President's Role In Constitutional Amendments: A Guide

The President of the United States has no formal role in the constitutional amendment process. The Constitution does not outline a role for the President in amending the Constitution, and the Supreme Court has affirmed this understanding. However, some Presidents have played an informal, ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification. For example, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not required. In recent times, the President may be present during the ceremonial function of signing the certification of a ratified amendment. Additionally, the Twenty-second Amendment, which limits the President to two terms, stands as a notable example of a constitutional amendment that directly impacts the Presidency.

Explore related products

American Constitutional Law, Volume II: The Bill of Rights and Subsequent Amendments

$105.52 $150

The Democracy Amendments: Constitutional Reforms to Save the United States

$12.92 $24.21

The Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence

$1.99 $6.95

Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause (Constitutional Law Series)

$3.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

The People’s Constitution: 200 Years, 27 Amendments, and the Promise of a More Perfect Union

$18.4 $45

The President has no formal role in the constitutional amendment process

The process of amending the Constitution is initiated by Congress, which proposes an amendment with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Alternatively, a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the State legislatures can propose an amendment. In both cases, the President's involvement is not required. The joint resolution for an amendment is forwarded directly to the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) for processing and publication, bypassing the White House.

While the President does not have a formal role, they have played an informal and ministerial role in the amendment process on some occasions. For example, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not necessary. Similarly, President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution extending the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being advised that his signature was not required. These instances demonstrate the President's informal participation in the amendment process.

The role of certifying a state's ratification of a constitutional amendment falls under the purview of the Archivist of the United States, who heads NARA. The Archivist has delegated many of the associated ministerial duties to the Director of the Federal Register. The certification process involves drafting a formal proclamation and publishing it in the Federal Register, serving as official notice of the amendment's completion. In recent times, the signing of the certification has become a ceremonial function that may include the President as a witness, along with other dignitaries.

In summary, while the President has no formal constitutional role in amending the Constitution, they have occasionally played an informal and ceremonial role in the amendment process. The primary responsibility for proposing and ratifying amendments rests with Congress and the designated officials within NARA.

Presidents have played an informal, ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments

The US Constitution does not outline a role for the President in amending the Constitution. The Supreme Court has also articulated the Judicial Branch's understanding that the President has no formal constitutional role in the amendment process. However, some Presidents have played an informal, ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification.

For example, President George Washington sent the first twelve proposed amendments, including the ten proposals that later became the Bill of Rights, to the states for ratification after Congress approved them. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not necessary for its proposal or ratification.

In modern times, the certification of amendments has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, including the President. For instance, President Johnson signed the certifications for the 24th and 25th Amendments as a witness, and President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment.

Despite these examples of Presidents playing an informal, ministerial role in the amendment process, it is important to note that the Supreme Court has made it clear that the President's signature is not required for the submission of a constitutional amendment. This was demonstrated in the 1920 case of Hawke v. Smith, where the Court characterized an earlier decision as having settled that the submission of a constitutional amendment did not require the action of the President.

The President cannot veto a proposed amendment

The President of the United States does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process. The Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in amending the Constitution. As a result, the President cannot veto a proposed amendment.

The process of amending the Constitution is outlined in Article V of the Constitution. Amendments can be proposed by Congress with a two-thirds majority vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Alternatively, a constitutional convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures can propose amendments. However, in either case, the President's approval or signature is not required.

Historically, some Presidents have played an informal, ministerial role in the amendment process. For example, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not necessary. Similarly, President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution to extend the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being advised that his signature was unnecessary.

In addition, some Presidents have acted as witnesses during the certification of amendments. For instance, President Johnson signed the certifications for the 24th and 25th Amendments, and President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment.

While the President may participate in ceremonial functions related to the amendment process, their signature or approval is not required for the proposal or ratification of amendments. The Supreme Court has also articulated the view that the President has no formal constitutional role in the amendment process.

Explore related products

The First Amendment: [Connected Ebook] (Aspen Casebook) (Aspen Casebook Series)

$326 $326

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$140

A Real Right to Vote: How a Constitutional Amendment Can Safeguard American Democracy

$12.65 $27.95

A Companion to the United States Constitution and Its Amendments

$34.65 $45

American Constitutional Law: Introductory Essays and Selected Cases

$143.59 $180

The Constitutional Amending Process in American Political Thought

$95

The President's signature is not required on a joint resolution proposing an amendment

The US Constitution does not outline a specific role for the President in the process of amending it. While some Presidents have played a ministerial role in transmitting Congress's proposed amendments to the states for potential ratification, their signature is not required on a joint resolution proposing an amendment. This is because the President does not have a constitutional role in the amendment process, and so the joint resolution does not go to the White House for signature or approval. Instead, the original document is sent directly to the National Archives and Records Administration's (NARA) Office of the Federal Register (OFR) for processing and publication.

The Supreme Court has also articulated the Judicial Branch's understanding that the President has no formal constitutional role in the amendment process. In the 1920 case of Hawke v. Smith, the Supreme Court characterised the Court's decision in Hollingsworth as having settled that the submission of a constitutional amendment did not require the action of the President. This was further evidenced by President Jimmy Carter's signing of a joint resolution to extend the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, which was unnecessary. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, despite his signature not being necessary for its proposal or ratification.

While the President does not need to sign off on proposed amendments, they may be involved in the ceremonial functions of the amendment process. For example, President Johnson and Nixon signed the certifications for the 24th, 25th, and 26th Amendments, respectively, as witnesses.

The President may be involved in the ceremonial function of signing the certification of an amendment

The Constitution of the United States does not outline a specific role for the President in the process of amending the Constitution. The Supreme Court has also articulated the view that the President has no formal constitutional role in the amendment process. This was seen in the 1920 case of Hawke v. Smith, where the Court characterised its earlier decision in Hollingsworth v. Virginia as having settled that the submission of a constitutional amendment did not require the action of the President.

Despite this, there have been instances where the President has played an informal, ministerial role in the amendment process. For example, President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution to extend the deadline for the ratification of the Equal Rights Amendment, despite being advised that his signature was unnecessary. Similarly, President Abraham Lincoln signed the joint resolution proposing the Thirteenth Amendment to abolish slavery, even though his signature was not required for its proposal or ratification.

In recent history, the signing of the certification of an amendment has become a ceremonial function attended by various dignitaries, including the President. For example, President Johnson signed the certifications for the 24th and 25th Amendments as a witness, and President Nixon witnessed the certification of the 26th Amendment.

Therefore, while the President does not have a formal role in amending the Constitution, they may be involved in the ceremonial function of signing the certification of an amendment. This signing is done as a witness to the amendment and does not imply any power to veto or approve the amendment.

Frequently asked questions