
The road to the ratification of the US Constitution was a long and contentious one. After the Revolutionary War, the young country was on the brink of collapse. The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. The disputes between the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the country apart. The final issues prior to the Constitution's ratification revolved around the concentration of power in the federal government, the absence of a Bill of Rights, and the need for a stronger, more centralized government. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution, arguing that it provided a necessary framework for an effective central government capable of unifying the nation. The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the Constitution, fearing that it concentrated too much power in the federal government at the expense of states' rights and individual liberties. The ratification process sparked an intense national debate, and the final votes were a nail-biter, with the Federalists ultimately securing victory when New Hampshire cast the ninth vote in favor of ratification on June 21, 1788.
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Date of final draft of the Constitution | September 17, 1787 |
| Number of delegates who signed the final draft | 39 of 55 |
| Number of states required to ratify | 9 of 13 |
| First state to ratify | Delaware |
| Date of first ratification | December 7, 1787 |
| Date Constitution became official framework for the government | June 21, 1788 |
| Date all 13 states ratified the Constitution | May 29, 1790 |
| Date Bill of Rights was ratified | December 15, 1791 |
| Date the capital was set | July 16, 1790 |
| Date of first national Thanksgiving | November 26, 1789 |
| Key Federalist leaders | Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, John Jay, George Washington |
| Key Anti-Federalist leaders | Patrick Henry, George Mason, Samuel Adams |
Explore related products
What You'll Learn

Federalists vs Anti-Federalists
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the ratification of the Constitution. They feared that it concentrated too much power in the federal government, infringing on the states' rights. They also criticized the absence of a Bill of Rights, arguing that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press. Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams were prominent Anti-Federalists who argued against ratification.
The Federalists produced 85 essays known as "The Federalist Papers," which were published in newspapers nationwide. These essays articulated arguments in favour of ratification and addressed Anti-Federalist concerns. The Anti-Federalists, meanwhile, mounted an effective opposition through essays and debates of their own. They demanded amendments to protect the liberties of the people before they would accept the new government.
The ratification process was far from smooth, with significant opposition in several states. The Federalists needed to convert at least three states to their cause. The tide turned in Massachusetts, where a "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory. Eventually, on June 21, 1788, the required nine out of thirteen states had ratified the Constitution, making it the official framework for the government of the United States of America. All thirteen states eventually ratified the Constitution by May 29, 1790, and ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified on December 15, 1791.
The French Constitution of 1791: Democracy or Not?
You may want to see also

State rights
The ratification of the US Constitution was a highly contested affair, with the Federalists and Anti-Federalists engaging in intense debates. The Federalists, led by the likes of Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, argued for a strong central government that could unify the nation, protect against external threats, and manage domestic affairs effectively. They believed that a centralised government was necessary to address the challenges facing the young nation, which had been operating under the Articles of Confederation—a system that gave individual states significant autonomy, akin to independent, sovereign countries. However, the Articles of Confederation lacked enforcement powers and could not regulate commerce or print money, leading to disputes over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening the unity of the nation.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the concentration of power in a central government, arguing that it came at the expense of states' rights. Notable figures among the Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams. They criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights in the proposed Constitution, asserting that it failed to adequately protect individual liberties. The Anti-Federalists' concerns were not unfounded, as the new Constitution marked a significant shift in the balance of power between the states and the federal government. The Federalists, however, maintained that the Constitution's system of checks and balances would prevent any single branch of government from becoming too powerful and infringing upon states' rights.
The debate over states' rights played out in public spheres across the country, including newspapers, pamphlets, and meetings. Each state held a special convention to discuss and vote on ratification, and the process was often contentious, with several states expressing strong opposition. The Federalists, in an effort to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, promised to support amendments that would address states' rights and individual liberties. This compromise was crucial in securing the ratification of the Constitution in several key states, including Massachusetts, Virginia, and eventually, the last holdout, Rhode Island.
The ratification of the Constitution and the subsequent adoption of the Bill of Rights marked a significant shift in the governing system of the United States, moving towards a more centralised government while also recognising the importance of protecting states' rights and individual freedoms. The debates surrounding states' rights during this period laid the groundwork for a political culture that values compromise, civic engagement, and the protection of individual rights.
Pool Hours: Women-Only Constitutional Rights Violation?
You may want to see also

Bill of Rights
The final issues prior to the ratification of the US Constitution centred on the absence of a Bill of Rights. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the ratification of the Constitution, arguing that it provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, opposed it, arguing that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties and states' rights. They demanded a Bill of Rights to guarantee fundamental freedoms such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press, as well as protections against government overreach.
The Federalists and Anti-Federalists engaged in intense debates across the country through newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings. The Federalists published "The Federalist Papers", a series of 85 essays, to defend the proposed new government and address Anti-Federalist concerns. Each state held a special convention to debate and vote on ratification, with the process being far from smooth due to significant opposition in several states.
The “vote now, amend later” compromise in Massachusetts helped secure victory for the Federalists, and the state became the sixth state to approve the Constitution on February 6, 1788, with a narrow vote of 187 to 168. The Federalists strategically adjourned the convention in New Hampshire, where they lacked sufficient votes, delaying the vote until June.
Madison, initially hesitant about the necessity of a Bill of Rights, took the lead in drafting the amendments. He introduced 17 amendments to the Constitution, of which Congress adopted twelve on September 25, 1789, to send to the states for ratification. Ten of those amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified on December 15, 1791. These amendments guaranteed fundamental freedoms and protections that the Anti-Federalists had advocated for.
The ratification of the US Constitution and the subsequent adoption of the Bill of Rights marked a significant shift in the country's governing system, reflecting the need for a more centralized government among the former colonies. The process was contentious and passionate, with both sides holding strong beliefs about the future of the nation. The final issues surrounding the lack of a Bill of Rights were resolved through compromises and negotiations, ultimately leading to the creation of a governing document that continues to guide and protect the rights of Americans today.
US Identity: Constitutional Foundations
You may want to see also
Explore related products
$239.99 $243

Centralised government
The ratification of the US Constitution was a long and contentious process, with the debate over the nation's form of government taking centre stage. The country was governed by the Articles of Confederation, which gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it lacked enforcement powers and could not regulate commerce or print money. This led to disputes between the states over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade, threatening the stability of the young nation.
Alexander Hamilton of New York led the call for a constitutional convention to reevaluate the nation's governing document, arguing for a stronger, more centralised government. The Federalists, led by Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the creation of a powerful central government that could unify the nation, protect against foreign threats, and manage domestic affairs. They believed that the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch of government from becoming too powerful.
However, the Anti-Federalists, including Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams, opposed the concentration of power in the federal government, arguing that it came at the expense of states' rights and individual liberties. They criticised the absence of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution and warned that a powerful national government would violate natural rights and civil liberties. The debate played out in newspapers, pamphlets, and public meetings across the country, with both sides presenting their arguments passionately.
The Federalists worked to gain support for the Constitution, and the first state to ratify it was Delaware on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. The "vote now, amend later" compromise in Massachusetts helped secure victory there, and eventually, the final holdouts also ratified the Constitution. The ratification of the US Constitution created a new governing system with a centralised government, reflecting the need for a stronger and more unified nation.
Who's Next in Line? Constitutional Guide to Presidential Succession
You may want to see also

Amendments
The ratification of the US Constitution was a contentious process that sparked intense national debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, led by figures such as Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, supported the Constitution, arguing that it provided a necessary framework for a strong central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. They believed the checks and balances built into the Constitution would prevent any one branch from becoming too powerful.
The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, opposed the Constitution because they believed it concentrated too much power in the federal government at the expense of states' rights. They also criticized the absence of a Bill of Rights, arguing that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press. Notable Anti-Federalists included Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Samuel Adams.
To address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists and build support for ratification, compromises were made, and amendments were proposed. The "vote now, amend later" strategy helped secure victory in several states, including Massachusetts. James Madison, initially hesitant about the necessity of a Bill of Rights, took the lead in drafting the amendments. He introduced 17 amendments to the Constitution, of which Congress adopted 12 on September 25, 1789, to be sent to the states for ratification.
On December 15, 1791, ten amendments, known collectively as the Bill of Rights, were ratified. These amendments guaranteed fundamental freedoms such as speech, religion, and the press, as well as protections against government overreach. The inclusion of the Bill of Rights addressed the concerns of those who felt their liberties were not sufficiently protected under the original Constitution.
The ratification of the Constitution and the subsequent adoption of the Bill of Rights marked a significant shift in the governing system of the United States, reflecting the need for a more centralized government among the former colonies. The process, though contentious, laid the foundation for the official framework of the US government and continues to guide and protect the rights of Americans today.
Due Diligence: Searching for the Decedent's Will
You may want to see also
Frequently asked questions
Federalists supported the Constitution, arguing that it provided a necessary framework for a strong, effective central government capable of unifying the nation, protecting against foreign threats, and managing domestic affairs. Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution, fearing that it concentrated too much power in the federal government at the expense of states’ rights.
The ratification campaign was a nail-biter. The Federalists needed to convert at least three states. The Anti-Federalists fought hard against the Constitution because it created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown, and it lacked a bill of rights.
Between December 7, 1787, and June 21, 1788, the required nine out of 13 states ratified the Constitution, making it the official framework for the government of the United States of America. All 13 states eventually ratified the U.S. Constitution by May 29, 1790, when Rhode Island finally approved the document.
Alexander Hamilton helped convince Congress to organize a Grand Convention of state delegates to work on revising the Articles of Confederation. He led the lobbying efforts for votes in favor of ratifying the Constitution. With assistance from John Jay, they produced the 85 essays known as "The Federalist Papers" that explained and defended how the proposed new government would function.
The lack of a Bill of Rights was initially criticized by Anti-Federalists, who argued that the Constitution did not adequately protect individual liberties. James Madison, who was initially hesitant about the necessity of a Bill of Rights, took the lead in drafting amendments. Ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights, were ratified on December 15, 1791, guaranteeing fundamental freedoms such as speech, religion, and the press, as well as protections against government overreach.



![The Ratification of the Federal Constitution by the State of New York [electronic Resource]](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51At1RX3onL._AC_UY218_.jpg)





















