws. The British Constitution, in contrast, is unwritten and can be changed overnight by an act of Parliament.

cycivic

The US Constitution does not mention education

The absence of a federal right to education in the Constitution has resulted in education-related lawsuits, such as Gary B. v. Snyder, which questioned whether education is a constitutional right protected under the Fourteenth Amendment. The answer, for now, remains no. However, decisions in cases like Gary B. could potentially lead to a change in the federal role in education.

The Supreme Court has also addressed the issue of a right to education. In San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez, parents from a low-income, predominantly Hispanic district argued that it was discriminatory for their schools to receive significantly less funding per pupil compared to a wealthier neighborhood. While a Texas court initially agreed with the parents, the US Supreme Court overturned this decision, asserting that Texas had not violated its constitution and that education is not a fundamental right.

Despite the lack of explicit mention of education in the Constitution, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been applied to educational issues. This clause provided the basis for the landmark 1954 Brown v. Board of Education decision, which ruled that separate educational facilities for black and white students were inherently unequal and laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools.

The context of educational equity has evolved since Brown v. Board, with the modern school population becoming increasingly diverse and multi-racial. While the case primarily focused on black and white students, Latino students are now the largest group of students of color. Research has shown that academic integration benefits students both academically and socially, and many school districts have begun working on voluntary desegregation plans to address the issue.

cycivic

The United States Constitution is a written document that outlines the country's power structure and establishes a government by and for the people. Amending it is a long and challenging process, and changes are not easily made. This is in contrast to the British Constitution, which is unwritten and can be altered overnight by an act of Parliament.

Article 5 of the US Constitution states that it can be changed, and any amendments are fully adopted into the original document. The process of amending the Constitution is deliberately designed to be difficult to prevent one party from making fundamental changes while in power. This safeguards the document from being altered to serve the interests of a single group or ideology.

The Constitution's rigidity is further emphasized by the fact that it took a civil war and the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendments to formalize the legal and civil rights of formerly enslaved people. Even with such fundamental issues, significant societal shifts were required to provide the impetus for constitutional change.

The challenge of amending the Constitution is not solely a matter of procedure but also a reflection of cultural factors. A high amendment threshold signals the sacred nature of the Constitution, making changes less frequent. This cautious approach to constitutional reform ensures that the document remains stable and consistent, providing a foundation for the nation's laws and governance.

While the Constitution does not allow for easy legal changes, it provides a framework for interpreting and applying its principles through formal amendment and informal interpretation. This flexibility ensures that the Constitution can adapt to societal changes while maintaining its core principles and values.

cycivic

The President can veto a bill passed by Congress

The Constitution of the United States is a written document that outlines the country's governing principles and establishes a federal republic. It consists of 4,543 words and is considered a "rigid" constitution due to its provisions being legally difficult to change compared to ordinary laws. The Constitution grants specific powers to the government, and any powers not mentioned in the document are generally derived from general provisions.

One of the key powers granted to the President by the Constitution is the ability to veto a bill passed by Congress. This means that the President can refuse to assent to or block a bill presented by Congress if they disapprove of it for any reason. This power is outlined in Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 of the Constitution, also known as the Presentment Clause.

The process of vetoing a bill involves the President returning the bill to the House of Representatives, along with their objections. The House then enters the objections into their journal and proceeds to reconsider the bill. If, after reconsideration, two-thirds of the House still agree to pass the bill, it is sent to the other house, the Senate, for similar reconsideration. If approved by two-thirds of the Senate, the bill becomes a law despite the President's veto. This process demonstrates the system of checks and balances inherent in the US government, where the President can curb the legislative power of Congress by vetoing bills, but Congress can override the veto with a supermajority vote.

It is important to note that the President has a limited timeframe to exercise their veto power. According to Article I, the President must sign or return a bill within ten days (Sundays excepted) of its presentment. If the President fails to sign the bill within this timeframe while Congress is in session, the bill automatically becomes law. However, if Congress adjourns before the ten days are up and the President does not sign the bill, it does not become law. This is referred to as a "pocket veto."

The President's veto power is a significant aspect of the US political system and underscores the Constitution's role in shaping the country's governance.

cycivic

The Constitution does not define treason (beyond what is mentioned in Section 3)

The Constitution of the United States is a rigid document, meaning that its provisions are written and cannot be changed as easily as ordinary laws. However, the Constitution does not define treason beyond what is mentioned in Section 3, Article III.

Section 3 of the US Constitution, also known as the Treason Clause, defines treason as levying war against the United States or adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort. It also stipulates that no person shall be convicted of treason without the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court. The Framers of the Constitution adopted this definition from the English Statute of Treason enacted in 1350, but they omitted the phrase "compassing or imagining the death of the King," which was a common basis for charges of constructive treason in English law.

The Treason Clause restricts the power of Congress to define treason and limits their ability to make proof of the offense easy to establish and to prescribe punishment. This was done to prevent the abuse of treason charges, as had occurred under English law. The requirement of two witnesses or a confession in open court is meant to ensure that treason charges are not based solely on circumstantial evidence or the testimony of a single witness, including the accused.

While the Treason Clause sets out the basic definition of treason, it does not provide an extensive definition or cover all possible scenarios. For example, it does not specify what constitutes "levying war" or "adhering to the enemy." This allows for some interpretation and flexibility in applying the definition to specific cases.

The interpretation and application of the Treason Clause have evolved over time through judicial decisions and political context. For instance, in the early 19th century, the partisan struggles of the time influenced the interpretation of treason in terms of levying war, as seen in the treason trials of Aaron Burr and his associates. In these cases, the Court confined the meaning of levying war to the actual waging of war, rather than conspiracy to subvert the government by force.

Frequently asked questions

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment