Anti-Federalists: The Constitution's Early Opponents

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The group was composed of small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers, and was led by Patrick Henry of Virginia. Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution would give the federal government too much power, threatening the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, and individuals. They also believed that the position of president might evolve into a monarchy. To communicate their concerns, Anti-Federalists wrote essays and newspaper articles, which became known as the Anti-Federalist Papers. Their opposition led to the enactment of the Bill of Rights.

Explore related products

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

Chen Jiongming and the Federalist Movement: Regional Leadership and Nation Building in Early Republican China (Volume 86) (Michigan Monographs In Chinese Studies)

$60

Revolutionary Brotherhood: Freemasonry and the Transformation of the American Social Order, 1730-1840 (Published by the Omohundro Institute of Early American ... and the University of North Carolina Press)

$16.19 $29.99

Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia [2 volumes]

$201

Allegiance to Liberty: The Changing Face of Patriots, Militias, and Political Violence in America

$53 $58.5

For the People: American Populist Movements from the Revolution to the 1850s

$25.99 $39.95

Anti-Federalists

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. Led by Patrick Henry of Virginia, they believed that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also believed that a large central government would not serve the interests of small towns and rural areas, unlike the urban interests that most Federalist delegates aligned with. Generally, Anti-Federalists were more likely to be small farmers than lawyers and merchants, and came from rural areas.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which protects Americans' civil liberties. They believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one. They also believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous. The original draft of the Constitution did not have a Bill of Rights, declared all state laws subservient to federal ones, and created a king-like office in the presidency.

To communicate their concerns, Anti-Federalists such as Patrick Henry wrote essays and newspaper articles, which became known as the Anti-Federalist Papers. Initially, many of the articles in opposition were written under pseudonyms, such as "Brutus" (likely Melancton Smith), "Centinel" (likely Samuel Bryan), and "Federal Farmer." Eventually, famous revolutionary figures came out publicly against the Constitution.

The Anti-Federalists included small farmers and landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers. They were composed of diverse elements, including those who opposed the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals. Some saw in the proposed government a new centralized and "monarchic" power that would replicate the cast-off governance of Great Britain, while others simply feared that the new government threatened their personal liberties.

Fear of strong central government

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and later opposed the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The name "Anti-Federalists" was imposed on the movement by their opponents, the Federalists, who supported a stronger central government. The Anti-Federalists believed that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. They argued that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments rather than a federal one. They also believed that without a Bill of Rights, the federal government would become tyrannous.

The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including those who opposed the Constitution because they thought it threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals. Some saw in the proposed government a new centralized and "monarchic" power that would replicate the cast-off governance of Great Britain. They believed that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also objected to the federal court system created by the proposed constitution.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties. The Bill of Rights is a list of ten constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. These include the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments. To accommodate Anti-Federalist concerns of excessive federal power, the Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution reserved any power not given to the federal government to the states and the people.

During the period of debate over the ratification of the Constitution, numerous independent local speeches and articles were published across the country. Initially, many of the articles in opposition were written under pseudonyms, such as "Brutus" (likely Melancton Smith) and "Centinel" (likely Samuel Bryan). Eventually, famous revolutionary figures such as Patrick Henry came out publicly against the Constitution.

No Bill of Rights

The Anti-Federalists were a political movement in the late 18th century that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution gave too much power to the federal government, threatening individual liberties and states' rights. They argued that the new “president” role could consolidate too much power and eventually lead to a pseudo-monarchy.

The Anti-Federalists played a crucial role in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which aimed to protect Americans' civil liberties. They strongly advocated for a Bill of Rights to be included in the Constitution to safeguard individual freedoms and prevent federal overreach. George Mason, one of the three delegates who refused to sign the original Constitution, proposed the addition of a Bill of Rights, but it was initially rejected by 10 out of 10 states as unnecessary.

The Federalists, supporters of the Constitution, argued that a Bill of Rights was unnecessary as the government could only exert the powers specified in the Constitution. However, when ratification was in danger in Massachusetts, they agreed to consider adding amendments. James Madison, once an opponent of the Bill of Rights, introduced a list of amendments to the Constitution in 1789, which eventually became the Bill of Rights.

The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and freedoms of American citizens, including freedom of speech, the right to a speedy trial, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments. These amendments were designed to win support in both houses of Congress and the states, addressing the concerns of the Anti-Federalists while avoiding significant structural changes to the government. The inclusion of the Bill of Rights was a compromise that helped pave the way for the adoption of the Constitution.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist: Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$33

The Great Courses: The Great Debate: Advocates and Opponents of the American Constitution

$21.9

The Anti-Federalist, Writings by the Opponents of the Constitution

$82.68

The Great Debate: Advocates and Opponents of the American Constitution

$13.09 $43.24

The Constitution Decoded: A Guide to the Document That Shapes Our Nation

$12.81 $16.99

The Great Courses Philosophy and Intellectual History ,The Great Debate: Advocates and Opponents of the American Constitution (DVD and Book 2007 )

$25.25

Loss of individual liberties

The Anti-Federalists were a late-18th-century political movement that opposed the creation of a stronger US federal government and the ratification of the 1787 Constitution. The Anti-Federalists believed that the liberties of the people were best protected when power resided in state governments, as opposed to a federal one. They believed that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights.

The Anti-Federalists were composed of diverse elements, including those who opposed the Constitution because they thought that a stronger government threatened the sovereignty and prestige of the states, localities, or individuals. Some saw in the proposed government a new centralized and "monarchic" power that would replicate the governance of Great Britain. They believed that the position of president, then a novelty, might evolve into a monarchy. They also believed that the national government would be too far removed from the people and thus unresponsive to the needs of localities.

The Anti-Federalists' opposition to ratifying the Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights, which was designed to protect Americans' civil liberties. The Bill of Rights is a list of 10 constitutional amendments that secure the basic rights and privileges of American citizens. They include the right to free speech, the right to a speedy trial, the right to due process under the law, and protections against cruel and unusual punishments. The Bill of Rights also reserves any power that is not given to the federal government to the states and to the people.

The Anti-Federalists' concerns about excessive federal power were addressed in the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which reinforced the reservation of powers to the states or the people. The First Amendment gives individuals "liberty" from the actions of the government, protecting their freedom of worship. The Fourth Amendment safeguards citizens' right to be free from unreasonable government intrusion in their homes through the requirement of a warrant. The Fifth Amendment protects citizens from self-incrimination and from being twice put in jeopardy for the same offence.

Monarchy vs. republic

In the context of the United States Constitution, those who opposed it were called Anti-Federalists. This group of people feared the centralisation of power in a strong national government, believing it would endanger individual liberties and states' rights. They were chiefly composed of small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers from rural areas. The Anti-Federalists wanted a Bill of Rights included in the Constitution to protect the rights of the people, and they believed that the position of president might evolve into a monarchy.

Now, let's compare this to the concepts of monarchy and republic:

A monarchy is a form of government where power is typically held by a single person, often a king or queen, who may inherit their position and rule for life. In a monarchy, the power structure is hierarchical, with the monarch at the top, often followed by a nobility or aristocracy, and then the general populace. The monarch may have absolute power or may be constitutionally limited, with power shared between a parliament or other governing bodies.

On the other hand, a republic is a form of government where power resides in the people, either directly or through elected representatives. Republics typically have a constitution that outlines the rights and responsibilities of citizens and the structure of the government. Power in a republic is often divided between different branches, such as the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, to prevent any one group from having too much power.

The Anti-Federalists' fears of a monarchy-like presidency in the US Constitution highlight an important distinction between these two forms of government. In a monarchy, power is often concentrated in a single person or a small group, while in a republic, power is meant to be distributed and balanced to protect against tyranny and ensure the rights of citizens.

While the US Constitution created a republic with a system of checks and balances, the Anti-Federalists' concerns about the concentration of power in the executive branch and the potential for a monarchy-like presidency were not unfounded. The US Constitution's system of government, with its separation of powers and checks and balances, was designed to guard against the excesses of both monarchy and pure democracy, as outlined by Alexander Hamilton in Federalist Paper No. 9.

Frequently asked questions