Tribunals: Understanding The Hierarchy Below The Supreme Court

which branch constitute tribunals inferior to the supreme court

The US Constitution grants Congress the power to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court, also known as lower federal courts. This power is derived from Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 of the Constitution, which allows Congress to establish lower federal courts subordinate to the Supreme Court. The first Congress created lower federal courts in the Judiciary Act of 1789, establishing thirteen judicial districts, each with one district judge. Over time, the federal judiciary expanded, with each new state receiving its own judicial district. The existence of these inferior tribunals has been a subject of debate, with some arguing that Congress has the authority to constitute them, while others propose that the Framers did not intend to require their creation. The Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of inferior tribunals and delineated their powers, ensuring they operate within the framework of the US judicial system.

Characteristics Values
Power to establish inferior federal courts Congress
Purpose Resolving disputes involving or arising under federal laws, including questions about the constitutionality of such laws
Types Article I, Article III, Article IV, and Article II tribunals
Article I tribunals Parties to litigation may voluntarily waive their right to an Article III tribunal and submit to a binding judgment from an Article I tribunal
Article III tribunals Federal courts
Article IV tribunals United States territorial courts
Article II tribunals Constituted unilaterally by the Executive branch
First legislation related to the Federal Judiciary Judiciary Act of 1789

cycivic

Congress has the authority to constitute inferior federal courts

The Constitution of the United States grants Congress the power to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court. This means that Congress has the authority to establish lower federal courts that are subordinate to the Supreme Court. This power is known as Congress's ninth enumerated power and is derived from Article III's Vesting Clause, which places the judicial power of the United States in the Supreme Court and such inferior courts as Congress may establish.

The Constitutional Convention's delegates agreed on the need for a national judiciary with a supreme tribunal but disagreed on the establishment of inferior federal tribunals. John Rutledge, for instance, argued that existing state courts should decide all cases, with a right of appeal to the supreme national tribunal. On the other hand, James Wilson and James Madison proposed a compromise, suggesting that Congress be empowered to appoint inferior tribunals if necessary. Madison further argued that without inferior federal tribunals, the Supreme Court's appellate workload would become unmanageable.

Through the Judiciary Act of 1789, Congress created lower federal courts, organising the federal judiciary into district courts with original jurisdiction over most federal cases, intermediate circuit courts of appeal, and the Supreme Court. Congress has the authority to structure the lower courts, make procedural rules, and regulate their jurisdiction. This includes the power to determine the modes and practices of proceeding for inferior federal courts.

The existence of Article I tribunals, or inferior federal tribunals, has been a subject of controversy, with their power being challenged on multiple occasions. The Supreme Court has consistently upheld their constitutionality, providing clarity on their powers. For example, in Murray's Lessee v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co. (1856), the Supreme Court ruled that legal matters involving public rights are inherently judicial, allowing Article I tribunal decisions to be reviewed by an Article III court.

cycivic

Article I power to establish inferior federal courts

Article III, Section I of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary, stating that "the judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." This provision, known as the Vesting Clause, grants Congress the power to establish lower federal courts, or tribunals, that are subordinate to the Supreme Court. This power is further affirmed by Article I, Section 8, Clause 9 of the Constitution, which explicitly authorises Congress to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court.

The power to establish inferior federal courts is a significant aspect of the separation of powers between the legislative and judicial branches of the US government. By vesting this power in Congress, the Framers of the Constitution intended to provide flexibility and discretion in the establishment and structure of the lower courts. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789, which created thirteen judicial districts, each with one district judge, and established the lower federal court system.

The existence of inferior federal courts, or Article I tribunals, has been a subject of debate and controversy. While some argued that existing state courts should decide all cases with a right of appeal to the Supreme Court, others, like James Madison, emphasised the need for inferior federal tribunals to alleviate the Supreme Court's appellate workload. The Supreme Court has consistently affirmed the constitutionality of Article I tribunals and delineated their power on several occasions.

Article I tribunals are established by the federal government to resolve disputes involving federal laws, including questions about the constitutionality of those laws. These tribunals operate alongside Article III tribunals (federal courts) and Article IV tribunals (US territorial courts). While Article I tribunals do not enjoy the same protections as Article III courts, they play a crucial role in the administration of justice, particularly in handling cases that do not require judicial determination but are susceptible to it.

In conclusion, the Article I power to establish inferior federal courts grants Congress the authority to create lower federal courts subordinate to the Supreme Court. This power has been exercised by Congress to establish a federal judiciary structure that effectively handles the caseload and ensures access to justice for all Americans. The existence of inferior federal courts is a testament to the Framers' vision of a flexible and adaptable judicial system that can meet the needs of a growing nation.

cycivic

Article III provisions outline the reach of federal judicial power

Article III of the Constitution of the United States establishes the federal government's judicial branch and outlines the reach of federal judicial power. It grants Congress the power to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court, or in other words, to establish lower federal courts subordinate to the Supreme Court.

Article III's Vesting Clause places the judicial power of the United States in the Supreme Court and such inferior courts as Congress may establish. This includes the authority to create and organise federal courts below the Supreme Court, as well as the power to define and limit the jurisdiction of these lower courts. This influences the types of cases they can hear and the scope of their decisions.

The judicial power of the United States, as outlined in Article III, extends to a wide range of cases and controversies. It includes all cases in law and equity arising under the Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority. It covers cases involving ambassadors, public ministers, and consuls, as well as admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. It also encompasses controversies in which the United States is a party, between two or more states, between a state and citizens of another state, between citizens of different states, and between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states.

The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction in cases involving ambassadors, public ministers, consuls, and those in which a state is a party. In all other mentioned cases, the Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with certain exceptions. The Evarts Act further limited the types of cases that could be appealed directly to the Supreme Court, giving appellate jurisdiction in most cases to the U.S. Court of Appeals.

The relationship between the judicial and executive branches is defined by a system of checks and balances outlined in Article III. The president, with the advice and consent of the Senate, appoints federal judges, ensuring a balance of power. The executive branch enforces the judgments and decisions of the federal courts and interacts directly with the judicial branch regarding litigation and legal interpretation.

Article III also grants Congress the power to declare the punishment for treason, and through legislative action, Congress can impeach and remove federal judges, including Supreme Court justices, for misconduct or abuse of power. This ensures accountability within the judiciary and safeguards the principles of democracy and the rule of law.

cycivic

The Supreme Court has the final say on inferior federal tribunals

The Supreme Court of the United States is the highest court in the country and acts as the court of last resort for those seeking justice. It is granted certain powers by Article III of the Constitution, which also establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "the judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." This means that Congress has the power to establish inferior federal tribunals, or lower federal courts, that are subordinate to the Supreme Court.

The Constitution Annotated explains that Congress has the power to “constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court," or to establish lower federal courts that are below the Supreme Court in the judicial hierarchy. This power is known as Congress's ninth enumerated power and is derived from Article III's Vesting Clause, which grants judicial power to the Supreme Court and any inferior courts established by Congress.

The existence of inferior federal tribunals was a subject of debate during the Constitutional Convention. Some delegates, like John Rutledge, argued that existing state courts should handle all cases, with a right of appeal to the supreme national tribunal. On the other hand, James Madison argued that without inferior federal tribunals, the Supreme Court's appellate workload would become unmanageable. He and James Wilson proposed a compromise, suggesting that Congress be empowered to appoint inferior tribunals if necessary. This proposal was approved, and Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789, creating a federal court system with thirteen judicial districts.

The Supreme Court plays a crucial role in ensuring that each branch of the government recognizes its limits and respects civil rights and liberties. It has original jurisdiction over certain cases, such as suits between states or cases involving ambassadors. It also has appellate jurisdiction, allowing it to hear cases on appeal that involve constitutional or federal law. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court discretion in deciding whether to hear these appeals.

In summary, while Congress has the power to establish inferior federal tribunals, the Supreme Court holds the ultimate authority as the highest court in the land. It has the final say on constitutional matters, including the interpretation of rights and liberties, and plays a vital role in maintaining the balance of power among the branches of government.

cycivic

The Judiciary Act of 1789 created lower federal courts

The Judiciary Act of 1789, signed by President George Washington, established the federal judiciary of the United States. The Act created lower federal courts, also known as inferior federal tribunals, which were subordinate to the Supreme Court.

The establishment of a national judiciary was considered a crucial task by the founders of the new nation. The Judiciary Act of 1789 provided a charter for the federal judicial system by specifying the jurisdiction and powers of the district and circuit courts. It also outlined the qualifications and authority of federal judges, district attorneys, court clerks, U.S. Marshals, and Deputy Marshals.

The Act was the result of a compromise between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported a strong federal government, while the Anti-Federalists sought to protect the rights of the states. The final form of the Act satisfied neither side, as it was recognised as a clumsy and inefficient system. Despite this, the judicial system established in 1789 remained largely unchanged for almost a century.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 also included the creation of the Office of Attorney General, who represented the United States before the Supreme Court. It authorised the removal of lawsuits between citizens of different states to federal circuit courts, asserting the primacy of national judicial power. Additionally, the Act set the number of Supreme Court justices at six: one Chief Justice and five Associate Justices.

The Judiciary Act of 1789 was a significant milestone in the development of the federal court system in the United States, laying the foundation for the nation's judicial branch.

Frequently asked questions

The ninth enumerated power of Congress is to constitute Tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court.

This power allows Congress to establish lower federal courts subordinate to the Supreme Court of the United States.

Examples of these inferior tribunals include Article I, Article III, and Article IV tribunals. Article III tribunals are federal courts, while Article I and Article IV tribunals are adjudicative entities.

The purpose of these inferior tribunals is to resolve disputes involving or arising under federal laws, including questions about the constitutionality of such laws. They also help reduce the workload on the Supreme Court by handling cases that do not require recourse to the Supreme Court.

Written by
Reviewed by
Share this post
Print
Did this article help you?

Leave a comment