Anti-Federalist Refusal: The Constitution's Missing Signature

The Anti-Federalists were a diverse group of individuals who opposed the ratification of the US Constitution in its original form. They had deep suspicions about the proposed new national government and believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a powerful and tyrannical central government that could trample on the rights of individuals and states. As the debate over ratification raged, one prominent Anti-Federalist's decision not to sign the document would become a pivotal moment in American history.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$6.92 $8.95

An Anti-Federalist Constitution: The Development of Dissent in the Ratification Debates (American Political Thought)

$27.3 $42.99

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.81 $10

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

Elbridge Gerry, Edmund Randolph, and George Mason were the first three Anti-Federalists

Elbridge Gerry was a delegate from Massachusetts, and he was involved in a physical brawl with Francis Dana during the debates between Federalists and Anti-Federalists in his state. Edmund Randolph was a delegate from Virginia, and he refused to sign the Constitution along with George Mason, another Virginian. George Mason was perhaps the most important of the three, as he proposed the addition of a bill of rights just a week before the Constitution was signed. This proposal was rejected as unnecessary, but it became a key demand of the Anti-Federalists and eventually led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights.

The Anti-Federalists played an important role in the early political history of the United States, and their collected speeches, essays, and pamphlets became known as the "Anti-Federalist Papers." They were a diverse group, with each member having their own vision for the new Constitution, but they generally agreed on some key principles. They were concerned about the extensive powers granted to the federal government and the potential for the presidency to become a monarchy. They also believed that the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties.

The Anti-Federalists were strong in the key states of Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, and they mobilized against the Constitution in these states. Their influence led to the passage of the Bill of Rights, as the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to assuage their critics and ensure the successful ratification of the Constitution. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, reluctantly drafted what became the first ten amendments, including the Tenth Amendment, which reinforced the reservation of powers to the states or the people.

They refused to sign the Constitution due to its absence of a Bill of Rights

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties and an erosion of state sovereignty. They advocated for a more decentralised form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.

The Anti-Federalists believed that the federal government's powers to tax provided by the Constitution could be used to exploit citizens and weaken the power of the states. They also believed that the Constitution, as written, would be oppressive, and that the position of president might evolve into a monarchy. They believed the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights to guarantee specific liberties.

The original draft of the Constitution did not include a Bill of Rights, and this was a significant concern for the Anti-Federalists. In fact, George Mason, one of the "Three Dissenters" who refused to sign the document, had proposed the addition of a bill of rights just a week before the Constitution was signed. This proposal was rejected as unnecessary by 10 out of 10 states voting. Mason argued that a bill of rights "would give great quiet to the people".

The Anti-Federalists' arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights, and the Federalists eventually agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, introduced draft proposals of what would become the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, including the Tenth Amendment, which reinforced the reservation of powers to the states or the people. These amendments secured the basic rights and privileges of American citizens, including the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

The Anti-Federalists believed the Constitution would threaten individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists were against the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution would lead to a loss of individual liberties and an erosion of state sovereignty. They advocated for a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states.

The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including those who opposed the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals. Some saw in the proposed government a new centralized and "monarchic" power in disguise that would replicate the cast-off governance of Great Britain. They believed that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also believed that the federal government's powers to tax provided by the Constitution could be used to exploit citizens and weaken the power of the states.

Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution, as written, would be oppressive. They believed that the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights. They also believed that the Constitution created a presidency so powerful that it would become a monarchy. They believed the Constitution provided insufficient rights in the courts (e.g., no guarantee of juries in civil cases, nor that criminal case juries be local) and would create an out-of-control judiciary. In the broadest sense, they held that states should be significantly autonomous and independent in their authority, applying the right to self-administration in all significant internal matters without the unwanted interjections of the federal government.

The Anti-Federalists' most successful argument against the adoption of the Constitution was the lack of a bill of rights to protect individual liberties. Their arguments influenced the formation of the Bill of Rights. As a response to the Anti-Federalists' demands, the Federalists agreed to consider amendments to be added to the new Constitution. This helped assuage its critics and ensure that the Constitution would be successfully ratified.

Explore related products

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$79.05 $85

The Complete Federalist and The Anti-Federalist Papers: The Articles of Confederation, The Constitution of Declaration, All Bill Of Rights & Amendments (Part 4)

$7.49

The Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$7.14 $8

Documents of Revolution: Common Sense, The Complete Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers, The Articles of Confederation, The Articles of Confederation, The U. S. Constitution, The Bill of Rights

$26.99 $26.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

The Complete Federalist and The Anti-Federalist Papers: The Articles of Confederation, The Constitution of Declaration, The Preamble to The Bill of Rights

$7.49

They wanted a more decentralised government with greater state protections

The Anti-Federalists were a loose coalition of politicians who opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution, as drafted, would lead to a loss of individual liberties, an erosion of state sovereignty, and the potential for the rise of tyranny. They wanted a more decentralised government with greater state protections.

The Anti-Federalists' primary concern was the preservation of individual liberties and the prevention of government overreach. They feared that the Constitution, without a Bill of Rights, would grant too much power to the federal government at the expense of the states and the people. They believed that a large central government would not adequately represent the interests of small towns and rural areas, instead favouring the urban interests of lawyers, merchants, and other Federalists.

The Anti-Federalists advocated for a more decentralised form of government, with greater protections for individual rights and stronger representation for the states. They believed that the states should be significantly autonomous and independent in their authority. They wanted to ensure that the power of the federal government was limited and that the rights of the states and the people were protected.

The Anti-Federalists also had specific concerns about the presidency. They worried that the position, which was a novelty at the time, might evolve into a monarchy, with the president holding too much power and becoming akin to a king. They also believed that the Constitution provided insufficient rights in the courts, such as no guarantee of juries in civil cases or local juries in criminal cases.

The Anti-Federalists played an important role in the early years of the United States, influencing the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution. Their efforts ensured that the rights and liberties of the states and the people were guaranteed and that the federal government's powers were limited.

The Anti-Federalists' influence helped lead to the passage of the Bill of Rights

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. They believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, threatening individual liberties and eroding state sovereignty. They wanted a more decentralized form of government with greater protections for individual rights and stronger state representation.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the Constitution and their demand for a bill of rights to guarantee specific liberties influenced the Federalists to agree to consider amendments to the new Constitution. James Madison, a Federalist and the primary architect of the Constitution, proposed nine changes to the Constitution, which later became the first ten amendments of the United States Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights. These amendments were designed to protect and uphold individual rights and included the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments.

The Anti-Federalists' influence on the passage of the Bill of Rights was significant. Their arguments and mobilization against the Constitution in state legislatures across the country, particularly in crucial states like Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, made ratification of the Constitution contingent on including a Bill of Rights. This compromise helped assuage critics and ensured the Constitution's successful ratification.

The Bill of Rights gave American citizens codified individual freedoms and rights, such as freedom of speech and the press, while also addressing Anti-Federalist concerns about excessive federal power by reserving any power not given to the federal government to the states and the people. This power dynamic is reinforced by the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Frequently asked questions