The Hatch Act: Constitutional Basis Explored

The Hatch Act, a United States federal law, prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and vice president, from engaging in certain forms of political activity. The Act was introduced by Senator Carl Hatch in 1939 and was most recently amended in 2012. The Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Special Counsel are responsible for enforcing the Act, which has been upheld by the Supreme Court several times. The Act's purpose is to ensure that federal programs are administered without political bias, to protect federal employees from political coercion, and to ensure that federal employees are promoted based on merit rather than political affiliation.

Explore related products

Federal Law: The Ultimate Guide to Beating Any Federal Case with Discrepancies

$11.11 $11.11

Federal Rules of Evidence; 2025 Edition: With Internal Cross-References

$9.99

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; 2025 Edition: With Statutory Supplement (Quick Desk Reference)

$19.5

Federal Administrative Law, Cases and Materials (University Casebook Series)

$305

Guide to Federal Pharmacy Law, 9th Edition

$39.04 $59.95

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; 2025 Edition

$12.5

The Hatch Act's restrictions on federal employees' political activities

The Hatch Act of 1939, also known as "An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities", is a United States federal law that prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government from engaging in certain forms of political activity. The law was enacted by Congress to regulate corruption and possible intimidation of federal employees in the civil service by their elected supervisors. It was named for Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico, who introduced the act after learning that New Deal–era government programs, specifically the Works Progress Administration, were using federal funds to overtly support Democratic Party candidates in the 1938 elections.

The Hatch Act restricts federal employees from taking part in political campaigns and prohibits the use of federal funds for electoral purposes. It forbids federal officials from coercing political support with the promise of public jobs or funds and bars federal employees from membership in any political organization that advocates the overthrow of the constitutional form of government. The act also precludes employees from taking any active part in political campaigns, such as running for office in partisan politics. The Supreme Court has twice upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act, finding that it does not affect voting rights and that Congress had exercised its authority properly.

The Hatch Act was most recently amended in 2012, with President Barack Obama signing the Hatch Act Modernization Act on December 28, 2012. This amendment modified the penalties under the act to allow for disciplinary actions in addition to removal for federal employees. It also clarified the act's applicability to the District of Columbia and limited the prohibition on state and local employees running for elective office. The Hatch Act does not apply to military members of the uniformed services but does apply to Department of Defense and Department of Homeland Security civil servants.

While the Hatch Act has been challenged on First Amendment grounds, the Court has upheld its enforcement, balancing the rights of individuals to free speech with the need for political neutrality among federal employees. The Court found that the act forbids only the partisan activity of federal personnel deemed offensive to efficiency and that Congress had enacted a constitutional balance between the interests of individual employees and the government.

The Act's applicability to state and local government employees

The Hatch Act applies to state and local government employees who are primarily funded by federal funds. This includes employees of state agencies that administer federal unemployment insurance programs and appointed local law enforcement officials with oversight of federal grant funds. The Act bars state and local government employees from running for public office if any federal funds support their position, even if it is funded primarily with local funds.

The Act specifies the types of political activities that these employees may and may not engage in. They can register and vote, contribute money to political organizations, and run for non-partisan office. They are, however, prohibited from running for partisan office or engaging in political activity while on duty, in a government office, wearing an official uniform, or using a government vehicle.

Employees who work for educational or research institutions that are supported in whole or in part by a state or its political subdivision are not covered by the Act, even if they are also financed by the federal government. The law also does not apply to mayors or unclassified elected department heads.

The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is responsible for enforcing the Hatch Act. For example, in 2006, the OSC upheld a challenge to the candidacy of Ogden City Police Chief Jon Greiner for the State Senate because the Ogden City Police Department had received federal grants in the previous year. Greiner remained on the ballot, won the election, and served one term while the results of the appeal were unknown.

The Act's enforcement and the role of the Office of Special Counsel

The Hatch Act of 1939, also known as "An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities", is a United States federal law that prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government from engaging in certain forms of political activity. The Merit Systems Protection Board and the Office of Special Counsel (OSC) are jointly responsible for enforcing the Hatch Act.

The OSC plays a crucial role in ensuring compliance with the Hatch Act by investigating alleged violations and providing guidance to federal employees and agencies. It receives and reviews complaints about potential Hatch Act violations and determines whether disciplinary action is warranted. The OSC can recommend disciplinary action, such as suspension or removal from office, for federal employees found to have violated the Act. The OSC also issues advisory opinions and provides educational resources to help federal employees understand their obligations under the law.

The Hatch Act has been amended several times to balance the rights of individuals to free speech and political expression with the need for political neutrality among federal employees. The Act does not apply to the President or Vice President, and it specifically protects the right of employees to vote and participate in political decisions at the ballot box. However, it prohibits federal employees from using their official authority to influence the outcome of elections or engage in certain political activities, such as running for office in partisan politics.

The Supreme Court has twice upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act, in 1947 and 1973, finding that Congress properly exercised its authority as long as it did not affect voting rights. The Court recognised the importance of maintaining a politically neutral federal workforce and preventing the appearance of currying favour through political activity. The Act has also survived First Amendment free expression challenges, with the Court balancing the rights of individuals with the need for order and efficiency in the federal government.

Explore related products

Federal Law Enforcement: A Primer, Third Edition

$47 $59

Federal Rules of Evidence, 2025 Edition: With Internal Cross-References, Advisory Committee Notes and Landmark Cases Supplement. Includes Recent Amendments and Practical Exercises

$19.99

Essential Guide to Federal Employment Laws, The

$37.98 $49.99

Federal Administrative Law (American Casebook Series)

$243.98 $305

CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS TITLE 34 2022 EDITION VOLUME 2 OF 4 PARTS 300 TO 399: WEST HARTFORD LEGAL PUBLISHING

$30

Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure; 2024 Edition

$12.5

The Act's constitutionality and First Amendment free speech challenges

The Hatch Act of 1939, An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities, is a United States federal law that prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government, except the president and vice president, from engaging in some forms of political activity. It was introduced by Senator Carl Hatch of New Mexico. The Act has been upheld against First Amendment challenges, with the Supreme Court twice affirming its constitutionality.

In United Public Workers of America v. Mitchell (1947), the Court balanced the rights of individuals to free speech with the "elemental need for order". The Court upheld the enforcement of the law, deferring to Congress's judgment regarding the amount of political neutrality necessary for federal employees. The Court explained that Congress was not unconcerned about its employees and that it had left untouched full participation by employees in political decisions at the ballot box and forbids only the partisan activity of federal personnel deemed offensive to efficiency. However, Justice Hugo L. Black dissented, arguing that the rights to vote and privately express political opinions were part of the broader freedoms protected by the Constitution, and he saw no reason to limit the freedoms of federal employees.

In 1973, the Supreme Court again upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act in United States Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers. The Court believed that Congress had enacted a constitutional balance between the interests of individual employees and the government-employer's interests in maintaining limitations on partisan political activities. The Court found that Congress used the act to avoid "practicing political justice" and also to avoid the appearance of currying federal government favour through political activity. The Court further explained that by limiting the political activities of federal employees, Congress protected the employees' interests in being free from coercion to become politically active.

The Hatch Act has been amended several times to allow federal employees more political expression. In 1993, Congress amended the Act to allow most federal employees to engage actively in partisan political management and political campaigns. However, some have argued that the Act restricts the speech of federal workers while not restricting the speech of highly visible senior political appointees, limiting transparency. There have been calls to amend the Act to restore federal workers' First Amendment rights.

The Act's impact on political coercion and employee advancement

The Hatch Act of 1939, also known as "An Act to Prevent Pernicious Political Activities", is a United States federal law that prohibits civil service employees in the executive branch of the federal government from engaging in certain forms of political activity. This law was enacted to prevent political coercion and ensure fair employee advancement, and it has been amended several times since its implementation.

The Hatch Act specifically targets political coercion by forbidding federal officials from using their power to influence political support. This includes banning the use of federal funds for electoral purposes and prohibiting the intimidation or bribery of voters. By doing so, the Act aims to prevent the appearance of currying federal government favour through political activity and protect employees from being pressured to become politically active. The Act also bars federal employees from holding membership in any political organisation that advocates the overthrow of the constitutional government, including far-left and far-right groups.

In terms of employee advancement, the Hatch Act ensures fairness by prohibiting federal employees from running for office in partisan elections or using their authority to impact election results. This prevents employees from gaining unfair political advantages through their positions and protects their right to free political expression. The Act also allows for disciplinary actions and clarifies the applicability of the law to state and local government employees, further ensuring equal opportunities for all employees.

While the Hatch Act primarily focuses on restricting political activities, it also underwent amendments in 1993 to remove the prohibition on participation in "political management or political campaigns". This amendment allows federal employees to engage in political expression while still maintaining the integrity of the electoral process. The Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the Hatch Act, acknowledging that it achieves a delicate balance between fair governance and the First Amendment rights of individual employees.

Overall, the Hatch Act plays a crucial role in maintaining the integrity of the political process and ensuring that federal employees are not coerced into political participation. By regulating political activities and prohibiting the use of federal resources for partisan gain, the Act promotes fair employee advancement and protects the rights of individuals. The Act has been subject to amendments and legal challenges over the years, reflecting the evolving nature of political expression and the need to adapt legislation accordingly.

Frequently asked questions