Douglas's Constitutional Vision: A Unique Perspective

There are two people referred to in the sources as Douglas with differing points of view on the US Constitution. One is Stephen A. Douglas, who believed that the central government should exercise only expressly delegated powers under the Constitution and that it should defer to the majority judgment of local populations. He also believed that the Union could only be preserved by maintaining the Constitution as it was written by the Founding Fathers. The other is Frederick Douglass, who initially believed the Constitution to be a problematic document that upheld slavery. However, he later changed his stance and began to use the Constitution as a tool to advocate for the freedom and civil rights of African Americans and women.

Explore related products

Notes of Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787

$35 $34.99

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$62.12 $85

Debates in the Federal Convention of 1787 by James Madison, a Member

$0.99 $99

Frederick Douglass believed the US Constitution upheld slavery

While the United States Constitution had a powerful and enduring place in Frederick Douglass's career, his views on it were complicated and evolved throughout his lifetime. Initially, Douglass believed the Constitution to be a problematic document that upheld slavery instead of promoting freedom. In his famous speech, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?", Douglass challenged the hypocrisy of a nation celebrating freedom while enslaving others, arguing for a Constitution that reflected true liberty for all. He critiqued the Constitution's egalitarian claims, believing it to be a tool for preserving slavery rather than promoting equality and justice. The Fugitive Slave Act, for instance, demonstrated how the Constitution was used to maintain the institution of slavery.

However, in the spring of 1851, Douglass publicly changed his stance on the Constitution. He acknowledged its validity and interpreted it as an anti-slavery document, setting a precedent for wielding it in the fight for emancipation. By becoming a political abolitionist, Douglass challenged the country to reconsider who was a citizen and entitled to protection under the Constitution. In 1852, he declared that the Constitution should always be construed toward freedom and natural rights, despite any ambiguity. This shift in perspective informed the rest of his career, as he used the Constitution as a tool to advocate for the freedom and civil rights of African Americans and women.

Despite his evolving views, Douglass remained committed to certain core principles. He believed that the country had not yet fulfilled its ideals as outlined in the Constitution, and it was the duty of citizens to use political processes to align the nation with its founding intent. Douglass's complicated legacy is further illustrated by his support for the Fifteenth Amendment, which focused on suffrage for Black men, leading to a severance of ties with his White female allies.

He used the Constitution to advocate for freedom and civil rights

It is assumed that the reference here is to Frederick Douglass, the abolitionist leader, and not Stephen A. Douglas, the US Senator and presidential candidate.

Frederick Douglass initially opposed the United States Constitution, viewing it as a problematic document that upheld slavery instead of promoting freedom. In his famous speech, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?", he challenges the hypocrisy of a nation celebrating freedom while enslaving others, thus arguing for a Constitution that reflects true liberty for all.

However, in the spring of 1851, Douglass publicly changed his stance on the Constitution. He began to view it as an anti-slavery document that could be "wielded on behalf of emancipation". By acknowledging the validity of the Constitution, Douglass inserted himself into a new dialogue and demonstrated his participation in American society.

From this point onwards, Douglass used the Constitution as a tool to advocate for freedom and civil rights. He challenged the country to reconsider who was a citizen and entitled to protection under the Constitution. In 1852, he declared that the proper interpretation of the Constitution should always be construed toward freedom and natural rights, despite any ambiguity in a particular situation.

Douglass's belief in the Constitution as a valid document informed the rest of his career. He continued to view it as the ideal to which the country had yet to fulfill. He supported the Fifteenth Amendment and Black male suffrage, despite opposition from some of his White female allies.

He believed the country should be as the Founding Fathers intended

It is assumed that the request refers to Stephen A. Douglas, the 19th-century American politician. Douglas's views on the US Constitution were largely driven by his political ambitions. He believed that the country should be as the Founding Fathers intended, and that the central government should exercise only the powers expressly delegated to it by the Constitution. This philosophy, known as "popular sovereignty", held that the majority judgment of local populations should prevail.

Douglas's views on popular sovereignty were influenced by his belief in states' rights and his opposition to congressional intervention in the western territories. He argued that citizens of territories had the same rights to self-government as citizens of states, and that intervention by Congress was inappropriate. This position was informed by his support for slavery, which he believed should be determined by the local population of each territory, rather than by the federal government.

Douglas's interpretation of the Constitution was also shaped by his rivalry with Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln supported congressional regulation of slavery in the territories, while Douglas believed that property owners could legally bring slaves anywhere in the territories and that Congress lacked the power to prohibit this. Douglas's ambition to become president led him to espouse a constitutional doctrine of popular sovereignty to meet his political needs.

Despite his support for slavery, Douglas believed that the Constitution should be interpreted to uphold freedom and natural rights. He challenged the country to reconsider who was a citizen entitled to protection under the Constitution, advocating for the freedom and civil rights of African Americans and women. Douglas viewed the Constitution as a tool to promote freedom and equality, arguing that it was a "glorious liberty document". However, he also believed that it was problematic in its support for slavery and its failure to promote true liberty for all.

Explore related products

James Madison His Notes on the Constitutional Debates of 1787, Vol 1 of 2

$18 $18

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$27.9 $42.5

The Essential Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches and Writings

$15.96 $16.95

Debates and Proceedings of the Constitutional Convention of the State of Delaware

$33.75

Federalists and Antifederalists: The Debate Over the Ratification of the Constitution (Constitutional Heritage Series)

$35.48 $50

Constitutional Originalism: A Debate

$19.66 $34.95

He believed in the validity of the Constitution as a document

Assuming you are referring to Frederick Douglass, it is important to note that his position on the United States Constitution evolved throughout his lifetime. Initially, he viewed the Constitution as a problematic document that upheld slavery instead of promoting freedom. He critiqued the document, arguing that while it had elements of liberty, its application often supported oppression. For instance, he cited the Fugitive Slave Act as an example of how the Constitution was used to maintain the institution of slavery.

However, in the spring of 1851, Douglass publicly changed his stance on the Constitution. He acknowledged its validity and interpreted it as an anti-slavery document, establishing a precedent that allowed it to be "wielded on behalf of emancipation." By doing so, Douglass inserted himself into a new dialogue, demonstrating that he was a participant in American society rather than an agitator. He advocated for the interpretation of the Constitution to always be construed toward freedom and natural rights, using it as a tool to fight for the civil rights of African Americans and women.

Douglass's new perspective on the Constitution was influenced by his transition to political abolitionism, which made him more moderate and palatable to the masses. He believed that the country had strayed from its founding ideals and that it was the duty of citizens to use the Constitution to bring the nation back in line with those ideals. This shift in his thinking would inform the rest of his career, with the Constitution becoming a lens through which he advocated for the rights and freedoms of all people.

Despite his changed viewpoint, Douglass did not want to change or modify the Constitution. He believed in preserving it as it was originally written by the founding fathers. This stance aligned him with the Confederates during the Civil War, as they sought to maintain slavery and prevent amendments to the Constitution. Douglass's complicated legacy further unfolded after the Civil War during the controversy over the Fifteenth Amendment, which focused on suffrage for Black men and caused a rift between White suffragists and Black activists, including Douglass.

He believed the Constitution should be preserved

Assuming you are referring to Frederick Douglass, it is clear that he believed the Constitution should be preserved. In his famous speech, "What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?", Douglass challenges the hypocrisy of a nation celebrating freedom while simultaneously enslaving others. He argues for a Constitution that reflects true liberty and equality for all.

Initially, Douglass was at odds with his fellow Garrisonian abolitionists, but he soon committed to his belief in the Constitution as a valid document. He used it as a tool to advocate for the freedom and civil rights of African Americans and women. In 1851, Douglass publicly changed his stance, interpreting the Constitution as an anti-slavery document that could be "wielded on behalf of emancipation".

By acknowledging the validity of the Constitution, Douglass positioned himself as a participant in American society, rather than an agitator. He believed that the country had strayed from its founding ideals and that it was the duty of citizens to use the Constitution to realign the country with its founding intent. This belief in the preservation of the Constitution was further emphasised in his statement: "I believe that the Union can only be preserved by maintaining inviolate the Constitution of the United States as our fathers have made it."

However, it is important to note that Douglass also recognised the problematic nature of the Constitution. He understood that while it contained elements of liberty, its application often supported oppression. For example, the Fugitive Slave Act demonstrated how the Constitution was used to uphold slavery and deny human rights. Despite this critical view, Douglass maintained his belief in the Constitution as a glorious liberty document that should be preserved and interpreted to uphold freedom and natural rights.

Frequently asked questions