The Plessy Case: Testing Constitutional Equality Principles

Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that tested the constitutional principle of equality before the law. The case originated in 1892 when Homer Plessy, a man of mixed race, intentionally sat in a railroad car designated for white passengers to challenge Louisiana's segregation laws. The Supreme Court, in its ruling, upheld the segregation law, stating that racial segregation was constitutional under the 'separate but equal' doctrine, as long as the separate facilities for both races were equal in quality. This decision effectively sanctioned racial segregation across the United States for several decades and highlighted the need for continued advocacy for civil rights, particularly for African Americans and other marginalized groups.

Explore related products

Plessy v. Ferguson: Race and Inequality in Jim Crow America (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$18.6 $29.99

Plessy v. Ferguson: A Brief History with Documents

$15.99 $27.99

Constitutional Law: [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$236.63 $359

Constitutional Law: Principles and Polices (Aspen Treatise)

$97.32 $126.95

An Introduction to Constitutional Law: 100+ Supreme Court Cases Everyone Should Know

$26 $34.95

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$305

The constitutionality of racial segregation

Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine. The case originated in 1892 when Homer Plessy, a man of mixed race, refused to sit in a car for Black people and challenged Louisiana's segregation laws. Plessy's lawyers argued that the law requiring "separate but equal accommodations" was unconstitutional and violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution, which provided for equal treatment under the law.

The Supreme Court, however, ruled that racial segregation laws did not violate the U.S. Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality. This decision was based on the interpretation that separateness did not imply legal inferiority and that the law did not impose a "badge of servitude" or infringe on the legal equality of Black Americans. The court's decision effectively sanctioned racial segregation across the United States for several decades and strengthened racial segregation in public accommodations and services.

The "separate but equal" doctrine resulted in systemic inequalities and widespread discrimination, affecting African Americans and other marginalized groups. It led to the proliferation of restrictive Jim Crow laws and separate public accommodations based on race. The decision in Plessy v. Ferguson was never explicitly overruled by the Supreme Court but was effectively rendered moot by subsequent rulings, such as the 1954 Brown v. Board of Education case, which rejected the "separate but equal" doctrine in public education and implied its unconstitutionality in other spheres.

The Plessy v. Ferguson case highlights the importance of equal treatment under the law in protecting civil rights and serves as a reminder of the misinterpretation and misuse of constitutional principles to justify racial segregation and discrimination. It underscores the need for continued vigilance and advocacy in the fight for racial equality and justice.

The separate but equal doctrine

The "separate but equal" doctrine, also known as the Plessy Doctrine, was a legal doctrine in United States constitutional law that was introduced in the Plessy v. Ferguson case of 1896. The doctrine stated that racial segregation did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment as long as the facilities provided to each race were equal. This gave constitutional sanction to laws designed to achieve racial segregation through separate but equal public facilities and services for whites and African Americans.

The case arose from an incident in 1892 when Homer Plessy, a mixed-race man, purchased a train ticket to travel within Louisiana and took a seat in a car reserved for white passengers. After refusing to move to a car for African Americans, he was arrested and charged with violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act. The law required "'equal, but separate' railroad accommodations for white and black passengers.

Plessy's lawyers argued that the law requiring "separate but equal accommodations" was unconstitutional and that it denied him his rights under the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, which provided for equal treatment under the law. However, the Louisiana Supreme Court upheld the law, and the case eventually made its way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court, in a 7-1 decision, ruled that the Louisiana law was constitutional and did not violate the Fourteenth Amendment. Justice Henry Billings Brown, who wrote the majority opinion, stated that separate treatment did not imply the inferiority of African Americans. This decision legitimized state laws establishing racial segregation, particularly in the South, and provided an impetus for further segregation laws.

However, the "separate but equal" doctrine was eventually overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. In this case, the Court unanimously ruled that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal" and that segregation in public education violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision marked a defining moment in U.S. history and served as a catalyst for the civil rights movement, leading to advances in desegregating housing, public accommodations, and institutions of higher education.

The 13th Amendment's prohibition of slavery

The 13th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, passed on January 31, 1865, and ratified on December 6, 1865, abolished slavery and involuntary servitude in the United States and its territories. The Amendment states that "neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States or any place subject to their jurisdiction." This marked a significant shift from the original Constitution, which implicitly recognised slavery, such as in the Three-Fifths Compromise.

While the 13th Amendment abolished slavery, it did not end all forms of it. The Amendment allows for slavery as a punishment for a crime, which has led to debates and legal challenges over the use of prison labour. Additionally, the Amendment did not address the deep-rooted racial inequalities and discrimination that persisted even after the legal abolition of slavery.

The 13th Amendment was the first of three Reconstruction Amendments, including the 14th and 15th Amendments, that greatly expanded the civil rights of Americans. These Amendments affirmed the political rights of Black Americans during the Reconstruction era following the Civil War. Despite these constitutional protections, racial segregation and discriminatory laws remained prevalent in many states, particularly in the South.

One notable example of the continued enforcement of segregation was in the case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. Homer Plessy, a mixed-race man, deliberately boarded a whites-only train car in New Orleans, violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890. The Act required "equal but separate" accommodations for white and black passengers. Plessy challenged the law as unconstitutional, arguing that it denied him equal protection under the 13th and 14th Amendments.

The Supreme Court, in its ruling, upheld the constitutionality of the Separate Car Act, stating that racial segregation laws did not violate the Constitution as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality. This doctrine became known as "separate but equal" and legitimised many state "Jim Crow laws" that re-established racial segregation in the South after the Reconstruction era. Plessy v. Ferguson set a precedent that endured for decades, shaping legal and social attitudes towards racial segregation in the United States.

Explore related products

Constitutional Law: a QuickStudy Laminated Reference Guide

$8.32 $8.95

Constitutional Law [Connected eBook with Study Center] (Aspen Casebook)

$100 $345

Examples & Explanations for Constitutional Law: Individual Rights

$76.95

A Short & Happy Guide to Constitutional Law

$28

Constitutional Law For Dummies

$18 $29.99

Constitutional Law (University Casebook Series)

$296.95

The 14th Amendment's equal protection clause

The 14th Amendment to the US Constitution addresses various aspects of citizenship and the rights of citizens. The amendment states that:

> No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The "equal protection of the laws" clause, commonly known as the Equal Protection Clause, is the most frequently litigated phrase in the amendment. It guarantees that all citizens are entitled to equal protection under the law and prohibits states from treating people differently under the law based on membership in a particular group.

In the case of Plessy v. Ferguson, the constitutionality of a Louisiana state law that allowed for "equal but separate accommodations for the white and colored races" was tested. Plessy, a mixed-race man, deliberately boarded a whites-only train car in New Orleans, violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890. His lawyers argued that the law requiring "separate but equal accommodations" was unconstitutional and violated the 13th and 14th Amendments, which provided for equal treatment under the law. However, the Louisiana Supreme Court and the US Supreme Court upheld the law, ruling that it did not violate the 14th Amendment as long as the facilities for each race were equal in quality.

The Plessy v. Ferguson decision set a precedent for state laws establishing "racial" segregation and provided an impetus for further segregation laws in the South and North. It legitimized the "Jim Crow laws" that re-established racial segregation in the American South after the Reconstruction era. While Plessy v. Ferguson was never explicitly overruled, it is no longer considered good law. The US Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) that segregation in public education was unconstitutional, effectively overturning Plessy v. Ferguson.

The 15th Amendment's right to vote

The case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896 was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that tested the constitutionality of racial segregation laws. The case centred around Homer Plessy, a mixed-race man, who deliberately boarded a whites-only train car in New Orleans, violating Louisiana's Separate Car Act of 1890. The act required "equal, but separate" railroad accommodations for white and black passengers. Plessy's lawyers argued that the law requiring "separate but equal accommodations" was unconstitutional and violated the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments, which provided for equal treatment under the law.

Now, moving on to the topic of the 15th Amendment's right to vote, this amendment was ratified on February 3, 1870, as the last of the Reconstruction Amendments. The 15th Amendment grants all male citizens of the United States the right to vote, regardless of their race, colour, or previous condition of servitude. The official text states: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."

Prior to the 15th Amendment, the most common measurement for voter eligibility was that the prospective voter had to be a white male who owned property of a certain value. However, with the passage of the 13th and 14th Amendments after the Civil War, the focus shifted towards expanding civil rights to the newly-freed African American population, including the right to vote. Despite the ratification of the 15th Amendment, discriminatory practices and laws in the Southern states prevented many African Americans from exercising their right to vote. These practices included poll taxes, literacy tests, grandfather clauses, and intimidation by the Ku Klux Klan.

It is important to note that the 15th Amendment did not extend the right to vote to women, and it would not be until the ratification of the 19th Amendment in 1920 that women gained the right to vote. Additionally, the Supreme Court interpreted the 15th Amendment narrowly, with the 1876 case of United States v. Reese determining that the amendment prohibited restrictions on voting rights rather than granting the right to vote. This interpretation contributed to the rise of "Jim Crow" laws in the South, which segregated African Americans and restricted their voting rights.

In conclusion, the 15th Amendment's guarantee of the right to vote regardless of race or colour was a significant step forward in the Reconstruction era. However, it faced challenges due to discriminatory practices and narrow interpretations by the Supreme Court, which led to the erosion of voting rights for African Americans in the South. It would take further legislative efforts, such as the Voting Rights Act of 1965, to address these issues and enforce the protections guaranteed by the 15th Amendment.

Frequently asked questions