Amending The Constitution: Understanding The Process

The process for amending the US Constitution is defined in Article V of the Constitution. Article V establishes two methods for proposing amendments: Congress can propose an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention can be called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. To become part of the Constitution, an amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures or by ratifying conventions in three-fourths of the states. The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, and no amendments have been proposed by constitutional convention so far.

Explore related products

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The United States Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights with Amendments: Large Print Edition (Annotated)

$9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and all of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation

$4.5 $4.5

The Second Founding: How the Civil War and Reconstruction Remade the Constitution

$16.69 $17.95

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

Article V outlines the process

The first method has been used for all 33 amendments submitted to the states for ratification. The second method, the convention option, has yet to be invoked. Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified to become part of the Constitution. This can be done in two ways: through the legislatures of three-quarters of the states or by ratifying conventions in three-quarters of the states. The latter method has only been used once in American history, for the 1933 ratification of the 21st Amendment.

The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, and the joint resolution does not require their signature or approval. The Archivist of the United States is responsible for administering the ratification process, although they do not make substantive determinations as to the validity of state ratification actions. Their certification of the facial legal sufficiency of ratification documents is final and conclusive.

Article V also makes certain subjects unamendable. It states that no amendment made prior to the year 1808 shall affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article, and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.

Congress proposes amendments

The authority to amend the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution. A two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate is required for this. The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, and the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval.

The original document is forwarded directly to NARA's Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication. The OFR adds legislative history notes to the joint resolution and publishes it in slip law format. The OFR also assembles an information package for the States, which includes formal "red-line" copies of the joint resolution, copies of the joint resolution in slip law format, and the statutory proposal.

The Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), is responsible for administering the ratification process. The Archivist submits the proposed amendment to the States for their consideration by sending a letter of notification to each Governor, along with the informational material prepared by the OFR. The Governors then formally submit the amendment to their State legislatures or call for a convention, depending on what Congress has specified.

A proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by three-fourths of the States (38 out of 50 States). When the OFR verifies that it has received the required number of authenticated ratification documents, it drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large and serves as official notice to Congress and the Nation that the amendment process has been completed.

Ratification by three-fourths of states

The process of amending the Constitution of the United States is derived from Article V of the Constitution. This article establishes two methods for proposing amendments: either by a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

Once an amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50 states) to become part of the Constitution. This can be done through a vote of the state legislatures or a state convention, as determined by Congress. The ratification process is administered by the Archivist of the United States, who heads the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), and the Director of the Federal Register.

When a state ratifies a proposed amendment, it sends an original or certified copy of the state action to the Archivist, who then forwards it to the Director of the Federal Register for examination. The Director ensures the ratification documents are legally sufficient and have authentic signatures. If the documents are in order, the Director acknowledges receipt and maintains custody of them until the amendment is adopted or fails.

Once the required number of authenticated ratification documents is reached, the Director drafts a formal proclamation for the Archivist to certify that the amendment is valid and has become part of the Constitution. This certification is then published in the Federal Register and U.S. Statutes at Large, serving as official notice to Congress and the nation that the amendment process is complete.

It is important to note that the ratification process does not have a specific time limit. However, the Supreme Court has affirmed that Congress has the power to set a "reasonable" and "sufficiently contemporaneous" time frame for ratification to reflect the will of the people at the time the amendment is proposed. Additionally, Congress may determine the validity of an amendment after ratification by three-fourths of the states, considering whether the amendment remains relevant or has "lost its vitality through lapse of time."

Explore related products

Perfecting the U.S. Constitution: 27 and Counting, The Amendments that Shaped America’s Future (Anthem Studies in Law Reform, 1)

$19.99 $90

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.18

The Fifth Amendment: Double Jeopardy, Self-incrimination, and Due Process of Law (Amendments to the United States Constitution: the Bill of Rights)

$13.95

Ordinary Equality: The Fearless Women and Queer People Who Shaped the U.S. Constitution and the Equal Rights Amendment

$23.26 $27.99

The Liberty Amendments: Restoring the American Republic

$8.2 $26.99

Perfecting the Constitution: The Case for the Article V Amendment Process

$52.19 $57.99

The President's non-involvement

The process of amending the US Constitution is defined in Article V of the Constitution. The President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process. The Congress proposes an amendment in the form of a joint resolution, which does not go to the White House for signature or approval. The original document is sent directly to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication.

The Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in amending the Constitution. The President cannot veto a proposed amendment. However, in recent history, the President has been involved in the ceremonial function of signing the certification of amendments. For example, President Johnson signed the certifications for the 24th and 25th Amendments, and President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment. Additionally, President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution extending the deadline for ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being advised that his signature was unnecessary.

While the President does not have a direct role in the amendment process, they can propose legislation to Congress. Some Presidents have played a ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification. For example, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after Congress approved them.

The authority to amend the Constitution rests with Congress and the states. Congress can propose amendments with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by calling a constitutional convention requested by two-thirds of the state legislatures. An amendment becomes part of the Constitution when ratified by three-quarters of the states (38 out of 50). The Archivist of the United States, who heads NARA, is responsible for administering the ratification process and certifying a state's ratification of an amendment.

Alternative methods debated

The authority to amend the US Constitution is derived from Article V of the Constitution. This article establishes two methods for proposing amendments: Congress proposes an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or a constitutional convention is called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures.

However, there have been debates and alternative methods proposed. For instance, some scholars, like Akhil Reed Amar, argue that the people of the United States may amend the Constitution using methods not specifically outlined in Article V. This view suggests that alternative processes could be utilized to amend the nation's foundational document.

Another proposed alternative method is the idea of an Article V convention, where states could apply for a convention focused on a particular amendment text. This proposal acknowledges that Congress could review applications for conformity with Article V but suggests that Congress cannot refuse to submit a proposed amendment to the states. However, it is considered unlikely that the Supreme Court would compel Congress to call a convention or submit an amendment.

Additionally, there is a debate about the role of Congress in the amendment process. While Congress has used its own machinery to propose amendments independently, some scholars argue that Congress should not have the power to review proposals, as it deprives the state convention method of its independence. This debate centers on the appropriate level of Congressional involvement in the amendment process.

These alternative methods and debates showcase the complexity of the constitutional amendment process and the ongoing discussions surrounding it. While Article V provides the primary framework, there are varying interpretations and proposals for how the process can be approached and potentially modified.

Frequently asked questions