Dayton's Disapproval: Constitutional Provisions

Jonathan Dayton was the youngest member of the U.S. Constitutional Convention and an active participant in the debates, advocating for the rights of smaller states like New Jersey. He opposed several aspects of the Constitution, including the Virginia Plan, which would have created a bicameral legislature with broad powers and proportional representation in both houses. However, he ultimately signed the final document and went on to serve in various political roles, including as a U.S. Congressman and Senator from New Jersey.

Explore related products

Constitutional Provisions And Laws, United States And California

$30.95

The Recent Attempt to Defeat the Constitutional Provisions in Favor of Religious Freedom

$13.95

The Odd Clauses: Understanding the Constitution Through Ten of Its Most Curious Provisions

$13.99 $18

Intangibility of certain constitutional provisions

$50

A Lexicon of Three U.S. Constitutional Provisions

$63.9

Constitutional provisions, laws and bylaws of the University of Michigan.

$13.99

Bicameral legislature with proportional representation

Jonathan Dayton was the youngest member of the U.S. Constitutional Convention, signing the Constitution at the age of 26. He was an active participant in the debates, advocating for the rights of smaller states like New Jersey.

Dayton opposed the Virginia Plan, which would have established a bicameral legislature with broad powers and proportional representation in both houses. He described it as "a novelty, an amphibious monster" and believed it would "never be received by the people". Instead, Dayton supported the New Jersey Plan, which featured a unicameral house with each state allotted the same number of representatives.

Despite his objections, Dayton signed the final Constitution, which incorporated elements of both the Virginia and New Jersey Plans. The Great Compromise, as it was known, ensured equal representation in the Senate and the nomination of Supreme Court justices by the Executive branch.

Following the Constitutional Convention, Dayton continued his political career, serving in the New Jersey Assembly, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the U.S. Senate. He was a prominent Federalist, backing Alexander Hamilton's financial program and supporting the suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion.

Congress regulating commerce by a simple majority

Jonathan Dayton was the youngest member of the U.S. Constitutional Convention and an active participant in the debates, advocating for the rights of smaller states like New Jersey. He was a supporter of the New Jersey Plan, which was ultimately rejected, but some of its provisions were included in the "Great Compromise" that allowed the Constitution to go forward to ratification.

One of the aspects of the Great Compromise that Dayton objected to was the right of Congress to regulate commerce by a simple majority. The Southern states had wanted a two-thirds vote in support of any such regulation. Despite his objections, Dayton signed the final document, becoming the youngest person to sign the Constitution of the United States at the age of 26.

Dayton's objection to Congress regulating commerce by a simple majority likely stemmed from his representation of and advocacy for smaller states like New Jersey. Giving each state an equal number of representatives, regardless of population size, would have ensured that the interests of smaller states were not overshadowed by larger states. This is reflected in his support for the New Jersey Plan, which proposed a unicameral house with each state allotted the same number of representatives.

Additionally, Dayton's concern may have been influenced by the economic interests of the Southern states, which relied heavily on commerce, particularly in the form of agriculture and trade. Requiring a two-thirds majority would have provided a higher threshold for decision-making, potentially protecting the interests of the Southern states and ensuring that any regulations considered by Congress were thoroughly discussed and supported by a supermajority.

It is important to note that while Dayton disagreed with certain provisions, including Congress's ability to regulate commerce by a simple majority, he ultimately supported the overall ratification of the Constitution. His signature on the document reflects his commitment to the formation of a unified nation, despite differences in opinion on specific aspects.

Abolition of slave importation after 1808

Jonathan Dayton was the youngest member of the U.S. Constitutional Convention, signing the Constitution at the age of 26. He was a frequent participant in the debates and opposed several aspects of the Constitution, although he did ultimately sign the final document.

One of the provisions of the Constitution that Dayton did not approve of was the abolition of the importation of slaves after 1808. This was included in the Great Compromise that allowed the Constitution to go forward to ratification. The abolition of slave importation was coupled with the imposition of taxes per slave, not to exceed $10 in the meantime. Additionally, slaves would count as three-fifths of a person when determining the number of Representatives allocated to each state.

Dayton objected to some of the provisions in the final document, but it is not entirely clear which specific aspects of the abolition of slave importation he disagreed with. However, it is known that he advocated for the rights of smaller states like New Jersey and played a role in drafting the Constitution's federal approach to national government.

Despite his objections, Dayton signed the Constitution, which included the provision for the abolition of slave importation after 1808. This was a significant step towards eventually ending slavery in the United States, although it would take many more years and a bloody civil war to achieve that goal.

Explore related products

Chronological List of Constitutional Provisions, Acts and Joint Resolutions of the State of Louisiana Relating to Her Public Lands from 1817 to 1921. Issued by Fred J. Grace, 1921 [Leather Bound]

$12.95

Constitutional provisions and irrigation law, November, 1910

$11.45

The Constitution of the United States

$1.5

The Compiled School Laws of South Dakota, with Constitutional Provisions 1901 [Leather Bound]

$12.95

Constitutional Provisions And Laws, United States And California: Relating To The Militia And National Guard, May, 1909 (1909)

$22.95

Legal Guide for Police: Constitutional Issues

$31.85 $54.95

Voting against the Twelfth Amendment

Jonathan Dayton was a prominent Founding Father and politician from New Jersey. At 26, he was the youngest person to sign the United States Constitution. He was also the youngest delegate at the Constitutional Convention. Dayton was a frequent participant in the debates and opposed several aspects of the Constitution, but he nonetheless signed the final document.

Dayton was a loyal Federalist. As a congressman, he backed Alexander Hamilton's financial program, pressed for the suppression of the Whiskey Rebellion, and supported the Jay Treaty with Great Britain in 1794. During his last two terms, he was the speaker of the House. Dayton was elected to the Senate, where he served from 1799 to 1805.

As a senator, Dayton opposed Thomas Jefferson's administration by voting against the Twelfth Amendment, which specified separate votes for president and vice president. He also voted against the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801 and for the acquittal of Supreme Court Justice Samuel Chase, who was impeached by the House for political bias.

Dayton's opposition to the Twelfth Amendment is particularly notable given his earlier involvement in shaping the Electoral College system as a member of the Constitutional Convention. During the Convention, Dayton advocated for the rights of smaller states like New Jersey and worked to create a federal approach to national government, which included establishing the Electoral College to select the President.

It is not entirely clear why Dayton voted against the Twelfth Amendment, but it is possible that he disagreed with the specific provisions or the broader implications of the amendment. The Twelfth Amendment changed the process by which the President and Vice President were elected, requiring separate votes for each position. This amendment was passed in response to the controversial election of 1800, in which Thomas Jefferson and Aaron Burr, running mates for the Democratic-Republican Party, received the same number of electoral votes, throwing the election to the House of Representatives. The House eventually elected Jefferson as President, but the close tie between Jefferson and Burr highlighted the need for a clearer process for electing the President and Vice President.

Opposing the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801

Jonathan Dayton was a prominent figure in the drafting and signing of the United States Constitution. As the youngest delegate at the Constitutional Convention, he actively participated in the debates and advocated for the rights of smaller states like New Jersey. While Dayton ultimately signed the Constitution, he objected to some of its provisions and supported the inclusion of certain amendments.

One specific instance where Dayton opposed a provision of the Constitution was in his vote against the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801. The Judiciary Act of 1801 was a federal statute passed by the Federalist-controlled Congress in the final days of John Adams' presidency. The Act restructured the federal court system and allowed for the appointment of numerous Federalist judges.

As a loyal Federalist, Jonathan Dayton opposed the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, which was advocated by President Thomas Jefferson and his Democratic-Republican administration. Dayton's opposition to the repeal can be understood in the context of his political alignment and support for Federalist policies.

The Judiciary Act of 1801 had significant implications for the federal judiciary and the balance of power between the political parties. By repealing the Act, President Jefferson and his party sought to undo the Federalist influence in the courts and assert their own control. However, Dayton and other Federalists viewed the repeal as a threat to the independence of the judiciary and a partisan attempt to reshape the court system.

In opposing the repeal of the Judiciary Act of 1801, Dayton and his Federalist colleagues argued that the Act ensured a strong and independent judiciary, free from political interference. They believed that the Act's provisions protected the courts from becoming a tool of the executive branch and preserved the integrity of the judicial process. Additionally, the Act's impact on the structure and composition of the federal courts was seen by Federalists as a necessary reform to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the judicial system.

While the specific reasons for Dayton's opposition to the repeal are not comprehensively documented, his stance can be contextualized within his broader support for Federalist policies and his commitment to an independent judiciary. As a loyal Federalist and a supporter of Alexander Hamilton's financial program, it is plausible that Dayton viewed the Judiciary Act of 1801 as a crucial component of the Federalist agenda and a safeguard against perceived Democratic-Republican overreach.

Frequently asked questions