
The group in favor of the Constitution of the United States, also known as Federalists, included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They favored a strong union, weaker state governments, a strong centralized government, and the indirect election of government officials. Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison were influential Federalists who wrote 85 essays collectively known as the Federalist Papers, advocating for the ratification of the Constitution. The Federalists were generally better organized, had strong support in the press, and ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Supporters | Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, George Washington, big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, professionals |
| Support Base | Commercial interests, men of property, creditors, Americans who believed the Articles of Confederation were inadequate |
| Beliefs | Weaker state governments, strong centralized government, indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, representative democracy |
| Goals | Ratification of the Constitution, strong union, assumption of state debts, pass tax laws, create a central bank |
| Publications | The Federalist Papers, 85 newspaper articles advocating for ratification of the Constitution |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn
- Federalists: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote the Federalist Papers, advocating for the Constitution
- Commercial interests: Many Americans believed the Articles of Confederation were inadequate
- Men of property: Big property owners in the North supported the Constitution
- Creditors: They were in favor of the Constitution
- Belief in a republic: Madison argued that a large republic would counterbalance political interest groups

Federalists: Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay wrote the Federalist Papers, advocating for the Constitution
The group in favour of the Constitution of the United States, also known as Federalists, included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They advocated for a strong union and a strong central government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy.
Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay were influential Federalists who wrote the Federalist Papers, a series of 85 powerful newspaper essays advocating for the ratification of the Constitution. Published in 1788, the Federalist Papers were written under the pen name of Publius and made a strong case for the adoption of the Constitution. Hamilton, Madison, and Jay argued that the Constitution would save the fledgling democracy from poverty and even destruction. They also believed that a large republic would counterbalance various political interest groups vying for power.
The Federalists were generally better organized and connected than their opponents, the Anti-Federalists. They had strong support in the press, and their arguments in favour of the Constitution ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates. The Federalist Papers remain a vital source for understanding the key provisions within the Constitution and their underlying principles.
The political divisions between Federalists and Anti-Federalists continued after the Constitution was adopted, particularly during the presidency of George Washington when disputes arose over national fiscal policy.
McConnell's Impact: Supreme Court's Decision and Constitution
You may want to see also

Commercial interests: Many Americans believed the Articles of Confederation were inadequate
The Articles of Confederation, which served as the United States' first constitution, were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. It was in force from March 1, 1781, until 1789 when the present-day Constitution went into effect. The Articles were established as a "league of friendship" and a constitution for the 13 sovereign and independent states after the revolution.
However, many Americans believed the Articles of Confederation were inadequate, particularly in terms of commercial interests. The central government had insufficient power to regulate commerce, levy taxes, or set commercial policy. It also lacked the ability to effectively support a war effort and settle disputes between states. These limitations led to economic instability, with states facing the risk of economic disaster.
The inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation in addressing commercial interests and the overall weakness of the central government concerned many Americans, including George Washington and John Jay. Washington described the government as "a half-starved, limping Government, that appears to be always moving upon crutches, & tottering at every step." John Jay shared similar sentiments, expressing his unease and apprehension about the state of affairs.
The belief in the inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation was a driving force behind the push for a new constitution. The Federalist supporters, which included big property owners, conservative small farmers, businessmen, wealthy merchants, and professionals, advocated for a strong central government and the adoption of the Constitution. They believed that a stronger national government would address the commercial interests and economic challenges faced under the Articles of Confederation.
In conclusion, commercial interests played a significant role in shaping the political landscape during this period. The perceived inadequacy of the Articles of Confederation in addressing these interests led to the emergence of Federalists and Anti-Federalists, with the former advocating for the adoption of the Constitution to address the commercial and economic concerns of the nation.
Separation of Powers: Constitution's Foundation for Governance
You may want to see also

Men of property: Big property owners in the North supported the Constitution
The Federalists were the supporters of the ratification of the U.S. Constitution. They included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. The Federalists were generally better organized, advocated for positive changes, and had strong support in the press of the day. They favored a strong central government, weaker state governments, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy.
Alexander Hamilton, an influential Federalist, wrote many essays advocating for the ratification of the Constitution. James Madison, another author of the Federalist Papers, also supported the Constitution. The Federalists published a series of 85 articles in New York City newspapers advocating for the ratification of the Constitution.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, were opposed to the ratification of the Constitution. They included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They favored strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties.
The political division between Federalists and Anti-Federalists began in the summer of 1787, and the debate over the ratification of the Constitution was a vigorous exercise of the rights to freedom of speech and press. The Federalists ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates, and the Constitution was ratified by nine states by January 9, 1788.
Thus, the Federalists, which included big property owners in the North, were in favor of the Constitution. They believed that a strong central government and the protections afforded by the Constitution would safeguard their property rights and provide stability to the young nation.
The Constitution's Cursive: Unraveling the Script's Secrets
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Creditors: They were in favor of the Constitution
The Constitution of the United States was drafted in 1787 and sent to the states for ratification. Supporters of the document were known as Federalists, while those who opposed it were known as Anti-Federalists. The Federalists included big property owners, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals.
Creditors were among those who supported the Constitution. They stood to benefit from several provisions in the document, including the Bankruptcy and Contracts Clauses. The Bankruptcy Clause gives Congress the power to establish uniform laws on bankruptcy throughout the United States. This provision ensures that creditors' rights are protected and provides a consistent framework for dealing with bankruptcy cases.
The Contracts Clause, on the other hand, states that no state shall pass any law impairing the obligation of contracts. This clause safeguards the rights of creditors by ensuring that contracts are upheld and enforced, preventing situations where a state law could be used to discharge a contract without the creditor's consent.
Additionally, creditors supported the Constitution because they believed it would strengthen the federal government and provide a more stable environment for their financial dealings. Alexander Hamilton, an influential Federalist, wanted the federal government to assume state debts accumulated during the American Revolution. This assumption of state debts was appealing to creditors, as it suggested a more unified and efficient system for debt repayment.
The support of creditors for the Constitution was significant, as it represented the interests of those who had financial stakes in the country's stability and prosperity. Their endorsement contributed to the eventual ratification of the Constitution, shaping the foundation of the United States' governing document.
Constitution's Effectiveness Proven in Battle: A Historical Analysis
You may want to see also

Belief in a republic: Madison argued that a large republic would counterbalance political interest groups
The group in favour of the Constitution of the United States, known as Federalists, included big property owners, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals. They were led by Alexander Hamilton and supported by Washington, commercial interests, creditors, and those who believed the Articles of Confederation were inadequate.
The Federalists believed in a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution. They wanted a strong central government, the indirect election of government officials, longer term limits for officeholders, and representative democracy. They were also in favour of a more mercantile economy and an expansive interpretation of congressional powers.
James Madison, a key figure in the Federalist movement, argued for a large republic, believing that the vastness of the country was a strong argument in favour of a republic. Madison's theory, known as the Madisonian model, suggested that a large republic would counterbalance various political interest groups vying for power. He wrote:
> "The smaller the society, the fewer probably will be the distinct parties and interests composing it; the fewer the distinct parties and interests, the more frequently will a majority be found of the same party and the more easily will they concert and execute their plans of oppression."
Madison argued that by extending the size of the republic, the country would be less vulnerable to separate factions within it. He believed in the necessity of a separation of powers and that the permanent and aggregate interests of the community and rights of citizens were independent of the will of the majority.
Article 5: Powers and Potential of Amendments
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
The Federalists were in favor of a strong union and the adoption of the Constitution. They supported a strong national government, an expansive interpretation of congressional powers, and a more mercantile economy.
The Federalists included big property owners in the North, conservative small farmers and businessmen, wealthy merchants, clergymen, judges, lawyers, and professionals.
The Anti-Federalists were in favor of strong state governments, a weak central government, the direct election of government officials, short term limits for officeholders, and the strengthening of individual liberties.
The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers.
The Federalists were better organized and had strong support in the press. They ultimately prevailed in state ratification debates and the Constitution was adopted. However, the Anti-Federalists' opposition led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties.






















