The Right To Remain Silent: Protected By The Fifth Amendment

The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1791, protects the right to remain silent. This amendment creates several constitutional rights, limiting governmental powers and focusing on criminal procedures. The right to remain silent is a well-known concept, often portrayed in movies and TV shows about police, but the constitutional rights it represents are often misunderstood. The Fifth Amendment states that no person [...] shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself. This right against self-incrimination applies when an individual is called to testify in a legal proceeding, whether in a federal or state court, and whether the proceeding is criminal or civil. While the Fifth Amendment protects the right to remain silent, it does not establish an unqualified right to remain silent, and individuals must explicitly invoke this right for it to be protected.

Explore related products

List of 5th Amendment Rights T-Shirt

$16.99

Bill of Rights 5th Amendment T-Shirt

$19.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The Rise and Fall of the Right of Silence

$61.99 $61.99

This Side of Silence: Human Rights, Torture, and the Recognition of Cruelty (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights)

$11.8 $34.95

The Power of Silence: Against the Dictatorship of Noise

$14.81 $19.95

The Fifth Amendment and Miranda rights

The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution creates several constitutional rights, limiting governmental powers focusing on criminal procedures. The Fifth Amendment states that "no person [...] shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself". This is often referred to as a person's right to remain silent, or right to silence.

Miranda rights require police to inform suspects about their rights to remain silent and to an attorney. The Miranda warning is only required before a custodial interrogation begins, and only applies to police officers. The Supreme Court has ruled that police must stop questioning suspects once they assert their right to counsel, but a person must affirmatively invoke the right to silence.

The Fifth Amendment privilege against compulsory self-incrimination applies when an individual is called to testify in a legal proceeding. This applies whether the witness is in a federal court or, under the incorporation doctrine of the Fourteenth Amendment, in a state court, and whether the proceeding itself is criminal or civil.

The Fifth Amendment also commands that property be not taken without just compensation. Valid contracts are property, and rights against the United States arising out of a contract are protected by the Fifth Amendment.

The right to remain silent

The Fifth Amendment protects individuals from being compelled to give self-incriminating testimony, meaning that they cannot be forced to provide evidence that may be used against them in a criminal case. This right applies when an individual is called to testify in a legal proceeding, whether in a federal or state court, and whether the proceeding is criminal or civil. The Supreme Court has extended this protection to any situation outside of the courtroom that involves the curtailment of personal freedom, such as when a suspect is taken into police custody. In such cases, law enforcement must inform the suspect of their Miranda rights, which include the right to remain silent, the right to an attorney, and the right to a government-appointed attorney if the suspect cannot afford one.

However, it is important to note that the right to remain silent is not absolute. For example, in the case of Salinas v. Texas in 2013, the Court ruled that the Fifth Amendment does not protect silence when individuals, not under arrest, are confronted with questions requiring incriminating answers. Additionally, courts have held that individuals must explicitly invoke their right to silence for it to be protected. Simply remaining silent may not be sufficient, as police interrogation prior to taking a suspect into custody is not subject to the same Miranda requirements. In some instances, an individual's silence may be deemed an implicit admission of guilt.

The Fifth Amendment also includes other rights, such as the right to indictment by a grand jury before any criminal charges for felonious crimes, the protection against double jeopardy (the right of defendants to be tried only once for the same offense), and the guarantee that the government cannot seize private property without providing just compensation. These rights have been extended to the state level through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Self-incrimination

The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects individuals from self-incrimination. This means that individuals have the right to remain silent when questioned by police officials or during a criminal trial. The text of the amendment states that "no person [...] shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself". This right is often referred to as "pleading the Fifth" and is well-known in popular culture.

The Fifth Amendment was ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights. While it originally only applied to federal courts, the Supreme Court has since incorporated it to the states through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. This means that neither the federal, state, nor local governments may deny people the rights protected by the Fifth Amendment.

The right to remain silent is not absolute and does not apply in all situations. For example, in the 2013 case Salinas v. Texas, the Court held that the Fifth Amendment does not protect silence when individuals who are not in custody voluntarily answer questions from law enforcement. Additionally, the amendment does not protect against self-incrimination in the form of business papers or obligatory reports, such as tax returns.

To invoke the right to remain silent, an individual must clearly and unambiguously communicate their desire to do so. This is a paradoxical aspect of the right, as speaking is necessary to invoke the right to silence. If a suspect fails to invoke the right properly, it must be established that they waived the right for any statements made during interrogation to be admissible as evidence.

The right to remain silent is a critical protection against self-incrimination, ensuring that individuals cannot be compelled to provide incriminating testimony or evidence against themselves. It is one of several constitutional rights established by the Fifth Amendment, which focus on limiting governmental powers in criminal procedures.

Explore related products

The Other Side of Silence: Voices from the Partition of India

$26.81

Undoing the Silence: Six Tools for Social Change Writing

$20.86

Silence: A Novel (Picador Classics)

$7.85 $18

Storying Silence: A Writing Workbook to Restore Your Voice & Reclaim Your Sovereignty: A Writing Workbook to Restore Your Voice

$24.95 $24.95

The Weight of Their Silence: The Unseen War of Animal Justice

$11.58 $11.58

Silences

$13.39 $16.95

The right to an attorney

The right to counsel is considered paramount as it affects a defendant's ability to assert any other rights they may have. Without legal representation, defendants may struggle to exercise their fair trial rights, such as securing a speedy trial in front of an impartial jury, confronting witnesses, or challenging the charges against them. The Supreme Court has continually clarified the types of cases where states must provide an attorney, what constitutes an “effective” attorney, and the necessary safeguards that public defence systems must have to prevent conflicts of interest.

Due process

The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, ratified in 1791 as part of the Bill of Rights, protects the right to remain silent. The text of the amendment states that "no person [...] shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself".

The Due Process Clause does not govern how a state sets the rules for student discipline in its high schools, but it does govern how that state applies those rules to individual students who are thought to have violated them. Even when an individual is unmistakably acted against on individual grounds, there can be a question of whether the state has "deprived [them] of life, liberty or property".

Frequently asked questions