Supreme Court Nominee Qualifications: What The Constitution Says

The process of nominating and confirming a Supreme Court justice in the United States attracts a lot of public attention and is closely scrutinized. The President nominates a justice, and the United States Senate provides advice and consent before the person is formally appointed to the Court. The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a justice, so the president may nominate any individual to serve on the Court. However, in modern practice, Supreme Court nominations are first referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee for review before being considered by the full Senate. The committee examines the background of the nominee, questions them about their work experience and views on constitutional issues, and hears testimony from witnesses supporting and opposing the nomination.

Explore related products

Supreme Power: Franklin Roosevelt vs. the Supreme Court

$10 $27.95

Friends of the Supreme Court: Interest Groups and Judicial Decision Making

$175 $86.79

The Supreme Court

$94.95

The Supreme Court: An Analytic History of Constitutional Decision Making (Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions)

$39.79 $45

The Myth of Judicial Activism: Making Sense of Supreme Court Decisions

$29.57 $38

Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches

$21.16 $37

The President nominates a justice

The Senate Judiciary Committee plays a key role in the confirmation process, reviewing nearly every Supreme Court nomination since 1868. The committee conducts hearings, examining the nominee's background and questioning them about their work experience, views on constitutional issues, and their general judicial philosophy. The committee also hears testimony from outside witnesses, both supporting and opposing the nomination. This typically includes the American Bar Association, which provides an analysis and recommendation on the nominee's professional qualifications. The pre-hearing investigation and public hearings are followed by a committee decision on what recommendation to make to the full Senate.

The full Senate then debates the nomination. This debate can be blocked or halted by a vote of 51 (of 100) Senators, known as "the nuclear option". After the debate, the full Senate votes on the nomination. A simple majority of Senators present and voting is required for confirmation. In the case of a tie, the Vice President, who also presides over the Senate, casts the deciding vote. Once the Senate has taken final action, the secretary of the Senate sends a resolution of confirmation or rejection to the President.

The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a justice, so the President may nominate any individual to serve on the Court. However, in modern practice, most nominees have had prior experience as lower court judges, legal scholars, or private practitioners, or have served in other public offices. While neither the Constitution nor federal law requires Supreme Court justices to be lawyers, every person nominated to the Court to date has been.

The Senate provides advice and consent

The US Constitution does not set out any specific qualifications for Supreme Court nominees. Instead, it gives the President the power to nominate and appoint justices with the "advice and consent" of the Senate. This means that the President selects a nominee, who is then reviewed and voted on by the Senate.

The "advice and consent" of the Senate is a crucial part of the nomination process. Once the President has selected a nominee, the nomination is sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. This committee plays a key role in the confirmation process, reviewing almost every Supreme Court nomination since 1868. The committee conducts hearings, examining the background of the nominee and questioning them about their work experience, views on constitutional issues, and judicial philosophy. The committee also hears testimony from outside witnesses, both supporting and opposing the nomination, including the American Bar Association, which provides an analysis of the nominee's professional qualifications.

After the hearings, the Judiciary Committee votes on the nomination and sends its recommendation to the full Senate. The full Senate then debates the nomination, and a simple majority of Senators present and voting is required to confirm the nominee. If there is a tie, the Vice President, who also presides over the Senate, casts the deciding vote.

The process of gaining the "advice and consent" of the Senate is a thorough and rigorous one, with the committee and full Senate examining the nominee's qualifications, experience, and views. This process can take several months, with the average time from nomination to final Senate vote being about 55 days since the mid-1950s.

While the Constitution does not set specific qualifications, most presidents have sought out nominees with solid legal qualifications, distinguished reputations, or expertise in a particular area of the law. As a result, many nominees have had prior experience as lower court judges, legal scholars, private practitioners, or public servants. While not a requirement, every person nominated to the Court to date has been a lawyer.

Nominees are reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee

The US Constitution does not set out any specific qualifications for Supreme Court nominees. However, the process of appointing a Supreme Court justice involves several steps, including review by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The President nominates a candidate to fill a vacancy on the Supreme Court. The nomination is then sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration and review. This committee plays a crucial role in the confirmation process, examining the background and qualifications of the nominee. The committee conducts hearings, during which the nominee is questioned about their work experience, views on constitutional issues, and judicial philosophy. Witnesses, both supporting and opposing the nomination, also present their statements and answer questions. The committee collects records from the FBI and other sources to thoroughly vet the nominee. This process typically takes about a month to complete.

The Senate Judiciary Committee's review of a Supreme Court nominee consists of three parts: a pre-hearing investigation, public hearings, and a committee decision on a recommendation. The committee's examination ensures that the nominee is thoroughly vetted and evaluated before a final decision is made.

After the committee completes its review, it votes on the nomination and sends its recommendation to the full Senate. The recommendation can be to confirm, reject, or take no position on the nomination. The full Senate then debates the nomination, and a simple majority of Senators present and voting is required for confirmation. If there is a tie, the Vice President, who also presides over the Senate, casts the deciding vote.

The role of the Senate Judiciary Committee is essential in ensuring a thorough review of Supreme Court nominees. Their investigations, hearings, and recommendations play a key role in the confirmation process, providing valuable insights into the qualifications, experience, and philosophical stance of the nominees.

Explore related products

Oral Arguments and Decision Making on the United States Supreme Court (American Constitutionalism)

$76.61 $99

Making Constitutional Law: Thurgood Marshall and the Supreme Court, 1961-1991

$83.36 $175

The Rule of Five: Making Climate History at the Supreme Court

$20.68 $23

The ^ALong Reach of the Sixties: LBJ, Nixon, and the Making of the Contemporary Supreme Court

$9.99 $15.59

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99 $9.99

Life, Law & Liberty: A Memoir

$27.98 $30

The nominee's background and qualifications are examined

The Constitution does not set any qualifications for service as a Supreme Court justice, so the president may nominate any individual to serve on the Court. However, in practice, most presidents have sought out nominees with solid legal qualifications, a distinguished reputation, or expertise in a particular area of the law. Nominees typically have prior experience as lower court judges, legal scholars, private practitioners, Members of Congress, federal administrators, or governors.

Once the president has selected a nominee, the nomination is sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee for consideration. The Committee holds a hearing on the nominee, collecting records from the FBI and other sources, and the nominee prepares for the hearings. The hearings include statements and questions for and from the nominee, as well as testimonies from witnesses supporting and opposing the nomination. The Committee also examines the background of the nominee, questioning them about their work experience, views on constitutional issues, and their general judicial philosophy. This process allows for the proper vetting and research of the nominee.

The Senate Judiciary Committee then votes on the nomination and sends its recommendation to the full Senate. The full Senate debates the nomination, after which a simple majority of Senators present and voting is required for confirmation. If confirmed, the nominee must take two oaths: the constitutional oath and the judicial oath.

The full Senate debates and votes on the nomination

The U.S. Constitution empowers the President to nominate and, with the confirmation of the Senate, to appoint public officials, including Supreme Court justices. Once the Senate Judiciary Committee has reviewed the nomination, it is put before the full Senate for final consideration.

The full Senate debates the nomination, and a simple majority vote is required to confirm or reject a nominee. Historically, such rejections are relatively uncommon. Of the 37 unsuccessful Supreme Court nominations since 1789, only 11 nominees have been rejected in a Senate roll-call vote. The most recent rejection of a nominee by vote of the full Senate occurred in 1987, when Robert Bork's nomination was defeated by a 42–58 vote.

Senate debate on a nomination continues until ended by cloture, which allows debate to end and forces a final vote. Historically, a three-fifths majority (60%) had to vote in favor of cloture to move to a final vote on a Supreme Court nominee. In 1968, there was a bipartisan effort to filibuster the nomination of Abe Fortas as chief justice. After four days of debate, a cloture motion fell short of the necessary two-thirds majority to cut off debate, and President Lyndon Johnson withdrew the nomination.

In April 2017, the Senate changed the rules to lower the required votes to 51 to end debate on Supreme Court nominations (commonly known as "the nuclear option"). When the debate ends, the Senate votes on the nomination. A simple majority of the Senators present and voting is required for the judicial nominee to be confirmed. If there is a tie, the Vice President, who also presides over the Senate, casts the deciding vote.

Frequently asked questions