
While the U.S. Constitution and its amendments do not specifically mention education, the 14th Amendment has been used to protect public education rights. The 14th Amendment's Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses have been applied to educational issues, such as in the landmark case Brown v. Board of Education, which laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools. The Court's decision required all public schools in states that had segregated students to desegregate, marking a significant shift in public education. The 14th Amendment continues to shape educational policies and rights, with ongoing debates about the federal government's role in education and the potential for a constitutional right to education.
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

The Fourteenth Amendment and racial discrimination
While the U.S. Constitution does not expressly mention education, the Fourteenth Amendment has had a significant impact on protecting public education rights. The Fourteenth Amendment addresses many aspects of citizenship and the rights of citizens, and the most commonly used and frequently litigated phrase in the amendment is "equal protection of the laws".
The Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause has been pivotal in addressing racial discrimination in education. This clause prohibits states from denying equal protection of the laws and depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The amendment ensures that states cannot withhold equal protection of the laws from people of colour, and it authorises Congress to enforce this through legislation.
The landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education is a prime example of the Fourteenth Amendment's role in combating racial discrimination in schools. The case challenged the discriminatory practice of segregating students based on race, and as a result, all public schools in all states were required to desegregate or face claims of violating the Fourteenth Amendment. This case set a precedent for future integration efforts in schools, aiming to promote diverse student populations.
Another notable case that invoked the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause was Plyler v. Doe. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that a Texas statute withholding state funds for the education of undocumented children and authorising schools to deny their enrolment violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Court affirmed that states could not deny a group of children access to the free public education offered to other children within its borders, unless it served a substantial state interest.
The Fourteenth Amendment has also been central in addressing affirmative action plans and racial quotas in education. For instance, in Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education, the Court invalidated a provision that gave minority teachers preferential protection from layoffs. On the other hand, in United States v. Paradise, the Court upheld a court-ordered racial quota in promotions as a remedy for past discrimination. These cases illustrate the complex nature of applying racial classifications and the need to balance the interests of different racial groups.
Amendment History: The 19th Amendment's Adoption
You may want to see also

Equal protection of the laws
The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution has had a significant impact on protecting public education rights. The 14th Amendment protects public education rights through its Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. The Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment provides that a state may not "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws." This clause prohibits states from denying equal protection of the laws and depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
The 14th Amendment has been applied to educational issues, with a focus on ending discriminatory practices and promoting integration efforts in public schools. In the landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court interpreted the Equal Protection Clause's requirements, stating that "separate but equal" in public education is unconstitutional. This decision required all public schools in states that had segregated students based on race to desegregate, marking the beginning of years of desegregation efforts and court decisions regarding the constitutionality of these efforts.
The Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools. It was determined that separate educational facilities for different races were inherently unequal and deprived students of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the 14th Amendment. This case primarily focused on black and white students; however, the modern school population is increasingly diverse and multi-racial, with Latino students being the largest group of students of colour.
Research has shown that integrated schools have positive academic and social benefits. Students who attend integrated schools have higher levels of academic achievement, improved critical thinking and communication skills, reduced prejudice and belief in stereotypes, and increased friendships across racial groups. These benefits can extend beyond graduation, impacting students' lives well into the future.
In addition to addressing racial segregation, the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment has been applied in other educational contexts. In Plyler v. Doe, the Supreme Court ruled that a Texas statute withholding state funds for the education of children not legally admitted into the country and authorising local school districts to deny enrollment violated the Equal Protection Clause. The Court stated that states could not deny a group of innocent children the free public education offered to other children unless it furthered a substantial state interest.
The Evolution of New Jersey's Constitution
You may want to see also

Education not a fundamental right
The US Constitution does not expressly mention education, and the Supreme Court has not interpreted it to require the federal government to provide or fund education services. The Tenth Amendment states that any power not specifically granted in the Constitution is reserved for the states, allowing for more localised decision-making. This means that the states are in charge of providing and regulating schooling.
The Fourteenth Amendment, which addresses citizenship and the rights of citizens, has been used as a tool in lawsuits to protect public education rights through its Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. These clauses prohibit states from denying equal protection of the laws and from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. The Fourteenth Amendment has been significant in ending the discriminatory practice of segregating students based on race.
However, the Supreme Court has consistently asserted that education is not a constitutionally protected right. In San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez in 1973, the Court opined that education "is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under our Federal Constitution". This interpretation was affirmed in three other cases in the 1980s. In 2016, a lawsuit was filed in what became the Gary B. case, challenging precedent under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court again ruled that there is no fundamental right to education under the Fourteenth Amendment.
While the US Constitution does not recognise a fundamental right to education, international law, including the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, recognises the right to education for all children, regardless of nationality, gender, or place of birth.
Latest Amendments: Constitution's Most Recent Changes
You may want to see also
Explore related products

Due Process Clause
The US Constitution does not expressly mention education, and the United States Supreme Court has not interpreted it to require the federal government to provide or fund education services. The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not given to the federal government for the states or the people, and these reserved powers include education.
However, the Fourteenth Amendment has had a significant effect on protecting public education rights through its Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. The Due Process Clause, found in the Fifth Amendment, says that no one shall be "deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law" by the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, extends this obligation to the states.
The Due Process Clause has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to have substantive and procedural protections. Substantive due process protects a parent's right to direct the educational upbringing of their child. The Supreme Court has ruled that state statutes prohibiting the teaching of foreign languages and requiring all students to attend public schools violate the Fourteenth Amendment. In another case, the Court ruled that a state statute requiring Amish children to attend school past the eighth grade violated the substantive due process rights and the religious freedom rights of Amish parents to direct their children's educational and religious upbringing.
The Due Process Clause also promises that the government must follow fair procedures before depriving a person of life, liberty, or property. This means that the government must not only act in accordance with the law but also observe fair procedures, whether or not those procedures are provided for in the law. For example, if state law gives students a right to a public education but doesn't address discipline, the state cannot deny students their right to education as a disciplinary measure without following fair procedures.
Amending the Constitution: The Power to Change
You may want to see also

Tenth Amendment and federal oversight
The Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution, passed early in the nation's history, states that:
> [t]he powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution ... are reserved to the States respectively.
This amendment forms the basis for making education a function of the states. The Tenth Amendment has been interpreted to mean that any power not specifically granted in the Constitution should be reserved for the states, allowing for more independence and localized decision-making. This includes the power to provide and regulate schooling, as the US Constitution and its amendments do not specifically mention education.
However, the federal government has played a minor role in education, particularly in evaluating each school district. The federal government administers the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), also known as the Nation's Report Card. The federal government has also used funding mechanisms to influence education policy at the state level. For example, the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) offered states funding for education programs on a conditional basis, allowing the federal government to work around the Tenth Amendment and enforce the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection requirements.
The 2001 No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) marked a new level of federal oversight by requiring states to set more rigorous student evaluation standards and demonstrate "adequate yearly progress" through testing. While the NCLB faced criticism and expired in 2007, it represented an attempt by the federal government to exert greater control over education policy.
In summary, while the Tenth Amendment generally reserves the power to regulate education for the states, the federal government has found ways to influence education policy through funding mechanisms, policy directives, and evaluation measures.
Amendments: How the Constitution Evolves
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
No, the US Constitution does not mention education. The Tenth Amendment states that any power not specifically mentioned in the Constitution is reserved for the states, allowing for more localised decision-making.
The Fourteenth Amendment has been used to address educational issues. The Fourteenth Amendment includes the "equal protection of the laws" clause, which has been used in landmark cases such as Brown v. Board of Education, which laid the foundation for dismantling racial segregation in schools.
The Fourteenth Amendment has had a significant impact on protecting public education rights. It has been used to end discriminatory practices such as segregating students based on race and to promote diversity in student populations. The Amendment's Due Process Clause has also been applied to ensure students get at least a basic minimum education.
No, there is currently no federal right to education enshrined in the US Constitution. The Supreme Court has ruled that education is not a fundamental right, and it is not among the rights afforded explicit protection under the Constitution. However, there have been court cases and legislative actions that have interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment as protecting a right to basic education, and there may be future lawsuits that could change this interpretation.

























