When Ballers Became Political: The Evolution Of Athlete Activism

The intersection of sports and politics has long been a topic of discussion, but the question of when did ballers become political? highlights a more recent and pronounced shift in athletes using their platforms to address social and political issues. Historically, athletes were often encouraged to stick to sports, but pivotal moments such as Muhammad Ali's stance against the Vietnam War and the 1968 Olympic Black Power salute laid the groundwork for activism in sports. In recent decades, high-profile athletes like Colin Kaepernick, LeBron James, and Megan Rapinoe have amplified their voices on issues like racial injustice, police brutality, LGBTQ+ rights, and voter suppression, leveraging their influence to drive societal change. This evolution reflects broader cultural shifts, where athletes are no longer just entertainers but also advocates, challenging the notion that sports and politics should remain separate.

Explore related products

History of Political Philosophy

$33.59 $38

A World History of Political Thought

$41.95 $190

Black Political History: From the Arch of Safety into the Mouth of the Lion

$24.99

A Sense of Where You Are: Bill Bradley at Princeton

$9.33 $18

People's History of Sports in the United States: 250 Years of Politics, Protest, People, and Play (New Press People's History)

$12.75 $18.95

The Stadium: An American History of Politics, Protest, and Play

$14.93 $32

Athletes as Activists: How sports stars began using their platforms for social and political causes

The role of athletes as activists has evolved significantly over the decades, with sports stars increasingly using their platforms to advocate for social and political causes. While athletes have long been influential figures, their direct involvement in political and social issues gained prominence in the mid-20th century. One of the earliest and most iconic examples is Muhammad Ali, who, in the 1960s, refused to be drafted into the Vietnam War, citing his religious beliefs and opposition to the conflict. Ali's stance cost him his boxing title and public admiration at the time, but it also cemented his legacy as a principled activist who used his fame to challenge systemic injustices. This marked a turning point, demonstrating that athletes could leverage their visibility to address issues beyond the sports arena.

The 1968 Olympics in Mexico City further solidified the athlete-activist movement when African American sprinters Tommie Smith and John Carlos raised their fists in a Black Power salute during the medal ceremony. Their silent protest against racial inequality in the United States sparked global attention and controversy. Though they faced severe backlash, their actions inspired future generations of athletes to speak out against oppression. This era highlighted how sports could intersect with politics, as athletes began to recognize their unique ability to amplify marginalized voices and push for change.

In the 21st century, the athlete-activist movement gained renewed momentum, particularly in response to racial injustice and police brutality. The killing of Trayvon Martin in 2012 and the subsequent rise of the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement prompted athletes like LeBron James and Colin Kaepernick to take a stand. Kaepernick's decision to kneel during the national anthem in 2016 to protest racial inequality and police violence became a defining moment. While polarizing, his actions reignited conversations about patriotism, free speech, and the responsibility of athletes to address societal issues. This period also saw the formation of organizations like the Players Coalition, where athletes worked collectively to advocate for criminal justice reform and racial equality.

Social media has played a pivotal role in amplifying athletes' voices in recent years. Platforms like Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok have enabled sports stars to directly engage with fans and address political issues in real time. For instance, during the 2020 George Floyd protests, athletes across various sports used their platforms to condemn racial injustice, share resources, and mobilize support. WNBA players, in particular, have been at the forefront of activism, advocating for LGBTQ+ rights, voting rights, and racial justice. Their efforts demonstrate how athletes can use their influence to drive both cultural and political change.

Today, the idea of athletes as activists is more accepted than ever, though it remains a contentious issue in some circles. Leagues like the NBA and NFL have shifted their stances, increasingly supporting players' rights to express their views. However, this evolution did not happen overnight. It required decades of athletes risking their careers and reputations to challenge the status quo. From Muhammad Ali to modern-day stars like Megan Rapinoe and LeBron James, athletes have proven that their impact extends far beyond the field, court, or track. Their activism has not only shaped sports culture but has also contributed to broader societal progress, making the phrase "stick to sports" increasingly outdated and irrelevant.

Kaepernick’s Kneel: The impact of Colin Kaepernick’s protest against racial injustice in 2016

In August 2016, Colin Kaepernick, then a quarterback for the San Francisco 49ers, took a stand—or rather, a kneel—that would reverberate far beyond the football field. During the national anthem before a preseason game, Kaepernick knelt as a form of protest against racial injustice and police brutality in the United States. This act, which he described as a way to bring attention to systemic oppression, particularly against Black and Brown communities, marked a turning point in the intersection of sports and politics. Kaepernick’s kneel was not just a personal statement but a catalyst for a broader conversation about race, activism, and the role of athletes in society. His protest forced the nation to confront uncomfortable truths and ignited debates about patriotism, free speech, and the responsibilities of public figures.

The immediate impact of Kaepernick’s kneel was polarizing. While many praised his courage and conviction, others criticized him for what they perceived as disrespect to the flag and the military. The protest quickly became a national news story, with politicians, celebrities, and everyday Americans weighing in. President Donald Trump, for instance, publicly condemned Kaepernick and other players who followed his lead, calling for them to be fired. Despite the backlash, Kaepernick’s action inspired a wave of solidarity among fellow athletes, with players across the NFL and other sports leagues kneeling, raising fists, or sitting during the anthem. This collective movement demonstrated the power of athletes to amplify social justice issues and challenge the status quo.

Kaepernick’s protest also had significant personal and professional consequences. By the end of the 2016 season, he opted out of his contract with the 49ers and became a free agent. Despite his talent and experience, no NFL team signed him, leading many to believe he was being blacklisted for his activism. Kaepernick filed a grievance against the NFL, accusing team owners of collusion, which was later settled. His exclusion from the league turned him into a symbol of the risks athletes face when they speak out against injustice. However, it also elevated his status as a global icon of resistance, with his image and story resonating far beyond the sports world.

The long-term impact of Kaepernick’s kneel has been profound and multifaceted. It sparked a national reckoning on racial injustice, particularly following high-profile incidents of police brutality against Black Americans. The protest laid the groundwork for future athlete activism, such as the widespread demonstrations after the murder of George Floyd in 2020. Additionally, Kaepernick’s stance forced sports leagues and corporations to reevaluate their roles in addressing social issues. The NFL, for example, eventually acknowledged the legitimacy of player protests and pledged millions of dollars to social justice initiatives. Kaepernick’s nonprofit organization, the Know Your Rights Camp, continues to empower marginalized communities through education and activism.

Colin Kaepernick’s kneel in 2016 was more than a moment—it was a movement. It challenged the notion that athletes should remain apolitical and demonstrated the potential for sports to be a platform for change. While the protest came at a personal cost, its legacy endures as a testament to the power of individual action in the fight for justice. Kaepernick’s kneel remains a defining moment in the history of athlete activism, proving that sometimes, the most impactful plays happen off the field.

Team Ownership Politics: Owners influencing politics through donations, endorsements, and public statements

The intersection of sports and politics has become increasingly prominent, with team owners playing a significant role in shaping political discourse. Team Ownership Politics refers to the ways in which sports franchise owners leverage their wealth, influence, and public platforms to impact political outcomes. This phenomenon gained notable traction in the early 2010s, as high-profile owners began using their positions to endorse candidates, make political donations, and issue public statements on contentious issues. For instance, the rise of social justice movements and polarizing political climates pushed owners into the spotlight, often forcing them to take a stand or face backlash from players, fans, or sponsors.

One of the most direct ways owners influence politics is through financial donations. Campaign finance records reveal that sports team owners are among the top contributors to political parties and candidates, often aligning their support with their business interests or personal ideologies. For example, during the 2020 U.S. presidential election, several NBA and NFL team owners donated millions to both Democratic and Republican campaigns, strategically hedging their bets or advocating for specific policies that could benefit their industries. These contributions often come with expectations of access or favorable legislation, such as tax breaks for stadium construction or relaxed regulations on sports betting.

Endorsements from team owners carry significant weight due to their public visibility and the cultural influence of sports. When an owner publicly backs a candidate or cause, it can sway fans and communities, especially in regions where the team is a central part of local identity. For instance, Mark Cuban, owner of the Dallas Mavericks, has been vocal about his political views, endorsing candidates and using his platform to advocate for issues like healthcare reform. Similarly, Michael Jordan’s rare political statement in 2020, endorsing Democratic candidates, marked a shift for the historically apolitical NBA legend, demonstrating how owners can amplify their influence when they choose to engage.

Public statements from owners have also become a powerful tool in shaping political narratives. Whether addressing racial injustice, LGBTQ+ rights, or election integrity, owners are increasingly expected to take a stance. For example, after the murder of George Floyd in 2020, many team owners issued statements condemning racial inequality and pledged financial support to social justice organizations. However, these statements are not without controversy. Critics argue that some owners use such moments to enhance their public image without committing to meaningful systemic change, a practice often referred to as “performative activism.”

The politicization of team ownership has also led to tensions within sports organizations. Players, who have become more politically active themselves, sometimes clash with owners over differing views. For instance, during the 2016 NFL protests against police brutality, some owners initially resisted players’ efforts to kneel during the national anthem, fearing backlash from fans or political figures. This dynamic highlights the complex power struggle between owners and players, as both groups seek to shape the political identity of their teams and leagues.

In conclusion, Team Ownership Politics has become a defining aspect of the modern sports landscape. Through donations, endorsements, and public statements, owners wield considerable influence over political outcomes, often leveraging their platforms to advance their agendas. As sports continue to intersect with societal issues, the role of owners in politics will likely grow, making their actions a critical area of scrutiny for fans, players, and policymakers alike.

Explore related products

Power Players: Sports, Politics, and the American Presidency

$12.17 $30

The Game is Not a Game: The Power, Protest and Politics of American Sports

$10.6 $16.95

Gaming the World: How Sports Are Reshaping Global Politics and Culture

$19.5 $31

The Geopolitical Economy of Sport: Power, Politics, Money, and the State

$43.99 $54.99

Sports in International Politics: Between Power and Peacebuilding

$25.07 $35

Game Over: How Politics Has Turned the Sports World Upside Down

$11.17 $18.95

League Policies Shift: Sports leagues adopting stances on political issues like voting rights and equality

The shift in sports leagues adopting stances on political issues, particularly those related to voting rights and equality, marks a significant evolution in the role of athletics in society. Historically, sports organizations often maintained a neutral stance on political matters, prioritizing entertainment and competition. However, in recent years, leagues like the NBA, NFL, and WNBA have increasingly embraced activism, reflecting broader societal changes and the influence of athlete advocacy. This transformation gained momentum in the 2010s, as players began using their platforms to address systemic injustices, prompting leagues to formalize policies that support these causes.

One pivotal moment in this shift occurred during the 2016 NBA All-Star Game, which was moved from Charlotte, North Carolina, to New Orleans in response to the state’s controversial HB2 law, which restricted LGBTQ+ rights. This decision demonstrated the NBA’s willingness to take a political stand, aligning itself with values of equality and inclusion. Similarly, the NFL faced pressure to address racial injustice following Colin Kaepernick’s 2016 national anthem protests, which initially led to backlash but eventually spurred the league to acknowledge issues of police brutality and systemic racism. These instances highlighted how leagues began to recognize their responsibility to address the concerns of players and fans.

The WNBA has been at the forefront of this movement, with players advocating for racial justice, LGBTQ+ rights, and voting rights long before it became mainstream. In 2020, the league and its players’ union formally committed to promoting social justice initiatives, including supporting the Black Lives Matter movement and encouraging voter participation. This included using arenas as polling places and promoting civic engagement campaigns. The WNBA’s bold stance set a precedent for other leagues to follow, emphasizing that sports could no longer remain silent on critical political issues.

The COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 racial justice protests further accelerated this shift, as leagues were forced to confront their roles in addressing societal inequities. The NBA, for example, allowed players to wear social justice messages on their jerseys and painted “Black Lives Matter” on courts during the 2020 season. The NFL, after years of controversy, officially condemned racism and supported players’ right to protest peacefully. These actions signaled a broader acknowledgment that sports leagues could no longer separate themselves from the political and social issues affecting their communities.

Today, league policies increasingly reflect a commitment to voting rights and equality, with initiatives like voter registration drives, partnerships with civil rights organizations, and public statements on legislative issues. For instance, the NBA and NFL have both launched campaigns to combat voter suppression and promote civic engagement, particularly in marginalized communities. This proactive approach not only empowers athletes to use their platforms but also positions sports leagues as influential voices in the fight for justice and equality. As these policies continue to evolve, they underscore a new era where sports and politics are inextricably linked, driven by the belief that leagues have a duty to advocate for a more equitable society.

Fan Backlash & Support: Polarized reactions from fans to athletes’ political expressions and activism

The intersection of sports and politics has long been a contentious issue, but in recent years, athletes' political expressions and activism have sparked particularly polarized reactions from fans. This phenomenon, often referred to as "ballers becoming political," has led to both fierce backlash and unwavering support, highlighting the deep divisions within society. One of the most prominent examples is the response to Colin Kaepernick's decision to kneel during the national anthem in 2016 to protest racial injustice and police brutality. While many fans applauded his courage and conviction, others viewed his actions as disrespectful to the flag and the country, leading to widespread boycotts of the NFL and burning of jerseys. This stark divide underscores how athletes' political statements can become lightning rods for broader cultural and ideological conflicts.

Fan backlash to athletes' political activism often stems from the belief that sports should remain a neutral, apolitical space. Critics argue that players should focus on their performance on the field rather than using their platform to advocate for social or political causes. For instance, when LeBron James spoke out against police brutality and supported the Black Lives Matter movement, some fans accused him of being "divisive" and called for him to "stick to sports." This sentiment reflects a desire to maintain the escapist nature of sports, where fans can temporarily set aside real-world issues. However, this perspective ignores the historical role of athletes like Muhammad Ali and Billie Jean King, who used their platforms to challenge societal norms and advocate for change.

On the other hand, many fans have rallied behind athletes who use their influence to address social injustices. Supporters argue that athletes, as high-profile figures, have a responsibility to leverage their platforms for the greater good. For example, the WNBA’s advocacy for racial justice and LGBTQ+ rights has garnered widespread praise, with fans commending players like Maya Moore for taking a stand. Similarly, the NBA’s partnership with players to promote voting rights and social equality has been celebrated as a model for constructive activism. These fans view athletes not just as entertainers but as leaders who can inspire meaningful change, especially in communities that are often marginalized.

The polarization of fan reactions is further amplified by social media, which provides a platform for both praise and vitriol. Hashtags like #IStandWithKap and #BoycottNFL trended simultaneously during the peak of the Kaepernick controversy, illustrating the sharp divide. While social media allows athletes to directly engage with supporters, it also exposes them to harassment and threats from detractors. This dynamic has forced athletes to navigate a complex landscape where their political expressions can have significant personal and professional consequences, from endorsement deals to public perception.

Ultimately, the polarized reactions to athletes' political activism reflect broader societal tensions over race, identity, and the role of public figures in advocating for change. For some fans, athletes stepping into the political arena is a betrayal of their entertainment value; for others, it is a necessary and admirable use of their influence. As athletes continue to speak out on issues ranging from racial justice to LGBTQ+ rights, the debate over their role in politics is unlikely to subside. Instead, it will remain a defining feature of the modern sports landscape, challenging fans to reconsider the boundaries between sports and society.

Frequently asked questions