The Constitution's Freedom Of Religion Amendment

The U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, which includes the right to freedom of religion, was adopted by Congress in September 1789 and ratified in December 1791. The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The amendment has two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from establishing an official religion, while the Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion without interference from the government.

Explore related products

Freedom for the Thought That We Hate: A Biography of the First Amendment

$10.99 $17.99

Make No Law: The Sullivan Case and the First Amendment

$14.59 $20

First Freedoms: A Documentary History of First Amendment Rights in America

$29.3 $45.99

What Is Free Speech?: The History of a Dangerous Idea

$26.65 $29.95

Free Exercise: Religion, the First Amendment, and the Making of America

$4.43 $29.99

Loaded: A Disarming History of the Second Amendment (City Lights Open Media)

$11.98 $16.95

The Establishment Clause

The Supreme Court is the ultimate arbiter when the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause come into conflict. For example, in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court set forth a three-part test to determine when government action related to religion is permissible. Under the "Lemon" test, government assistance to religion is permissible only if (1) the primary purpose of the assistance is secular, (2) the assistance does not promote or inhibit religion, and (3) there is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

The Free Exercise Clause

The First Amendment of the US Constitution contains two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Free Exercise Clause, or the "free exercise of religion", protects citizens' religious freedoms by stating that the government cannot interfere with citizens' religious practices.

Over the years, the interpretation of what qualifies as protected under the Free Exercise Clause has evolved, particularly through Supreme Court interpretations. The central question in these cases is: what happens if a law violates someone's religious beliefs? In Sherbert v. Verner (1963), the Supreme Court sided with an individual's religious beliefs over the law, using the Compelling Interest Doctrine and Strict Scrutiny. However, in Employment Division v. (1990), the Supreme Court sided against two men who used Peyote as a sacrament in the Native American Church, as they feared that exempting them from the law banning Peyote use would lead to people using the Free Exercise Clause to justify breaking any law.

The role of James Madison

James Madison (1751–1836) was the chief author of the Bill of Rights and, therefore, the First Amendment. He was the foremost champion of religious liberty, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press in the Founding Era. Madison played a central role in drafting, explaining, and ratifying the Constitution. After it was ratified, he sought to reassure critics by adding guarantees of fundamental liberties.

Madison considered the bill a “dangerous abuse of power”. He reasoned that if the government could establish Christianity over other religions, then it would also have the power to elevate one Christian group over another. Madison believed that religion was a matter of individual conscience and that giving legislators control over religious belief would inevitably lead to the violation of other basic rights: “It is proper to take alarm at the first experiment on our liberties.”. He succeeded in defeating the religious assessment bill and then spearheaded the passage, in 1786, of Thomas Jefferson’s Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom.

In 1785, as the legislature debated whether to continue to fund churches with tax money, Madison wrote an influential petition called “Memorial and Remonstrance,” which clearly laid out 15 arguments against government support of churches. Madison emphasized that religion was a matter of individual conscience and could not be directed by the government in any way. He called conscience “the most sacred of all property,” and felt strongly that one’s property was a natural right.

Madison played a crucial role in calling the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia and in shaping the Virginia Plan, which offered a clear alternative rather than mere alterations to the Articles of Confederation. He also played a crucial role in shaping deliberations during the convention. Madison's proposal for what eventually became the First Amendment is broadly consistent with the final product but, in some respects, is more descriptive: “The civil rights of none shall be abridged on account of religious belief or worship, nor shall any national religion be established, nor shall the full and equal rights of conscience be in any manner, or on any pretext infringed...”.

Explore related products

No Second Amendment, No First: God, Guns, and the Government

$17.91 $30

First Amendment, Freedom of the Press: Its Constitutional History and the Contempory Debate

$14.3 $18.99

The Great Dissent: How Oliver Wendell Holmes Changed His Mind—and Changed the History of Free Speech in America

$12.96 $18.99

First Amendment (Examples & Explanations)

$35.38 $76.95

First Amendment For Beginners

$11.78 $15.95

Religious Freedom: A Conservative Primer

$8.7 $28.99

Religious freedom in schools

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution ensures religious freedom in public schools. The Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause, both part of the First Amendment, work together to define the balance between religious freedom and government neutrality. The Establishment Clause prevents government entities, including public schools, from endorsing, promoting, or establishing any religion, thus ensuring the separation of church and state. On the other hand, the Free Exercise Clause safeguards individuals' rights to practice their religion freely, allowing them to express their beliefs and engage in religious activities.

In the context of schools, the Establishment Clause ensures that schools remain neutral on religion and do not endorse or promote any specific faith. Students are protected in their private religious activities and have the freedom to pray individually and discuss religious topics with others. They can also express their religious views without school officials mandating or encouraging religious activities. This balance between protecting individual religious expression and maintaining a secular and inclusive educational environment is essential to respect the rights and beliefs of all students.

However, it is important to note that public schools cannot impose religious observances or activities on students. While the Free Exercise Clause protects students' right to practice their religion, it does not allow them to infringe on "public morals" or "compelling" governmental interests. The U.S. Supreme Court has clarified that the Constitution prohibits public school-sponsored prayer or religious indoctrination, but violations still occur in many parts of the country.

Organizations like the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) work to protect public school students' religious freedom by curbing school-sponsored prayer and proselytizing while ensuring that students can freely express and exercise their faith. Legal resources and organizations specializing in religious liberty can offer guidance and support to students and families who believe their constitutional rights regarding religious freedom in schools are being violated.

The Supreme Court's interpretation

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which includes the right to freedom of religion, was adopted by Congress in September 1789 and ratified in December 1791. The First Amendment has two provisions concerning religion: the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause.

The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from "establishing" a religion. The precise definition of "establishment" is unclear, but it has historically meant prohibiting state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. The Supreme Court has interpreted this clause under the three-part "Lemon" test set forth in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971). Under this test, the government can assist religion only if:

• The primary purpose of the assistance is secular;
• The assistance neither promotes nor inhibits religion; and
• There is no excessive entanglement between church and state.

The Free Exercise Clause protects citizens' right to practice their religion, or no religion at all, as they see fit, as long as it does not conflict with "public morals" or a "compelling" governmental interest. This clause upholds the right to hold any religious beliefs, regardless of whether they adhere to the principles of a particular faith. The Supreme Court has clarified that constitutional protections only extend to sincerely held religious beliefs and activities, and that an inquiry into the sincerity of one's religious beliefs may be appropriate in certain cases.

The Supreme Court has also established permissible restrictions on these freedoms and developed frameworks for determining whether a restriction is constitutional. For example, the strict scrutiny standard requires a restriction to advance a compelling state interest in the least restrictive way possible. The Court's interpretations of the First Amendment provide valuable insights into the limits and reach of religious freedom in the United States.

Frequently asked questions