The Supreme Court's Constitutional Review: A Historical Overview

The Supreme Court's power of constitutional review, also known as judicial review, is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution. However, the Court established this power in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, where it asserted its ability to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional if they violated the Constitution. This case set a precedent for the Court's role in interpreting and safeguarding the Constitution, ensuring that federal and state laws adhere to its principles. The Court's jurisdiction, established in Article III of the Constitution, includes original jurisdiction over cases between states and those involving foreign representatives, and appellate jurisdiction over a wide range of cases involving constitutional and federal law. The Certiorari Act of 1925 further granted the Court discretion in choosing which cases to hear on appeal. The Supreme Court's decisions have a significant impact on society, shaping civil rights, liberties, and the balance of power between different branches of government.

Explore related products

A People's History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution: Revised Edition

$16.13 $24

The Most Powerful Court in the World: A History of the Supreme Court of the United States

$31 $39.99

A History of the Supreme Court

$12.59 $30.99

The Hidden History of the Supreme Court and the Betrayal of America (The Thom Hartmann Hidden History Series)

$12.19 $19.95

The American Supreme Court, Sixth Edition (The Chicago History of American Civilization)

$29 $29

The Supreme Court: An Essential History, Second Edition

$27.1 $34.99

Judicial review

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the supreme law of the land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand.

The concept of judicial review was already established at the time of the Founding. The Privy Council had employed a limited form of judicial review to review colonial legislation and its validity under the colonial charters. There were also several instances of state court invalidation of state legislation as inconsistent with state constitutions. Debates on the Alien and Sedition Acts and on the power of Congress to repeal the Judiciary Act of 1801 similarly saw recognition of judicial review of acts of Congress.

The Supreme Court can strike down any law or other action by the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution. This power of judicial review applies to federal, state, and local legislative and executive actions. The Court's power of judicial review plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. It also protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution.

The Supreme Court's role in the constitutional system

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it plays a crucial role in the constitutional system of government. The Court's power of judicial review, established in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803, allows it to declare acts of Congress or the Executive branch that violate the Constitution as unconstitutional. This power is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution but has become a distinctive feature of US constitutional law.

Article III, Section I of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary, vesting the "judicial Power of the United States" in the Supreme Court and inferior courts established by Congress. The Judiciary Act of 1789, passed by Congress, created a Supreme Court with six justices and established the lower federal court system. This Act also gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over certain cases, such as issuing writs of mandamus to compel government officials to act in accordance with the law.

Thirdly, the Supreme Court protects civil rights and liberties by invalidating laws that contravene the Constitution. For example, in Ex parte Milligan (1866), the Court struck down Lincoln's wartime executive order providing for military trials for civilians, upholding the right to a jury trial in criminal cases. The Court also sets limits on democratic government, safeguarding minority rights from potential infringement by the majority.

Additionally, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over specific cases, such as disputes between states or cases involving foreign nations. It also has appellate jurisdiction, where it can choose to review decisions by lower courts, particularly in cases involving federal law or the Constitution. This discretion allows the Court to shape its docket and have a significant impact on society, influencing not just lawyers and judges but the nation as a whole.

The Supreme Court's jurisdiction

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and its jurisdiction is established by Article III, Section II of the Constitution. The Court has original jurisdiction over certain cases, meaning it is the first venue to hear a dispute. These cases include disputes between two or more states, disputes involving foreign nations' representatives, and cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers.

The Supreme Court's original jurisdiction also includes the ability to issue writs of mandamus, or legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law. This power was established by the Judiciary Act of 1789, and it played a crucial role in the landmark case of Marbury v. Madison (1803). In this case, the Court established its power of judicial review, or the ability to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution. The Court held that an Act of Congress that contradicts the Constitution is invalid and that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

The Supreme Court also has appellate jurisdiction, meaning it can hear cases on appeal from lower courts. This jurisdiction applies to a wide range of cases that implicate federal law or the Constitution, including cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving treaties, and admiralty cases involving ships on the high seas or navigable waterways. The Court has the discretion to decide whether to hear a case on appeal, and it grants only about 2% of petitions for a writ of certiorari each year.

The power of judicial review is a key feature of the federal judicial system, and it allows the Supreme Court to play a crucial role in ensuring that all branches of government respect constitutional limits. The Court can strike down any law or action by a federal, state, or local legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution. This power extends to reviewing executive orders and ensuring that they do not violate due process or civil rights guaranteed by the Constitution.

While the Constitution does not expressly grant the Supreme Court the power of judicial review, the historical record suggests that those who framed and ratified the Constitution were aware of this concept and that it was already established at the time of the Founding. The Supreme Court's first exercise of judicial review occurred in 1796 in Hylton v. United States, where the Court considered the constitutionality of a federal tax on carriages. However, it was the Marbury v. Madison case in 1803 that firmly established the Court's power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional.

Explore related products

The Great Supreme Court Cases: Student Edition (Reading Through History)

$16.99

Supreme Court Decisions (Penguin Civic Classics)

$11.51 $15

The Supreme Court in United States History, Vol. I (in Three Volumes)

$24.99

Nine Scorpions in a Bottle: Great Judges and Cases of the Supreme Court

$16.99

The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Supreme Court (The Politically Incorrect Guides)

$12.49 $21.99

The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions

$25.2 $40.99

The Supreme Court's power to strike down laws

The power of the Supreme Court to strike down laws is known as judicial review. This power is not explicitly mentioned in the US Constitution, but it was established in the case of Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In this case, the Supreme Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand, thus establishing its power of judicial review.

The concept of judicial review was already in use at the time of the Founding. The Privy Council, for example, employed a limited form of judicial review to review colonial legislation and its validity under the colonial charters. There were also instances of state courts invalidating state legislation as inconsistent with state constitutions.

The Supreme Court's power of judicial review allows it to strike down any law or action by the legislative or executive branch that violates the Constitution. This includes federal, state, and local laws and actions. The Court's role in judicial review is to ensure that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power and that the changing views of a majority do not undermine fundamental values such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

The Supreme Court has the original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, which are legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law. In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the Court refused to issue a writ of mandamus because it found that the relevant clause of the Judiciary Act of 1789 was unconstitutional. This was because the clause extended the original jurisdiction of the Court beyond what was provided by the Constitution.

The Supreme Court has used its power of judicial review to strike down laws and actions that violate constitutional rights and freedoms. For example, in Ex parte Milligan (1866), the Court struck down Lincoln's wartime executive order providing for the trial of civilians by military commissions, finding that it violated the right to a jury trial in criminal cases. In addition, the Court has reviewed both statutes and executive actions to ensure that they comply with the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, which guarantees "substantive due process".

The Supreme Court's review of executive orders

The Supreme Court is the highest court in the United States, and it plays a crucial role in the constitutional system of government. One of its key powers is judicial review, which allows it to declare a legislative or executive act in violation of the Constitution. Notably, the power of judicial review is not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution itself. Instead, it was established through a landmark case, Marbury v. Madison, in 1803.

In the case of Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court established its authority to review acts of Congress and determine their constitutionality. This case involved a dispute over the appointment of a Justice of the Peace in the District of Columbia, where William Marbury sued James Madison, the Secretary of State, for failing to deliver his commission. Chief Justice John Marshall asserted the Court's power to issue a writ of mandamus, a legal order compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law. However, Marshall also acknowledged the limitations of the Court's jurisdiction, as outlined in Article III of the Constitution.

The Supreme Court's power of judicial review extends to reviewing executive orders and ensuring they comply with constitutional principles. One notable example is the case of Ex parte Milligan (1866), where the Court struck down President Lincoln's wartime executive order authorizing military trials for civilians accused of aiding the Confederacy. The Court held that these military trials violated constitutional rights, including the right to a jury trial in criminal cases.

While the Supreme Court has the authority to review executive orders, it has not set a uniform standard for the level of scrutiny applied to these orders. Executive orders often come before the Court in the context of attempts to invalidate them or halt their enforcement. In some instances, courts have engaged in "reasonableness review," interpreting the Due Process Clause of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to include a guarantee of "substantive due process." This allows courts to review executive actions impacting life, liberty, or property rights to ensure they are reasonable.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court's review of executive orders is a significant aspect of its judicial power. Through judicial review, the Court ensures that executive actions comply with the Constitution and protects the rights and liberties of citizens. While the Court has exercised its authority in notable cases, the absence of a uniform standard for scrutinizing executive orders leaves room for varying interpretations and continues to shape the dynamic between the executive and judicial branches of the US government.

Frequently asked questions