The Constitution's Biggest Flaw: A Historical Perspective

The United States Constitution has been described as both brilliant and flawed, with some arguing that it is undemocratic and ineffective, causing political polarization. One of the biggest issues with the original Constitution was the power dynamic between the federal government and the states. The Articles of Confederation established a weak central government with limited powers, such as the inability to regulate commerce, collect taxes, or conduct foreign policy without the voluntary agreement of the states. This dynamic led to issues such as Shays' rebellion, where the central government couldn't put down an internal rebellion without the help of private sponsors. The Constitution has also been criticized for its handling of slavery, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the delay in banning the international slave trade. Amendments have been made over time to address these issues, but some argue that a new constitutional convention is necessary to address modern challenges.

Explore related products

The Constitutional Convention: A Narrative History from the Notes of James Madison (Modern Library Classics)

$13.65 $22

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

The Summer of 1787: The Men Who Invented the Constitution (The Simon & Schuster America Collection)

$11.29 $19.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

1787: The Grand Convention

$15.65 $28.95

Madison’s Hand: Revising the Constitutional Convention

$26 $26

Weak central government

The Articles of Confederation, the first American constitution, established a very weak central government. The Articles formed a war-time confederation of states, with limited central governance. The document made official some of the procedures used by Congress to conduct business, but many delegates realised the Articles had limitations.

The central government lacked the authority to regulate commerce, making it unable to protect or standardise trade between foreign nations and the various states. It could not raise funds, regulate trade, or conduct foreign policy without the voluntary agreement of the states. The Confederation relied on the voluntary efforts of the states to send tax money to the central government. Lacking funds, the government couldn't maintain an effective military or back its own currency.

The central government couldn't collect taxes to fund its operations and had to rely on state militias to put down internal rebellions, such as Shays' rebellion. It also lacked the power to enforce states conducting their own foreign policies, and there was no common currency, making trade between states and other countries extremely difficult.

The Articles Congress only had one chamber, and each state had one vote, reinforcing the power of the states to operate independently from the central government. Congress needed nine out of thirteen states to pass any laws, making it very difficult to pass legislation that would affect all thirteen states. The document was also practically impossible to amend, as it required unanimous consent for any amendment, so all thirteen states would need to agree on a change.

Lack of executive or judicial branch

One of the biggest issues with the original US Constitution was its lack of an executive or judicial branch. The Articles of Confederation established "the United States of America" as a perpetual union formed to defend the states as a group, but it provided few central powers beyond that. The central government was intentionally designed to be extremely weak, with no executive official or judicial branch.

The Articles Congress only had one chamber, and each state had one vote, reinforcing the power of the states to operate independently from the central government. This meant that the central government lacked the authority to regulate commerce, making it unable to protect or standardise trade between foreign nations and the various states. It also couldn't collect taxes to fund its operations and had to rely on voluntary efforts from the states.

The lack of an executive branch meant that there was no single leader or body to enforce the power of the central government. This led to difficulties in conducting foreign policy, as the central government couldn't enforce its authority over the states in international affairs. The states also had their own money systems, which made trade between states and with other countries extremely challenging.

The absence of a judicial branch also created issues with interpreting and enforcing the laws and principles outlined in the Constitution. Over time, the Supreme Court has played a crucial role in interpreting the Constitution and ensuring equal justice for all. However, there have been challenges and controversies regarding the nomination and confirmation of justices, with concerns about political manipulation and the selection of justices who may be hostile to fundamental human rights.

The lack of executive and judicial branches in the original Constitution contributed to a weak central government and challenges in governing and protecting the interests of the nation as a whole.

Difficulty passing legislation

The Articles of Confederation, the first American constitution, lasted less than a decade due to several inherent weaknesses. One of the biggest challenges it faced was the difficulty in passing legislation due to the requirement of a supermajority. Congress needed at least nine out of thirteen states to pass any laws, which made it challenging to enact legislation that would impact all states. This high threshold often resulted in frustrating delays and hindered the effectiveness of the legislative process.

The weakness of Congress under the Articles of Confederation had far-reaching consequences. It encouraged delegates to focus more on their home-state politics and personal affairs than on the nation's legislative body. The lack of attendance and lackadaisical attitude of some delegates further exacerbated the issue, making it difficult to achieve the required quorum for passing laws.

Additionally, the Articles of Confederation did not provide Congress with the authority to regulate commerce or conduct foreign policy without the voluntary agreement of the states. This meant that Congress was unable to effectively manage trade between foreign nations and the various states, as well as protect the nation's interests on the global stage.

The inability to pass legislation and address pressing issues, such as the national debt and the need for standardised trade practices, highlighted the limitations of the Articles of Confederation. It became apparent that a stronger central government with more effective legislative powers was necessary to overcome these challenges.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 marked the end of the era of the Articles of Confederation and the beginning of a new chapter in American governance, where the difficulties in passing legislation under the previous system were addressed through a more robust and adaptable framework.

Explore related products

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member

$0.99 $99

Debates and Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Delaware

$33.75

Decision in Philadelphia: The Constitutional Convention of 1787

$18 $18

The Constitutional Convention of 1787: Constructing the American Republic (Reacting to the Past™)

$19.99 $32.5

The Records Of The Federal Convention Of 1787, Issue 2

$32.95

Reclaiming America: through Single Issue Federal Conventions

$19.95

Inability to regulate commerce

One of the biggest issues with the original US Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, was its inability to regulate commerce. This weakness had far-reaching consequences, hindering the country's economic development and stability.

Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress lacked the authority to regulate trade effectively. This meant that individual states often pursued their own interests, sometimes at the expense of the nation as a whole. The central government was left powerless to standardise trade policies or protect domestic industries from foreign competition.

The lack of regulatory power over commerce also impacted the government's ability to raise funds. Congress was dependent on voluntary contributions from the states, which often fell short of what was needed to fund national projects. This financial instability weakened the central government's ability to act and left it struggling to address the country's growing debt.

Recognising the urgency of the situation, Congress requested that the states grant it limited power over commerce for a 15-year period. However, this plea fell on deaf ears, with most states failing to respond. The inability of Congress to regulate commerce highlighted the inherent weakness of the central government and the challenges of managing a union of states with diverse interests.

The issue of regulating commerce was a key factor in the decision to revise the Articles of Confederation. The Constitutional Convention of 1787 marked a shift towards a stronger federal government with greater regulatory powers. The new constitution aimed to address the shortcomings of the Articles of Confederation, including the inability to effectively manage the nation's commerce and finances.

Slavery and representation

The issue of slavery and representation was central to the debates over commerce and representation during the drafting of the US Constitution. The Three-Fifths Compromise held that 60% of enslaved people in each state would count toward congressional representation, significantly increasing the number of congressional seats in several Southern states. This compromise, however, did not address the fundamental injustice of slavery and the contradiction between the Constitution's articulation of fundamental equality and the reality of slavery.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention also debated whether to allow the new federal government to ban the importation of enslaved people. They agreed to give Congress the power to do so but only after a waiting period of 20 years. This delay in addressing the slave trade was a significant moral failing of the Constitution, and it would be over 60 years before the Civil War finally brought an end to slavery in the United States.

The Three-Fifths Compromise also had important implications for representation in Congress. The compromise gave Southern states with large enslaved populations a significant advantage in terms of congressional representation, as it increased their political power relative to other states. This compromise was a source of tension and contributed to the eventual Civil War.

The issue of representation in Congress was also a subject of debate during the Constitutional Convention. Large states favored representation based on population, while small states argued for equal representation by state. The "Great Compromise" resolved this issue by establishing the House of Representatives, which was apportioned by population, and the Senate, which provided equal representation for each state.

The power dynamics between the federal government and the states were also a significant point of contention. Many delegates believed that the federal government should be able to overrule state laws, while others feared that a strong federal government would oppress its citizens. This tension between state and federal power impacted the balance of representation in Congress, with the Senate representing the interests of individual states and the House of Representatives reflecting the population distribution across the country.

Frequently asked questions