Poland's Current Ruling Party: Law And Justice's Governance Explained

As of October 2023, the political party currently in power in Poland is the Law and Justice (Prawo i Sprawiedliwość, PiS), a right-wing, conservative party led by Jarosław Kaczyński. PiS has held a majority in the Sejm (the lower house of Poland's parliament) since 2015, with Mateusz Morawiecki serving as Prime Minister. The party's governance has been marked by policies emphasizing national sovereignty, social conservatism, and increased welfare spending, alongside controversies over judicial reforms and media freedom. However, Poland is scheduled to hold parliamentary elections in October 2023, which may shift the balance of power depending on the outcome.

Explore related products

Democracy in Poland (2nd Edition)

$110 $61.99

Poland's EU Accession (Routledge Contemporary Russia and Eastern Europe Series)

$200 $63.99

The Global Expansion of Judicial Power

$2.99 $42

Regional Economic Voting: Russia, Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic, 1990–1999 (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics)

$21.67 $39

Poland's role in the development of an 'Eastern Dimension' of the European Union

$38.96 $75.5

Solidarity And Contention: Networks Of Polish Opposition (Volume 18) (Social Movements, Protest and Contention)

$99.99 $26

United Right Coalition: Law and Justice (PiS) leads the current ruling coalition in Poland

The Law and Justice (PiS) party has been at the helm of Poland's political landscape since 2015, leading the United Right Coalition. This conservative and nationalist alliance has significantly shaped the country's domestic and foreign policies, often sparking both admiration and controversy. With a strong focus on traditional values, social welfare, and sovereignty, PiS has managed to maintain its grip on power, despite facing criticism from the European Union and liberal opposition parties.

Understanding the Coalition's Dynamics

The United Right Coalition is a strategic alliance primarily composed of PiS, along with smaller parties like United Poland (SP) and the Republican Party. PiS, as the dominant force, sets the agenda, emphasizing policies such as increased social spending, opposition to liberal reforms, and a strong stance on national identity. For instance, the flagship "Family 500+" program, which provides monthly child benefits, has been a cornerstone of their appeal to working-class families. However, the coalition’s unity is occasionally tested by ideological differences, particularly on issues like the EU’s influence and the pace of judicial reforms.

Policy Impact and Public Perception

PiS’s governance has been marked by a blend of populism and pragmatism. On one hand, their pro-family and pro-rural policies have solidified support in smaller towns and villages. On the other, their reforms of the judiciary and media have drawn accusations of undermining democratic norms. For example, the overhaul of the Supreme Court and the introduction of state-friendly media narratives have led to tensions with the EU, culminating in withheld funds and legal disputes. Despite this, PiS retains a loyal base, often portraying these conflicts as a defense of Polish sovereignty against external interference.

Comparative Perspective: PiS vs. Previous Governments

Compared to the liberal-centric governments of the Civic Platform (PO) era (2007–2015), PiS has shifted Poland’s political axis toward conservatism and state interventionism. While PO focused on economic liberalization and EU integration, PiS prioritizes social conservatism and national interests. This shift is evident in their handling of issues like immigration, where PiS maintains a restrictive approach, contrasting sharply with the more open policies of their predecessors. Such differences highlight the ideological divide that continues to shape Polish politics.

Practical Implications for Citizens and Observers

For Poles, the PiS-led coalition’s policies have tangible effects. Families with children under 18 benefit directly from the "Family 500+" program, while retirees see periodic bonuses like the "13th pension." However, critics argue that these measures are unsustainable without long-term economic reforms. For international observers, understanding PiS’s blend of populism and nationalism is key to grasping Poland’s role in the EU and its broader geopolitical stance. As the coalition navigates internal and external challenges, its ability to balance popular demands with institutional pressures will determine its future trajectory.

Key Figures: Mateusz Morawiecki as Prime Minister, Andrzej Duda as President

As of October 2023, the Law and Justice (PiS) party holds power in Poland, with Mateusz Morawiecki serving as Prime Minister and Andrzej Duda as President. This duo has been central to shaping Poland’s domestic and foreign policies, often characterized by conservative nationalism and a focus on sovereignty. Their leadership reflects PiS’s broader agenda, which includes social conservatism, economic interventionism, and a strong stance on traditional values. Understanding their roles and influence is key to grasping Poland’s current political trajectory.

Mateusz Morawiecki, as Prime Minister, has been the face of Poland’s executive governance since 2017. His background as a former banker and economist has informed his approach to economic policy, marked by initiatives like the "Polish Deal," which aims to overhaul taxation and welfare systems. However, his tenure has also been controversial, particularly regarding his handling of judicial reforms that have drawn criticism from the European Union for undermining judicial independence. Morawiecki’s ability to balance populist rhetoric with pragmatic economic management has been a defining feature of his leadership, though it has polarized both domestic and international opinion.

Andrzej Duda, as President, has played a complementary role to Morawiecki, leveraging his position to reinforce PiS’s conservative agenda. Elected in 2015 and re-elected in 2020, Duda has been a vocal advocate for traditional family values and has supported policies limiting abortion rights, aligning with PiS’s socially conservative base. His veto power and role in foreign affairs have allowed him to act as a stabilizing force for the party’s vision, particularly in negotiations with the EU. However, his close alignment with PiS has also raised questions about the separation of powers in Poland’s political system.

Together, Morawiecki and Duda exemplify PiS’s strategy of consolidating power through a blend of economic populism and cultural conservatism. Their leadership has solidified PiS’s dominance in Polish politics, but it has also deepened divisions within the country and strained relations with Brussels. For observers, their roles highlight the tension between national sovereignty and EU integration, a recurring theme in Poland’s political discourse.

Practical takeaways for understanding their impact include tracking their responses to EU funding conditionality, their handling of Poland’s energy transition, and their approach to regional security, especially in the context of the Ukraine conflict. Analyzing their public statements and policy decisions provides insight into PiS’s priorities and the direction of Poland under their leadership.

Policy Focus: Emphasis on social conservatism, economic nationalism, and EU relations

As of October 2023, the Law and Justice (PiS) party holds power in Poland, shaping policies that reflect its core ideologies. This party’s governance is marked by a distinct emphasis on social conservatism, economic nationalism, and a complex relationship with the European Union. These three pillars not only define PiS’s domestic and international stance but also highlight the broader ideological shifts in Polish politics.

Social conservatism under PiS manifests in policies prioritizing traditional family values, religious influence, and cultural preservation. For instance, the party has championed stricter abortion laws, culminating in a near-total ban in 2020, which sparked widespread protests. Additionally, PiS has reinforced ties with the Catholic Church, integrating religious education into public schools and aligning state rhetoric with ecclesiastical teachings. Critics argue these measures limit individual freedoms, while supporters view them as safeguarding Poland’s cultural identity. To navigate this landscape, individuals and organizations should monitor legislative changes closely, particularly those affecting reproductive rights and secular education, and engage in advocacy efforts to balance tradition with modernity.

Economic nationalism is another cornerstone of PiS’s agenda, characterized by efforts to protect domestic industries, reduce foreign ownership, and promote self-reliance. The party has implemented programs like the "Family 500+" child benefit scheme to stimulate domestic consumption and reduce economic inequality. Simultaneously, PiS has pursued policies to re-nationalize key sectors, such as media and banking, often citing the need to protect Polish interests from foreign influence. While these measures have boosted domestic support, they raise concerns about market competitiveness and compliance with EU regulations. Businesses operating in Poland should assess their exposure to policy shifts favoring local enterprises and consider partnerships that align with nationalist economic goals.

EU relations under PiS are fraught with tension, reflecting the party’s skepticism of deeper European integration. PiS has clashed with Brussels over issues like judicial reforms, which the EU views as undermining the rule of law, and climate policies, where Poland’s reliance on coal conflicts with EU green energy targets. These disputes have led to financial penalties and frozen EU funds, complicating Poland’s access to critical resources. For policymakers and stakeholders, understanding this dynamic is crucial. Engaging in constructive dialogue, emphasizing shared values, and proposing compromise solutions—such as phased transitions to renewable energy—can help mitigate conflicts while respecting Poland’s sovereignty.

In practice, the interplay of these policy focuses creates a unique governance model that resonates with PiS’s voter base but poses challenges for international relations and domestic pluralism. Social conservatism and economic nationalism reinforce each other by appealing to traditionalist and protectionist sentiments, while tensions with the EU highlight the party’s commitment to prioritizing national interests over supranational directives. Observers and participants in Polish politics must recognize these interconnections to predict future policy directions and their broader implications. By focusing on specific initiatives—like abortion legislation, economic subsidies, and EU fund negotiations—one can gain actionable insights into PiS’s strategic priorities and their real-world impact.

Explore related products

Poland and the European Union (Europe and the Nation State)

$190

Freedom, Equality, Solidarity: Thoughts on Europe's Future - from Germany, France and Poland

$4.99

Reinventing Poland: Economic and Political Transformation and Evolving National Identity (BASEES/Routledge Series on Russian and East European Studies)

$30.39 $39.99

Effective Environmental Regulation: Learning from Poland's Experience

$85.5

Lustration and Transitional Justice: Personnel Systems in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland (Pennsylvania Studies in Human Rights)

$85.5 $90

Polish Politics and Society (Routledge Studies of Societies in Transition Book 12)

$240

Election History: Won parliamentary elections in 2015, 2019, and 2023

The Law and Justice (PiS) party has dominated Poland's political landscape in recent years, securing victories in three consecutive parliamentary elections. This streak began in 2015, when PiS, led by Jarosław Kaczyński, emerged as the largest party, winning 235 out of 460 seats in the Sejm (the lower house of Poland's parliament). Their campaign focused on social conservatism, economic nationalism, and a promise to increase welfare spending, which resonated with a significant portion of the electorate. This election marked a shift in Poland's political trajectory, as PiS replaced the Civic Platform (PO) party, which had held power since 2007.

In 2019, PiS solidified its position, winning 235 seats again, despite a higher voter turnout. This election was a testament to the party's ability to maintain its support base, even as opposition parties formed coalitions to challenge their dominance. PiS's campaign highlighted its achievements in social policy, including the popular '500+' child benefit program, which provides monthly payments to families with children. This policy, along with their conservative values, appealed to many traditional and rural voters.

The 2023 election was a closer contest, with PiS winning 194 seats, a decrease from previous years, but still enough to form a government. This election saw a rise in support for opposition parties, particularly the Civic Coalition, led by Donald Tusk, who had previously served as Prime Minister. Despite this, PiS's consistent messaging and strong organizational structure allowed them to secure another term. Their campaign focused on defending traditional values, promoting Polish sovereignty, and continuing their social welfare programs.

PiS's electoral success can be attributed to several factors. Firstly, their ability to mobilize their core supporters, particularly in rural and small-town Poland, has been crucial. Secondly, their policies have targeted specific demographics, such as families and the less affluent, with tangible benefits. Lastly, PiS has effectively utilized media and communication strategies to promote its agenda and criticize opponents. However, their dominance has also sparked concerns about democratic backsliding, as critics argue that PiS has undermined judicial independence and media freedom during its tenure.

Understanding PiS's election history provides valuable insights into Poland's political dynamics. It highlights the party's skill in identifying and addressing the needs of its target voters, as well as its effective campaign strategies. For those interested in Polish politics, studying these elections offers a practical guide to the country's shifting political landscape and the factors influencing voter behavior. This knowledge is essential for anyone seeking to comprehend the current political climate in Poland and the potential future direction of the country.

Opposition Parties: Civic Platform (PO) and others form the main opposition bloc

As of October 2023, the Law and Justice (PiS) party holds power in Poland, leading a right-wing coalition. This political landscape positions the Civic Platform (PO) as the primary opposition force, spearheading a bloc that includes other centrist and liberal parties. Understanding this dynamic requires examining PO’s strategy, allies, and challenges in countering PiS’s dominance.

Consider the opposition’s composition: Civic Platform, once the ruling party under Donald Tusk, now anchors a diverse coalition. This bloc includes Modern (.N), the Polish People’s Party (PSL), and smaller liberal factions. Each party brings distinct strengths—PSL appeals to rural voters, while .N targets urban progressives. However, aligning their agendas demands careful negotiation. For instance, balancing PO’s pro-EU stance with PSL’s agrarian interests requires pragmatic compromises, such as joint policy papers on agricultural subsidies and climate adaptation.

Analyzing their approach reveals a dual strategy: critique PiS’s policies while proposing alternatives. PO frequently highlights PiS’s erosion of judicial independence and media freedoms, framing these as threats to democracy. Simultaneously, they advocate for reforms like decentralizing healthcare funding and increasing education budgets. This two-pronged tactic aims to attract undecided voters by offering both accountability and vision. A practical tip for opposition supporters: engage in local forums to amplify these messages, leveraging data on PiS’s unfulfilled promises in specific regions.

Comparatively, PO’s bloc differs from PiS’s coalition in its emphasis on inclusivity. While PiS relies on nationalist rhetoric, the opposition promotes multiculturalism and EU integration. This distinction is evident in their responses to crises, such as PO’s call for structured refugee support during the Ukraine conflict versus PiS’s ad-hoc measures. However, this approach risks alienating conservative voters, underscoring the need for targeted messaging in PiS strongholds.

Persuasively, the opposition’s success hinges on unity and adaptability. Internal disputes, like those over leadership or ideological purity, weaken their appeal. A cautionary example is the 2019 elections, where fragmentation allowed PiS to secure a majority. To avoid this, PO must prioritize coalition cohesion, possibly through rotating leadership roles or joint candidate slates in key districts. Voters can contribute by pressuring parties to sign public unity pledges, ensuring accountability.

In conclusion, Civic Platform and its allies form a critical counterweight to PiS, blending critique with constructive policy proposals. Their effectiveness depends on strategic alignment, inclusive messaging, and grassroots engagement. By focusing on these elements, the opposition can challenge PiS’s hegemony and offer a viable alternative for Poland’s future.

Frequently asked questions