The Constitution: What Almost Stopped It From Happening

The United States Constitution faced many obstacles on its path to ratification. The country was initially governed by the Articles of Confederation, which gave the Confederation Congress the power to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. This led to concerns about economic disaster and instability, with states disputing territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade. The Constitutional Convention assembled in Philadelphia in May 1787, with delegates debating fiercely over congressional representation and the issue of slavery. The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution due to its creation of a powerful central government and the lack of a bill of rights. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed in the necessity of a strong central government. The ratification process was challenging, with only six of the required nine states initially reporting a pro-Constitution majority. The tide turned with the vote now, amend later compromise in Massachusetts, and the Constitution was eventually ratified by the required nine states, becoming the official framework of the US government in 1788.

Explore related products

Articles of Confederation (Books of American Wisdom)

$12.95

Articles of Confederation of The United States, 1778. 14 x 16 Replica on Genuine Antiqued Parchment

$11.99 $13.99

The Constitution of the United States of America, with the Bill of Rights and all of the Amendments; The Declaration of Independence; and the Articles of Confederation

$4.5

Founding Documents of the United States of America: Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, The Constitution, The Bill of Rights and Amendments 11-27 (America Series)

$11.99

The Articles of Confederation: Classic Literature

$13.98

We Have Not a Government: The Articles of Confederation and the Road to the Constitution

$23

The Articles of Confederation were ineffective

The Articles of Confederation, America's first constitution, gave the Confederation Congress the authority to make rules and request funds from the states, but it had no enforcement powers, couldn't regulate commerce, or print money. The states' disagreements over territory, war pensions, taxation, and trade threatened to tear the young country apart. The Articles were tailored to a newly formed nation made of states acting more like independent, sovereign countries, and it quickly became clear to some of America's leaders that future stability required a stronger, more centralized government.

Secondly, the Articles did not grant the Confederation Congress the ability to regulate commerce or print money. This meant that the central government was unable to implement coherent economic policies or support a war effort. The lack of regulatory power over commerce and currency led to economic instability, with states acting independently and often pursuing conflicting interests.

Thirdly, the Articles of Confederation did not provide a mechanism for protecting individual rights and liberties. The absence of a bill of rights was a significant concern for many, including the Anti-Federalists, who opposed the creation of a powerful central government without guarantees of individual freedoms. The lack of protections for rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press was seen as a critical shortcoming of the Articles.

Finally, the Articles of Confederation did not adequately address the issue of slavery. The question of slavery and its representation for taxation and congressional representation was highly divisive and threatened to derail the Union. While a temporary compromise was reached, allowing the slave trade to continue until 1808, it was clear that a more permanent solution was needed to address the moral and practical implications of slavery.

In summary, the ineffectiveness of the Articles of Confederation stemmed from their lack of enforcement powers, inability to regulate commerce and currency, omission of a bill of rights, and insufficient resolution of the slavery question. These shortcomings led to economic instability, weak central governance, and social unrest, ultimately paving the way for the creation and ratification of the United States Constitution.

Centralised power was contentious

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by 39 delegates. However, it only went into effect on June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth of 13 states to ratify it. The road to ratification was long and arduous, with contentious issues surrounding centralized power.

The delegates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 were tasked with revising the existing government under the Articles of Confederation. However, they soon decided to completely redesign the government, creating a powerful central government. This shift towards centralization was driven by concerns about the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation, which had left the country on the brink of economic disaster and unable to effectively resolve disputes between states.

However, the idea of centralized power was highly contentious. The Anti-Federalists strongly opposed the creation of a powerful central government, arguing that it resembled the one they had just overthrown and lacked a bill of rights. They wanted to protect states' rights and prevent the concentration of power in a national government. On the other hand, the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton, believed that a strong central government was necessary to address the nation's challenges and ensure stability.

The debate over congressional representation further highlighted the contentious nature of centralized power. The small states advocated for equal representation, while others argued for representation based on population. A compromise was reached, with each state getting one representative for every 30,000 people in the House of Representatives and two representatives in the Senate.

The issue of slavery also played a role in the debate over centralized power. The delegates agreed to count enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person for representation and taxation purposes, and they temporarily resolved the issue by agreeing to continue the slave trade until 1808.

In conclusion, centralized power was a contentious issue during the ratification of the Constitution. The balance between state rights and national power was a delicate one, and the delegates had to navigate strong opposition from Anti-Federalists and concerns about the effectiveness of the government. The compromises reached during the Constitutional Convention helped pave the way for the eventual ratification of the Constitution and the formation of a more centralized government.

Slavery was a divisive issue

The issue of slavery was a highly contentious topic during the drafting of the US Constitution and threatened to derail the Union. The delegates at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia in 1787 were divided over the issue of slavery, specifically the method by which slaves were to be counted for purposes of taxation and representation. The delegates eventually agreed to count enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person, and the slave trade could continue until 1808. This was a temporary resolution, but it highlights how slavery was a divisive issue that had to be navigated carefully during the formation of the Constitution.

The delegates to the Philadelphia Convention, anticipating Antifederalist sentiment among state politicians, provided for ratification of the Constitution by popularly elected ratifying conventions in each state. This ensured that judges, ministers, and others ineligible to serve in state legislatures could be elected to a convention. The Constitution would go into effect as soon as nine states ratified it, with the remaining four states joining the newly formed union subsequently. This strategy recognised the reality of differing views on slavery and other issues across the states and provided a pathway to achieving the required majority for ratification.

The Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution because it created a powerful central government, reminding them of the one they had recently overthrown, and it lacked a bill of rights. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed a strong central government was necessary to address the nation's challenges. The "vote now, amend later" compromise in Massachusetts helped secure victory, and the tide turned in favour of ratification. This compromise reflected the delicate balance between state interests and the need for a unified nation, with slavery as a central tension.

The North-South division over slavery continued to shape the political landscape. The Constitution included provisions shielding certain clauses from amendment until 1808, including Article One, Section 9, Clause 1, which prevented Congress from restricting the importation of slaves before that date. On January 1, 1808, Congress approved legislation prohibiting the importation of slaves, marking a significant step in addressing the divisive issue of slavery.

In conclusion, slavery was a divisive issue that threatened to derail the formation of the United States Constitution. The delegates navigated this challenge through compromises, such as the three-fifths compromise and the agreement to postpone the abolition of the slave trade until 1808. The ratification process, shaped by differing state interests and views on slavery, ultimately led to the establishment of a powerful central government. The contentious issue of slavery continued to shape US politics, with the Constitution including provisions shielding slavery-related clauses from amendment until the importation of slaves was prohibited in 1808.

Explore related products

The First Constitution: The Articles of Confederation

$5.99

The Constitution of the United States, Bill of Rights, Declaration of Independence, and Articles of Confederation

$3.99

The Constitution of the United States of America: The Declaration of Independence, The Bill of Rights

$9.99

The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation

$4.95

The Articles of Confederation: An Interpretation of the Social-Constitutional History of the American Revolution, 1774-1781

$22.95

The Constitution of the United States with the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation

$17.96

The Bill of Rights was debated

The United States Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, by 39 delegates, but it did not go into effect until June 21, 1788, when New Hampshire became the ninth of 13 states to ratify it. The road to ratification was long and arduous, and the Constitution was fiercely debated. One of the main points of contention was the lack of a bill of rights.

The Anti-Federalists, who opposed the Constitution, argued that it created a powerful central government that reminded them of the one they had just overthrown, and it did not include a bill of rights. They believed that a bill of rights was necessary to protect individual liberties and prevent government overreach. The Federalists, on the other hand, believed that a strong central government was necessary to address the nation's challenges. They argued that a bill of rights was unnecessary because all power not expressly delegated to the government was reserved for the people.

James Madison, a key author of the Constitution, initially sided with the Federalists. However, by the fall of 1788, he had changed his position and recognised the necessity of a bill of rights to ensure the acceptance of the Constitution. He believed that a bill of rights would have positive effects, providing "fundamental maxims of free government" and serving as "a good ground for an appeal to the sense of community" against potential oppression.

The debate over the bill of rights was closely tied to other contentious issues, such as slavery and congressional representation. The delegates eventually reached a compromise, agreeing that each state would have one representative for every 30,000 people in the House of Representatives and two representatives in the Senate. They also agreed to count enslaved Africans as three-fifths of a person and to allow the slave trade to continue until 1808.

The Massachusetts Compromise, reached in February 1788, played a crucial role in securing the ratification of the Constitution. It stipulated that amendments would be proposed to protect certain rights, including freedom of speech, religion, and the press. These amendments became known as the Bill of Rights and were ratified on December 15, 1791, along with eight other amendments.

Ratification was a challenge

The road to ratification was long and arduous. The Federalists, led by Hamilton and Madison, embarked on a lobbying campaign to garner support for the Constitution. With John Jay, they wrote "The Federalist Papers," a collection of 85 essays explaining and defending the proposed new government. These essays were published in newspapers across the nation.

The first state to ratify was Delaware on December 7, 1787, followed by Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Georgia, and Connecticut. However, several states opposed the Constitution due to its lack of protection for rights such as freedom of speech, religion, and the press. The ratification campaign was a closely contested affair, with only six out of 13 states initially reporting a pro-Constitution majority.

The tide turned in Massachusetts, where the "vote now, amend later" compromise helped secure victory. This compromise led to the inclusion of a bill of rights, which was a significant concession to the Anti-Federalists. The Constitution was eventually ratified by Massachusetts, Maryland, South Carolina, and, crucially, New Hampshire, becoming the ninth state to do so on June 21, 1788, and enacting the new government.

Frequently asked questions