The Supreme Court Term Lengths: Where In The Constitution?

The United States Constitution does not specify the size of the Supreme Court or the term length of its justices. Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution states that justices shall hold their offices during good behaviour, which has been interpreted to mean life tenure. This interpretation has been controversial, with critics arguing that it sets the U.S. apart from other democracies and leads to a lack of accountability and increased partisanship. In recent years, there have been proposals to amend the Constitution to impose term limits for Supreme Court justices, typically suggesting an 18-year term.

Explore related products

The Supreme Court and The Constitution: Readings in American Constitutional History

$51.59

The Supreme Court and the Constitution (University Casebook Series)

$231.9 $305

Listening to the Law: Reflections on the Court and Constitution

$22.19 $32

The Changing Constitution: Constitutional Law in the Trump-Era Supreme Court

$36.12 $39.99

CONGRESS, THE CONSTITUTION, AND THE SUPREME COURT (NEW REVISED AND ENLARGED EDITION)

$30.3

A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution: Revised Edition

$16.13 $24

The US Constitution does not specify term limits for the Supreme Court

The lack of term limits for Supreme Court justices is a unique feature of the US Constitution when compared to other democracies and even the US state-level courts. Almost all states have established term limits for their high court justices, which typically range from 6 to 14 years. The absence of term limits at the federal level means that appointments to the Supreme Court are dependent on the unpredictable events of a justice's death or retirement, rather than a regular process. As a result, the nine justices can wield significant power for decades, with the average tenure of justices who have left the court since 1970 being around 25 to 26 years.

The primary goal of imposing term limits on the Supreme Court would be to reduce its politicization and improve accountability. Proponents of term limits argue that the current system of lifetime appointments has failed to remove partisanship from the Court and that regular turnover of justices would help to balance accountability with judicial independence. Additionally, the advanced age of some justices has raised concerns about age-related disabilities and the potential impact on their decision-making abilities.

However, the implementation of term limits for Supreme Court justices is a complex issue. Some judges have expressed concern that imposing term limits could lead to increased politicization, as the stakes of each election would be raised with the knowledge of which justices will be replaced by the next president. Additionally, there is a risk that a constantly changing court could lead to sudden and radical shifts in doctrine. Any proposal to impose term limits on Supreme Court justices would also face the significant challenge of requiring a constitutional amendment, which is a difficult and rare process in the United States.

While there is no explicit mention of term limits for the Supreme Court in the US Constitution, the document does grant Congress the power to decide how to organize the Court. This power has been exercised through various Acts of Congress that have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court over time. However, any attempt to impose term limits on the Supreme Court through legislative means would likely face significant constitutional challenges.

Article III of the Constitution provides for life tenure during good behaviour

The United States Constitution does not specify term limits or mandatory retirements for the Supreme Court. Instead, Article III of the Constitution provides for life tenure during "good behaviour". This means that justices typically hold office for life, and their salaries cannot be decreased during their term.

The lack of term limits in the Supreme Court is a unique feature among high courts in constitutional democracies. While the Constitution does not specify a term length, the average term for Supreme Court justices has increased over time. Until the late 1960s, the average term for justices was 15 years, while the average tenure for justices who have left the court since 1970 has been roughly 25 to 26 years.

The absence of term limits has led to criticisms of the Court, including concerns about partisanship and the lack of accountability of justices. Some have argued for term limits or mandatory retirement ages to address these issues. However, others have expressed concerns that term limits could lead to increased politicization of the Court, as the confirmation process would become more frequent and contentious.

Proposals for term limits have included an 18-year term limit, which has received support from legal experts and some judges. Other suggested term lengths include 12, 10, and 20 years. However, implementing term limits would require amending the Constitution, which is a challenging and divisive process.

In conclusion, while the Constitution's provision for life tenure during "good behaviour" has resulted in de facto lifetime appointments for Supreme Court justices, there are ongoing debates and proposals for term limits or mandatory retirements to address concerns about the Court's accountability and partisanship.

The Supreme Court has the final say on constitutional interpretation

The United States Constitution does not specify the size of the Supreme Court, nor does it specify any specific positions for the court's members. The Constitution also does not outline term limits for Supreme Court justices. Instead, it provides for judicial tenure during "good behaviour", which has been understood to mean life tenure. This is because legislative impeachment and removal are rare.

The Supreme Court justices have the last word on constitutional interpretation and face little accountability. This is because appointments to the Court depend on when a justice dies or retires, rather than a regular process. This gives the nine justices extraordinary power for decades. The U.S. Supreme Court is unique among high courts in constitutional democracies in lacking term limits or a mandatory retirement age.

There have been calls for term limits for Supreme Court justices, with some arguing that it would reduce partisanship and improve the judiciary's reputation. Others have suggested an age limit, pointing out the greater likelihood of age-related disabilities as justices serve into their 80s. However, some judges have argued against term limits, stating that lifetime appointments are necessary to protect the Constitution.

Explore related products

Criminal Procedure and the Constitution, Leading Supreme Court Cases and Introductory Text, 2025 (American Casebook Series)

$225

The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The First Hundred Years, 1789–1888

$11.99 $17.99

The Supreme Court and the Constitution (Classic Reprint)

$10.64 $10.64

The Constitution in the Supreme Court: The Second Century, 1888–1986

$4.99 $74

Justice Abandoned: How the Supreme Court Ignored the Constitution and Enabled Mass Incarceration

$27.25 $35

The Supreme Court: An Essential History, Second Edition

$27.1 $34.99

Congress can specify additional duties for retired justices

The U.S. Supreme Court is unique among high constitutional courts in constitutional democracies in that it lacks term limits or a mandatory retirement age for its justices. The U.S. Constitution provides for judicial tenure during "good behaviour", which has been interpreted to mean life tenure. However, Congress can specify additional duties for retired justices or leave it to the justices themselves to decide through an internal rule.

The senior judge model, deemed constitutional by the Supreme Court ninety years ago, allows Congress to lighten the duties of senior justices so long as it neither abolishes their office nor reduces their salary. This model is already in effect for the lower federal courts. A federal statute provides two options for federal judges approaching retirement, including Supreme Court justices who meet the requirement. A judge may choose to retire from office entirely, in which case they will continue to be paid an annuity equal to their salary at the time of retirement. Alternatively, they may retain their office but retire from regular active service, receive the same salary, and participate in judicial duties to the extent they choose.

In 1984, Congress modified the eligibility criteria for senior status, favouring the so-called "rule of 80". Under this rule, Article III judges who have met age and service requirements set by federal statute are eligible to take senior status if they are at least 65 years old and have served at least 15 years on the bench, or any combination of age and years of service that equals 80. Regardless of age, judges must serve at least 10 years to qualify for senior status. Upon taking senior status, judges may choose to handle a reduced caseload. Senior judges handle about 20% of the total district and appellate caseload.

Retired justices can be appointed for recall service for a specific period of time, usually no more than five years, which may be renewed. Visiting judges may sit by designation in any federal court requiring their service. They provide temporary assistance when a court's judges must disqualify themselves, as well as helping to meet caseload needs arising from vacancies, lack of sufficient judges, emergencies, and other workload imbalances.

The proposal for term limits for Supreme Court justices is structured to avoid a constitutional issue. Term limit proposals require that a justice does not leave judicial service entirely but rather takes on new duties, thus retaining their office but retiring from regular active service.

Lifetime appointments are meant to remove partisanship from the Supreme Court

Lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court are meant to remove partisanship from the judiciary. The idea is that by insulating judges from political pressures, they are free to make decisions based on the law rather than on political considerations. This is important for the judiciary to be able to function as a check on the other branches of government.

The US Constitution does not expressly grant "life tenure" to Supreme Court justices. Instead, the concept of lifetime appointments is derived from the language that judges and justices "shall hold their offices during good behaviour." This has been interpreted to mean life tenure. However, the lack of term limits or mandatory retirements has led to concerns about the politicization of the Supreme Court and the lack of accountability of its justices.

The Supreme Court is highly political and polarized along partisan lines. Justices have been criticized for timing their retirements to create vacancies for ideologically aligned presidents to fill, reinforcing the view that they are simply extensions of the political parties that appointed them. The average tenure of justices has also increased significantly, with some serving for multiple decades. This has resulted in extraordinary power being wielded by individual justices, as they can push their personal, ideological agendas for extended periods with little accountability.

Proposals for term limits or mandatory retirement ages aim to address these concerns. Critics of lifetime appointments argue that they give justices the incentive to stay on the court until a like-minded president takes office, allowing them to lock in their jurisprudence for multiple generations. Term limits could make appointments more predictable and less partisan, ensuring that the values of the public, rather than individual justices, shape the future direction of the law.

However, some experts caution that imposing term limits could make the institution appear more political and compromise its objectivity. Lifetime appointments were intended to provide stability and continuity in the judiciary, allowing justices to make decisions without worrying about re-election or external pressures.

Frequently asked questions