Federalists And Anti-Federalists: The Constitution Clash

The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists clashed over support for the new constitution. The Federalists, supporters of the Constitution, argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, who opposed ratification, worried that the proposed constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They feared that the new national government would be too powerful and threaten individual liberties, given the absence of a bill of rights. The political split between the two groups began in the summer of 1787 when 55 delegates attended the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia to draft a new plan of government.

Explore related products

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics)

$8.32 $8.95

The Federalist & The Anti-Federalist Papers: Complete Collection: Including the U.S. Constitution, Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, Important Documents by the Founding Fathers & more

$0.99 $20.4

What the Anti-Federalists Were For: The Political Thought of the Opponents of the Constitution

$18.65 $23

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788: A Library of America Boxed Set

$61.14 $85

The Anti-Federalist Papers (Dover Thrift Editions: American History)

$10 $15.59

The Federalist Papers: A Collection of Essays Written in Favour of the New Constitution

$17.99 $17.99

Federalists vs Anti-Federalists

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two opposing groups with vastly different beliefs about the role of the national government in the United States. The Federalists were nationalists who believed in a strong national government with greater congressional powers, a more powerful executive, and an independent judiciary. They were instrumental in shaping the new US Constitution in 1787, arguing that it supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism. Alexander Hamilton was a key figure in this group, writing 51 essays arguing for ratification and helping to gain allies for the Constitution.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the US Constitution, arguing that it betrayed the principles of the American Revolution. They believed that the Constitution strengthened the national government at the expense of the states and the people. The Anti-Federalists worried that a large republic would lead to an unresponsive government, and that a corrupt senate, judiciary, and executive would form an aristocracy. They also argued against the absence of a bill of rights, which they felt was necessary to ensure the liberties that they believed the Constitution violated.

The debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was often contentious and took place in homes, taverns, and on the printed page. The Federalists had gained momentum by mid-January 1788, with five states having ratified the Constitution. However, they knew their main opposition would come from Anti-Federalists in large and powerful states, including Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. The Anti-Federalists never organized efficiently across all thirteen states, so they had to fight the ratification at every state convention.

One notable confrontation between the two groups occurred at the New York ratifying convention in Albany in June 1788. Hamilton and 19 other Federalist delegates faced 47 Anti-Federalists, and Hamilton's focused logic ultimately drove the Constitution through the convention. To gain support for his proposals, Hamilton struck a deal with Virginians, agreeing to support the assumption of state debts in exchange for their backing of his plan to move the federal capital to a location on the Potomac River. With this and other economic policies, Hamilton helped secure a solid footing for the nation's future prosperity.

The Federalist Papers

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, feared that the Constitution gave too much power to the central government, threatening individual liberties and states' rights. They believed that the new government would be unresponsive to the people and argued for the inclusion of a bill of rights to protect these liberties. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers.

Alexander Hamilton, the driving force behind The Federalist Papers, wrote 51 of the essays. James Madison, often referred to as the "father of the Constitution", and John Jay, president of the Continental Congress, also contributed. The first Federalist essay was published in a New York newspaper under the pseudonym Publius. It was addressed to the people of New York but aimed at the delegates to the state's Ratifying Convention.

The Federalists and Anti-Federalists engaged in a year-long debate over ratification, clashing over the balance of national and state power. The Federalists needed nine states to ratify the Constitution, and by January 1788, they had gained the support of five: Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. The main opposition was expected to come from large and powerful states like Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia, where Anti-Federalist sentiment was strong.

State conventions

The clash between Federalists and Anti-Federalists over support for the new constitution played out in state conventions, where delegates debated and decided whether to ratify the document. The Federalists, supporters of the Constitution, argued that it strengthened the national government and provided a system of checks and balances, with separation of powers across three branches. They believed this stronger government was necessary to protect liberties and prevent anarchy, as seen in the uprising led by Daniel Shays in 1786. Alexander Hamilton, a driving force behind the Federalists, played a key role in the New York convention, using his logical arguments and economic proposals to sway delegates.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, vehemently opposed ratification. They feared that the new government would threaten individual liberties and state sovereignty, with national laws taking precedence over state laws. They believed the Constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution, as it consolidated power in a central government with unlimited taxation powers. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers, and their prominent figures included Patrick Henry and George Mason, who proposed the addition of a bill of rights to protect civil liberties.

The state conventions became a battleground for these opposing ideologies. The Federalists needed the support of nine out of the thirteen states to win, and by January 1788, they had gained the approval of five states: Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. However, they faced strong opposition from Anti-Federalists in large and influential states like Massachusetts, New York, and Virginia. The New York convention, in particular, highlighted the divide, with 20 Federalists facing off against 47 Anti-Federalists.

The debates and negotiations in these state conventions were intense and often contentious, taking place not only in convention halls but also in homes and taverns across the states. The Federalists, through persuasive arguments and strategic compromises, gradually built momentum. They addressed the concerns of the Anti-Federalists, with James Madison shepherding through amendments that later became the Bill of Rights. The Federalists' efforts culminated in the adoption of the Constitution, laying the foundation for the United States' new framework of government.

Explore related products

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America)

$32.82 $42.5

The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification, Part Two: January to August 1788 (Library of America)

$39 $42.5

The Essential Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches and Writings

$15.96 $16.95

Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787-1788

$13.2 $24

The Constitution: An Introduction

$18.98 $19.99

The Debate on the Constitution: Federalist and Anti-Federalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification 1787-1788 ( Complete )

$15

Checks and balances

The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists were the two groups that clashed over support for the new constitution. The Federalists, supporters of the new constitution, comprised 20 delegates, including Alexander Hamilton, who defended the document at the New York Ratifying Convention in Albany in June 1788. They argued that the new government upheld the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

The Anti-Federalists, on the other hand, vehemently opposed the ratification of the 1787 US Constitution. They believed that the new national government would wield too much power, threatening individual liberties, and they were concerned about the absence of a bill of rights. The Anti-Federalists included small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and laborers, with Patrick Henry as one of their most outspoken leaders.

The clash between these two groups was intense and played out in homes, taverns, and on the printed page. The Federalists published essays, such as "The Federalist," to defend the Constitution and gain allies. Meanwhile, the Anti-Federalists anonymously published essays under pseudonyms like Brutus and Cato in New York newspapers, critiquing the Constitution and expressing their coherent set of principles about government.

The Federalists' efforts were ultimately successful, and by mid-January 1788, five states had ratified the Constitution. However, the Anti-Federalists' opposition played a crucial role in the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, protecting Americans' civil liberties.

Bill of Rights

The Bill of Rights, the first ten amendments of the US Constitution, was the outcome of the clash between two groups: the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists supported the Constitution, while the Anti-Federalists opposed it. The Anti-Federalists' opposition to the ratification of the 1787 Constitution was a powerful force in the origin of the Bill of Rights to protect Americans' civil liberties.

The Federalists, who included Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strengthened national government with greater congressional powers, a more powerful executive, and an independent judiciary. They argued that the new government supported the principles of separation of powers, checks and balances, and federalism.

On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, including small farmers, landowners, shopkeepers, and labourers, feared that the proposed Constitution represented a betrayal of the principles of the American Revolution. They worried about too much power being invested in the national government at the expense of the states, threatening individual liberties. They also argued for the inclusion of a bill of rights, remembering the English Bill of Rights of 1689, which had helped expose the abuses of power by the British government.

The clash between these two groups led to a series of essays and debates over ratification, with the Federalists ultimately gaining the support needed to ratify the Constitution. However, the Anti-Federalists' influence resulted in the adoption of the First Amendment and the other nine amendments that constitute the Bill of Rights, protecting Americans' civil liberties and ensuring a balance of power between the national government and the states.

Frequently asked questions