Patrick Henry's View On The Constitution

Patrick Henry was a Founding Father of the United States, a vocal anti-Federalist, and a passionate advocate for individual liberties and religious freedom. Henry's opinions on the Constitution were shaped by his fears of a powerful central government and his belief in states' rights. In his famous speech on June 5, 1788, he expressed his opposition to the ratification of the US Constitution, arguing that it granted too much power to the federal government and lacked a Bill of Rights. Henry's stance, though ultimately unsuccessful, remains a critical moment in American history, influencing ongoing discussions about the balance of power between the government and its citizens.

Explore related products

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$10 $15.59

How to Read the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence

$16.07 $16.95

The Constitution of the United States (U.S. Heritage): with The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights and other Founding Documents with an ... by Constitutional Lawyer Alan Dershowitz

$34.99

The Anti-Federalist & The Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: The U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Works by the Founding Fathers…

$24.54

The U.S. Constitution

$12.99

Patrick Henry was an early opponent of the US Constitution

Patrick Henry was a firebrand speaker, an ardent supporter of the American Revolution, and an early opponent of the US Constitution. In 1788, he passionately opposed the ratification of the new, controversial US Constitution, arguing that it granted too much power to the federal government without sufficient protections for the states or their citizens. Henry believed that the document created a government that was too centralized and powerful, and that it did not adequately protect the liberties for which the United States had fought a bitter war with Great Britain. He also criticised the lack of a bill of rights and the potential for government secrecy, which he saw as a threat to states' rights and individual freedoms.

Henry's stance on the Constitution set him at odds with many other leaders of his era, including his longtime ally George Washington. He was invited to serve as a delegate to the Constitutional Convention but refused and instead fought hard against the proposed Constitution. He was elected to the state-level ratification convention in Virginia, where he delivered a lengthy speech outlining his objections. Henry argued that ratification should only occur after "a full investigation of the actual situation of America" and that the proposed government, in his view, was not the best means of overseeing the nascent United States. He believed that the Constitution would “entail misery” for the nation's citizens and that his duty as a true American patriot was to oppose it.

Henry's opposition to the Constitution was not without influence, however. His critiques influenced the eventual inclusion of a Bill of Rights and shaped Democratic-Republican policy. Additionally, his warnings about government secrecy continue to resonate with open government advocates. Henry's legacy is complex; while he is remembered for his oratory skills and his role in the fight for independence, his opposition to the Constitution has also led him to be viewed as "one of history's losers". Nonetheless, he remains a symbol of the homeschooling movement and a favourite among Christian conservatives who cite his deep religious beliefs and defence of religious liberty.

Henry's refusal to support the Constitution ultimately caused a rift in his relationship with George Washington, who offered him multiple prominent positions in his administration, including a seat on the Supreme Court, the position of Secretary of State, and Minister to Spain, all of which Henry refused. Despite their political differences, the two men later reconciled, and Henry even joined the Federalist Party, which he had once opposed.

He believed the document created a government that was too centralized and powerful

Patrick Henry was a vocal opponent of the United States Constitution, believing that it created a government that was too centralized and powerful. In his famous "Give me liberty or give me death" speech delivered at the Second Virginia Convention in 1788, Henry argued against ratifying the Constitution, fearing it would grant too much power to the federal government without sufficient protections for the states or their citizens. He believed that the document, as written, posed a threat to states' rights and individual liberties.

Henry's concerns about potential government overreach and his support for states' rights were shared by other Anti-Federalists. He and his fellow Anti-Federalists viewed the Constitution as a powerful federal government's tool to infringe upon the rights of states and individuals. Henry's opposition played a critical role in influencing discussions about government power and individual rights, a debate that continues to resonate in American political discourse.

Henry's stance on the Constitution was influenced by his belief that the document lacked a Bill of Rights. He felt that the absence of such a document left citizens' liberties unprotected. This concern was not unfounded, as evidenced by the later inclusion of the Bill of Rights as amendments to the Constitution. Henry's arguments contributed to this outcome, as his opposition helped convince Federalists to support the inclusion of a Bill of Rights to address the concerns raised by him and other Anti-Federalists.

In addition to his concerns about centralization of power and the lack of a Bill of Rights, Henry also criticized the Constitution for not explicitly requiring Congress to meet in public. He warned that the liberties of the people would never be secure if the transactions of their rulers could be concealed from them. Henry's words continue to resonate with advocates of open government, even centuries later.

Henry's opposition to the Constitution was so strong that he refused to serve at the Constitutional Convention, despite being offered a place. He actively campaigned against its ratification, believing that the document as written would entail misery for the nation's citizens. While Henry's efforts ultimately proved futile, his critiques influenced the development of the Bill of Rights and Democratic-Republican policy. Despite his initial opposition, Henry later reconciled with Federalists, including George Washington, and even joined the Federalist Party towards the end of his career.

He was concerned about potential government overreach

Patrick Henry, the famous orator and patriot, was a vocal opponent of the ratification of the US Constitution. He believed that the Constitution granted too much power to the federal government, without sufficient protections for the states or their citizens.

Henry's concerns about potential government overreach were rooted in his belief that the Constitution created a government that was too centralized and too powerful. He feared that the strong executive branch and the concentration of power in the national legislature would infringe upon the liberties of the people. In his famous speech to the Virginia Convention in 1788, Henry proclaimed his belief that the liberties of the people would never be secure if the transactions of their rulers could be concealed from them. He warned against the government meeting in secret, declaring that there should be transparency in the government's dealings.

Henry's opposition to the Constitution was influenced by his firm adherence to the protection of liberties for which the United States had fought against Great Britain during the American Revolution. He argued that the Constitution should only be adopted if it were found to be a "trifling evil", but he believed it would instead bring "misery" to the nation's citizens. Henry's stance on this matter set him at odds with many other leaders of his era, who recognized the shortcomings of the weak central government under the Articles of Confederation.

Henry's passionate arguments against the Constitution had a significant impact on the discussions around government power and individual rights. His critiques influenced the inclusion of a Bill of Rights and shaped Democratic-Republican policy. Despite his initial opposition, Henry later reconciled with supporters of the Constitution, such as George Washington, and even joined the Federalist Party towards the end of his career.

Explore related products

Benedictine Options: Learning to Live from the Sons and Daughters of Saints Benedict and Scholastica

$18.55 $19.95

The Essential Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches and Writings

$15.96 $16.95

The Federalist vs. Anti-Federalist Dispute: The Original Arguments For Each

$0.99 $25.13

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99

Uncertain Justice: The Roberts Court and the Constitution

$13.23 $23.99

The Federalist-Antifederalist Debates: Optimized for Classroom Use

$7.99 $7.99

He wanted to protect the liberties of citizens

Patrick Henry was a vocal opponent of the ratification of the United States Constitution. He believed that the Constitution granted too much power to the federal government, without sufficient protections for the states or their citizens. Henry, a skilled orator and lawyer, famously proclaimed, "Give me liberty or give me death", reflecting his deep commitment to protecting the liberties of citizens.

Henry's concerns about the Constitution were rooted in his fear of a powerful central government and the lack of a Bill of Rights. He argued that the document seemed sure to “entail misery” for the nation's citizens and that it was the duty of true American patriots to oppose it. Henry's stance represented a critical moment in American history, resonating in ongoing discussions about government power and individual rights.

One of Henry's main criticisms of the Constitution was the lack of prohibition against Congress meeting in secret. He warned that "the liberties of a people never were, nor ever will be secure, when the transactions of their rulers may be concealed from them". Henry's words still resonate with open government advocates today, highlighting the enduring relevance of his concerns.

While Henry's opposition to the Constitution may have been controversial at the time, it ultimately influenced the inclusion of a Bill of Rights. His arguments contributed to shaping the Democratic-Republican policy and ensuring that citizens could hold their governments accountable. Henry's legacy is that of a passionate defender of liberty, willing to stand against the tide to protect the freedoms he believed in.

Despite his initial opposition, Henry later reconciled with his former political opponent, George Washington, and joined the Federalist Party. He ran for the Virginia legislature at Washington's request in 1799 but died before taking his seat.

Henry believed the Constitution lacked a bill of rights

Patrick Henry was a vocal opponent of the ratification of the US Constitution. He believed that the Constitution, as written, created a government that was too centralized and too powerful. Henry, an anti-federalist, viewed the Constitution as a threat to states' rights and individual liberties. He argued that the document lacked sufficient protections for the states or their citizens and that it granted too much power to the federal government.

Henry's stance was based on his fear of a powerful central government and his belief that the Constitution lacked a bill of rights. He felt that the Constitution did not adequately protect the liberties for which the United States had fought a bitter war with Great Britain during the American Revolution. Henry's concerns about potential government overreach and his desire for a bill of rights were shared by other anti-federalists, and their opposition helped convince Federalists to agree to support the inclusion of a bill of rights.

Henry's opposition to the Constitution was so strong that he refused to serve at the Constitutional Convention and actively campaigned against its ratification at the Virginia Ratifying Convention. He believed that approving the Constitution would endanger the freedoms that Americans had fought for during the Revolution. Henry's arguments against the Constitution were passionate and lengthy, filling one-quarter of the Convention's debates. His stance on this issue represented a critical moment in American history and continues to resonate in discussions about government power and individual rights.

Henry's famous oratory skills were on full display during his speeches against the Constitution. His remarks at the Virginia convention in 1788, where he urged his fellow Americans to choose liberty over tyranny, spanned some 600 pages in the official record. Henry's words and warnings about the dangers of government secrecy and the need for transparency in governance have had a lasting impact. While some of his concerns, such as Congress meeting in secret, may seem unnecessary today, his broader point about the importance of government transparency remains relevant and has been taken up by open government advocates.

Frequently asked questions