Compromises That Shaped The Constitution

The US Constitution is sometimes called a bundle of compromises due to the delegates of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 having to make several concessions to create a government charter acceptable to each of the 13 states. Four of the most significant compromises were the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Commerce Compromise, and the creation of the Electoral College.

Explore related products

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

Founding Fathers: The Essential Guide to the Men Who Made America

$14.77 $19.99

Founding Fathers

$19 $19.98

Founding Brothers: The Revolutionary Generation

$9.92 $19

America The Story of Us (TV Series)

$2.99

Founding Fathers: The Fight for Freedom and the Birth of American Liberty

$14.18 $40

The Great Compromise: Proportional representation in the House, equal representation in the Senate

The Great Compromise, also known as the Connecticut Compromise, was a significant agreement reached during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. It addressed the contentious issue of representation in Congress, specifically in the House of Representatives and the Senate. The delegates from the 13 states were divided over how representation should be structured in the legislative branch.

The larger states, like Virginia, argued for representation based on population. They believed that legislative power should be proportional to the number of people in each state. On the other hand, smaller states, like New Jersey, advocated for equal representation for each state, regardless of population size. They feared that a system based solely on population would disadvantage them and allow the larger states to dominate the legislative process.

The Great Compromise resolved this dispute by establishing a bicameral legislature with proportional representation in the House of Representatives and equal representation in the Senate. This compromise allowed for both principles of representation to be reflected in the structure of Congress. The House of Representatives would provide proportional representation, with the number of representatives allocated according to each state's population. Meanwhile, the Senate would offer equal representation, with each state receiving two senators regardless of its population.

The compromise was a delicate balance that aimed to address the concerns of both the larger and smaller states. It ensured that the legislative process would reflect the diverse interests and perspectives of all the states, providing a foundation for the United States federal government that has endured for over two centuries. The Great Compromise was a pivotal moment in the creation of the U.S. Constitution, demonstrating the importance of compromise and negotiation in the democratic process.

Three-Fifths Compromise: Counting slaves for congressional representation

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement reached during the 1787 United States Constitutional Convention over the inclusion of slaves in counting a state's total population. This agreement was made between delegates from the Northern and Southern states. The Southern states, with their embrace of slave-based agriculture and racial prejudice, wanted their entire population, including slaves, to be counted to determine the number of Representatives they could elect and send to Congress. The Northern states, on the other hand, wanted to exclude the counting of slave populations, arguing that only voters should be accounted for. This disagreement threatened to tear the Union apart, but a compromise was eventually reached.

The Three-Fifths Compromise stated that three-fifths of each state's slave population would be counted toward that state's total population for the purpose of apportioning the House of Representatives. This compromise gave the Southern states more power in the House relative to the North, as it effectively increased their representation. It also tied into taxation, reducing the burden on the slave states. This compromise, while morally dubious, was a reflection of the firmly established slavery system in the United States at the time.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was a significant aspect of the U.S. Constitution, which has been referred to as a "bundle of compromises." The delegates representing the 12 of the 13 original states had to navigate diverse interests and viewpoints, and the Three-Fifths Compromise was one of the key agreements that helped create a government charter acceptable to each state. The enduring influence of the Constitution, ratified by all 13 states in 1789, underscores the importance of compromise and negotiation in the democratic process.

It is important to note that the Three-Fifths Compromise was later superseded and explicitly repealed by Section 2 of the Fourteenth Amendment in 1868. This amendment provided for representatives to be apportioned by counting the whole number of persons in each state, excluding untaxed Native Americans. Additionally, slavery and involuntary servitude were outlawed in the United States by the 13th Amendment in 1865, marking a shift away from the contentious issues surrounding the Three-Fifths Compromise.

Commerce Compromise: Federal government regulates trade, not the slave trade

The Commerce Compromise was one of the key compromises that helped create the U.S. Constitution. It addressed how the new federal government should regulate business and trade. The compromise dictated that Congress would have the authority to control domestic and international trade, but not the slave trade for at least 20 years.

The Commerce Compromise was controversial because some states were worried that a central government with the power to regulate commerce might unjustly favour some states over others. However, other states recognised the necessity for a central authority to control commerce to avoid trade conflicts and guarantee the efficient operation of the national economy.

The Northern states were largely urbanised, relying on trade and industrial production. Some had already outlawed slavery in their state constitutions. The Southern states, on the other hand, were almost entirely agricultural, and agriculture was the most profitable industry in the new nation. The use of enslaved people was sustaining Southern agriculture.

The Southern states did not want the federal government to be able to regulate commerce because they feared that it would lead to the government abolishing the slave trade. They argued that the slave trade provided the trade and treasury that the new nation needed. The Northern states wanted to give the federal government the authority to regulate commerce, which would have been a significant shift in power.

The issue of slavery was one of the most divisive in American history and ultimately led to the Civil War. The Commerce Compromise was an attempt to address the issue of slavery without taking into account the perspective of the enslaved.

Explore related products

Founding Fathers [DVD]

$8.57 $11.98

America's Founding Fathers (TV Series)

$2.99

Spooktacular Creations Halloween Founding Father Costume, Blue Men Colonial Costume for Halloween Party

$58.99

Washington (TV Series)

$2.99

America's Founding Fathers

$14.46 $18.8

Founding Fathers: A Captivating Guide to Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Adams, Thomas Jefferson, John Jay, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, and James Monroe (Historical Figures)

$20.95 $25.22

Electoral College: Electors proportional to population vote for president

The Electoral College system was one of the key compromises made during the Constitutional Convention of 1787. The delegates had to agree on a method to elect the president, and the Electoral College was the solution that emerged from this debate.

The delegates considered various methods for selecting the president, including direct election by popular vote, selection by members of Congress, electors chosen by lottery, state governors, or an electoral college. The Electoral College system was chosen as a compromise between those who favoured direct popular election, such as James Wilson, and those who supported alternative presidential selection systems.

The Electoral College is made up of electors, with the number of electors from each state roughly proportional to its population. Citizens vote for these electors, who are bound to a particular candidate, and then the electors cast their votes for the president. This system was designed to balance the interests of larger and smaller states and ensure that the president was chosen through a process that considered the population while also providing equal representation to each state in the Senate.

The creation of the Electoral College addressed the broader debates surrounding the presidency and the selection of the president. It was a compromise that allowed for the establishment of a method of presidential selection that balanced the diverse interests and viewpoints presented by the delegates during the Constitutional Convention.

The Electoral College system has been a subject of ongoing debate and discussion in American politics, with some calling for direct popular elections instead. However, it remains the method by which the president is chosen, reflecting the complex nature of democratic decision-making and the concessions made during the formation of the U.S. Constitution.

Slavery Compromise: Congress could ban slave trade after 20 years

The US Constitution, produced after the Constitutional Convention, is sometimes referred to as a "bundle of compromises". This is because delegates had to agree on several key points to create a government charter that was acceptable to each of the 13 states. One of the most important compromises was the Slavery Compromise, which stated that Congress could not ban the slave trade before 1808, 20 years after the Constitution was ratified.

During the Constitutional Convention, the issue of slavery was hotly debated. Northern states, which had an industrialised economy, wanted to end the importation and sale of enslaved people. Southern states, which relied heavily on slavery and had an agricultural economy, did not want the government interfering. The delegates eventually agreed to the Slavery Compromise, which was a concession made by the Northern states to keep the Union intact.

The Slavery Compromise, also known as Article 1, Section 9 of the Constitution, stated that Congress could not ban the slave trade before 1808, 20 years after the Constitution was ratified. This compromise also allowed Congress to tax enslaved people as property, with a tax or duty of up to $10 for each person. While some delegates opposed this aspect of the compromise as it "acknowledged men to be property", others saw it as a necessary compromise to discourage the slave trade.

In the years leading up to the 1808 ban, Congress passed several laws to restrict the slave trade. In 1794, Congress made it illegal for American ships to participate in the slave trade, and in 1800, Congress outlawed US citizens' investment in the trade. Finally, in 1807, Congress passed the "Act Prohibiting the Importation of Slaves", which took effect on January 1, 1808. This Act imposed heavy penalties on international slave traders but did not end slavery or the domestic sale of slaves within the US.

Frequently asked questions