The Constitution And Privacy: What's The Connection?

While the right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, it is considered a fundamental liberty and is protected by various amendments and interpretations of constitutional law. The Third Amendment, for instance, relates to privacy within someone's personal property, and the Fourth Amendment states that no one can search possessions or property without good reason or a warrant. The Fourteenth Amendment, which concerns personal liberties, has been used to extend the right to privacy to encompass an individual's right to have an abortion and use contraceptives. The Supreme Court has also recognised the right to decisional privacy, or the right to independently control the most personal aspects of our lives, as an outgrowth of protections for individual liberty. In other countries, such as China and India, the right to privacy is explicitly mentioned in their constitutions and is considered a fundamental right.

Explore related products

The Right To Privacy

$13.6 $26.95

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Griswold v. Connecticut: Birth Control and the Constitutional Right of Privacy (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)

$24.99 $29.99

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

Privacy and the American Constitution: New Rights Through Interpretation of an Old Text

$99.46 $119

How to Interpret the Constitution

$13.69 $22.95

Privacy in the US Constitution

Privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution. However, it is widely regarded as a fundamental liberty and is inferred from the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments.

The Supreme Court first recognised the "right to privacy" in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). The Court used personal protections expressly stated in the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments to find that there is an implied right to privacy in the Constitution. This created a “zone of privacy” for citizens. The Fourteenth Amendment has also been used in privacy cases, guaranteeing due process and extending the right to privacy to individuals rather than marital couples, as well as to same-sex couples.

Privacy rights are also inherently linked to information technology and medical decision-making. The Supreme Court has protected a person's freedom in medical choices, such as abortion and contraceptive access, under the right to privacy. The right to "informational privacy" allows individuals to limit government disclosure of information about them.

While the US Constitution does not explicitly mention privacy, it is a right deeply valued by Americans and has been recognised by the Supreme Court as an essential liberty, evolving and adapting to new situations and technologies.

Privacy and the Fourteenth Amendment

The Fourteenth Amendment addresses various aspects of citizenship and citizens' rights. While the amendment does not explicitly mention the "right to privacy", the Supreme Court has inferred this right from the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments.

The Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause is the source of a range of constitutional rights, including some of the most cherished and controversial. The rights protected under the Fourteenth Amendment can be categorised into three groups:

• Procedural due process: This concerns the procedures that the government must follow before depriving an individual of life, liberty, or property.
• Individual rights listed in the Bill of Rights, "incorporated" against the states: This includes most of the rights in the Bill of Rights, with a few exceptions, such as the Third Amendment's restriction on quartering soldiers and the Fifth Amendment's right to a grand jury trial.
• Substantive due process: This includes certain substantive rights that are not listed in the Constitution, such as the right to privacy.

In Eisenstadt v. Baird (1971) and Lawrence v. Texas (2003), the Supreme Court extended the right to privacy by relying on the Fourteenth Amendment. In Eisenstadt, the Court extended the right to purchase contraceptives to unmarried couples, affirming that the right to privacy "inheres in the individual, not the marital couple." In Lawrence, the Court used the Fourteenth Amendment to extend privacy rights to same-sex couples engaging in sexual conduct, guaranteeing their right to respect for their private lives.

Additionally, in Roe v. Wade, the Court used the right to privacy derived from the Fourteenth Amendment to protect an individual's right to abortion, stating that it falls under the amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions on state action. However, this was later overturned with the Dobbs decision, removing abortion rights from the broader right to privacy.

While the right to privacy is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution or the Fourteenth Amendment, the Supreme Court has interpreted and extended this right through various cases, ensuring that citizens' private lives are respected and protected.

Privacy in marriage

While the US Constitution does not explicitly mention the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has inferred it from the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments. In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court first recognized the "right to privacy", derived from penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The Court used personal protections expressly stated in the Amendments to find an implied right to privacy in the Constitution, creating a "zone of privacy".

Invasion of privacy in a marriage can be harmful. Respecting each other's privacy and boundaries is crucial, and both partners should be honest about their privacy needs. For instance, reading through a partner's private messages without permission can be considered a violation of trust and space.

However, it is important to distinguish between privacy and secrecy. While privacy refers to personal boundaries and individual history, thoughts, opinions, and experiences, secrecy involves intentionally hiding information from a partner, which can undermine trust and intimacy. For instance, keeping an affair secret is hurtful to a marriage.

Ultimately, privacy in marriage is about finding a balance between sharing and maintaining personal boundaries. It is about respecting each other's needs for space and privacy while also fostering trust and intimacy through openness and honesty.

Explore related products

More Essential than Ever: The Fourth Amendment in the Twenty First Century (Inalienable Rights)

$17 $31.49

The Right of Privacy in the Constitution

$0.99

Our Right to Privacy-Hijacked by Government: The U.S. Government Consistently Violates "the supreme law of the land," the Constitution of the United ... of America Revised and Updated Second Edition

$35.5

The Right to Privacy: Interpreting the Constitution (Understanding the United States Constitution)

$44.8

The Right to Privacy: Gays, Lesbians, and the Constitution

$35.9

Liberty, Property, and Privacy: Toward a Jurisprudence of Substantive Due Process

$38.99 $47.95

Privacy and the Supreme Court

The right to privacy is an important element of legal traditions, aiming to restrict government and private actions that may threaten an individual's privacy. Interestingly, while the US Constitution does not explicitly mention the right to privacy, the Supreme Court has inferred its existence from the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments.

In Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court first recognized the "right to privacy," derived from the penumbras of other explicitly stated constitutional protections. The Court found that the Constitution creates a "'zone of privacy,'" protecting individuals from government intrusion. This decision was based on the personal protections guaranteed by the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments. For example, the common law phrase, "a man's home is his castle," reflects the understanding that privacy meant security in one's home, safe from government interference.

In privacy cases after Griswold, the Supreme Court often relied on Justice Harlan's concurrence, which found a right to privacy rooted in the Fourteenth Amendment. This was seen in Eisenstadt v. Baird (1971) and Lawrence v. Texas (2003), where the Court extended the right to privacy to unmarried couples' access to contraceptives and same-sex sexual conduct, respectively.

The Supreme Court has also used the right to privacy in landmark cases such as Roe v. Wade, where the Court extended this right to encompass an individual's right to abortion, based on the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty. However, this decision was later overturned by the Dobbs ruling, removing abortion rights from the broader right to privacy.

Outside of the United States, the right to privacy has also been a subject of legal debate. In India, for example, the Supreme Court ruled that the right to privacy is a fundamental right for citizens, paving the way for the decriminalization of homosexuality. This ruling recognized the importance of protecting individual liberty and privacy in the digital age, demonstrating the evolving nature of privacy rights in an increasingly connected world.

Privacy and the press

While the word "privacy" is not mentioned in the US Constitution, the Supreme Court has inferred it from the language of the First, Third, Fourth, Fifth, and Ninth Amendments. The Supreme Court first formally identified "decisional privacy" in 1965, saying it was implied from other explicit constitutional rights. For example, the First Amendment rights of speech and assembly allow people to privately decide what they will say and with whom they will associate.

The right to privacy is fundamental to our understanding of freedom. In the 18th century, privacy meant the right to be secure in one's home, safe from the powers of government. This understanding is encapsulated in the common law phrase, "a man's home is his castle." However, it is important to note that the right to privacy is not absolute, and even in their own homes, citizens must abide by the law.

The right to privacy has evolved over time, and today it encompasses a range of issues, including reproductive rights, medical decision-making, informational privacy, and protection from government surveillance. The Supreme Court has used the Fourteenth Amendment to extend the right to privacy to unmarried couples purchasing contraceptives and same-sex couples engaging in sexual conduct.

The press also plays a role in privacy debates. While freedom of the press is protected by the US Constitution, the publication of private facts is only protected if they are deemed newsworthy. The courts will usually side with the press in the publication of private facts, upholding freedom of the press. However, this has led to debates about the definition of newsworthiness and the potential detriment to individuals whose private information is made public.

The right to privacy is a complex and evolving issue, with ongoing debates about how to balance privacy rights with national security concerns and the role of the press in a free society. While the US Constitution does not explicitly mention privacy, it is inherent in many of the rights and protections it guarantees.

Frequently asked questions