
The first ten amendments to the US Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified on December 15, 1791. The first amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, states that Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, prohibiting the free exercise thereof, or abridging the freedom of speech, of the press, or of the right of the people to assemble and petition the government for a redress of grievances.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Year of the first amendment proposal | 1789 |
| Year of the first amendment ratification | 1791 |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

The Bill of Rights was ratified in 1791
The Bill of Rights, comprising the first ten amendments to the US Constitution, was ratified on December 15, 1791. James Madison wrote these amendments to limit government power and protect individual liberties. The amendments were proposed by Congress and ratified by the state legislatures.
The First Amendment, which is part of the Bill of Rights, protects freedom of religion, speech, and the press. It also safeguards the right to assemble peacefully and petition the government. These rights were considered natural and essential by the Founders. The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms, and the Third Amendment prohibits the quartering of soldiers in private homes without consent. The Fourth Amendment guarantees freedom from unreasonable searches and seizures, while the Fifth Amendment ensures due process and protects against self-incrimination.
The Bill of Rights was established to address the lack of limits on government power in the original Constitution. The amendments were proposed by Congress in 1789, and the final version included ten amendments, which were ratified by the states in 1791. The Bill of Rights is considered a fundamental part of the US Constitution, guaranteeing certain natural rights and freedoms to American citizens.
The First Amendment has been central to many significant court cases throughout US history. It has been invoked to protect free speech, religious freedom, and the freedom of the press. The Supreme Court has ruled on numerous occasions that the First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting speech or the expression of ideas, even if they are offensive or disagreeable to some. This amendment has also been used to challenge laws and actions that infringe on these fundamental rights, such as in the case of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan in 1964.
The Bill of Rights, with the First Amendment at its core, continues to shape US law and policy, ensuring that individual liberties are protected and that government power is limited. The ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791 marked a significant step towards safeguarding the rights and freedoms that Americans hold dear today.
Federal Reserve: Constitutional Amendment Explained
You may want to see also

The First Amendment protects freedom of speech
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed by Congress in 1789 and ratified in 1791. It is part of the Bill of Rights, which comprises the first ten amendments to the Constitution. The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, and states that "Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech".
The protection of free speech is a cherished value, and the U.S. Supreme Court has often struggled to define what constitutes protected speech. The First Amendment's protection of free speech has been interpreted to include the right not to speak, such as in the case of West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (1943), where it was ruled that students had the right not to salute the flag. The Supreme Court has also ruled that students do not "shed their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate", as in the case of Tinker v. Des Moines (1969), where students wore black armbands to school to protest a war.
The First Amendment has also been interpreted to protect offensive language used to convey political messages, as in Cohen v. California (1971). In this case, the Court ruled that the First Amendment protected Cohen's right to wear a jacket with an offensive phrase to protest the Vietnam War. Similarly, in Texas v. Johnson (1989), the Supreme Court reversed the conviction of Gregory Lee Johnson, who was charged with violating a Texas law prohibiting the vandalization of venerated objects by burning an American flag at a demonstration. The Court ruled that "if there is a bedrock principle underlying the First Amendment, it is that the government may not prohibit the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable."
The First Amendment's protection of free speech has also been applied to speech in a professional or occupational context. In Thomas v. Collins (1945), Justice Robert H. Jackson argued that while a state may forbid the practice of law without a license, it could not stop an unlicensed person from making a speech about their rights. However, the First Amendment does not protect all speech in a professional context equally. In Bethel School District #43 v. Fraser (1986), it was ruled that students did not have the right to make obscene speeches at school-sponsored events, and in Morse v. Frederick (2007), it was ruled that students could not advocate for illegal drug use at school-sponsored events.
Nevada's Two-Vote Rule for Constitutional Amendments
You may want to see also

The right to petition the government
The right to petition is not a new concept, and it can be traced back to the Magna Carta of 1215, the English Bill of Rights of 1689, and the Petition of Right of 1628. The inclusion of this right in the US Constitution ensures that individuals and groups have the legal right to approach administrative agencies, courts, and all branches of the government to seek redress for their grievances. This right was also recognised in ancient China, where commoners could petition the Emperor to remove local officials.
In the context of the US, the right to petition played a significant role in advocating for the end of slavery. Starting in 1836, Congress received well over a thousand petitions signed by approximately 130,000 citizens, urging an end to slavery. Initially, the House of Representatives and the Senate adopted gag rules to automatically table and prohibit discussions on these petitions. However, in 1844, former President John Quincy Adams and other Representatives successfully repealed these rules, citing the Constitutional right to "petition the government for a redress of grievances".
The right to petition extends beyond simply presenting grievances to the government. It also includes the legal right to sue the government and seek redress through the court system. Additionally, some consider lobbying to be a form of petitioning, as it involves persuading public officials, even though it may not be explicitly protected by the petition clause.
While the right to petition is guaranteed by the First Amendment, it has faced challenges and interpretations over the years. The Supreme Court, in 1984, rejected the view that the government is required to listen to or respond to members of the public under this right. Additionally, some courts and scholars have assumed that the clause primarily protects the right to assemble rather than the right to petition. Despite these challenges, the right to petition remains an essential aspect of US democracy, allowing citizens to hold their government accountable and seek redress for their grievances.
The Fourth Amendment: Protecting Privacy, Preventing Unreasonable Searches
You may want to see also
Explore related products

The right to assemble peaceably
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution was ratified in 1791, and it guarantees the rights of assembly and free association. The right to assemble peaceably is a fundamental principle protected by the First Amendment. This right allows individuals to gather peacefully for social, economic, political, or cultural purposes without fear of government interference or retaliation. The freedom to assemble is closely linked to the freedom of association, which is the right to join or form groups, such as political parties, labour unions, or community organizations.
Throughout American history, the right to assemble peaceably has been invoked in numerous significant social and political movements. Examples include the civil rights movement, where peaceful protests and marches played a pivotal role in advocating for racial equality and justice, and the women's suffrage movement, where women organized and assembled to demand the right to vote. In contemporary times, movements such as Black Lives Matter and the Women's March have continued to utilize peaceful assembly as a powerful tool for social change.
While the right to assemble is fundamental, it is not absolute. The key qualifier in the First Amendment is "peaceably." This means that assemblies that turn violent or pose a clear and present danger of imminent violence can be restricted by the government. Additionally, reasonable time, place, and manner restrictions may be imposed to ensure that assemblies do not interfere with the rights of others or unduly disrupt public order. However, these restrictions must be content-neutral and narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest.
In conclusion, the right to assemble peaceably, as guaranteed by the First Amendment, is a cornerstone of democratic society. It empowers individuals and groups to express their views, influence public policy, and pursue social change through collective action. While this right has been repeatedly affirmed in American jurisprudence and international law, it also comes with responsibilities, including maintaining peace and respecting the rights and freedoms of others. By upholding the right to assemble peaceably, we strengthen the foundations of a just and inclusive society.
The Amendments: Our Constitutional Rights
You may want to see also

The freedom of religion
The First Amendment to the United States Constitution was passed by Congress on September 25, 1789, and ratified on December 15, 1791. It forms what is known as the Bill of Rights, which comprises the first ten amendments to the Constitution.
One of the key provisions of the First Amendment is the freedom of religion. This is encompassed by what is known as the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause. The Establishment Clause prohibits the government from "establishing" a religion, while the Free Exercise Clause guarantees the right to freely exercise one's religious beliefs.
The precise definition of "establishment" in the context of the Establishment Clause has been a subject of debate. Historically, it was understood to prohibit state-sponsored churches, such as the Church of England. However, the interpretation of what constitutes an "establishment of religion" has evolved over time. The Supreme Court has played a significant role in clarifying this definition, often governing it under the three-part test set forth in Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971).
The First Amendment's protection of religious freedom is a fundamental aspect of the United States Constitution, ensuring that individuals are free to practice their religious beliefs without government interference. This freedom also extends to the right to hold no religious beliefs, promoting religious tolerance and diversity in American society.
The Establishment and Free Exercise Clauses have been the subject of numerous court cases over the years, with the Supreme Court providing further clarification and interpretation of these provisions. One notable case is Engel v. Vitale, which dealt with religion in schools and the Establishment Clause. These court decisions have helped shape the understanding and application of religious freedom under the First Amendment.
Informal Ways to Change the Constitution
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
1789.
1791.
12.
10.
The First Amendment was about protecting religious freedom, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. It also guaranteed the right to peaceably assemble and petition the government.

























